logo
Will fewer corporate reporting obligations jeopardise the EU Green Deal?

Will fewer corporate reporting obligations jeopardise the EU Green Deal?

Euronews18-03-2025
The Omnibus package aims to simplify four sets of rules and has been welcomed by the business sector because it reduces obligations to report on their performance on environmental and social issues, as well as due diligence on their supply chains.
"Competitiveness is the new motto of this Commission, just as the Green Deal was the motto of the previous mandate led by Ursula von der Leyen. The idea is to cut red tape by 25% for companies, with a target of 35% for SMEs. The Commission says it's not deregulation, it's just simplification," says Gregoire Lory, who covers Green Deal policies for Euronews.
The proposal also aims to exempt smaller companies from import tax to offset polluting emissions and to help mobilise more private investment. The EU executive says €6.3 billion in annual administrative costs would be saved and €50 billion in additional public-private investment would be mobilised.
However, unions and environmental organisations fear the consequences, as only one in five companies would be required to make environmental reports. Checks on supply chains would be limited to the largest 10,000 companies.
'The weakening of the due diligence requirement by imposing these requirements only on direct suppliers is really worrying because, in a very significant number of cases, the harm happens beyond the EU. Around 80% to 90% of environmental and human rights abuses actually happen outside the EU,' argued Anaïs Berthier, director of ClientEarth's Brussels office.
"The Commission wants to simplify, it is not advocating moving away from the Green Deal objectives. What they are doing is trying to align competitiveness with sustainability and the comprehensive growth strategy," said Levin Spiegel, policy adviser at Eurochambers.
The EU executive has asked co-legislators to treat this package as a priority, which will have to be negotiated with the governments of the 27 member states and the European Parliament.
This promises to be a heated political debate and will be an important test of Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's ability to forge alliances in the European Parliament.
"The centre-right EPP, which pushed for the Omnibus Package, holds the presidency of the Commission, has the largest group in Parliament and the support of many leaders in the European Council. However, the EPP will need to build a majority," says Gregoire Lory.
The centre-right may seek support from radical right parties, rather than the traditional coalition with the S&D (centre-left) and Renew Europe (liberal). The Green Party has been one of the most vocal parties against the proposal.
Some analysts point to the current geopolitical situation of major trade disruptions and a race for resources as justification for the EU to focus on reforms that boost business competitiveness.
Levin Spiegel agrees, adding that Eurochambers supports 'this important step' with the expectation of further legislative action to tackle high energy costs and skills shortages.
But environmental organizations like ClientEarth warn that "it is not at all strategic in the long term". "The climate, biodiversity and pollution crisis will not stop just because of the Trump administration (USA) and the EU must really stick to its values, its laws, its principles," said Anaïs Berthier.
Germany's parliament on Tuesday passed a historic bill unlocking a record level of state borrowing for defence and infrastructure through amending the country's constitutionally enshrined fiscal rules.
The vote made it through the parliament with 513 votes in favour — above the 489 votes required.
The law still needs a two-thirds majority in the Bundesrat, Germany's lower house representing the country's states, to become law.
The crucial vote in the Bundestag followed weeks of debate sparked when Merz's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and would-be coalition partners Social Democrats (SPD) unveiled plans to unleash hundreds of billions in spending through loosening Germany's constitutionally-enshrined "debt brake."
Merz faced a tense race to push the proposal through ahead of the new parliament convening on 25 March, where the far-left Die Linke and far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) would have the ability to block the package.
The Greens were originally reluctant to offer their support of the bill until Merz last week gave the party guarantees that €100 billion of the special fund would be directed to supporting climate economic transformation measures.
The historic deal marks a shift away from decades of fiscal conservatism. Out of the proposals, defence spending above 1% of Germany's gross domestic product is effectively exempt from the country's "debt brake", which was written into the constitution in 2009.
A €500 billion special fund will also be created to finance infrastructure projects outside of the ordinary budget over the next decade, and give Germany's 16 states leeway to borrow the equivalent of around €15 billion.
Merz — who campaigned against reforming the debt brake throughout his career — has framed his U-turn necessary in response to a changing security landscape.
"Our friends in the EU are looking to us just as much as our adversaries and the enemies of our democratic and rules-based order," Merz said on Tuesday ahead of the vote.
Defence Minister Boris Pistorius defended the decision to lift fiscal rules to invest in Germany's defence, including its woefully underfunded army.
"Our security must not be jeopardized by budgetary constraints," Pistorius said, adding that "anyone who hesitates today is denying reality."
Some of the strongest criticism in parliament on Tuesday came from the AfD and the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), the latter who tried to derail the package by suggesting a last-minute change.
The German stock market and the euro reacted positively ahead of the vote, which experts have said has the power to bring Germany out of its two years of poor economic growth.
Most economists are in favour of incurring debt to finance additional security and defence needs, but have repeatedly noted that the infrastructure package should be accompanied, or replaced, by strong reforms in other areas according to economic thinktank Ifo.
Reforms in bureaucracy, pension, energy, as well as addressing the country's dire workforce shortage are desperately needed, experts say.
President of the Berlin-based economic research institute DIW Berlin, Marcel Fratzscher, reiterated to Euronews that, "We need reforms in bureaucracy and the workforce in other areas so that such investments can be implemented at all."
"The package would be a very important step in the right direction, but that alone will not be enough. We need a reform of the debt brake, to bring investments in infrastructure, education, defence permanently into the federal budget."
The law still needs a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag, Germany's lower house.
Here, the CDU, SPD, and the Greens need the backing of another party to ratify the legislation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zelenskyy proposes new round of peace talks with Russia
Zelenskyy proposes new round of peace talks with Russia

Euronews

time2 hours ago

  • Euronews

Zelenskyy proposes new round of peace talks with Russia

Kyiv has proposed a new round of peace talks to be held next week with Russia, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Saturday. In a video message posted on X, Zelenskyy urged "the pace of negotiations must be increased" to ensure lasting peace. "A meeting at the level of leaders is needed," he said, emphasising Ukraine's willingness to do so. Ukraine's newly appointed Secretary of National Security and Defence, Rustem Umerov, was the one who sent Moscow the invitation, Zelenskyy said. He also previously lead the delegation talks held in Istanbul last month. The previous negotations held in June failed to lead to a ceasefire agreement, but did result in a new prisoner of war exchange. The first round of negotiations held on 16 May also resulted in a prisoner exchange, the largest one yet, but hadn't yielded much result either regarding putting an end to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In his video address, Zelenskyy also urged Western allies to further toughen their sanctions against Russia. "It is very important that the new EU sanctions package is also supported by other free European countries that are currently not part of the European Union," Zelenskyy said. "We are also working on the American track, there are agreements with President Trump that must be implemented as soon as possible," he added. A day prior to Zelenskyy's address, the EU imposed new sanctions on Russia, targeting its oil and banks. It marks the 18th package of sanctions imposed by the EU since February 2022. Earlier this month, the US President also threatened harsher sanctions on Russia if a peace agreement was not reached within 50 days. Writing on his Truth Social platform, Trump framed the threat as a response to Russia "absolutely 'pounding' Ukraine on the battlefield right now." "To Russia and Ukraine, get to the table right now, before it is too late. Thank you," the US president said.

Anti-immigrantion demonstrations in more than 80 cities across Poland
Anti-immigrantion demonstrations in more than 80 cities across Poland

Euronews

time16 hours ago

  • Euronews

Anti-immigrantion demonstrations in more than 80 cities across Poland

Anti-immigration protests organised by the far-right Confederation Libery and Independence party took place in more than 80 cities across Poland, including in Warsaw, Krakow, Poznan, Wroclaw, and Bialystok. Demonstrators demanded the closure of the borders with Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Slovakia. "Enough of the years-long policy of 'let everyone in, and who they are will be determined later'," Krzysztof Bosak, one of Confederation party's leaders, wrote on X. "Polish women and men have the right to be concerned about the level of security in their own homeland," he added. In a speech at the start of the march, Bosak demanded the resignation of Donald Tusk's government, the closure of the borders with Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and Slovakia to curb illegal immigration, and the permission for soldiers to shoot at people who cross the border illegally. "Without closing Poland to illegal immigration, without launching a deportation operation, without renouncing political correctness, without equipping the Border Guard and the forces responsible for controlling the legality of residence, and without controlling the labour market, security will gradually deteriorate," he said, calling for a change in policy. The protests come shortly after Poland introduced border controls with Germany and Lithuania, which came into effect on 7 July. On the Polish-German border, controls are in place at 52 places and on the Polish-Lithuanian border at 13. The issue of migration has been widely up for debate, and a contentious topic in Polish politics, particularly as the country has experienced a rise in immigration in recent years. In the first round of the presidential elections held in May, candidates of the far-right performed well, with Slawomir Mentzen of the Confederation Libery and Independence party and Grzegorz Braun of Confederation of the Polish Crown party coming in third and fourth, respectively. Many believe that both candidates' successes were due to their hardline stance on migration. Interior ministers agree on asylum rules On Friday, Poland and five other EU countries, agreed a set of targets for tightening asylum rules. During the meeting hosted by Germany's interior minister, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz admitted that he was "pleased that Poland is carrying out border controls." Last year, Poland saw an increase in asylum applications due to the recurring crisis on its eastern border with Belarus, which has been ongoing since 2021. As a result, the Polish parliament passed a law temporarily suspending the right to apply for asylum for those who crossed the Belarusian border. Both Polish and European leaders have long accused Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko of orchestrating the influx of migrants to destabilise the EU. On Saturday morning, the Ministry of Interior and Administration published statistics on the number of approvals issued for special protection for foreigners on X. "In 2024, we issued 40 per cent fewer approvals for special protection for foreigners than in 2021. This is the result of a better managed system, our operations at the border and more efficient procedures," the post read. "The government is pursuing a responsible and well-considered migration policy, taking care of the stability and security of citizens," it added. Counter demonstrations in many cities Counter-manifestations against the Confederation marches were also held in Warsaw, Katowice, Olsztyn and other cities on Saturday. Demonstrators carried banners with the slogans: "Accept the refugees, delete the fascists," "Action Democracy" and "We defend the right to asylum." "Everyone, regardless of their skin colour and origin, should feel comfortable not only in Poland, but also in Europe," Maria Książak of the International Humanitarian Initiative Foundation said during the demonstration.

The EU must assert itself in its trade relationship with the US
The EU must assert itself in its trade relationship with the US

LeMonde

timea day ago

  • LeMonde

The EU must assert itself in its trade relationship with the US

"Trump always chickens out." The phrase, coined by a columnist at the Financial Times, has been circulating widely in recent weeks. The idea that the US president speaks loudly but does not always follow through on his threats has fueled complacency among stock markets regarding the risks his trade war poses to the global economy. However, accusations of cowardice may not apply to Donald Trump alone. The European Union's hesitance in the face of Trump's maneuvering has also raised questions about whether the 27 member states can truly engage in the kind of power struggle that is now essential. While Brussels believed it was on track to minimize the tariffs on European exports to the United States, Trump dashed the EU's hopes by announcing on July 12 that he would unilaterally impose a 30% tax starting August 1. Is this a final bluff to extract further concessions, or a definitive move that could deal a severe blow to European growth? In any case, as the American president ramps up the pressure, the EU continues to waver, trying to salvage what it still can. European leaders have responded with lackluster retaliatory measures that have done little to deter Trump, who seems indifferent to the economic consequences of his actions. This game of high-stakes bluffing is likely to benefit the party setting the rules, to the detriment of those who are forced to adapt, always a step behind and uncertain of the game's true objective. Setting ambitious goals The confrontation appears to be based on a misunderstanding. The EU seeks to negotiate in good faith, aiming for fair trade based on the principle of comparative advantage between countries. But the US president has little interest in this quest for a mutually beneficial, purely commercial agreement. His ambitions go further. He aims to undermine Europe by any means, because he despises everything it stands for: supranationalism, multilateralism, progressivism and the primacy of law. Yet the EU has no reason to apologize for what it represents, nor to make concessions on its tax policy or the regulatory framework it has established for digital services. In this final stretch of negotiations, Europe must give the talks a political dimension, moving beyond the technical aspects that have dominated the debate so far. The EU should clearly set out its red lines and aim high. Settling for a compromise as unfavorable as the one the United Kingdom accepted in May would be unacceptable. If the 27 member states, as the US's top trading partner, fail to demonstrate that they carry more weight than a single country, it would send a disastrous message about the purpose of the European project. The EU's strategy of absorbing American provocations without actually implementing the retaliatory measures at its disposal has shown its limitations. The "proportionate, robust, and well-calibrated" reprisals promoted by the 27 member states do not measure up to what is a clear act of aggression, one whose aim goes beyond simply rebalancing the US trade deficit – its goal is to subordinate Europe. If Europe were to "chicken out," the consequences would not be purely economic.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store