
How inheriting a second home became the ultimate embarrassment for millennials
Are you planning to leave a second home to your children? Email: money@telegraph.co.uk.
For generations, Britons have aspired to buy their own piece of the countryside – a second home to provide the backdrop for family holidays year in year out.
But the dream of owning a second home is slowly dying. Data from Hamptons shows the percentage of sales to a second home buyer has fallen from 2pc in 2016 to 0.8pc in 2025 – the lowest figure on record.
Buying a second home has never been less of an inviting prospect, not least because successive tax raids have made buying and maintaining one increasingly unaffordable.
For millennials, who are buying later, and 'maxing themselves out more than previous generations', buying a second home is all but impossible, says Aneisha Beveridge, of Hamptons.
'This limits their ability to withdraw money from their main residence to purchase a second home, or indeed save up enough money on the side,' she says. 'Likely, money which was enjoyed or invested by previous generations at the same point will be tied up for longer by millennials' and Gen Z's mortgage bills.'
According to lawyers and wealth managers, it seems no one particularly wants to inherit a second home either.
'We do see an increased resistance to inheriting real estate and a preference for cash gifts,' says Natasha Southam, of law firm Seddons GSC. 'Owning numerous properties can be seen as burdensome and prohibitive to a mobile lifestyle, which is often a priority.'
Younger generations are also embarrassed at the idea of owning a holiday home, says Mark Wood, of Everest Funeral Concierge and former chief executive of Prudential, who is accustomed to helping families with end-of-life planning.
Many fear they may be accused of hollowing out communities by hoovering up housing stock and inflating house prices.
'I remember the local antagonism in Wales years ago when people would vandalise properties. There is a similar anxiety among younger generations,' Mr Wood adds. 'Do they really want to be the ones turning up in their estate car and unloading stuff from a central London branch of Waitrose?'
The millennials who stand to inherit such homes often grew up in the age of low cost airlines and a social media-driven desire to see as much of the world as possible.
'If you can go to Lisbon for £15, why would you want to spend four hours driving to Devon?' adds Mr Wood.
The twilight years of baby boomers will mark one of the biggest wealth transfers between generations in centuries, Ms Southam says. Baby boomers account for £2.89 trillion in housing wealth alone, Savills data shows, and the lion's share of that wealth will likely be passed to their descendants.
But consensus among experts is that inheriting a second home is more hassle than it's worth.
'A lot of people underestimate the admin burden of inheriting a second home,' says Sam Grice, of Octopus Legacy, a succession planning firm. 'You've got the general upkeep of the property, and they might have to continue paying a mortgage.'
Anyone inheriting a second home will also have to navigate a potentially eye-watering inheritance tax bill and, following changes brought in this year, pay twice the rate of council tax.
Inheriting a second home also comes with a sting in the tail for would-be first-time buyers, who have been kept on the rental market by surging house prices. Indeed, the average age of a first-time buyer has crept up from 30 to 34 since 1980, according to Hamptons data.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves raised the stamp duty surcharge from 3pc to 5pc for second home purchases, a move seemingly aimed at giving first-time buyers an edge on landlords.
'But let's say you're renting in London, and you inherit a third of a Cornish home. If you then go and buy your own property, you'll have to pay an extra 5pc in stamp duty,' says James Ward, of law firm Kingsley Napley.
'I often suggest that people don't give property to children until they've bought their own home.'
In addition, arguments can erupt between siblings – where there is a disagreement as to how to share a holiday home, or even if any of them want it in the first place.
'We tend to draft ownership agreements between families, but it's a liquid asset. What happens if someone wants to take the money out?' says Mr Ward.
Mr Wood, of Everest Funeral Concierge, adds: 'Unless siblings are close and have a lot of money, it leads to disputes – what weeks you take, who is allowed to use it and who pays for repairs. It's a constant battlefield.'
Sometimes it is the parents who are pushing for children to inherit properties they are, at best, agnostic about.
'They become the backdrop for family holidays and memories,' says Mr Wood. 'People want these places passed down because they represent childhood, and they want their grandchildren to have the same experiences.'
There is also some evidence that Labour's war on second home owners is working as intended.
Jennie Hancock, of West Sussex buying agency Property Acquisitions, says second homes forced on to the market by tax changes are indeed being snapped up by downsizers.
'The lack of suitable properties to move to has been a major deterrent for downsizers in recent years, but as second home owners sell up, downsizers are finally seeing the opportunity to make their move,' she says.
In any case, boomers whose pensions will soon be subject to inheritance tax following Ms Reeves's maiden Budget are increasingly seeing second homes as blows to be softened.
'We are seeing more people with second homes taking out equity releases as part of their inheritance tax planning,' says Adam Canavan, of Bowmore Wealth Group.
'The same rules apply to second homes in Europe, but rather than just releasing equity, we are also seeing people sell those properties altogether. In both cases, the goal is the same – to reduce the value of the taxable estate and ultimately pass more wealth on to their family.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


FF News
an hour ago
- FF News
Once-in-a-Generation Advice Changes to Help Millions Navigate Their Financial Lives
Millions more people could get help navigating their financial lives with support on pensions and investments, under proposals announced today by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The FCA's proposals would allow firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics. These could include people who may be currently drawing down on their pension unsustainably, not saving enough for retirement or who have excess cash sitting in a current account. The changes, which have inbuilt protections for consumers, also support growth by enabling increased investment and innovation. Sarah Pritchard, Deputy Chief Executive of the FCA, said, 'We want to help consumers navigate their financial lives and plan for the long term. Some of the most difficult financial decisions we face are how to save, invest and prepare for a comfortable retirement. 'These once-in-a-generation reforms will help people navigate their financial lives and give them greater confidence to invest. This is a win-win for consumers and firms alike.' These reforms should set the framework for the next 20-30 years, to support consumers now as well as future generations. The FCA wants to see a thriving and trusted market for full financial advice, simplified advice, targeted support and guidance. Alongside today's proposals for targeted support, the FCA has set out plans to reform the framework for simplified advice. Consumer access to a choice of guidance, targeted support, simplified advice and full financial advice should help reduce the so-called 'advice gap'. This supports our ambition that consumers should have access to the help and guidance that they need, at a cost they can afford, when they need it, to make informed decisions about their financial lives. This advice gap is stark. Just 9% of adults received financial advice about their pensions or investments in the previous 12 months, according to the FCA's latest Financial Lives survey (FLS 2024). Of those who did not receive financial advice, but hold £10,000 or more in cash savings, 24% said they don't invest because they don't know enough about it, 12% because they feel overwhelmed by the number of options available, and 8% said they would need more support before they invest. There are about 7 million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives. The FCA has worked in a smarter way to carry out this work, running its very first 6 week policy sprint, where firms designed consumer journeys to help design the rules in the consultation, with support from consumer representatives and other members of the regulatory family. Detailed consumer testing has also been completed, published alongside the consultation. The aim of this detailed sprint, and consumer testing, has been to help then accelerate the period for consultation, which is now open for 8 weeks. The FCA is also working with the government to help resolve issues that might prevent firms communicating with consumers, with issues having been identified early through the policy sprint. The FCA committed to support growth in its strategy. These reforms are among almost 50 initiatives the FCA set out in a letter to the Prime Minister in January 2025, which the FCA is delivering against this year.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
‘I was in a dark place. Now I'm moving house to restart motherhood'
My divorce was turbulent. I was left in my thirties to bring up three children, with no financial contribution or involvement from their father. We split the equity from our marital home 50/50 and with that I took on a mortgage on my four-bedroom town house in St Albans, Hertfordshire, but only by maximising my mortgage loan and putting £10,000 on a credit card to secure the house. I didn't want to, but we needed a home, and I also knew that paying rent wasn't getting me anywhere [says Sabrina Ponte, 59]. It was quite simple: I had to work, and hard. I got a job at a publisher, HR Grapevine, selling online advertising. I had a base salary, but commission went up and down. My employer was supportive, but the responsibility was mine. After three years I started to get into trouble with the mortgage payments: it just became too much. The credit card loan had climbed from the original £10,000 that I borrowed to £40,000 after interest was applied. I was too proud to ask my parents or friends for help, so I just dealt with it myself. I sought the advice of a debt management adviser. They told me that I should stop paying it back and consolidated the debt for me. It took me six years in total to clear it. It was one of the darkest times of my life — we had little money to live on after I paid off the mortgage and loan. I tried to make Christmas and birthdays special, but there wasn't much else. I did up my daughters' bedrooms myself, stripped wallpaper and re-painted their wardrobes, putting new handles on. • Read more expert advice on property, interiors and home improvement My main thoughts were always to keep a roof over our heads, food on the table and them safe. Due to my full-time job, I was unable to attend many key moments such as school plays, concerts and some sports days. I do feel sad about that. In sales you need to put the hours in to get the deals so that's what I did. My children are now in their thirties, and by re-mortgaging I was able to help them get onto the property ladder. I have shown them that if you work hard, you can own a home and I'm proud that each of them has achieved that. When the last of my three moved out, I knew it was time to move on. I have put them first my whole life. I have a new partner and it's a second chance at love. My house has meant so much, but we want to be together. Since the house down the road took over a year to sell, I decided to try a new sales approach. I used Springbok; it takes cash offers with no chains. It sold in two months. The plan is to rent together close to the school gates, but so far we have found it hard to secure a property and I have had to extend the completion date on my house. Most letting agents appear to be unresponsive or slow at getting viewings — we were prepared to put down the deposit on one place without seeing it to speed up the process, but they had tenants that they couldn't shift. • 'To ease the pain of my divorce, I transformed my home' I will cry buckets when I close the door on this house, but I have achieved what I set out to. The house sold for £460,000 and I have a mortgage to clear of £100,000 so that's a great nest egg. My partner is a builder, and we dream of buying a plot of land after two years and building our own home. It does feel like a second chance at motherhood too. I love my children dearly, but at times it was tough and I had to be both mum and dad to them: do the hard bits, the discipline, the homework nagging, the picking them off from the floor when they had a bad time, you name it. This time round, it's more like being a grandparent — we have my partner's child 50 per cent of the time and I can do all the fun bits that I wasn't always able to do with my own. I also skip the real challenges — I don't have to go to parents' evening and when there is a need to be strict, I hand him back to his dad. I am excited to be mortgage-free even though it has been so important to me to have a property for most of my life — the difference is that this time all my children are grown up and I just get to nurture and have fun playing mum again but without the stresses first time around. New walls equal new chapters and I can't wait.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Concessions to welfare reforms to be revealed after Labour backbench rebellion forces government retreat
Changes to welfare reforms, forced on the government by rebel Labour MPs, are being revealed today ahead of a crucial vote. The original bill restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit (UC). The government, which insisted welfare costs were becoming unsustainable, was forced into a U-turn after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the bill at its first Commons hurdle. While the amendment is expected to be withdrawn, after changes that appeased some Labour MPs, others are still unhappy and considering backing a similar amendment to be tabled today. 2:59 Here are the main changes to the UC and pip bill: • current pip claimants will keep their benefits; stricter eligibility requirements will only apply to new claims from November 2026 • a review of the pip assessment, which will have input from disabled people • existing recipients of the health-related element of UC will have their incomes protected in real terms Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said in a statement that the legislation now aims to deliver a "fairer, more compassionate system" ahead of the second reading and vote on Tuesday. "We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. "That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. "This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances." On Saturday, Sir Keir Starmer said fixing the UK's welfare system was a "moral imperative". The government claimed cuts to sickness and disability benefits would shave £5bn off the welfare bill and get more people into work. The Resolution Foundation believes the concessions could cost as much as £3bn, while the Institute for Fiscal Studies warned that the changes make tax rises more likely. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News that welfare bill changes have put Labour in a much better position ahead of tomorrow's vote. On Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, Mr Streeting said: "There were things that we didn't get right, we've put right, and there'll be a debate about future amendments and things, I'm sure, as it goes through in the usual way." On the same programme, shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately repeatedly refused to say whether the Conservatives would back the bill, but would review the proposals after the minister's statement later. "We have said that if there are more savings that actually bring the welfare bill down, if they'll get more people into work, and if they commit to using the savings to avoid tax cuts in the autumn, which looks highly unlikely at the moment, then they have our support." The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against the bill and have called for the government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce.