No mention of Pak terror: Rajnath refuses to sign SCO joint statement
The SCO operates under the framework of consensus, and Singh's refusal to endorse the document resulted in the SCO defence ministers' conclave ending without a joint communique, people familiar with the matter said.
There was no clear-cut approach to combating terrorism, including cross-border terrorist activities, they said.
The Opposition launched a scathing attack, accusing the Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led government of failing diplomatically to rally international support against terrorism and to hold Pakistan accountable.
In his address, Singh said there should be "no double standards" in combating terrorism and urged the SCO member nations to condemn the menace with unity.
Besides India and China, the SCO comprises Pakistan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
In an oblique reference to Pakistan, Singh said some countries are using cross-border terrorism as an "instrument of policy" to provide shelter to terrorists.
"The biggest challenges that we are facing in our region are related to peace, security and trust-deficit," he said.
"And the root cause of these problems is increasing radicalisation, extremism and terrorism." Singh said peace and prosperity cannot co-exist with terrorism and proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) in the hands of non-state actors and terror groups.
"Dealing with these challenges requires decisive action, and we must unite in our fight against these evils for our collective safety and security," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
20 minutes ago
- India Today
Ban Pak content: Film body to PM as channels and accounts reappear on social media
The All India Cine Workers Association (AICWA) on Wednesday wrote a letter to PM Modi, demanding a complete ban on Pakistani channels and social media accounts in India. The development came the same day as several Pakistani YouTuber channels and Instagram accounts of celebs started reappearing on social letter appealed to the government to respect the lives lost in the Pahalgam attack earlier this year. It also mentioned that "Cutting off Pakistan completely will have zero negative impact on our economy or entertainment industry."advertisementThe note also referred to the "handful of sympathisers" who may try to "dilute" India's resistance against cross-border terrorism. "We, the people of India - all 140 crore citizens - stand united in our opposition to Pakistan. While a handful of sympathizers may try to dilute this stance, the collective voice of the nation is stronger than any lobby or appeasement group (sic)," it Pakistan's long-standing association with terrorism, the film body referred to the reappearance of Pakistani channels in India as "a direct insult to the sacrifice of our martyred soldiers and an emotional assault on every Indian who lost a loved on in terror attacks perpetrated by Pakistan.""As long as Pakistani blood is on the hands of our enemies, no trace of Pakistan shall be allowed on Indian soil — not on our screens, not in our films, and not on our social media," the film body said in a strongly-worded letter declaring the visibility of these banned accounts in India as "absolutely acceptable".advertisementAICWA shared that it will continue to represent India's strict stand against Pakistan-funded terrorism, which also includes not allowing any visibility to Pakistani artistes in the country."We will continue to resist, protest, and oppose any attempt to normalise cultural ties with Pakistan. The ban on Pakistani artists and content will never be lifted as long as Pakistan continues to export terrorism to our land," they letter further mentioned a three-point list, urging the PM to announce a 'permanent cultural disconnect from Pakistan.'The letter mentioned:"Enforce an immediate nationwide digital blackout of all Pakistani social media accounts and media all future collaborations or promotions involving Pakistani citizens in Indian media, OTT platforms, and a permanent cultural disconnect from Pakistan, as a mark of respect to the Indian Armed Forces and the families of our martyrs."The note featured the film body signing off while evoking the 'nation first' RELEASEDate: 2nd July 2025From: All Indian Cine Workers Association (AICWA)Subject: Urgent Appeal to Honourable Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi Ji Regarding the Reappearance of Pakistani Artists' Social Media & Channels in India – AICWA Demands Immediate and All Indian Cine Workers Association (@AICWAOfficial) July 2, 2025On July 2, the Instagram accounts of several Pakistani artists, including Saba Qamar, Mawra Hocane, Ahad Raza Mir, Yumna Zaidi, and Danish Taimoor, among others, started becoming visible in India. Even many YouTube channels like Hum TV, ARY Digital and Har Pal Geo were also made available to be streamed ban followed the ghastly Pahalgam attack, which claimed 26 innocent lives, mostly tourists, earlier this year. India launched Operation Sindoor and destroyed terrorist centres in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, and also banned all cross-border associations, including creative Ministry of Information and Broadcasting is yet to react to the reappearance of the Pakistani channels and celebrity accounts in India despite the ban.- Ends
India Today
22 minutes ago
- India Today
Karnataka Cabinet approves renaming Bengaluru City University after Manmohan Singh
The Karnataka Cabinet on Wednesday approved the renaming of Bengaluru City University as Dr Manmohan Singh City University. The decision was taken at a meeting held at Nandi marks the first university in the country to be named after the former Prime Minister, who passed away on December 26, 2024. The move follows an announcement made by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah in his budget speech on March 7, 2025, where he stated that the university would be rechristened in honour of Singh's contributions to university, a state-run institution formerly known as Bengaluru Central University, was originally established in 2017 and renamed in 2020. It is now set for another renaming under the Congress-led government. As part of the initiative, Government Arts College and Government RC College will be brought under the university as constituent colleges. In addition to the renaming of the university, The state government has also cleared proposals to rename Bengaluru Rural district as Bengaluru North and to change the name of Bagepalli taluk to Chief Minister DK Shivakumar had previously announced plans to establish a research and study centre at Bangalore University dedicated to Dr Singh's work. Speaking in Belagavi on December 27, 2024, a day after Singh's passing, Shivakumar had said, 'Destiny is not in our hands, but I am proud to say that though Manmohan Singh is no more, he is still alive through his contributions to the nation. His legacy cannot be altered. In Bangalore University, we are going to start a research and study centre for all students to learn about the reforms he had created for the growth of the country.'advertisementThe initiative aims to educate students about Singh's pivotal role in economic reforms and his impact on India's development. Singh, who died at the age of 92, is widely regarded as the architect of India's modern economic liberalisation. Serving as the country's 13th Prime Minister, he was instrumental in reshaping India's economy through key policy decisions and governance reforms.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Karnataka
News18
44 minutes ago
- News18
SCO Summit: India, Pakistan And The Curious Case Of Missing Fingers
How Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's SCO gambit is a case of a Bharat rising confidently, self-assuredly and surefootedly Not every agreement inked from a position of strength translates into strategic triumph. The 1971 war is a telling reminder. Bharat's decisive victory split Pakistan, created Bangladesh, and saw 93,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendering in Dhaka—one of the most humiliating defeats in modern military history. Yet, just months later, the Simla Agreement of 1972 exposed how battlefield gains could be squandered at the diplomatic table. Despite explicit warnings from then RAW chief RN Kao to 'count her fingers" after shaking hands with Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Mrs Indira Gandhi fell for his charm, unilaterally agreeing to release the Pakistani prisoners without even securing the return of Indian soldiers languishing in Pakistani jails. If all treaties signed from a point of strength are not success stories, then all treaties not signed aren't failures either. Last week, when Defence Minister Rajnath Singh refused to sign the SCO's joint statement on countering terrorism, he not only safeguarded Bharat's core security interests but also offered a glimpse of a country willing to stand firm—alone if necessary—in pursuit of its national priorities. The Defence Minister's conduct at the SCO summit reflects a growing confidence, maturity, and self-assuredness of the country while dealing with global powers. Unlike in the past, when New Delhi would have been tempted to make a compromise for the sake of 'consensus" or 'regional solidarity", today's Bharat doesn't mind walking that extra mile on treacherous terrains if the country's long-term interest so demands. The SCO draft statement was a watered-down document that, with Chinese collusion, sought to downplay Pakistan's terror connections. It also refused to acknowledge, far less condemn, Islamabad's sinister role in not just waging but also spreading global jihad. What particularly irked New Delhi was the refusal to give the dastardly Pahalgam attack a place in the draft statement. For Bharat—having borne the brunt of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism for decades—any endorsement of such a document would have compromised its core security interests. More so in the wake of the much successful Operation Sindoor, where Bharat drew for Pakistan—and the world—a new Lakshman Rekha on terrorism. Critics argue that Bharat should reconsider its engagement with institutions like the SCO, given their internal dynamics and frequent tilt against Bharat's interests. But there is a compelling counterpoint: Bharat's very participation forces these blocs to confront their inconsistencies. By attending and then refusing to endorse a flawed document, Bharat highlighted the SCO's duplicity on terrorism. New Delhi's presence gives the SCO a democratic legitimacy, especially when most of its member states lack genuine democratic credentials. At the same time, it does moderate the innate anti-Bharat tendencies of such institutions. Yet, the incident is also a reminder of the solitary nature of Bharat's fight against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. The West's support often stops at rhetoric. Washington's Bharat policy is still largely China-driven, focused on counterbalancing Beijing rather than addressing Islamabad's terror machinery. Europe, preoccupied with internal crises, besides being wary of disturbing its fragile equations with Islamic states, rarely ventures beyond routine condemnations, followed by an exhortation to both sides to return to talks. Russia, Bharat's time-tested partner and an SCO member, finds itself increasingly aligned with China, compelled by geopolitical realities and economic compulsions after the Ukraine war. Moscow's growing dependence on Beijing inevitably narrows the space for unequivocal support to New Delhi, especially on issues where Chinese and Pakistani interests converge. Perhaps the most sobering takeaway from the SCO saga is the fact that Bharat is, in many ways, alone in its fight against terrorism emanating from Pakistan. While Western capitals may occasionally put up rhetorical support in Bharat's favour, very few will be willing to shun, far less confront, Pakistan for its terror connections. However, the path ahead is not without challenges. Bharat will likely face more such moments where standing up for its core interests may mean standing alone. The international system is inherently transactional. Allies shift their positions, interests evolve, and moral arguments often give way to strategic calculations. This reality makes it imperative for Bharat to continue diversifying its partnerships—deepening ties not just with the Quad countries but also with nations in Europe, ASEAN, Africa, and the Middle East. Simultaneously, Bharat must persist in exposing Pakistan's duplicity on terror at every available forum, denying Islamabad the international space it needs to whitewash its record. Be that as it may, the fact of the matter is that Bharat's conduct at the SCO summit reflects the case of a confident, self-assured, and surefooted nation. Yes, there is this concern of finding itself isolated on the international platform, but one needs to see it in the larger context of Bharat rising at an unprecedented pace and scale—a pace and scale that seem to be unnerving its friends and foes alike. The next couple of decades will be critical. As Bharat continues its unprecedented economic and geopolitical ascent, it will inevitably unsettle entrenched interests, both among rivals and even some partners. How deftly Bharat navigates this phase—balancing assertion with strategic partnerships, principle with pragmatism—will determine how swiftly it cements its place as a global power. The good thing is, as Rajnath Singh's resolute stance at the SCO shows, Naya Bharat not just counts the fingers after shaking hands with other powers; it has also started making them accountable if some of the fingers go missing after the handshake! About the Author Utpal Kumar Utpal Kumar is Opinion Editor, News18 and Firstpost. He can be reached at He tweets @utpal_kumar1 First Published:
