
The Dalai Lama's 90th birthday will reignite China's religion problem – and put Tibet back in Xi's firing line
We know that Xi, the most powerful and ruthless Chinese leader in a generation, has little time for religion unless it's the carefully curated cult of Xi himself. Organised religion is a threat to his authority, and his vision, for China and the world.
The 14th Dalai Lama, an exiled Tibetan with huge influence over a territory that China regards as its own, is a particular irritant. Even worse, in Xi's eyes, the religious leader, a Nobel Peace Laureate with global status, campaigns for human rights, the area in which China is most vulnerable to criticism.
This week, just days ahead of his 90th birthday, the Dalai Lama assured followers that he would, after his death, be reincarnated as the next spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism and spelt out a succession process that sets up a renewed clash with Beijing.
The communist superpower wants to choose its own, more politically malleable successor. Xi would love to turn Tibet's greatest symbol of resistance into a tool of state authority.
In March 2025, the Dalai Lama declared that his successor "will be born in the free world'. This was his riposte to the 2023 ruling by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) asserting that the reincarnation of the 'Dalai Lamas and Panchen Lamas [the second most senior Tibetan spiritual figures], must be looked for within the country… and receive approval from the central government'.
China had already given Tibetan Buddhists good reason to appoint religious leaders outside of China and Tibet, and away from the tendrils of CCP. In 1995, Beijing selected Gyaltsen Norbu as the 11th Panchen Lama, just days after the Dalai Lama's own choice – a six-year-old boy, Gendun Choki Nyima, was, along with his parents, disappeared by the authorities. They have not been seen to this day.
The Dalai Lama has friends in powerful places. He is revered by tens of thousands in and around his home in exile in Dharamshala, northern India. What would happen if his successor were born there? In the US, the Tibetan Policy and Support Act, signed by President Donald Trump during his first term, threatens reprisals against Beijing should it interfere in the Dalai Lama's succession process.
But China, especially the China of Xi Jinping, will not let up. Xi's destruction of democracy in Hong Kong and his use of concentration camps to crush the culture of the Uyghurs and others in northwest China indicate his determination to obliterate inconvenient spirituality.
Beijing's strong-arm tactics against the Catholic Church in China show that even powerful global religions are not safe. In 2018, the Vatican made a secret pact with China that allows Beijing to appoint bishops for government-approved houses of worship. Cardinal Joseph Zen, the former archbishop of Hong Kong, accused the Holy See of 'an incredible betrayal'.
Like the papacy and other absolute religious monarchies that rest on opaque rituals and remain immune from scrutiny, the office of the Dalai Lama can undermine itself. Remember the unsavoury incident of the young boy and the 'tongue-sucking'? Who, other than a revered religious leader could have survived that?
And the selection of a new Dalai Lama is, by its nature, mystical. The 14th Dalai Lama was chosen at the age of two by a search party of Tibetan monks in northwest China, when the toddler was said to have identified the belongings of his predecessor.
The Chosen One's legitimacy might be strengthened, however, if a degree of formality were added to the process. Some have advocated the creation of a council, with representatives from the four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism, to ensure the implementation of the Dalai Lama's written instructions on succession.
But, for all its eccentricities, the tradition of the Dalai Lama and Tibetan Buddhism, is an important example of cultural freedom.
Tianxia (literally: 'all under heaven') was the system of inter-state relations governing Asia in ancient times. China, as the then centre of the civilised world and the apex of culture, governed by a sage empire, supposedly spread wisdom and material benefits to all mankind. Some think Xi's ultimate goal is to have a modern version of Tianxia established globally by 2050.
If the Dalai Lama falls, and Xi is able to brush off US and world criticism, he might be on his way to achieving it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
China releases plan to improve rural workers' skills, CCTV reports
HONG KONG, July 7 (Reuters) - China on Monday released a plan outlining 14 specific tasks to promote retraining of the rural workforce to improve their job prospects, state broadcaster CCTV reported. The announcement comes after China in April announced a 10-year plan to build an agricultural powerhouse, amid escalating tensions with the United States, an economic slowdown and challenges posed by climate change. The plan, issued by several government departments including the Commerce Ministry and National Development and Reform Commission, announced policies including vocational education for rural workers. China has close to 300 million rural migrants in cities, with around 100 million of them reaching retirement age over the next 10 years, according to official data. To improve employment security of rural labour, it said it would "strengthen housing security, create favourable conditions for rural workers in cities to enjoy basic public services equally and integrate into the local society as soon as possible," CCTV said. The report said the scheme would help support job-seeking services for rural labour and support the employment and entrepreneurship of college graduates. The plan would help improve the supply and quality of workers and better meet employers' needs, CCTV said, citing Zou Yunhan, deputy director of the Macroeconomic Research Office of the Economic Forecasting Department of the National Information Center.


Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Gym boss typifies Taiwan's division over China
Heavily tattooed, uber-muscly and foul-mouthed, the Taiwanese gym manager and live streamer Chen Chih-han is an unlikely ambassador for China-Taiwan friendship. Yet on his YouTube channel with more than a million subscribers, Chen live streamed a recent six-day trip to Shanghai, praising everything from the city's maglev trains to its 'pretty' police station. It's quite a turn from a few years ago, when Chen railed against the Chinese Communist Party as a 'totally unreasonable, very tyrannical and murderous regime'. The man known to most as Kuan Chang, 'The Manager', has a Joe Rogan-like following for his straight-talking style. You'd expect no less from someone who was a member of a triad gang and, before that, in the marines. But his visit and volte-face has elicited a huge reaction in Taiwan, dominating conversation for days, even overshadowing the trip of a former Taiwanese president to the People's Republic at around the same time. What explains Chen's about-turn? Critics say that he's been bought off by the CCP, while supporters (and there are plenty of them) say he's just honestly describing what he saw in China. Most probably, Chen's real paymaster is the YouTube algorithm, where his live streams garnered more than 100,000 views each day. His motivations aside, the ensuing storm goes to show how deeply divided Taiwan is over the question of China, a division that is only getting worse. • Yes we can! A master of political slogans reveals his secrets The Taipei-based political scientist Lev Nachman puts it thus: 'Taiwan has always been incredibly, deeply polarised because the fundamental questions about it are: who are we and what do we do about our future?' Politics doesn't fall on a spectrum of left to right, but green to blue: green emphasising Taiwan's independence, like the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP); blue favouring engagement with China, like the Kuomintang (KMT) — yes, the CCP's erstwhile enemies. These are rough labels because both extremes are political no-go zones: the Taiwanese know that any declaration of independence is an invitation for war, while there is next-to-zero appetite for unification with the People's Republic. One problem facing the democracy is that while the DPP holds the presidency, as of last year's election, the KMT is the biggest party in the legislature. This has produced unedifying chaos. Fist fights in the chamber (hospitalising five) erupted last year when KMT legislators rushed through reforms to expand their power against the executive. Street protests followed. The reforms were quashed by Taiwan's Constitutional Court but a frustrated DPP retaliated, calling on voters to recall KMT legislators en masse. More than 30 of them face a recall vote this month. 'We are in another election year. It's unprecedented,' says Brian Hioe, editor of Taiwan's New Bloom magazine. Polls suggest that voters are generally against the so-called 'Great Recall'. After all, they only chose these legislators a year ago. There's no guarantee on the outcome. 'Both sides are trying to drive turnout,' says Hioe. • Juliet Samuel: MI5's 'epic' China warning is being ignored Are these the signs of a healthy democracy or an indulgent tussle between navel-gazing politicians? I lean to the latter. Just as Brexit narrowed the British government's bandwidth for dealing with other pressing issues, and just as the subsequent parliamentary wrangling and debate over a second referendum appealed to different definitions of the democratic mandate, Taiwan's political turmoil is splitting society, with both sides accusing the other of bad faith. Ultimately, it means that the domestic issues that drove so many voters out last year — soaring property prices, stagnant wages, the rising cost of living — are not being tackled. It also means that the high-stakes dance with China is reduced to tribal party politics. To make life hard for the executive, the KMT-controlled legislature has cut defence budgets on projects such as Taiwan's submarines, citing fiscal discipline. And a DPP campaign to root out spies has embroiled 12,000 Chinese immigrants in a loyalty test, where they must prove that they have relinquished any Chinese residency rights to maintain their Taiwanese residency. (The irony is that many of them have had to travel to China to do the paperwork.) Meanwhile, voters on both sides have become increasingly mistrustful of what they hear on traditional media. • Lenin, Mao and Castro: three journeys that shook the world In this febrile environment, influencers like Chen become more crucial. A recent Reuters Institute poll found that nearly half of Taiwanese get their news from YouTube. Mainstream outlets are declining in importance, especially among the young. The changing media landscape might also be changing public opinion: whereas Taiwan's young have traditionally been more China-sceptic and likely to identify as only Taiwanese, a recent poll from the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation found that, now, a smaller proportion of 20 to 24-year-olds identify as Taiwanese compared with over-25s. Just as Gen Z in the West seem less 'woke' than millennials, could Taiwan's Gen-Z be less sceptical of China? If this phenomenon is real (still an 'if'), The Manager may be on to something with his U-turn.


BBC News
5 hours ago
- BBC News
How tariffs are shifting global supply chains
A 90-day pause on Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs plan is about to expire on Wednesday, which could upend US trading relationships with the rest of the world. But the uncertainty of the last few months has already forced several companies to rethink their supply lines in radical ways. When an Illinois toymaker heard that Trump was introducing tariffs on Chinese imports, he was so incensed that he decided to sue the US government."I'm inclined to stand up when my company is in genuine peril," says Rick Woldenberg, who is the CEO of educational toy firm Learning majority of his company's products are made in China, so the tariffs, which US importers have to pay, not Chinese exporters, are now costing him a says his import taxes bill leapt from around $2.5m (£1.5m) a year to more than $100m in April when Trump temporarily increased tariffs on Chinese imports to 145%. That would have "devastated" the company, he says."This kind of impact on my business is just a little bit hard to wrap my mind around," he US tariffs on Chinese imports now at 30%, that's still unaffordable for many American companies such as Learning in addition to its continuing legal fight, it is changing its global supply chain, moving production from China to Vietnam and two countries, like most others around the world, have seen the US hit them with general 10% tariffs, two-thirds lower than those on China. Although these 10% tariffs are due to run out on Wednesday, 9 July, uncertainly remains over what they may be replaced many Canadian companies, who often trade in both their home country and in the US, are now facing a double hit to their supply hits are the 25% tariffs put in place by Trump on many Canadian imports, and the reciprocal ones of the same level that Canada has placed on a host of American other businesses around the world are looking at exporting less to the US, because their American import partners are having to put up prices to cover the tariffs they now have to pay, which makes their products more expensive on US shelves. At Learning Resources, Mr Woldenberg has now moved about 16% of manufacturing to Vietnam and India. "We have gone through the process of vetting the new factories, training them on what we needed, making sure that things could flow easily, and developing relationships."Yet he admits that there are uncertainties: "We don't know if they can handle the capacity of our business. Much less the whole world moving in there at the same time."He also points out that switching production to another country is expensive to the meantime, his legal case against the US tariffs, called "Learning Resources et al v Donald Trump et al" is continuing its way through the US court May a judge at the US District Court in Washington DC ruled that the tariffs against it were unlawful. But the US government immediately appealed, and Learning Resources still has to pay the tariffs for the time the firm is continuing to move production away from China. Global supply chain expert Les Brand says that it is both expensive and difficult for companies to switch manufacturing to different countries."Trying to find new sources for critical components of whatever you are doing - that's a lot of research," says Mr Brand, who is CEO of advisory firm Supply Chain Logistics."There's a lot of quality testing to do it right. You have to spend the time, and that really takes away from the business focus."He adds: "The knowledge transfer to train a whole new bunch of people on how to make your product takes a lot of time and money. And that effects already razor-thin margins businesses have right now." For Canadian fried chicken chain Cluck Clucks, its supply chain has been significantly impacted by Canada's revenge tariffs on US imports. This is because while its chicken is Canadian, it imports both specialist catering fridges and pressure fryers from the it can't live without the fridges, it has decided to stop buying any more of the fryers. Yet with no Canadian company making alternative ones, it is having to limit its menus at its new is because it needs these pressure fryers to cook its bone-in chicken pieces. The new stores will instead only be able to sell boneless chicken, as that is cooked differently."This was a substantial decision for us, but we believe it's the right strategic move," says Raza Hashim, Cluck Clucks CEO."It's important to note that we do plan to retain the necessary kitchen space in new locations to reintroduce these fryers should the tariff uncertainty be completely resolved in the future."He also warns that with the US fridges now more expensive for the company to buy, the price it charges for its food will likely have to go up. "There is a certain amount of costs we cannot absorb as brands, and we may have to pass those on to consumers. And that is not something we want to do."Mr Hashim adds that the business is continuing with its US expansion plans, and it has set up local supply chains to source American chicken. It currently has one US outlet, in Houston, Texas. In Spain, olive oil producer Oro del Desierto currently exports 8% of its production to the US. It says that the US tariffs on European imports, presently 10%, are having to be passed on to American shoppers. "These tariffs will directly impact the end consumer [in the US]," says Rafael Alonso Barrau, the firm's export company also says it is looking at potentially reducing the volume it sends to the US, if the tariffs make trading there less profitable, and exporting more to other countries instead."We do have other markets where we can sell the product," says Mr Barrau. "We sell in another 33 markets, and with all of them, and our local market, we could cushion US losses."Mr Brand says that firms around the world would have been less impacted if Trump had moved more slowly with his tariffs. "The speed and velocity of these decisions are really making everything worse. President Trump should have gone slower and been more meaningful about these tariffs."Back in Illinois, Mr Woldenberg is also concerned about where Trump will go next in his trade battles."We just have to make the best decision we can, based on the information we have, and then see what happens," he says."I don't want to say 'hope for the best', because I don't believe that hope is a strategy."