Major airlines may have been secretly selling your flight data to DHS, report claims
A data broker, the Airlines Reporting Corporation (ARC), owned by several of the top airlines in the U.S., including Delta, American Airlines, and United, reportedly gathered the flight records of U.S. travelers and sold access to CBP.
Part of the contract was that CBP wasn't allowed to share where the data had originated from, the report says. The data included passengers' names, itineraries, and financial information, according to Wired.
CBP is part of the Department of Homeland Security. The agency has stated that it requires the data to support state and local law enforcement in tracking individuals of interest.
This comes after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) outlined how it also bought the data.
'The big airlines—through a shady data broker that they own called ARC—are selling the government bulk access to Americans' sensitive information, revealing where they fly and the credit card they used,' Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden said in a statement. "ARC has refused to answer oversight questions from Congress, so I have already contacted the major airlines that own ARC—like Delta, American Airlines, and United—to find out why they gave the green light to sell their customers' data to the government."
Publicly shared documents show that ARC is owned and operated by at least eight top U.S. airlines.
Delta, Southwest, United, American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, JetBlue, as well as European airlines Lufthansa and Air France, in addition to Air Canada, all have representatives on the company's board of directors.
Over 240 airlines use ARC's services for ticket settlement. The company also connects airlines and travel agencies, locating travel trends with other companies such as Expedia. It also provides fraud prevention, the ARC YouTube channel and website show.
The selling of travel information is conducted via the company's Travel Intelligence Program (TIP).
The documents obtained by 404 Media via a Freedom of Information Act request state that CBP needed access to the information 'to support federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to identify persons of interest's US domestic air travel ticketing information.'
The documents reveal that ARC asked CBP to 'not publicly identify vendor, or its employees, individually or collectively, as the source of the Reports unless the Customer is compelled to do so by a valid court order or subpoena and gives ARC immediate notice of same.'
The data delivers 'visibility on a subject's or person of interest's domestic air travel ticketing information as well as tickets acquired through travel agencies in the U.S. and its territories,' the documents state.
According to a DHS Privacy Impact Assessment, the data is updated daily and includes more than a billion records over the course of 39 months of travel, both past and future. TIP can be searched using names, credit cards, or airlines. However, the data only includes travel arrangements made using a travel agency accredited by ARC, such as Expedia.
'If the passenger buys a ticket directly from the airline, then the search done by ICE will not show up in an ARC report,' the assessment states. It also says that data is included on both U.S. and non-U.S. persons.
The deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Security and Surveillance Project, Jake Laperruque, told 404 Media that 'While obtaining domestic airline data—like many other transaction and purchase records—generally doesn't require a warrant, they're still supposed to go through a legal process that ensures independent oversight and limits data collection to records that will support an investigation.'
'The government seems intent on using data brokers to buy their way around important guardrails and limits,' he added.
A spokesperson for CBP told Wired that the agency 'is committed to protecting individuals' privacy during the execution of its mission to protect the American people, safeguard our borders, and enhance the nation's economic prosperity.'
'CBP follows a robust privacy policy as we protect the homeland through the air, land and maritime environments against illegal entry, illicit activity or other threats to national sovereignty and economic security,' the spokesperson added.
ARC earlier told The Lever that TIP 'was established after the September 11 terrorist attacks to provide certain data to law enforcement … for the purpose of national security matters' and criminal probes.
The Independent has contacted ARC and CBP for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
39 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's racking up wins — and rewriting the book on diplomacy
The least diplomatic president in US history is scoring diplomatic victories. Over the last couple of days, Donald Trump has gotten NATO to agree to a defense spending target of 5%, and backed Canada off imposing a digital-services tax on American tech firms. He's done this while being loathed by many of his foreign interlocutors. In fact, Trump has executed a near-complete inversion of the typical diplomatic formula. He's not nice. He's not conflict-averse. He's not euphemistic. And yet he's gotten results. The NATO commitment, in particular, is potentially historic, and could materially strengthen the position of the Western alliance for the long term. Trump is violating the usual rules of persuasion. Abraham Lincoln famously said: 'It is an old and true maxim that 'a drop of honey catches more flies than a gallon of gall.' ' Trump doesn't hesitate to pour on the gall, often in ALL CAPS on Truth Social. The leading 19th-century French diplomat Talleyrand said, 'A diplomat who says 'yes' means 'maybe,' a diplomat who says 'maybe' means 'no,' and a diplomat who says 'no' is no diplomat.' Trump says 'go to hell' as the start of the negotiation. He persuades by pressuring. He coaxes by threatening. He de-escalates by escalating. He wins friends and influences people by convincing them he thinks they're freeloaders and losers. A lot of this is a function of his personality and his experience as a Gotham real-estate developer with a nose for power dynamics, a knack for showmanship and a willingness to court risk. It's hard to see how his style of international politics will be replicable by a more traditional political figure. But undergirding his approach is a key strategic insight into the gap between US military and economic might and that of its allies, and how this meant there was a vast unexploited potential for the United States to throw its weight around. When the US president is talking about pulling the plug on NATO, or cutting off trade talks with Canada — as Trump did in response to the proposed digital services tax — it's going to get everyone's attention. The bull standing outside the door of the china shop is a powerful incentive to get along with the bull. The United States has jawboned European countries about their defense spending over the years, but always in a 'we are all friends here' fashion. Defense Secretary Robert Gates issued warnings, cast in terms of how the United States might one day lose its patience. The Biden team didn't have it in them to force the issue. One expert told The New Yorker of her effort to convince Biden officials to get tougher on Germany over its low level of spending. They demurred. 'We don't want to overpressure them,' the expert recalled them saying. 'They should do it on their own time.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters What Trump has shown is that 'over-pressuring' can sometimes be the right amount of pressuring. Amazingly, prior to the NATO summit on spending, the secretary-general of NATO sounded like a Republican senator trying to keep on Trump's good side in a text message to the president: 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.' There's, no doubt, a limit to Trump's way of doing business. It's true that Machiavelli said it's better to be feared than loved, but he also warned against being hated. Operating this way will build up resentment of the United States over time. And Trump so far has gotten his most notable results using his leverage against dependent friends and allies, not China or Russia. Still, there's no denying his unconventional effectiveness. The late political scientist Joseph Nye contrasted so-called soft power with hard power. 'This soft power — getting others to want the outcomes that you want — co-opts people rather than coerces them,' he wrote. Trump wields soft power with an edge, co-opting through an element of coercion. Twitter: @RichLowry
41 minutes ago
Senate strikes AI provision from GOP bill after uproar from the states
WASHINGTON -- A proposal to deter states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade was soundly defeated in the U.S. Senate on Tuesday, thwarting attempts to insert the measure into President Donald Trump's big bill of tax breaks and spending cuts. The Senate voted 99-1 to strike the AI provision from the legislation after weeks of criticism from both Republican and Democratic governors and state officials. Originally proposed as a 10-year ban on states doing anything to regulate AI, lawmakers later tied it to federal funding so that only states that backed off on AI regulations would be able to get subsidies for broadband internet or AI infrastructure. A last-ditch Republican effort to save the provision would have reduced the time frame to five years and sought to exempt some favored AI laws, such as those protecting children or country music performers from harmful AI tools. But that effort was abandoned when Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, teamed up with Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington on Monday night to introduce an amendment to strike the entire proposal. Voting on the amendment happened after 4 a.m. Tuesday as part of an overnight session as Republican leaders sought to secure support for the tax cut bill while fending off other proposed amendments, mostly from Democrats trying to defeat the package. Proponents of an AI moratorium had argued that a patchwork of state and local AI laws is hindering progress in the AI industry and the ability of U.S. firms to compete with China. Some prominent tech leaders welcomed the idea after Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who leads the Senate Commerce committee, floated it at a hearing in May. But state and local lawmakers and AI safety advocates argued that the rule is a gift to an industry that wants to avoid accountability for its products. Led by Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a majority of GOP governors sent a letter to Congress opposing it. Also appealing to lawmakers to strike the provision was a group of parents of children who have died as a result of online harms. —- O'Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Big Beautiful Bill 101: What you need to know about House and Senate versions
The Schoolhouse Rock classic 'I'm Just a Bill' song spared kids some of the complexities of lawmaking. Say, for example, what happens when a party with a thin majority tries to pass a 1,000-page bill through the House and Senate without bipartisan support? A new verse would have to find a way rhyme 'common ground' and 'Independence Day' now that Senate Republicans passed their own version of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' on July 1. To reach President Donald Trump's deadline of July 4, members of both chambers will need to quickly agree on some key specifics of the final bill. The winners (and losers): Who benefits the most in Trump's "big beautiful" tax bill Where is the 'Big Beautiful Bill' now Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them. Below, we've collected the items that will likely have the biggest impact on your lives and your dollars. The biggest among them: extending the 2017 tax cuts, which amounts to about $3.7 trillion that federal government won't have in its coffers over the next 10 years. Proposed cuts to programs would save about $1.3 trillion, according to a June 17 Congressional Budget Office report. Three in five Americans will continue to have lower federal taxes, which will drive our national debt higher. Within 10 years, this bill alone could ultimately add $3.3 trillion to the current $29 trillion national debt held by the public, according to the CBO. What's in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Skip to: OTHER TAX CUTS, BENEFITS | MORE FUNDING | LESS FUNDING Back to top But wait, there's more. Other tax cuts, credits and gifts In addition to extending the tax cuts from the 2017 tax bill, the House version would give people who live in high-tax states such as California, New York and New Jersey a bigger income tax deduction for state and local taxes, known as SALT. A recent Senate proposal wouldn't increase the deduction. In one of the most talked-about provisions and one of Trump's 2024 campaign promises, tips and overtime wages would no longer be taxed. A new Senate proposal sets limits on both. The other tax reductions now in the House's tax bill: Back to top What areas would get more money from the bill Back to top What areas would get less money from the bill Back to top How big is the bill for the tax bill? Depending on whom you ask on Capitol Hill, the cost of the bill could be as little as $440 billion, while other, more conventional estimates put the cost at nearly 10 times higher. In recent days, Senate Republicans requested that the Joint Committee on Taxation omit the 2017 tax cuts in a new estimate. Without those portions, the bill's total cost falls to $441 billion. Senate Republicans argue that because the bill extends current tax law, those cuts shouldn't be counted. More traditional methods have pegged the cost around $2.4 trillion − not including the interest costs. Back to top Contributing: Reuters
