Cops discover huge stash of firearms wrapped in plastic inside a wooden crate during 'high-risk' raid
Officers carried out a 'high-risk' search warrant at the sprawling property in Walkerston, located 14km southwest of Mackay, on June 18.
In video of the 39-year-old man's arrest, he appears shirtless and barefoot as officers force his hands behind his back and place handcuffs around his wrists.
The man was then led to a waiting police vehicle wearing an unzipped hoodie.
Police allege officers discovered semi-automatic rifles and large-capacity magazines with ammunition while searching the property.
The weapons were found wrapped in plastic and stashed inside a crate beside a large double-door fridge and a microwave.
The man has since been charged with seven offences, including two counts of unlawful possession of a weapon (rifle), and one count each of unlawful stalking, deprivation of liberty, possession of explosives (ammunition) without authority, and possession of drug utensils.
He is scheduled to reappear in Mackay Magistrates Court on September 8.
Acting Inspector Scott Ingram praised the efforts of local officers and reinforced the region's commitment to tackling domestic and family violence.
'The Mackay Whitsundays District is dedicated to supporting victims of domestic violence and taking firm action against offenders,' he said.
'Everyone has the right to live without fear of domestic and family violence.'
The arrest comes just a day after a 27-year-old man was charged in Nanango, regional Queensland, for unlawful possession of firearms.
Officers carried out the raid at a home on Old Esk North Road on Wednesday and allegedly located a firearm and a quantity of cannabis.
The man has been charged with three offences including one count each of unlawful possession of a firearm, possessing dangerous drugs, and possessing anything used in the commission of a crime.
The raid in Walkerston forms part of Operation Whiskey Firestorm, a Queensland Police initiative targeting illegal firearms and weapons across the state.
The crackdown comes in response to alarming 2024 data, which saw more than 1,055 firearm licences revoked and over 3,290 firearm-related offences recorded, including attempted murder, armed robbery, assault, and unlawful entry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Man carrying home his gardening tools arrested by armed police in Manchester
A man who had returned home from his allotment with a trug of vegetables and gardening tools strapped to his belt was arrested by armed police, after a member of the public said they had seen 'a man wearing khaki clothing and in possession of a knife'. Samuel Rowe, 35, who works as a technical manager at a theatre, had come back from his allotment in Manchester earlier this month and decided to trim his hedge with one of his tools, a Japanese garden sickle, when police turned up on his doorstep. 'I just heard shouting behind me, and then two armed officers shouting at me to drop the knife,' he said. 'And then they turned me around, pushed me up against my house, cuffed me, and then they arrested me, put me in the back of the van.' The tools he had on his belt, he said, were a Niwaki Hori Hori gardening trowel in a canvas sheath, and an Ice Bear Japanese gardener's sickle. When he was arrested, Rowe said, the officer pulled the trowel out of its sheath, and said: 'That's not a garden tool.' 'I said it is, because it was in the Niwaki-branded pouch that you get at garden centres,' Rowe said. He was then taken to a police station and questioned. 'They started asking questions, like if I was autistic or anything like that, asking me whether I'd ever been in the army, whether I told people I was in the army,' he said. 'I was obviously in shock. I was struggling to think straight, struggling to talk properly, because I was pretty scared. I was answering the questions honestly, whatever they asked me, because I hadn't done anything wrong in my mind.' Rowe said police had questioned him on whether he was 'planning on doing something' with the tools, and he said he was also asked to explain what an allotment was. '[I had] to explain in very basic terms what an allotment is to this guy,' he said. 'So it didn't fill me with a lot of confidence that I was going to be let off.' 'I kept explaining that they're gardening tools, none of the blades were on show,' Rowe added. 'I said that I don't leave [the tools] at my allotment because it's not secure, people can break into the allotments and easily get into your shed in five minutes … they were just constantly not listening.' Rowe said he was interviewed without legal representation as officers had been unable to reach a solicitor, and after spending several hours in custody he said he accepted a caution so he would be released. 'I was trying to be overly polite in the police station and trying to ingratiate myself with them in a way, because I felt like my future was in their hands, basically,' he said. 'It was up to them whether they decided I was committing a crime or not.' A Greater Manchester police spokesperson said: 'At around 12.20pm on 3 July, we acted on a call from a member of the public that a man was walking in public wearing khaki clothing and in possession of a knife. 'Nearby officers were flagged down by the caller, who directed them towards a male. He was subsequently stopped and a small sickle, a large dagger which was in a sheath on a belt, and a peeling knife, were seized. 'He was arrested on suspicion of possession of an offensive weapon and taken into custody. He admitted the offence and was given a conditional caution, which entailed advice and guidance around the legislation of knives and bladed weapons in a public place.' Rowe is now seeking legal representation to try to challenge his arrest and his caution. He is worried it will affect his future employment, as part of his job involves working with vulnerable adults. 'I've basically got a caution that's going to show up on a DBS [Disclosure and Barring Service check] that I don't think I deserve,' he said. 'I shouldn't have been arrested by armed officers. I want my caution removed, and then I'd like my gardening tools back. And if I got that, I might even like an apology off them, but I know the chances of that are next to nothing.'
The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labor and Coalition want convicted rapist Gareth Ward expelled from NSW parliament
Moves are afoot to expel the MP for Kiama, Gareth Ward, from the New South Wales parliament after he was convicted of serious sexual offences involving two young men. State parliament sits next week and Ward has not yet said whether he intends to appeal Friday's convictions. The MP has also not indicated whether he might resign from parliament and did not respond to questions from Guardian Australia. Ward was granted bail ahead of a hearing on Wednesday, when the prosecution will seek to have him taken into custody ahead of his sentencing. A date for that is due to be set on Wednesday. The 44-year-old stood trial in the NSW district court after pleading not guilty to sexual intercourse without consent and indecent assault charges. Several politicians have been convicted of 'an infamous crime' or a crime that carries a sentence of five years or more – which is the threshold that disqualifies a person from sitting in the NSW parliament. Most have chosen to resign when they have been charged and were well out of parliament by the time they were convicted. So the question of how lodging an appeal – or winning an appeal – might affect an MPs right to sit in the parliament has rarely arisen. Both major parties are hoping that Ward will choose to resign from parliament and the matter is resolved quickly. But Ward has, to date, shown little inclination to end his own political career. In 2021, Ward left the Liberal party and moved to the crossbench after identifying himself as the state MP under investigation by the child abuse and sex crimes squad of the NSW police force. When charges were laid in March 2022, then NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet called for his resignation. On 24 March 2022, Ward was suspended after a motion unanimously passed the Legislative Assembly. In mid-August 2022, Ward was committed to stand trial. But Ward's voters in the south coast state seat of Kiama re-elected him in March 2023 and he returned to Macquarie Street. The Minns government believes Ward should not sit in parliament now he is convicted of serious crimes and that seniment is echoed by the opposition. The premier, Chris Minns, said on Monday that Ward should resign or he would move a motion to expel him. Minns stressed Ward was convicted of 'incredibly serious charges' relating to 'multiple accusers.' 'He should resign,' the premier told reporters. 'It is completely ridiculous to be in a situation where someone has been, not just accused, not just charged, but convicted of incredibly serious sexual assault convictions and stay as a member of parliament. 'You name me one workplace in the whole world where that person would continue as an employee, facing that kind of jail time.' Minns said he had sought legal advice from the NSW cabinet office and believed expulsion was an option. Sign up to Morning Mail Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion But it's not straightforward. The expulsion cannot be 'punitive' but must be founded on protecting the integrity of the NSW parliament. That will mean establishing that Ward's conduct brings the house into disrepute and that he cannot adequately perform his duties – which would be easier to argue if he was incarcerated. 'It seems ridiculous that he could stay as a member of parliament. Steps need to be taken,' Minns said. He said it was 'untenable' for Ward to remain the MP for Kiama. Minns does not have a majority in the Legislative Assembly so would need the opposition or crossbenchers to gain the bare majority needed to pass an expulsion motion. The opposition leader, Mark Speakman, has said he would support an expulsion motion, subject to seeing the government's legal advice. 'The jury finding is about behaviour that is sickening,' Speakman told reporters on Monday. 'He should not be in parliament; his position is untenable. There is no way he can effectively represent his constituents. He should resign, and if he doesn't, parliament must take all the steps it can to protect its integrity.' Ward could alternatively be suspended or granted leave but both options would result in the convicted rapist continuing to receive his parliamentary salary and entitlements until he resigned, the next election was held in March 2027 or all appeals were finalised. These alternatives would prevent a by-election from being held. An expulsion or suspension could be challenged in the courts. There have been only a handful of cases challenging orders of parliament but, as constitutional expert Anne Twomey has said, courts have expressed wariness when it comes to expelling MPs. The situation would be complicated further if Ward appeals. Ward has 28 days to lodge any appeal. The appeal process itself would likely be lengthy, and if Ward was expelled, he would challenge that decision in the courts. Of course, there will be practical problems for Ward continuing in parliament if he is jailed pending any appeal. He couldn't attend parliament or effectively represent his constituents.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Police use spit hoods on suspects once an hour
Police officers are using spit hoods to defend themselves in potentially violent situations once every hour, new figures have shown. The mesh fabric hoods are placed over a suspect's head to prevent them from spitting or biting when arrested or in custody. Figures show that they were used 26,4000 times over three years and that their use is increasing each year. Official data showing the use of spit hoods between 2021 and 2024 has been released by the Home Office, following a House of Lords written question by Lord Palter of Spalding. In 2021-22, they were used by police 8,281 times, in 2022/23 it was 8,275 and in 2023-24, it was 9,844. On average, that is 8,800 each year, which breaks down to 24 times a day. The Metropolitan Police had the highest number with 4,503 over the three years, Greater Manchester Police with 1,951 and West Midlands Police using 1,875. Critics of the tactic have voiced concerns that spit hoods can be dangerous, potentially leading to suffocation or distress, and that they can mirror a waterboarding effect. Two serving Metropolitan Police officers and a former officer are facing a gross misconduct hearing after a 90-year-old black woman with dementia was 'red-dotted' with a Taser, handcuffed and put in a spit hood. The woman was targeted with the Taser when she refused to drop kitchen utensils she had been holding after officers were called to an address in Peckham, south London, in May this year over reports of a disturbance. Officers approached the woman who spat in the direction of some officers. She was physically detained and placed in handcuffs and then a spit hood was applied, but she was not arrested. Ambulance staff attended and the woman was taken to hospital still in the handcuffs and spit hood. These were later removed at the hospital. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is now investigating the police officers' actions. Steve Noonan, the IOPC director, said: 'We are concerned by some of the actions and decision-making of police officers involved in the detention of this elderly and vulnerable lady, and we recognise this incident has also caused community concern. 'It's important that an independent investigation takes place to establish the full circumstances.' But officers have defended their use of spit hoods. Peter Bleksley, a retired Metropolitan Police detective, said: 'This is the shocking reality of policing in 2025. If there's a risk of an officer being spat on, I'd say put the hood on. ' Violence against police is out of control. It needs a proper crackdown. The use of these hoods is a clear sign it is not acceptable in any form.' 'Put yourselves in the shoes of the officers' He added: 'It's a horrific thing to have to go through. Anyone who does not believe me, I'd say put yourselves in the shoes of the officers it is happening to. 'They are there for a reason. Anyone making the human rights argument, what's humane about being spat on? It's a disgraceful act.' One officer from Kent, who did not want to be named, said: 'It's becoming an increasing problem. There is more reporting of it now. 'No police officer wants to have to use them. But if we're being spat on, we have to. It's also about controlling what could be an unfolding violent situation and not making it worse.'
