Cigarette tax increase called for in Indiana revenue forecast
'With today's announcement by the State Budget Committee on the revenue forecast, it's clear we must tighten our belts and consider new sources of revenue to ease financial constraints. And in the process, we should take the opportunity to make Indiana a healthier state.'We commend Governor Braun for putting such a big emphasis on Hoosier health. It will take all stakeholders working together to build a healthier and more financially resilient future for all of us.
'A big action still on the table this legislative session is a minimum $2 per pack increase to the cigarette tax. We urge lawmakers to put the increase in the state budget both for the positive impact on the health of Hoosiers who smoke and the additional revenue.
'Having healthy, prosperous communities and citizens is so vital that we included the aspiration as one of the six pillars of our Indiana Prosperity 2035 visioning plan for the state. Indiana proudly has built one of the country's most competitive business climates. But we also must be willing to identify, discuss and act on difficult matters surrounding the health of Hoosiers like the adult smoking rate so we can continue to prosper as citizens and as an economy.
'We look forward to further discussions with the Braun administration and legislative leaders about how our Wellness Council of Indiana can help achieve our shared goals. That program's mission is to improve Hoosiers' quality of life by empowering employers and communities to create thriving places. We believe the right approach is investing in Hoosier health today instead of paying down the road when the cost will be even greater.'
Indiana Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Vanessa Green Sinders
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
IDEM issues deregulation report under Gov. Braun's orders. Advocates question need, impact
The state agency charged with protecting Indiana's environment and Hoosiers from industrial pollution completed its first step to 'reduce excessive environmental regulation' and fulfill obligations imposed by Gov. Mike Braun. Braun issued an executive order earlier this year requiring state agencies to revisit any environmental regulations that 'impose unnecessary burdens on businesses, communities, agencies or industries' in the state. The order also requires agencies to identify 'overly burdensome' regulations and policies and report ways to revisit or rescind them no later than July 1. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management fulfilled this requirement in a new report that outlines 10 items for review. These regulations and policies range from streamlining pollution and discharge permits to making it easier for firefighters to conduct open-burn training. The agency not only plans to pursue changes in state regulations, but says it wants to encourage federal agencies such as the EPA to also change regulations. In a letter of support for IDEM's report, Braun said states going beyond federal environmental standards create complexity for businesses and farmers, and federal baselines are an appropriate limit. 'We need to unleash the productive side of our economy, while protecting and preserving our state's natural resources,' Braun wrote. IDEM said in its report it remains committed to reducing regulatory burdens that do not benefit Hoosiers and the environment. Industry groups said they welcome the changes in regulations and believe quicker permitting and fewer regulations will bring economic benefits. But environmental advocacy groups oppose the roll-back and contend the state is already behind on protecting Indiana's air and water and the health of Hoosiers. They also questioned why IDEM is tasked with protecting business interests over the environment. Kim Ferraro, managing attorney at Conservation Law Center, said Braun's executive order reinforces a false premise that regulating the environment is bad for the economy. 'There is no evidence to support that,' Ferraro said. 'It's dangerous that we keep putting it out there as the choice we have to make because that's a false choice.' The Conservation Law Center joined with other advocacy groups to submit comments to IDEM, but Ferraro said the premise of Braun's executive order was aimed at getting input from industry and did not focus on the burdens deregulation would have on Hoosiers. 'Current regulation doesn't meet the law in that it doesn't go far enough,' Ferraro said. 'That imposes many costs on Hoosiers in terms of medical costs and health care bills. It's bad for human health and the environment and not based in reality or best available science.' These burdensome costs on human health and the environment are what IDEM should be paying attention to, not the monetary costs of doing business, she said. 'Why is this on environmental agencies to roll back policies?' Ferraro asked. 'There are many other state agencies charged with promoting business interests, are they not doing their job? It seems strange to have (IDEM) promote industry interests.' The groups also argue in their comments that Indiana already faces serious environmental challenges that require the state to go beyond federal standards, and Braun's order imposes an unnecessary burden on state agencies. Others, however, are eager to see Braun's order play out. 'By making sure that our environmental regulations through IDEM match up closely or exactly with the federal regulations, it provides employers with regulatory certainty,' said Ashton Eller, the vice president of governmental affairs at the Indiana Manufacturers Association. He believes manufacturers who operate nationwide will be enticed to come to Indiana when they see the state's regulations are streamlined with the federal government. Eller said he's aware of the potential health impacts of environmental deregulation, but views Braun's directive as a modernization of regulations — not an elimination. 'Manufacturers are aware of the environmental outcomes upon health,' Eller said. He noted the report acknowledges it's possible to be good stewards of the environment without stifling growth through excessive government mandates. "We couldn't agree more,' he said. IDEM sought public input as part of its effort evaluating existing regulations. A selection of those comments was included in the agency's report to Braun. The department received about 1,000 comments from various groups and will review them all while it considers the next steps. Some farming groups submitting comments thought the state could do more than the federal standards. Two comments focused on Indiana's confined animal feeding operation laws on farms. The state's regulations are stricter than federal guidelines, but both commenters supported IDEM's current regulations. They cited how Indiana's regulation offers protection to farmers against nuisance lawsuits and environmentally related litigation. A large selection of the comments IDEM provided in its report came from industrial groups. One submission asked IDEM to change the verification timeline for wastewater discharge lagoons from once yearly to every five years to coincide with federal permit renewals, while another expressed support for streamlining state permits for coal mining facilities. Earlier this year, the U.S. EPA announced it also would look into permitting reforms across the country to streamline energy investment, and one coal-mining company urged IDEM to continue to review and update state regulations in alignment with these changing federal priorities. If IDEM decides state laws that exceed federal regulations should stay in place, the department has until Oct. 31 to review those rules and regulations. The agency must then provide a written report to Braun and the Legislative Council by Dec. 31. The 10 regulations and policies IDEM outlined in its report to Braun were chosen so the agency may clarify or rescind them. The agency in its report said it is committed to making sure its regulations are consistent with current law, supported by best available science and are not 'unduly burdensome.' Here are the 10 items with brief descriptions of what they are: Underground storage tank forms: IDEM says these forms, used during changes in facilities with these tanks, are redundant and duplicative due to federal requirements. Prior approval for fire training at an open burn: IDEM says fire departments requesting prior approval to train with an open burn is burdensome and recommends removing this requirement. Streamline pollution discharge permitting: Facilities currently have three years to come into compliance with pollution discharge permits known as NPDES. IDEM believes this timeline is out-of-date and recommends extending it to five years, in line with U.S. EPA. Redefining biomass and feedstock: The state wants to look at new definitions for biomass and feedstock to clear up confusion on what can be used in anaerobic digesters used for recycling items like manure and food waste. Emissions Reduction Plan for malfunctions: IDEM is considering revising or removing the requirement that air pollution-permitted facilities submit a plan to reduce emissions that resulted from a malfunction. Remove IDEM certification requirement for some tax deductions: IDEM is currently required to certify if certain systems or devices qualify for tax deductions. IDEM says the process is unnecessary and recommends removing the requirement. Electronic waste fund flexibility: Revenue from electronic waste registration and recycling is currently limited to the administration expenses. IDEM recommends expanding what the fund can be used for, like outreach and collection. Extend some waste permits: Solid and hazardous waste permits range from three to five years in length. IDEM proposes extending certain permits to 10 years to reduce the paperwork burden for applicants. Streamline application for alternative water discharge limits: Facilities, like steam-powered electricity generators, which release heated water into rivers and streams are typically bound by temperature limits, unless they can prove their proposed limit won't harm the natural environment. IDEM suggests streamlining the application process to remove burdens and uncertainty for facilities. Rescind environmental penalty guidance: Documents guiding civil penalties for breaches of environmental regulations and penalties for leaking storage tanks will be rescinded. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. Karl Schneider is an IndyStar environment reporter. You can reach him at Follow him on BlueSky @ or X @karlstartswithk.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
Here's what you need to know about E. coli while swimming in Indiana
Hoosiers looking to cool off with a dip in open waters this summer may be met with health risks and beach closures due to E. coli pollution. The bacteria prompted temporary swimming bans at Eagle Creek and a few beaches in Hamilton County as the summer season kicked off. Some forms of the fecal bacteria can pose a health risk to people, so precautions may be needed as you pack up the towels and swimsuits for an afternoon in the sun and water. There are a few ways E. coli finds its way into our water, and state agencies remind everyone to keep an eye out for any health advisories at beaches where regular testing is performed. Here are a few reminders before heading out for a beach day. E. coli, or Escherichia coli, is a coliform bacteria living in many places including human and animal intestines. There are many types of E. coli, but a few strains of the bacteria, such as E. coli 0157:H7, can cause people to have severe stomach cramping, bloody diarrhea and vomiting, according to the Mayo Clinic. E. coli is a fecal coliform that health departments can test for in Indiana waters. The bacteria ends up in our waters from the gastrointestinal tracts of people and warm-blooded animals. The bacteria can get into water three ways, according to the Waterkeeper Alliance. There are many forms of E. coli, and only a handful of them will make you sick if you swallow the bacteria. Young children under 5 years old, adults above 65 and people with weakened immune systems can be more susceptible to E. coli infection, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. While less severe symptoms may include a day or two of diarrhea, more severe strains of Shinga-carrying E. coli can cause a serious health risk called hemolytic uremic syndrome. This can lead to kidney failure, permanent health problems and even death, according to the CDC. Some E. coli infections can cause urinary tract infections and other gastrointestinal issues, according to the Cleveland Clinic. The clinic also says E. coli cases can lead to prostate, bloodstream or gallbladder infections and, in rare cases, pneumonia and meningitis. Symptoms can take up to 10 days to appear after being exposed to E. coli, but some bacteria strains will make you sick within hours. High counts of E. coli found where Hoosiers might want to swim means that there is likely feces contamination in the river, stream or lake, according to the Clean Lakes Alliance. The Indiana Department of Environmental Management did not make an expert available for this article, but sent a document that recommends Hoosiers check for regularly monitored beaches that have posted advisories as one way to reduce E. coli exposure. If a waterbody or beach is not regularly monitored, the department recommends finding a swimming location with good water circulation. Hoosiers should also shower after coming into contact with surface water, the department advises. IndyStar's environmental reporting project is made possible through the generous support of the nonprofit Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Indianapolis Star
a day ago
- Indianapolis Star
From taxes to Medicaid, 4 ways Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' could impact Hoosiers
President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' is another step closer to becoming law after the U.S. Senate narrowly voted on July 1 to advance the signature legislation of Trump's second term. The massive budget reconciliation bill, which members of Congress have debated for months, could significantly impact Hoosiers through spending and tax cuts that will affect access to government programs, such as Medicaid. Independent polls in recent weeks have shown that Americans have unfavorable views of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' but Indiana's congressional delegation has fallen largely along party lines in voting on the legislation. Hoosier Republicans in the House and Senate have supported Trump's agenda while Democrats opposed it. Before the bill heads to Trump's desk, it must pass a final vote in the House, which could begin voting on July 2. Here are four ways the bill is likely to impact Hoosiers once it is signed into law. Thousands of Hoosiers could lose access to Medicaid, the public health insurance program for low-income Americans, and SNAP benefits under the bill. The Senate's version of the bill gradually decreases the cap on provider taxes, which are taxes paid by hospitals that Indiana relies on to fund its Medicaid expansion program, otherwise known as the Healthy Indiana Plan. In mid-June, state leaders warned that the Senate's plan to reduce the provider tax from 6% to 3.5% would make the state unable to afford the current costs of HIP. The state would have to ask the Trump administration for the flexibility to enroll fewer Hoosiers. In the final days of negotiations in the Senate, lawmakers added a $50 billion fund to support rural hospitals and appease senators who were concerned about Medicaid cuts. It's unclear at this point how much Indiana would get from that $50 billion fund. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act also establishes work requirements for adults receiving Medicaid. It also expands the age limits on work requirements for adults receiving food stamps, or the federal nutrition program known as SNAP. Hoosier adults who are eligible for Medicaid must work a minimum of 80 hours a month starting in late 2026, according to the bill. It also raises the working age threshold from 55 to 64 for adults receiving food stamps, which means some older Hoosiers may have to work longer to receive nutrition assistance. More than 1.9 million Hoosiers are currently on Medicaid, according to FSSA enrollment numbers. In April 2025, more than 588,000 Hoosiers received SNAP benefits. Independent of the Medicaid provisions in federal legislation, Indiana already passed legislation seeking to institute work requirements for the Healthy Indiana Plan, which means the federal working requirements may not make a huge difference in eligibility. As of July 1, the state has yet to submit a waiver request to the federal government to establish the work requirements lawmakers approved earlier this year. An analysis of 2024 Census data from the Kaiser Family Foundation shows 72% of adults on Medicaid in Indiana are working. Several provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Congress passed during Trump's first term, expire at the end of this year, but the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' would make those tax cuts permanent. According to the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, an expiration of the 2017 tax cuts would result in an average tax increase of $1,936 for Hoosiers starting in 2026. But the bill goes beyond the 2017 tax cuts and includes additional provisions, such as a temporary deduction for seniors and making auto loan interest deductible for vehicles made in the U.S. An analysis from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, another nonpartisan group, estimates that Hoosiers earning $144,000 and above would receive the largest share of tax cuts in the bill. According to the U.S. Census, the median household income in Indiana between 2019 and 2023 was around $70,000. Hoosiers with that income, per the ITEP analysis, might see about a $1,700 tax cut in 2026 from the provisions in the bill. Hoosier homeowners that seek tax credits for clean energy upgrades will lose access to thousands of dollars in incentives under the bill. Home upgrades and improvements, such as solar panel or battery installations, can be costly, but the current 30% credit on purchases in existing law can help offset costs, advocates previously told IndyStar. Big Beautiful Bill 101: What you need to know about Trump's tax bill Many of these existing incentives were scheduled to sunset in the 2030s, several years from now, but under the Senate-passed legislation they would expire later this year or by mid-2026. In addition to making it harder for Hoosiers to afford energy efficient upgrades, advocates previously told IndyStar they are also concerned about the impact ending these credits could have on the more than 4,000 solar jobs in the state. Hoosiers who regularly work overtime hours or work in industries that receive tips may receive short-term tax benefits on those dollars under the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Specifically, the bill makes up to $12,500 worth of overtime pay tax deductible, or $25,000 for joint tax filers. For Hoosiers working in tipped industries, their initial $25,000 earned in tips would also be tax deductible. Both provisions would expire after 2028. Mitch Olson, one of the founders of Olson Custom Designs in Indianapolis, said in June the elimination of taxes on overtime benefits their 80 employees by putting more money in their pockets – and it could help the manufacturing company grow their business. 'Passing along that savings back to our employees is crucial to recruit more employees and to help advance the ones we currently already have,' he told reporters in June. IndyStar reporter Karl Schneider contributed to this story. Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at Follow her on Twitter/X @CarloniBrittany.
