logo
Illinois clean energy hit hard by Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax bill: ‘An incredibly damaging blow'

Illinois clean energy hit hard by Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax bill: ‘An incredibly damaging blow'

Chicago Tribune2 days ago
Already the calls are coming in at Chicago's All Bright Solar.
Customers want solar roofs installed on their homes — and they want them before a federal tax credit worth about $8,000 expires at the end of the year.
The repeal of that tax credit under President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is 'pretty catastrophic' for residential solar, according to All Bright owner Lisa Albrecht, who expects demand to fall sharply.
'I've been on the 'solar-coaster' for a long time, and this is the roughest ride,' said Albrecht, using a term for the dramatic highs and lows of the industry. 'I'm definitely white-knuckling it. (Illinois) will lose jobs. We will lose installers.'
Residential solar is particularly hard hit, but the president's far-reaching budget bill, signed July 4, has dealt a mighty blow to Illinois' clean energy overall, ending a tax credit of up to $7,500 for electric vehicle buyers, reducing access to tax credits for battery and solar panel manufacturers, slowing the construction of wind and solar farms and leaving $14 billion of announced clean energy investment statewide at higher risk for cancelation or downsizing.
Under the bill, Illinois will see about 30% to 60% less clean power added to the grid by 2035, according to an analysis of a similar scenario by the Rhodium Group, a financial research firm.
The firm also found that there would be about 16% to 38% fewer electric vehicles on the road nationwide in 2035.
'This bill goes after the very foundation of a clean energy economy, and tips the scales toward fossil fuels instead. So it is an incredibly damaging blow to the clean energy transition … it will severely curtail deployment,' said Julie McNamara, the associate policy director for climate and energy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Still, she said, clean energy deployment will continue: 'It will just come slower than it could and should have, and at higher cost.'
The bill comes at a time of growing concern about climate change, which is caused mainly by the burning of fossil fuels and increases the likelihood of extreme weather events such as severe floods, multiyear droughts, record-breaking heat waves and raging wildfires.
Illinois clean energy supporters bemoaned what's essentially the rollback of President Joe Biden's landmark climate bill, the Inflation Reduction Act, which Trump has labeled the 'green new scam' and targeted from the first days of his administration.
But even as they were licking their wounds, the state's clean energy advocates were looking to the future.
Clean energy companies, environmentalists and trade associations are all now very focused on what can be done on a state level, said Jon Carson, founder and managing partner at Trajectory Energy Partners, a solar development company in Highland Park.
'It's very clear to me that this will only amplify Illinois' leadership role in driving clean energy forward,' he said.
Environmentalists and the clean energy industry had already been pushing for a new Illinois clean energy law, with provisions such as an ambitious new goal for large-scale energy storage, in which giant batteries absorb wind and solar energy when it's not needed, and release it when it is.
Trump, a strong supporter of fossil fuels, has pressed for the repeal of Biden's climate bill on the grounds that it unfairly favored some forms of energy over others.
'For too long, the Federal Government has forced American taxpayers to subsidize expensive and unreliable energy sources like wind and solar,' Trump said in a July 7 executive order on the implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill. '… Ending the massive cost of taxpayer handouts to unreliable energy sources is vital to energy dominance, national security, economic growth, and the fiscal health of the Nation.'
Large solar farms and onshore wind are the most cost-effective forms of new-build energy generation, even without tax subsidies, according to a 2025 report from the financial firm Lazard.
Wind and solar farms don't run as constantly as gas or coal plants, but solutions such as battery storage can help produce a steadier and more predictable flow of electricity.
In the aftermath of the Trump bill, Illinois clean energy has an advantage; it still benefits from the state's own ambitious climate law, the 2021 Climate and Equitable Jobs Act, a signature achievement for Gov. JB Pritzker. The law sets a goal of 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045.
Illinois has annual targets for wind and solar energy, and requires the utilities ComEd, Ameren Illinois and MidAmerican Energy to purchase increasing amounts of clean electricity. The state has an incentive for residential solar customers that's worth nearly as much as the federal tax credit. And there's a state rebate for electric vehicles of up to $4,000.
Illinois is expected to see a smaller reduction in new clean energy under the Trump bill than the nation as a whole, according to the Rhodium Group. The 30% to 60% less clean power that will be added here by 2035 compares with 57% to 72% less nationwide, according to Ben King, a director in the firm's climate and energy practice.
'Part of that is just that Illinois is a great place to build wind, particularly downstate, and the economics of that are favorable in some cases, even without the tax credits,' King said.
But he added that Illinois' clean energy policies also provide 'guardrails' that protect the state from some of the impact of the Trump bill.
The Trump bill is expected to increase planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions, according to an analysis by Princeton's REPEAT project, which found the U.S. would emit roughly 470 million additional metric tons per year in 2035.
For comparison, 470 million metric tons is more than twice Illinois' current annual greenhouse gas emissions.
The bill is also expected to cost Illinois jobs, with 21,000 fewer people employed in 2030, according to Dan O'Brien, a senior analyst at Energy Innovation, a nonpartisan energy and climate policy think tank.
With the bill in place, the annual energy cost per household nationwide will be $170 higher in 2035, according to the think tank.
'We (will) lose a lot of low-cost renewables that are pushing prices down for household consumers as well as commercial businesses and industries,' O'Brien said. 'So as a result of the bill, we're likely to see pretty steep increases in the costs for people like you and me.'
King noted that $14 billion in clean energy investments — for manufacturing and utility-scale wind and solar — have been announced in Illinois but have not yet come online.
'A lot of that investment has been put at risk because of the changes in this bill,' he said.
Among those who want to respond to the Trump bill with strong state action is Jen Walling, executive director of the Illinois Environmental Council, which advocates for more than 100 organizations.
Illinois environmentalists have been pushing for the Clean and Reliable Grid Affordability Act, which would expand energy efficiency in Illinois and encourage renewable energy projects.
Walling said she wants the state to prioritize the addition of new transmission — the system, including high-voltage wires, that carries electricity across long distances. With more transmission, it's faster and easier to add solar and wind projects to the electric grid.
Large battery arrays, which store energy from wind and solar farms and help make them more efficient, are also a priority, she said.
The Illinois legislature made progress on a wide-ranging clean energy bill in the spring, and Walling would like to see that work continue when lawmakers return in the fall.
'We have a big, beautiful bill that we need to get done,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump judicial nominee Bove clears Senate panel despite Democratic protest
Trump judicial nominee Bove clears Senate panel despite Democratic protest

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump judicial nominee Bove clears Senate panel despite Democratic protest

By Andrew Goudsward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. Senate panel on Thursday advanced the nomination of Donald Trump's former personal lawyer to be a federal appeals court judge over protests from Democrats, who accuse him of using aggressive tactics to enforce the U.S. president's agenda at the Justice Department. Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee unanimously supported the nomination of Emil Bove for a lifetime appointment on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, sending the nomination to the full Senate. Bove currently serves as a top Justice Department official. The hearing devolved into partisan rancor when the panel's Republican chairman, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, cut off debate on Bove's nomination. Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, a Democrat, shouted that Grassley was violating the committee's rules as Republicans cast their votes. The other Democrats walked out of the hearing. "This is outrageous that you're not allowing senators to have their fair say," Booker told Grassley. "What are you afraid of?" Grassley accused Booker of "obstruction." Bove's nomination drew fierce opposition from Democrats and many former Justice Department employees, more than 900 of whom signed a letter accusing him of undermining the integrity of the department. Bove's defenders have pointed to his background as a federal terrorism prosecutor in New York and his work countering drug cartels and other threats. Trump named Bove to a senior post at the Justice Department after he helped defend Trump against three criminal cases brought against him during his years out of power. Bove came under scrutiny over his role in firing career prosecutors who worked on cases arising from the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol and his order to drop a federal corruption case against New York Mayor Eric Adams. A former Justice Department lawyer last month accused Bove of suggesting the government may defy court rulings against the Trump administration's deportation efforts. Bove has said he cannot recall making the statement and denied being a Trump "enforcer."

Trump's World Liberty Financial crypto tokens approved for trading
Trump's World Liberty Financial crypto tokens approved for trading

Fast Company

time12 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Trump's World Liberty Financial crypto tokens approved for trading

Holders of the digital tokens issued by World Liberty Financial, one of the crypto ventures of the family of Donald Trump, voted on Wednesday to make them tradable, paving the way for their wide sale and purchase — potentially boosting the value of the president's holdings of them. The World Liberty tokens, known as $WLFI, were sold to investors after the Trump family and their partners launched the venture – a 'decentralised finance' platform that has also issued a stablecoin – last autumn. The tokens were not made tradeable at their initial sale. Instead, they gave holders a right to vote on some changes to the business, such as its underlying code. Early investors have said the primary draw of $WLFI was the connection to Trump and, in turn, their expectations the tokens would grow in value due to his backing. Making the tokens tradable would see investors determine their price, enabling speculation, earning trading fees for exchanges that list them and likely stoking interest from a wider swath of crypto investors. The extent to which the Trump family, which reaps three-quarters of revenues from the initial sales of the tokens, will benefit from their wider trading is not clear. Gains in the tokens' price would, however, swell the value of the family's token holdings, the exact level of which is unclear. World Liberty and Trump's other crypto businesses have faced criticism from Democratic lawmakers and ethics experts as the president's administration reshapes regulations in the booming crypto sector. Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and Democratic Representative Maxine Waters sent a letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year in which they said, 'The Trump family's financial stake in World Liberty Financial represents an unprecedented conflict of interest with the potential to influence the Trump Administration's oversight—or lack thereof—of the cryptocurrency industry.' The World Liberty tokens have not been designated as securities by the SEC, meaning they are not subject to the same scrutiny as investments like stocks. The White House has said Trump's assets are in a trust managed by his children and that there are no conflicts of interest. The White House has not released the details of the trust arrangement. The Trump family business has been placed into a trust whose sole beneficiary is the president, meaning that the hundreds of millions of dollars from crypto deals struck while Trump is in office could hypothetically be withdrawn at any time, or at the latest, be at his disposal when he leaves office in less than four years. Trump's company, DT Marks DEFI LLC, was set to receive 22.5 billion out of a total 100 billion $WLFI tokens, according to a description of the project released in October. The president held 15.75 billion of the tokens at the end of last year, according to a public financial disclosure report published last month. The Trump family has made around $500 million from World Liberty since the platform was launched, according to Reuters calculations based on the company's terms and conditions, transactions traced by crypto analysis firms and publicly-disclosed deals. Asked by Reuters how the vote would impact the value of $WLFI tokens held by Trump and his family, the White House press office said: 'This is not an inquiry for the White House.' The Trump Organization did not respond to a request for comment. In response to Reuters' questions about how the tokens will become tradable, a World Liberty spokesperson said: 'Additional details are forthcoming.' The venture says on its website that making $WLFI tradeable 'brings us one step closer to building a more open, transparent, and powerful financial system.' 'The American public should be very concerned about the president's vested interests in the cryptocurrency market,' said Chris Swartz, a former longtime attorney at the U.S. government's Office of Government Ethics, including under both Trump administrations, who now serves as senior ethics counsel for Democracy Defenders Action, a legal advocacy group. 'Not only is it a potential conduit for foreign emoluments and other illicit payments, but it puts the president in competition against other cryptocurrency issuers at the same time he is advocating for digital asset marketplace legislation. That is a clear conflict of interest.' 99.9% support The World Liberty proposal to 'formally initiate the tradability of the token,' posted on its website on July 9, was approved by 99.94% of around 20,900 votes. Some voters cited expectations of price gains or support for Trump as reasons for their choice. 'We invested to get rich,' one wrote on the World Liberty website. 'To make america great again,' wrote another. The identities of nearly all holders are hidden behind wallet addresses. A Milan-based person using the name Paolo, who declined to give his full name, told Reuters he had bought 95,000 $WLFI tokens for about $5,000. $WLFI tokens were sold in two initial tranches at $0.015 and $0.05. Paolo said he voted in favour of making the tokens tradeable and planned to hold the tokens until they reach $12. 'Then I try to buy more when the price drops,' he said. The World Liberty proposal said the timing for making the tokens tradeable, and the eligibility requirements, would be determined at a later, unspecified date. Tokens held by World Liberty's founders, team and advisers would not be initially 'unlocked' for trading and would be subject to a longer 'unlock schedule,' it said. The implementation of approved proposals would 'occur within a reasonable time from the passage of the applicable proposal,' according to the project description from October.

French pop band cancels North American tour over 'very worrying' US political climate
French pop band cancels North American tour over 'very worrying' US political climate

Fox News

time13 minutes ago

  • Fox News

French pop band cancels North American tour over 'very worrying' US political climate

French electro-pop band Yelle announced on Wednesday that they are canceling their North American tour slated for the fall due to the "very worrying" political climate in the United States. The band cited concerns over immigration and freedom of speech as part of the reason they are canceling their North American tour dates — adding that since they are traveling as a family with their young child, they "need to feel safe." "Today we have made the immensely difficult decision to cancel our North American tour. There are multiple reasons why we came to this decision," Yelle told their Instagram followers. "The current political climate in the US, especially in regard to immigration and freedom of speech, is very worrying. We are now traveling as a family with our young child, so more than ever, we need to feel safe," the band shared on their Instagram page. Aside from their worries about the U.S. political climate, the band also expressed concerns over the "great financial burden" the tour has placed upon them. "In addition, the overall costs of this tour are becoming barely possible to balance and it is putting a great financial burden on us," they stated. As noted by online music outlet Pitchfork, Yelle is part of a growing list of international acts who have expressed concerns over performing in the U.S. following President Donald Trump's return to the White House. Members of the British punk band U.K. Subs claimed that they were denied entry into the U.S. in March, citing incorrect visas and other undisclosed reasons. The band's bassist, Alvin Gibbs, theorized that his "regular and less than flattering public pronouncements regarding [Trump] and his administration were a factor" in his entry being denied. Bob Vylan, the British punk duo whose anti-Israel set at the Glastonbury Festival drew widespread condemnation, had their U.S. visas revoked by the State Department following their controversial performance. Another international artist, Bells Larsen — a transgender singer-songwriter from Montreal — said he had to cancel his tour after being unable to apply for a visa due to new U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services policies that do not recognize transgender identities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store