
‘Natasha O'Brien had courage to ruffle feathers and be difficult'
O'Brien, however, did not go quietly. The subsequent public outcry sparked a wave of protests across the country in support of her, and she became an inadvertent spokeswoman and activist for victims of gender-based violence. Now, her quest for justice is being told in Natasha, a documentary directed by Harris.
'Like a lot of people in the country, I was shocked to see the story,' she recalls. 'I saw Natasha in the news like everyone else, and was very surprised to see how outspoken she was. We see footage of victims going in and out of court, but we don't often hear them speaking the way that Natasha spoke. So she caught my attention.'
The American-born film-maker was approached by the producers Elaine Stenson and Stephen McCormack. They brought her on board to document the impact that the assault had on O'Brien's life, as well as the appeal against Crotty's sentence, which was heard in January and resulted in him being jailed for two years.
'I'm very drawn to stories about women and about activists, and it was a story that I thought was important,' Harris says. 'When I met Natasha, she was so keen to do a film. She saw it as an opportunity. And she kept saying to me, 'Kathleen, I want to be vulnerable. You need to push me to be vulnerable. I want this to be raw, I want people to see everything, I want to let it all hang out.' That was her attitude.'
The film was originally envisaged as an investigation of the criminal justice system in Ireland, but soon morphed into something more personal. For Stenson, the associate producer and driving force behind the documentary, O'Brien's charisma dictated that shift. 'Natasha annoys people,' Stenson says. 'She doesn't apologise. That upsets people. It upsets people when a woman demands attention and keeps demanding attention.'
Harris, a former Irish Times video journalist, has form in such projects, having previously directed the documentaries Birdsong and Growing Up at the End of the World — both of which wove personal stories together with wider themes, including environmental activism and climate activism.
At the film's core are the reverberations that the assault and its aftermath had on O'Brien's life, particularly on her relationship with her mother, Anne, which became visibly strained at points.
• Cast convicts out of army, urges Natasha O'Brien
'Those scenes are hard to watch,' Harris admits. 'There is a lot of pain there, but they were willing to put that out there and allow it to be on camera, and we tried to be as delicate with it as we could. It is difficult to watch, but I think it also lets us see how some of this stuff plays out between loved ones.
'At one point in the film, Natasha explicitly talks about the ripple effect of violence and of trauma — she even mentions the taxpayers who had to pay for her medical bills. This isn't something we think about. We think that a victim of crime is the face on the news, but there's a long shadow there,' Harris adds.
'I've worked in news for years,' Stenson says, 'and there are some stories that need to be told in something more than three minutes, and some people who need to be on a bigger screen.
'Natasha is a tough woman but she also has her vulnerabilities. She wants to tell her story but doing so is a form of retraumatisation. Natasha thought that she was going to die during that attack, and in making this documentary we had to ask her to relive that, over and over.'
In one especially striking scene O'Brien meets two other victims of gender-based violence, Maev McLoughlin Doyle and Bláthnaid Raleigh, and they discuss the fallout from their respective cases. It portrays them not just as one-dimensional 'victims' but as women who continue to feel the ramifications of their trauma in their everyday lives. It also illustrates how lacking the system is when it comes to supporting victims. At various points, a frustrated O'Brien is seen on the phone begging the director of public prosecutions for an update on the forthcoming appeal and complaining about how she is learning information about her case from the media.
Despite its largely personal focus, the film does touch upon the legal system and explores the process of restorative justice, which allows the victim to have a conversation with the perpetrator in the hope of gaining closure and potentially reducing the risk of them reoffending. Although it has proven success rates, it is a rarely used option in Ireland.
'We do talk in the film about how you never get to address the perpetrator when you're a victim,' Harris says. 'You never get to actually say to the person, 'This is what you did to me,' and you don't get to ask them questions — and they also don't have to explain themselves or apologise. Those are all things that are critical to moving beyond trauma.'
Restorative justice is offered in less than 1 per cent of cases in Ireland, she says, but points out that O'Brien was not sure if it was something she would have wanted. 'Like she says in the film, it would have been daunting because you sit across from the person who did this thing to you, but as she also said, going through the court system was daunting as well.'
Tackling such a complex story has had an impact on Harris's life too, including affording her a new empathy for her relationship with her mother, because 'in part, this is a film that is about a mother and a daughter'.
'I'd also say that the film was meant to be a celebration of women, and of women like Natasha in particular — who stick their head above the parapet, who have that courage to speak out and ruffle feathers and be 'difficult'. I think I did a lot more of that when I was younger, but as I've gotten older I've stayed quiet more. So I think, going forward, when there are moments I see something that's not quite right or not OK, I will think of Natasha and her courage.'
• It's time for men to speak out about the savagery against women
Harris says she hopes people who see the film are inspired by O'Brien. 'I hope other victims and other women see it and think, 'OK, she could do that; I can do it too' — if it's right for them, of course. And I think she'll make people feel not so alone going through that process, and that they're not a weirdo for feeling all these weird, contradictory, messy emotions in the wake of something horrible that happened to them.'
Stenson agrees. 'Natasha is going to be on our screens again this week. And that's going to annoy people again. Natasha is unfiltered, so unashamedly herself. You don't know what she is going to say next. She doesn't care what you think of her. And that's what makes her so remarkable.'
Natasha airs on RTE1 on Wednesday, June 25, at 9.35pm
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Sean ‘Diddy' Combs guilty on two charges but acquitted of racketeering and sex trafficking
Update: Date: 2025-07-02T15:35:49.000Z Title: The jury has founded Combs: Content: Combs faces a maximum of 20 years in prison for transportation to engage in prostitution related to Casandra Ventura and 'Jane' Full story: Sean Combs found guilty on two of five counts Key moments from the trial Seven weeks, 34 witnesses, a media circus: inside the trial Anna Betts and Shannon Ho Wed 2 Jul 2025 17.33 CEST First published on Wed 2 Jul 2025 16.06 CEST From 4.21pm CEST 16:21 NOT GUILTY of racketeering conspiracy NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of Casandra Ventura NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of 'Jane' GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution, related to Casandra Ventura GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution related to 'Jane' Updated at 4.55pm CEST 5.33pm CEST 17:33 Here are some more images of the family emerging from court: NBC News spoke to Christian Combs, who said his his father was feeling 'Great.' 5.21pm CEST 17:21 Some supporters are putting their fists in the air outside the courthouse in lower Manhattan. They can be heard chanting 'Let Puffy go!' Updated at 5.25pm CEST 5.20pm CEST 17:20 Janice Combs, mother of Sean 'Diddy' Combs, gives a thumbs up after hearing the verdict in her son's sex-trafficking trial: 5.18pm CEST 17:18 More of Combs's supporters are showing up at the courthouse. Lots of smiles and clapping. 5.17pm CEST 17:17 Outside the courthouse, supporters of Combs are saying, 'If you're being abused, come out right away' – seemingly going after Combs's alleged victims for not coming forward about their alleged abuse sooner. 5.12pm CEST 17:12 Patrick Lam, a member of the Screen Actors Guild, was outside the courthouse after the verdict was read in Combs's trial. 'Here to support Sean and his family,' he said. 'Glad they found him not guilty for Rico because prosecutors tried to get whatever they wanted for political reasons.' Updated at 5.23pm CEST 5.09pm CEST 17:09 It's packed outside the courthouse in lower Manhattan as press as well as Combs's supporters fill the streets. People are shouting: 'Not guilty!' Updated at 5.24pm CEST 4.56pm CEST 16:56 Andrew Lawrence Since Combs's arrest last September on federal criminal charges for racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution, a number of podcasters and YouTubers have been notably more sympathetic to him than to the witnesses called for the prosecution. The allegations about Combs's behavior are horrific and include shocking revelations about his drug use, sexual indulgences and hair-trigger temper. But you wouldn't know that from following trial coverage from these faithful evangelists of toxic masculinity. Combs's former girlfriend and key witness Cassie Ventura, especially, is an object of their derision, and their assessment of her testimony is withering. In their view, Combs is not a man with incredible power and influence who abused and mistreated those in his circle, but the target of a #MeToo-style witch-hunt orchestrated by Ventura. Before the verdict was announced, the Guardian's Andrew Lawrence wrote about how some commentators on Black masculinity are popular pundits on Sean Combs's case – and explores how they took a clear side: Updated at 5.05pm CEST 4.42pm CEST 16:42 The federal sex-trafficking and racketeering conspiracy trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs reached its conclusion on Wednesday, with a jury of 12 New Yorkers finding the music mogul guilty on two charges and not guilty on three charges. Here were some of the key moments from the seven-week trial: Updated at 4.53pm CEST 4.40pm CEST 16:40 In the courtroom, fans of the music mogul and his family are clapping and embracing each other. 4.39pm CEST 16:39 Both sides have been asked to submit letters to the judge regarding whether Combs should continue to be held in federal detention or released on bail. The parties will convene after the letters are submitted this afternoon. Updated at 4.53pm CEST 4.35pm CEST 16:35 The government has said that it will seek the maximum 20-year sentence for Combs. Each count that he has been found guilty of carries up to 10 years. Ultimately, it will be up to the judge how long Combs serves. 4.33pm CEST 16:33 The defense is asking that the court release Combs from federal detention, where he has been held since his arrest last September. Updated at 4.54pm CEST 4.32pm CEST 16:32 Given what the jury has found Combs guilty of, he faces a maximum of 20 years behind bars. Updated at 4.37pm CEST 4.30pm CEST 16:30 The judge has thanked the jurors for their 'sacrifice'. 'I want you to know that it is inspiring to all of us. You listened, you worked together, you were here every day, rain or shine. You did so with no reward, other than the reward that comes from answering the call of public service. That should give all of us hope,' Judge Arun Subramanian, who is presiding over this case, said. Updated at 4.54pm CEST 4.21pm CEST 16:21 NOT GUILTY of racketeering conspiracy NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of Casandra Ventura NOT GUILTY of the sex trafficking of 'Jane' GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution, related to Casandra Ventura GUILTY of the transportation to engage in prostitution related to 'Jane' Updated at 4.55pm CEST


BreakingNews.ie
33 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man (24) who dragged visually impaired child away from her mother avoids jail
A man who dragged a visually impaired child away from her mother has been given a suspended sentence. Dublin Circuit Criminal Court heard that Stephan Obelngoa (24), of Deerpark Road, Tallaght, Dublin 24, pleaded guilty to assault causing harm, assault of a peace officer and resisting arrest at The Square, Tallaght, Dublin, on October 2nd, 2023. He has six previous convictions and was on bail at the time of this offence. Advertisement Judge Sinéad Ní Chúlacháin handed down an 18-month prison sentence but suspended it in full on strict conditions. Obelngoa was suffering from a mental illness at the time and had not been taking his medication, the court heard. Garda Sergeant Gemma Collins told Shaun Smyth BL, prosecuting, that an 11-year-old girl, her mother and little brother were leaving the shopping centre on the day in question when they noticed a man later identified as Obelngoa. He was topless, and the mother described his movements as 'unnerving' and said he seemed 'aggressive'. The court heard the mother intended to walk on and avoid Obelngoa, but she suddenly noticed that her daughter had disappeared from her peripheral vision. Advertisement The woman turned around and saw her visually impaired daughter being dragged away by Obelngoa. The little girl was screaming, crying and struggling to get away. The mother described her daughter as 'bouncing off the ground'. Obelngoa then threw the girl into a concession stand. Gda Sgt Collins said two security guards immediately subdued Obelngoa. When gardaí arrived, they found Obelngoa was shouting, roaring and aggressive as he was being restrained. He then spat a mixture of blood and saliva into the face of one of the gardaí. As gardaí were trying to place handcuffs on Obelngoa, he tried to bite them. Advertisement Specialist gardaí interviewed the young girl, and she described to them 'being dragged like a doll and being dragged on the floor'. She said: 'I thought he was going to drag me away forever and would kidnap me'. The girl was examined the following day by a doctor, and a medical report stated she suffered minor spinal soft tissue tenderness and abrasions. The court heard the young girl had trouble sleeping and was extremely anxious in public places like shopping centres afterwards. Gda Sgt Collins agreed with Ciara Ní Ghabhann BL, defending, that gardaí were unable to interview her client after he was arrested, as he was made an involuntary patient in Tallaght Hospital, where he remained for a period of time. The garda agreed with counsel that CCTV footage obtained by the gardaí shows that the incident lasted a matter of seconds. Advertisement Ms Ní Ghabhann said her client suffers from schizophrenia and is given antipsychotic medication every three months. She said at the time of this incident, Obelngoa had been off his medications for six months and was self-medicating with cannabis. Counsel said her client is currently under the supervision of the Probation Services and has undertaken community response programmes. The Probation Services have said he is at low risk of reoffending. She said Obelngoa has written letters of apology to both the garda and the young girl in this case, outlining his sincere remorse. He does not have a clear memory of the incident, but when shown the CCTV footage, he was embarrassed. She asked the court to take into account that her client was quite young and had an acute mental health issue when this offence was committed. She said her client has taken steps to ensure that nothing like this will ever happen again. Advertisement At a hearing last month Judge Ní Chúlacháin said, 'these are very serious offences,' and adjourned the case for two weeks to consider her sentences and read all documents handed into court. In sentencing, the judge noted that the injured party was walking past him with her mother when he threw her into a concession stand and had to be pepper-sprayed. The judge asked Sgt Collins to explain to the injured party 'that we can't punish people for things that aren't their own fault' and that 'if he takes his medication, he's never going to come near her again.' 'It must be very strange to her that he is not going into prison,' the judge added. She said the onus was on the defence to establish their client was suffering from a mental illness and that she was satisfied they had done so. She noted he was unmedicated for six months and was displaying his genitalia in public while in hospital. Ireland McGregor appeal material to be referred to DPP ami... Read More Judge Ní Chúlacháin noted his mental state at the time but said it 'does not reduce all your culpability,' she said. She said the appropriate sentence was 18 months, but she had to take account of his guilty plea, which saved the injured party giving evidence at her young age. The judge noted he was 24 and was in college but dropped out and was on bail for six offences, but there was a 'positive' probation report, and he was at low risk of reoffending if he continued on the same path. She imposed a one-year imprisonment term to run concurrently on each of the assault charges, but in view of the effect prison would have on him, she suspended it for two years on strict conditions.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
All the salacious evidence from seven weeks of the Diddy trial that guaranteed Sean Combs would WALK on charges threatening to put him away for life
After weeks of bombshell testimony about drug-fueled 'freak off' sex sessions and heartbreaking details of abuse from alleged victims, a Manhattan jury found Sean ' Diddy ' Combs not guilty of the most serious crimes he faced yet guilty on two counts related to prostitution. In total, Combs was charged with racketeering conspiracy and two counts each of sex trafficking and transportation of individuals across state lines to engage in prostitution. The first two charges carried maximum sentences of life in prison, while the prostitution accusations may now put Combs away for up to 20 years.