logo
Reading City Councilwoman Vanessa Campos announces bid for council presidency

Reading City Councilwoman Vanessa Campos announces bid for council presidency

Yahoo12-02-2025
Reading City Councilwoman Vanessa Campos has announced her candidacy for City Council president.
Campos, 38, represents council District 1.
Vanessa Campos
She was elected in 2023 to complete the remaining two years of the term vacated when Brianna Tyson resigned.
Campos will enter the May 20 primary on the Democratic ticket.
Campos is the second person to announce a primary bid for the president's seat, which is elected at-large.
Councilman Jaime Baez Jr. also will be running as a Democrat for the post.
Campos, a licensed real estate agent and former teacher, holds a master of education degree.
'My goal is to promote the vitality of a city where we can invest, enjoy and live,' Campos said.
As a city councilor, Campos said, her mission is to strengthen the legislative body through proactive approaches in local government policies.
To help fulfill her role, she noted, she completed voluntary courses in local government and budget.
During her time on council, Campos said, she has aimed to unite stakeholders using coordinated efforts to prioritize the city's financial stability and growth.
If elected council president, she said, she would continue those efforts along with enhancing council operations by using modern practices that reinforce efficiency and accessibility.
Campos said she has the proven leadership skills needed to drive progress in the city.
She is member of Reading's Recreation Commission, Redevelopment Authority, and Nominations and Appointments Committee.
She has worked toward securing strong relationships with the city's departments, officials and other boards, commissions and authorities, she said, and maintains open communication with constituents.
She also works with state and federal legislators.
Coordinating city efforts and aligning them with the initiatives of state and federal legislators is essential in moving the city forward, she said.
'We have to make sure that we're taking guidance from those that are involved and that are in these seats,' she said, 'and have those conversations, so that we're working together coherently, instead of working divided.'
Coordinated efforts among city departments, boards and authorities also are key to the city's progress, she said.
'I think coordinated efforts are huge in avoiding more bumps in the road when we're trying to create a push for progress in the city,' she said.
A former teacher, Campos served the Reading School District for more than a decade as an educator, reading specialist, department head, committee chair, literacy coach and intern supervisor.
As a department head, she piloted a new program helping Reading's middle schools achieve academic growth and meet district goals.
Campos said she demonstrates her volunteer spirit by serving a catechist teacher at her local church, and her civic duty as an executive board member of the Berks County Democratic Committee and the Greater Reading PAC.
She decided to run for council president, Campos said, because she is confident she has the leadership experience, strengths and qualities required for the role.
Campos also said she could remain open-minded and nonbiased while performing the functions of the office, which include presiding over council meetings and maintaining order.
'There needs to someone without an agenda,' she said. 'I think that's important, and that's a character that I bring as well.'
Meet the candidate
Candidate: Vanessa Campos, 38, Reading
Position sought: Reading City Council President
Background: Campos represents council District 1. She is a licensed real estate agent and is a former Reading School District teacher and department head. She holds a master of education degree.
Term: Four years.
Compensation: The council president is paid an annual salary of $6,875.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate confirms Jeanine Pirro as US Attorney for DC
Senate confirms Jeanine Pirro as US Attorney for DC

The Hill

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate confirms Jeanine Pirro as US Attorney for DC

The Senate on Saturday night confirmed President Trump's pick Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Pirro, a former Fox News host and prosecutor who served as district attorney for Westchester County in New York, was confirmed along party lines in a 50-45 vote. Sens. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.) and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) did not vote. Attorney General Pam Bondi celebrated the vote in a post on social platform X. 'Congratulations to my dear friend @USAttyPirro on her confirmation today! Jeanine is not only a wonderful person — she is a warrior for law and order,' Bondi wrote. 'I am absolutely thrilled to work side by side with my friend to keep Washington, DC safe,' she added. In a post on Saturday, Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Pirro 'should never be a permanent U.S. Attorney.' 'She endorsed the firing of January 6 prosecutors. She recklessly spread the Big Lie to the point her *own producers* had to tell her to cool it. Ultimately, she's a rubber stamp for Donald Trump,' he wrote. The Judiciary panel gave its approval to Pirro in mid-July despite Democratic backlash. Democrats walked out of a business meeting after debate on Pirro and another controversial Trump nominee was cut short. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) said in his own X post that it was 'a sad moment for the Senate and the country.' 'Republicans just confirmed Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Yes, the same Judge Jeanine that even Fox News said was 'crazy' and had to take off the air. How can they vote to confirm these people?' the Democratic senator wrote. Pirro, who has been serving as the interim U.S. Attorney in D.C. since May, thanked Trump in a post on X 'for giving me the opportunity to bring justice to the swamp in D.C.' and she shared a message for the city: 'get ready for a real crime fighter.'

GOP privacy hawks wage quiet battle with TSA over face recognition bill
GOP privacy hawks wage quiet battle with TSA over face recognition bill

Politico

time24 minutes ago

  • Politico

GOP privacy hawks wage quiet battle with TSA over face recognition bill

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the bill's champion, in an interview compared the TSA's increasing use of facial recognition capabilities to similar apparatuses used by authoritarian countries like China and Hungary to conduct massive citizen surveillance. 'It's been used to intimidate, to track and to intimidate freedom of expression and freedom of assembly,' Merkley said. Merkley tried to shoehorn the legislation into last year's reauthorization of Federal Aviation Administration programs. But associations representing airlines, airport employees and other travel-related businesses fiercely opposed it, arguing it would allow bad actors to opt for manual ID checks and significantly increase wait times at airport security checkpoints. Industry backlash against the proposal is well enough known that it might have been the reason lobbyists weren't given an advance heads-up about the Commerce committee's plans to mark up the measure, Ryan Propis, vice president of security and facilitation at the U.S. Travel Association, intimated. 'The discussion at the time was that there's going to be more transparency, more hearings … around the use of biometrics,' said Propis in an interview about assurances the industry received at the time of Merkley's efforts to get the bill included in the FAA reauthorization. 'And unfortunately none of that has happened.' But lawmakers who have been trying to push the bill forward are saying that TSA was the real driving force behind the legislation's withdrawal, with the agency using industry lobbyists as conduits to relay dissatisfaction and mar the measure's chances. When asked Thursday whether he believed TSA itself was raising concerns about the bill, Cruz replied, 'undoubtedly.' The burgeoning industry tasked with supplying technologies that use sophisticated biometric data for identity verification, and which are increasingly powered by AI algorithms, have also arrived on the scene to tank the bill. Two of the sector's top associations, the Security Industry Association and the International Biometrics and Identity Association, sent a letter on the eve of the scheduled markup to Cruz and the top Commerce Committee Democrat, Sen. Maria Cantwell of Washington. In the missive, they contended that the bill was 'completely out of line with the Trump Administration's stated priorities for federal agencies to increasingly incorporate advanced technologies and limit unnecessary personnel costs.' Since the start of Trump's second term, the administration has been pushing for federal agencies to slash budgets and reduce personnel, touting technological advances like artificial intelligence as a cheaper, more efficient backfill. Testifying before House appropriators in May on the Trump administration's proposed $247 million cut to the TSA budget, McNeill also noted that her agency has been deploying state-of-the-art screening technology to airports around the globe, adding that 'a commitment to continually embracing new and emerging technology is urgently needed.' Following the postponement of the bill's consideration in committee, Cruz and other members of the panel said they were confident differences could be resolved in time to bring it up at a subsequent business meeting — and gave no indication they were planning to stand down despite administration opposition. 'I think the bill will get marked up,' said Cruz, 'and it's going to pass.'

Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary
Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary

Business desk: Beyond Trump's Trade Deals 'Dealmaker-In-Chief' Donald Trump has been 'positively monomaniacal' about trade lately, marvels Freddy Gray at The Spectator. His 'real coup' is the 'new framework arrangement with the European Union,' which is 'not simply a major breakthrough in and of itself,' but also 'a useful piece of leverage in the even bigger tariff struggle with China' — because it pulls 'Europe more towards a western trading orbit and less towards the east.' Trump then slammed India for 'buying up Russian oil and gas,' and pivoted sharply by praising a new deal with Pakistan, 'including an arrangement to invest in Pakistani oil.' Advertisement Meanwhile, his enthusiasm for Pakistan — 'an extension of China's empire' — may be part of a plan to 'ring loud alarm bells' in Beijing. From the right: Consolation for the Little Guy 'For all the political criticism they take, the federal courts keep delivering good outcomes more often than not,' cheers The Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board. In 2016, the Labor Department 'imposed hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines' on a fourth-generation farm, Sun Valley Orchards — first requesting penalties and then approving them itself, thus 'serving as prosecutor, judge and jury.' Advertisement But an appeals court just ruled the proceedings 'should properly be enforced in federal court' — the proper venues for federal agencies to impose fines. Sun Valley has since gone out of business,' but at least its owners 'have the consolation of a ruling that will vindicate the rights of other farmers and small businesses under the boot heel of the bureaucracy.' Libertarian: Get Honest About Gov't Spending 'What kind of government do Americans want seriously enough to pay for?' asks Veronique de Rugy at Reason. 'I suspect that most people aren't willing to pay the taxes required to fund everything our current government does.' Advertisement Yet 'all the benefits and subsidies that we're unwilling to pay for' but keep going 'will eventually have to be paid for in the future with higher taxes, inflation, or both' by our children and grandchildren. 'Growing the economy' can be 'part of the solution,' but it won't be enough, and 'raising taxes on the rich will fall short too,' since higher tax rates 'do not automatically translate to more tax revenue.' 'It's long past time' we 'ask what level of spending we truly want with the money we truly have.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Liberal: Hey, Dems — End the #Resistance Advertisement 'Nonstop Democratic fulminations in Trump's second term have been notably unsuccessful in resuscitating the party's toxic brand,' sighs the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira. Tellingly, 'voters, despite their negative views of Trump's performance on key issues, still prefer Republicans to Democrats.' Also, 'voters neither like nor trust' Dems, and thus don't see them as 'an obvious choice over their opponents.' Yet 'many Democratic politicians persist in reading — loudly — from the #Resistance script.' Why? The '#Resistance trope is what advantages individual Democratic politicians within the party because it generates adulation from activists, media coverage, and gushers of donations.' And taking back the House in 2026 will only 'convince #Resistance aficionados that nothing really needs to change.' Hello, President JD Vance. Health beat: Big Pharma Wins, Patients Lose 'In May, Dr. Vinay Prasad joined the Food & Drug Administration as the top regulator for vaccines,' yet he 'apparently knew the games too well,' gripes Alex Berensen at his Substack: After last week's attacks from Trump's allies, Prasad resigned: 'He was targeted because he posed a direct threat to Big Pharma profits.' Advertisement Just last month, he told Sarepta Therapeutics 'it needed to halt shipments of its gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD.' 'Sarepta has never shown its drugs actually benefit patients.' The company won the right to a drug trial in 2016; 'nine years later, Sarepta still hasn't completed those trials.' Yet 'that hasn't stopped it from selling the drug — for up to $1.5 million per year.' Advertisement 'Big Pharma scalped Prasad for his honesty.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store