logo
Neighbours' seven-year row over garden tap is ‘ridiculous', says judge

Neighbours' seven-year row over garden tap is ‘ridiculous', says judge

Telegraph15-05-2025
A neighbourly row over a garden tap has racked up £250,000 in legal bills.
The dispute between two neighbours in Ilford, east London, has lasted for seven years and has now gone before the High Court.
A judge, presiding over the case this week, said: 'Hundreds of thousands of pounds about a tap and a pipe that doesn't matter – this brings litigation into disrepute.'
The feud started when pensioner Christel Naish complained to her doctor neighbour, Jyotibala Patel, about a tap and pipe outside her house in Chadacre Avenue, the court heard.
She said the tap and pipe were 'trespassing' on a narrow strip of land between their homes, which she claimed partly belonged to her.
Ms Naish is accused of 'terrorising' Dr Patel and her husband Vasos Vassili with 'petty and vindictive' complaints about the matter.
The couple's barrister, Paul Wilmshurst, told the court they felt forced to sue because of the 'blight' on the property's value caused by the unresolved row.
'For many years the appellant has been making allegations about the trespassing nature of the [tap and pipe], thereby making it impossible for them to sell their house,' he said.
In a trial at Mayor's and City County Court in 2023, the couple claimed the gap between the houses belonged to them.
They insisted the boundary between the two properties was the flank wall of Ms Naish's house and not the edge of her gutter as she claimed.
They won that case and Ms Naish was ordered to pay 65 per cent of her neighbours' lawyers' bills, amounting to about £100,000, on top of her own costs.
But Ms Naish has refused to back down and took her case to the High Court for an appeal last week.
Her barrister, David Mayall, argued that the original decision was 'fatally flawed' and should be overturned.
The appeal is costing more than £30,000 and Mr Mayall said it could result in 'another £200,000' being spent on a second trial if she succeeds.
Judge Sir Anthony Mann criticised both parties for the 'ridiculous' row after the court heard the tap had since been removed by Dr Patel anyway.
Addressing Mr Mayall, he said: 'You don't care about the pipe and the tap, so why does it matter, for goodness' sake, where the boundary lies?
'It seems to me to be a ridiculous piece of litigation - on both sides, no doubt.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man at war with council over plans for seven-bedroom mansion after SIX protected trees were mysteriously axed... but he claims it was not his fault
Man at war with council over plans for seven-bedroom mansion after SIX protected trees were mysteriously axed... but he claims it was not his fault

Daily Mail​

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Man at war with council over plans for seven-bedroom mansion after SIX protected trees were mysteriously axed... but he claims it was not his fault

A property developer has had plans for a sprawling seven-bedroom mansion blocked after six protected trees were mysteriously felled - but he insists he is not to blame. Mohammed Tayyab bought a derelict care home in Bradford, West Yorkshire, for £355,000 in August 2021, with plans to bulldoze the eyesore building and replace it with a lavish detached home. But his dream development has now been blocked by councillors, after it emerged that protected lime and horse chestnut trees were illegally felled from the site, which sits in a conservation area. Town hall officials discovered that the trees had been deliberately uprooted and damaged during unauthorised excavation work at the site. Councillors refused planning permission, claiming that doing so would effectively mean 'rewarding criminal activity', and open the floodgates to other developers cutting corners. Mr Tayyab, described by backers as a 'pillar of the community', claims he had no knowledge that the trees were chopped down and insisted it happened before he purchased the site. Bradford Council said the six trees were uprooted without consent between 2012 and November 2021, 'around the same time that the property was last purchased.' It said that regardless of whether Mr Tayyab was involved in lopping down the mature trees, he was responsible for replacing them as the landowner - making his housebuild impossible. Town hall officials concluded: 'It would be inappropriate to grant a planning permission which in effect rewards the unlawful removal of protected trees.' Despite offering to plant varied tree species on the land in Oak Mount, the council has applied for a legal order against Mr Tayyab to replace the trees in exactly the same location. At a heated council meeting, Cllr Sinead Engel said: 'I can't bring myself to sanction a plan that rewards criminal activity. 'Regardless of who committed the crimes - the person who did it has benefitted if it has increased the value of the land. 'Before this building shut it was a 10-bedroom property. I'm struggling to understand why, with a bit of imagination, someone could not just create an amazing family home without trampling over mature trees.' Councillor Paul Sullivan added: 'If we allow this then everyone is just going to rip trees down for their own benefit and let the site look like a wreck before they put plans in. 'We can't set that precedent.' The former care home has stood derelict for nearly a decade and has become a hotspot for fly-tipping and antisocial behaviour, with evidence of deliberate fire damage. Mr Tayyab had wanted to build a 'substantial' two-storey home boasting ensuites, open-plan living, a study, utility room and even a disabled-access ground floor bedroom. His three previous planning applications were also rebuffed, council papers show. The planning application, which generated just one objection, stated: 'The existing site is vacant as a former registered group home and harms the appearance of the conservation area through its redundant appearance without maintenance and upkeep. 'The proposed development provides an important opportunity to improve the appearance of the site and secure its optimum viable use.' Councillor Safina Kause said the site had been derelict for eight years before the applicants bought it. Voting in favour of granting planning permission, she said: 'It is almost like planning officers don't want to bring this property back into life. Why are they making it so difficult? 'The applicants are being penalised for something they haven't done. If this plan is refused, they will have no choice but to sell the property. I implore you to approve this application.' A council report states: 'The site has been altered over the years due to unauthorised works, excavation and tree removal, taking place which has detrimentally harmed the appearance of the site and the wider conservation area due to the loss and damaged caused to the boundary trees which collectively had significant amenity value. 'The engineering works which have been carried out have destabilised the remaining mature trees. These works have resulted in the significant damage and loss of mature trees which has harmed the character and appearance of the conservation area.' Under planning laws, chopping down trees in a conservation area without permission is a criminal offence, punishable by potentially unlimited fines.

Jess Carter subjected to racist abuse on social media
Jess Carter subjected to racist abuse on social media

Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Times

Jess Carter subjected to racist abuse on social media

England's players will stop taking the knee before Euro 2025 matches after one squad member, Jess Carter, revealed she has suffered racial abuse on social media. The FA has confirmed that the police and 'appropriate bodies' have been contacted over the alleged abuse, but did not say why they were not prepared to identify the platforms on which the alleged abuse took place. The team have been going down to one knee before kick-off of their matches so far at the tournament, but after Carter's ordeal believe 'we and football need to find another way to tackle racism'. Carter and her team-mate, Lotte Wubben-Moy, have confirmed they will step back from social media. 'No one should have to endure such vile abuse, be that in football or any walk of life', a statement from the squad read. 'Representing our country is the greatest honour. It is not right that while we are doing that some of us are treated differently simply because of the colour of our skin. 'Until now, we have chosen to take the knee before matches. It is clear we and football need to find another way to tackle racism. We have agreed as a squad to remain standing before kick-off on Tuesday [when England play their Euros semi-final against Italy]. 'We hope the game can come together to see what more can be done. For now, we will return our total focus to an important semi-final. 'In the meantime, we know the FA are working with UK police and the appropriate bodies. Those behind this online poison must be held accountable.' Taking the knee has become a familiar form of protest against racial injustice at sporting events. Colin Kaepernick, the NFL quarterback, is thought to be the first to perform the gesture in 2016. It became prominent in football in 2020 after the killing of George Floyd sparked widespread protests against racism. Although Women's Super League teams have taken the knee before games for the past five years, in August 2022 the Premier League announced that players would stop doing so before every match and instead 'select significant moments' to kneel. The England players no longer believe the action is sufficiently combating racism. Carter, whose performances at the Euros have received some criticism, revealed her ordeal in a social media post. 'From the start of the tournament I have experienced a lot of racial abuse,' she said. 'While I feel every fan is entitled to their opinion on performance and result I don't agree or think it's ok to target someone's appearance or race. As a result of this I will be taking a step back from social media and leaving it to a team to deal with. 'As ever I am grateful for all of the support from the genuine fans but I am taking this measure to protect myself in a bid to keep my focus on helping the team anyway I can. Hopefully speaking out will make the people writing this abuse think twice so that others won't have to deal with it. 'We have made some historic changes with this Lionesses squad that I am so proud to be a part of and my hope is that by speaking out about this it will make another positive change for all. I'm now looking forward and focusing on putting all of my energy into helping my team.' HARRIET LANDER – THE FA/THE FA VIA GETTY IMAGES Mark Bullingham, the FA CEO, added: 'Our priority is Jess and giving her all the support she needs. 'We strongly condemn those responsible for this disgusting racism. 'As soon as we were made aware of the racist abuse Jess received, we immediately contacted UK police. They are in touch with the relevant social media platform, and we are working with police to ensure those responsible for this hate crime are brought to justice.' The incident is far from unprecedented in football. Among the most infamous was the abuse towards Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Bukayo Saka after they missed penalties in the Euro 2020 final against Italy. 'Regrettably, this is not the first time this has happened to an England player, so we had measures in place to allow us to respond quickly and where possible provide information to support any potential police action,' Bullingham said. 'We will continue to discuss with the relevant authorities and social media companies about what more can and should be done to prevent this abhorrent abuse.' Wubben-Moy, the England defender, also released a statement on Instagram. 'Another tournament goes by where we see the same disgusting racist abuse,' she posted. 'It is unacceptable for any person to be subject to this or any kind of abuse. The issue goes beyond sport. But what is being done about it? On the very platforms we post on? I will not continue to feed the very platform that enables abuse with no consequence.' Uefa released a brief statement saying: 'We stand with Jess. Abuse and discrimination should never be tolerated, whether in football or society, in person or online.'

Motorcyclists dies in Ledbury tractor crash
Motorcyclists dies in Ledbury tractor crash

BBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Motorcyclists dies in Ledbury tractor crash

A man has been arrested after a motorcyclist died in a crash with a tractor in collision happened on the A449 Ross Road, near Ledbury, just after 10:30 BST on woman, in her 50s, was pronounced dead at the scene, West Mercia Police said, as the force appealed for witnesses to come forward.A 47-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of causing death by careless driving and has been released under investigation, officers added. The woman was on a Honda CBF 500 at the time of the crash, which involved a John Deere tractor towing a trailer containing a seed driver was leaving a farm, waiting to turn right on to the A449 towards Preston Cross Roundabout, police Danny Somner said the force's thoughts were with the woman's loved ones. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store