Humiliation as Keir Starmer wins vote on welfare only after farcical climbdown on welfare reform plans
On a shambolic day for Labour, the Prime Minister dropped his flagship plan to cut disability benefits just hours after ministers had insisted they were going ahead.
The decision to abandon the reforms blows a £5 billion hole in the public finances and increases the risk that Chancellor Rachel Reeves will raise taxes again this autumn.
It also deals a shattering blow to Sir Keir's authority as he prepares to mark his first anniversary in No 10 this weekend.
Kemi Badenoch said the 'utter capitulation' showed that 'Starmer cannot govern' even with a landslide majority. The Tory leader warned that failure to tackle welfare reform would 'bury the next generation under a mountain of borrowing and debt'.
Sir Keir had offered huge concessions to rebel MPs last week to head off a revolt.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall yesterday said there would be no further concessions, insisting Labour would not 'duck the big challenges facing this country'.
But, as Labour MPs lined up to condemn the 'Dickensian' cuts, Government whips began to panic that the legislation was heading for defeat.
Just 90 minutes before the vote, the Government abandoned plans to tighten eligibility for the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which was at the heart of Sir Keir's 'reforms'.
The capitulation was enough to allow the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to pass its first Commons stage by 335 votes to 260.
But it will now save no money – and leaves Sir Keir's plans for welfare reform in tatters.
Dozens of Labour MPs were incensed by the Government's 'disrespectful' handling of the issue and voted against the Bill despite Sir Keir's near-total climbdown. The rebellion by 49 Labour MPs was by far the biggest revolt of his premiership.
Last night, even some MPs who sided with the Government said they could switch sides when the legislation returns to the Commons next week – unless they get further concessions.
Benefits reform has now been kicked into the long grass pending a review by welfare minister Sir Stephen Timms next year, which will be 'co-produced' by disability campaigners. Sir Stephen last night said his review was 'not designed to save money'.
The humiliation will raise further questions about Sir Keir's political judgment and the operation of his top team. Ms Reeves has been singled out for criticism by rebel MPs for demanding the £5 billion savings to balance the books, while the PM's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney has been accused of ignoring the strength of feeling on the issue.
Shadow welfare minister Helen Whately said the debacle suggested the PM 'can't even deliver a U-turn'.
Shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: 'This farcical climbdown is the most humiliating moment of Labour's first year in office. Their flagship welfare Bill has disintegrated – stripped bare at the last minute in a desperate attempt to avoid both a defeat, and a confidence vote in Keir Starmer. This isn't serious government – it's chaos.
'Labour has bottled welfare reform, left a multi-billion pound hole in the nation's finances, and set the country on course for higher taxes or a debt spiral.'
Rebel ringleader Rachael Maskell said the Government's plans were now 'a complete farce' and urged ministers to start again.
Ms Kendall last night acknowledged there were 'certainly lessons to learn', adding: 'I wish we had got to this point in a different way.'
She said welfare reform was 'never easy, especially perhaps for Labour governments'. But she insisted the Government would continue trying to put the benefits bill on a 'more sustainable footing'.
Ms Kendall said Labour MPs remained '100 per cent behind the Prime Minister' despite the insurrection.
Sir Keir's original plan would have ended eligibility for PIP payment for 800,000 disabled people, who would each have lost around £4,500 each. The Government's own assessment suggested this would drive 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children.
In a climbdown last week, the Government agreed not to apply the cuts to existing claimants. But official estimates said this would still have pushed 150,000 people into poverty in future.
Ms Maskell said the 'Dickensian cuts belong to a different era and a different party'. And former frontbencher Richard Burgon told fellow MPs it would 'hang like an albatross around their necks' if they voted for the Government's cuts.
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said the entire package should be scrapped, adding: 'If it does cost more money, so be it.'
Speaking before the climbdown, Ms Kendall said reform was essential – warning that new PIP claims are rising at a rate of 1,000 a day.
'I do not believe that this is sustainable if we want a welfare state that protects people who most need our help for generations to come,' she said.
She added: 'There is no responsibility in leaving our system of social security to continue as it is, and risk support for it becoming so frayed that it is no longer there to provide a safety net for those who can never work, and who most need our help and support.'
Who are the Labour rebels who voted against the welfare bill?
Here is a full list of the Labour rebels who voted against the Bill at second reading:
Rosena Allin-Khan (Tooting)
Paula Barker (Liverpool Wavertree)
Lee Barron (Corby and East Northamptonshire)
Lorraine Beavers (Blackpool North and Fleetwood)
Olivia Blake (Sheffield Hallam)
Richard Burgon (Leeds East)
Ian Byrne (Liverpool West Derby)
Irene Campbell (North Ayrshire and Arran)
Lizzi Collinge (Morecambe and Lunesdale)
Stella Creasy (Walthamstow)
Peter Dowd (Bootle)
Neil Duncan-Jordan (Poole)
Cat Eccles (Stourbridge)
Clive Efford (Eltham and Chislehurst)
Mary Kelly Foy (City of Durham)
Tracy Gilbert (Edinburgh North and Leith)
Mary Glindon (Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend)
Chris Hinchliff (North East Hertfordshire)
Imran Hussain (Bradford East)
Terry Jermy (South West Norfolk)
Kim Johnson (Liverpool Riverside)
Ian Lavery (Blyth and Ashington)
Brian Leishman (Alloa and Grangemouth)
Emma Lewell (South Shields)
Clive Lewis (Norwich South)
Rebecca Long Bailey (Salford)
Rachael Maskell (York Central)
Andy McDonald (Middlesbrough and Thornaby East)
Navendu Mishra (Stockport)
Abtisam Mohamed (Sheffield Central)
Grahame Morris (Easington)
Margaret Mullane (Dagenham and Rainham)
Simon Opher (Stroud)
Kate Osamor (Edmonton and Winchmore Hill)
Kate Osborne (Jarrow and Gateshead East)
Richard Quigley (Isle of Wight West)
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Clapham and Brixton Hill)
Marie Rimmer (St Helens South and Whiston)
Cat Smith (Lancaster and Wyre)
Euan Stainbank (Falkirk)
Graham Stringer (Blackley and Middleton South)
Marie Tidball (Penistone and Stocksbridge)
Jon Trickett (Normanton and Hemsworth)
Derek Twigg (Widnes and Halewood)
Chris Webb (Blackpool South)
Nadia Whittome (Nottingham East)
Steve Witherden (Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr)
Marsha De Cordova (Battersea)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The M&S ‘Scattered Spider' hackers are coming for your holidays
If air traffic control strikes, errant drones and climate protesters weren't enough to contend with, the aviation industry has a new antagonist threatening to grind things to a halt: hackers. This week it emerged that the secretive 'Scattered Spider' group who attacked M&S and Co-op are targeting the aviation industry. Charles Carmakal, an executive at Google's cybersecurity unit, said that his firm was 'aware of multiple incidents in the airline and transportation sector which resemble the operations [of] Scattered Spider.' Sam Rubin, of Palo Alto Networks, said his company had 'observed Muddled Libra (also known as Scattered Spider) targeting the aviation industry.' While neither Rubin nor Carmakal specified which airlines have been targeted, Hawaiian Airlines and WestJet have recently suffered cyber attacks. WestJet said the incident affected 'some services and software systems' including its app, but neither airline suffered operational disruption due to the breach. The issue is not isolated to North America. On Monday June 30, Qantas suffered a major cyber attack, reportedly compromising the personal data of up to six million customers. A spokesperson for the UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) told The Telegraph: 'We are aware of rumoured activity. We are in contact with the National Cyber Security Centre and have warned our industry contacts about this group and the techniques they use.' One of the things that the CAA would have told their industry contacts is that when Scattered Spider targets an industry, the attack tends to be sustained and relentless for a period. If aviation is next in line, how could a hack play out, and what can you do to protect your holiday? Worrying potential There are a few different avenues for the hackers. One would be to target airlines' corporate infrastructure. In 2018, 380,000 British Airways customers had their credit card details stolen in a major data breach. Bookings made in a two-week window had been infiltrated in a 'very sophisticated, malicious criminal' attack, according to the airline's former CEO Alex Cruz. The airline was later fined £20m for the security breach. A second scenario is that ground systems could be targeted. In 2015, Poland's flag carrier LOT cancelled 10 flights after hackers infiltrated the computer systems that issued flight plans from Warsaw's Chopin Airport. But the scale could be much bigger than this. In 2023, the US Federal Aviation Administration's 'Notice to Airmen' (NOTAM) system suffered a three-hour outage. The result was that all flights across the US were grounded for the first time since 9/11, leaving 11,000 aircraft stuck on tarmac across the country. While this was a hardware issue, not a malicious hack, it highlights the potential impact of a sudden IT meltdown. The third, and perhaps most worrying scenario, is that in-flight systems could be infiltrated. Earlier this year, several aircraft coming into land at Ronald Reagan National Airport in Washington DC received false mid-air collision warnings, even though there were no other planes in the area. The pilots receiving the alerts disconnected autopilot and climbed rapidly. It is unknown whether this was caused by the deliberate, malicious 'spoofing' of airline systems, or if it was due to an error or another cause. Regardless, it is an example of how hackers could potentially enter the cockpit in the future, putting pilots into compromised scenarios. This week's Qantas data breach suggests hackers are already targeting the databases of airlines. But given the nature of Scattered Spider's previous high-profile, high-impact attacks, scenarios two or three should not be ruled out. 'Hacking groups thrive on attention, and with families about to start jetting off on their summer holidays, the potential to attack and extort an airline is irresistible,' says Matt Saunders of Adaptavist, a tech consultancy which works with major airlines. 'The good news is that a potential hacking attempt should not cause safety issues for passengers, as any safety-critical IT systems will already have a manual backup option which maintains the highest safety standards in the event of an unwelcome intrusion,' he added. How to hack-proof your holiday There are steps that we, the passenger, can take to protect ourselves from cyber attacks. Paying for your holiday with a credit card is preferable; if somebody makes unauthorised payments on your card you will be protected by the Consumer Credit Act, meaning the process of reclaiming your lost funds will be more straightforward. Regularly changing the password for your online account with an airline's website or app will also help to protect it from the rising issue of air-mile theft. And, as always, avoid booking tickets on public Wi-Fi networks which might not be encrypted, potentially putting your data at risk. When it comes to the larger scale hacking incidents, we can only rely on the strength of airline security systems – which are, by all accounts, becoming more powerful. In 2024 alone, the aviation industry spent $37bn (£27bn) on IT systems, and airports spent $9bn (£6.5bn). Around half of airlines and three quarters of airports are in the process of safeguarding data and upgrading IT systems. 'Defending against these risks requires more than perimeter controls – it demands continuous workforce education, Zero Trust principles, phish-resistant multi-factor authentication and identity verification that can't be socially engineered,' stresses Jordan Avnaim of identity security company, Entrust. Recent cyber attacks on Hawaiian, WestJet and Qantas did not affect flight operations, which should give us hope. Nevertheless, the fact that the shelves in some M&S stores were empty for six weeks and its online orders were suspended – to the sum of £300m – shows why airports, airlines and passengers should remain on high alert.
Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jaguar in crisis after woke rebrand that stunned fans crashes sales
Jaguar's sales have plummeted after the legendary British car marque's ' woke ' rebrand left fans outraged. Sales of the luxury motoring manufacturer appear to be in freefall following its controversial move to scrap its iconic 'growler' big cat logo in November. The firm's rebrand saw it replace the well-known badge in favour of a geometric 'J' design - which lovers of the brand raged looked like the logo on a handbag clasp. Meanwhile, a glossy ad campaign accompanying the design overhaul, featuring androgynous-looking men and women in exuberant clothes, also came under fire. And as the firestorm surrounding the famed car maker's change continues to rage, sales at Jaguar Europe have plunged a staggering 97.5 per cent. According to figures from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association (AECA), the company registered just 49 new vehicles in April 2025 compared to 1,961 units sold in the same month last year. Year-to-date sales from January to April also slumped, dropping 75.1 per cent with just 2,665 motors sold. Globally, Jaguar sold just 26,862 vehicles for the 2024/25 financial year - an 85 per cent drop compared to 2018. The sales dip followed Jaguar's repositioning away from its performance and heritage roots towards a lifestyle-focused, fashion-forward brand. Jag's big rebrand had been in development for three years as the company prepares to become an all-electric car manufacturer ahead of the UK's 2030 target to stop selling new purely fossil fuel-powered cars. Launched under the slogan 'copy nothing' - an adage from company founder Sir William Lyons - the new ad featured diverse models in technicolour outfits walking through an alien landscape. Around 800 people are believed to have worked on the rebrand, which peaked with the unveiling of a 'design vision concept' at Miami Art Week in December. However, the sales slump may not be as catastrophic as it first appears. As part of Jaguar's refresh, the car firm intentionally stopped producing cars at the end of 2024, a move which stretched into 2025. The manufacturer - now owned by an Indian firm - is currently seeking to bring in a new range of entirely electric vehicles, which were due for release this year. It's unclear whether the brand's gamble - thought to be in a bid to attract younger, more environmentally conscious motorists - will pay off. Jaguar's head of global brand strategy and insight, Richard Green, shared images of a pop-out panel on the concept car However, global branding experts appeared to be less than convinced, ridiculing the makeover and dubbing it a 'dog's dinner'. Californian designer Joseph Alessio said it would be 'taught in schools as how not to do a rebrand,' while another designer labelled it 'one of the most destructive marketing moves ever attempted.' While public relations experts said they were stumped by the firm's decisions - from the 'vandalism' of the company's iconic logo to the apparent casting off of decades of motoring heritage to attract new buyers. Brand and culture expert Nick Ede said he was 'baffled' by the marketing push - which featured precisely no cars - while Oli Garnett, co-founder of creative design agency Something Familiar, called the rebrand a 'dog's dinner'. The likes of Nigel Farage and Elon Musk led other critics, with Farage describing it as 'woke' and warned the automaker risked 'going bust' due to its new design choice. And billionaire Space X owner Musk turned the knife on X, simply asking Jaguar: 'Do you sell cars?' Jaguar, meanwhile, doubled down on the rebrand, sending sassy and saccharine replies to detractors on social media who question the wisdom of moving away from the kind of thinking that birthed iconic vehicles such as the E-Type. And the company's boss, Rawdon Glover - managing director of the Indian-owned firm - hit out at the 'vile hatred and intolerance' directed at the eccentric-looking models who appeared in the video released on November 18. Mr Glover denied the firm was throwing away its near-100-year heritage with its most dramatic rebrand in decades - instead claiming the car maker needed to step away from 'traditional automotive stereotypes' to find its place in the market. Mr Glover told the Financial Times he believed the overall reaction to the campaign had been 'very positive', but that he was disappointed by the 'level of vile hatred and intolerance' directed at the models in the advert. 'If we play in the same way that everybody else does, we'll just get drowned out. So we shouldn't turn up like an auto brand,' Glover said. 'We need to re-establish our brand and at a completely different price point so we need to act differently. We wanted to move away from traditional automotive stereotypes.' MailOnline has approached Jaguar for comment.
BreakingNews.ie
26 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Pound drops and UK bonds suffer big selloff after finance minister cries in parliament
British prime minister Keir Starmer's office rushed to give finance minister Rachel Reeves his full backing on Wednesday after she appeared in tears in parliament following a series of U-turns on welfare reforms that blew a hole in her budget plans. Reeves looked exhausted and appeared to brush away tears during the half-hour session of prime minister's questions in the House of Commons. Her spokesperson said it was a personal matter. Advertisement British borrowing costs rose and the pound fell as the weekly question-and-answer session unfolded on TV, with market analysts saying the moves reflected fears that Reeves would be replaced, throwing the government into further turmoil. Asked about Reeves, a Treasury spokesperson said: "It's a personal matter, which – as you would expect – we are not going to get into." Starmer's press secretary told reporters: "The chancellor is going nowhere, she has the prime minister's full backing." The pressure on Reeves comes after the British government managed to pass its welfare reform bill, but only after it removed measures that would have led to savings in the long run. Advertisement Reeves has repeatedly emphasised her commitment to self-imposed fiscal rules, limiting the amount Britain will borrow to try to build the confidence of investors. But that ambition collided with Labour members of parliament who were opposed to the scale of the cuts to welfare, and who said Reeves was being cruel in pushing for billions of pounds of savings from some of the most vulnerable people in society. Opposition politicians and economists said the decision to sharply scale back the welfare reforms meant the government would have to raise taxes or cut spending elsewhere to balance the public finances in the annual budget later this year. Looking miserable One Labour member of parliament, who asked not to be named, said Reeves was upset after an argument with the House of Commons speaker Lindsay Hoyle. A spokesperson for Hoyle declined to comment. Advertisement The opposition Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch singled out Reeves during the weekly set-piece parliamentary session, in which lawmakers put questions to the prime minister in often-raucous exchanges, saying: "She's pointing at me, she looks absolutely miserable." Reeves animatedly gestured back. Badenoch said: "She is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?" Starmer then responded that Badenoch would not be in her job by then, but did not explicitly back Reeves. Business Michael O'Leary says Rachel Reeves 'hasn't a clue'... Read More The appearance of Reeves in tears put British government bonds on track for their biggest daily selloff since October 10th, 2022, when financial markets were still reeling from former prime minister Liz Truss's decision to announce big, unfunded tax cuts. The pound fell almost 1 per cent on Wednesday. Starmer's press secretary later said the prime minister had expressed his confidence in Reeves many times and did not need to repeat it every time a political opponent speculated on her position. The Treasury spokesperson said Reeves would be working out of Downing Street on Wednesday afternoon. Asked if Reeves had offered her resignation, Starmer's press secretary said: "no".
