Evita London: What you need to know about the Andrew Lloyd Webber West End revival and how to find tickets
She grew up in poverty and became the most famous woman in Argentina. Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice's fiery musical tells the extraordinary story of Eva Perón, who moved to Buenos Aires as a teenager, pursued a career as an actress (while dating a series of influential men), and married political leader Colonel Juan Péron.
The Pérons ruled Argentina, as President and First Lady, during the 1940s. Theirs was a controversial regime: purportedly championing downtrodden workers, with Eva (known as 'Evita') adored as a saintly figure who understood their plight, but also accused of fascism, authoritarian tactics, and corruption. However when Eva died in 1952, aged just 33, the whole nation mourned.
The Evita theatre show brilliantly tackles this contentious yet fascinating 20st-century icon, depicting her charisma, her longing to be accepted, and her ruthless ambition. It's also a timely exploration of the intersection between politics, power and show business.
That's particularly apparent in Jamie Lloyd's blistering rock-star revival, first seen at Regent's Park Open Air Theatre in 2019. Now Lloyd brings a new version of the musical to the stage in a major Evita West End revival at the London Palladium.
How to buy tickets for Evita
You can find seats for the London production of Evita on Telegraph Tickets. Check the site for the latest prices.
The cast
Lloyd's explosive revival presents Eva Péron through a modern lens: as a sexy pop diva with a hunger for fame. The Regent's Park production was a fantastic showcase for American actress Samantha Pauly, who put her own stamp on this iconic role.
There are also great parts for the wily politician Péron, Eva's fierce critic Che (loosely inspired by revolutionary leader Che Guevara), and Péron's rejected mistress. We are yet to find out who will lead the West End production, and get to sing fantastic songs like Oh What a Circus, Another Suitcase in Another Hall, High Flying, Adored, and of course Don't Cry for Me Argentina.
Director Jamie Lloyd has won three Olivier Awards and is renowned for his electrifying revivals with big-name actors, including Sunset Boulevard starring Nicole Scherzinger, Cyrano de Bergerac with James McAvoy, and Much Ado About Nothing with Tom Hiddleston and Hayley Atwell.
The details
Where is Evita playing?
Evita runs at the London Palladium, which is on Argyll Street, close to Oxford Circus, Oxford Street and other theatres in London's West End.
What is the running time of Evita?
The running time of Evita is to be confirmed.
How long is Evita running for?
Evita is booking to September 6, 2025.
What is the minimum age for Evita?
The age recommendation for Evita is 12+.
Does Evita have accessible tickets?
Yes, the show has captioned, BSL and audio-described performances scheduled. Find more information on the theatre website.
The review
'Jamie Lloyd's revelatory staging of Andrew Lloyd Webber's most adventurous hit flies the flag for Evita as the revolutionary precursor to Hamilton.' Read the full Telegraph review.
FAQs
Who has played Evita on stage in London?
This phenomenal role has attracted some of the most exciting names in musical theatre. Elaine Paige was the original West End star, with Patti LuPone succeeding her on Broadway. Elena Roger played Eva in the 2006 London revival, followed by Madalena Alberto in 2014 and Emma Hatton in 2017.
When will Evita open in London?
Evita is set to be this summer's hot ticket. It begins performances on June 14 and runs until September 6, playing at one of the West End's biggest and most beloved venues, the London Palladium. Jamie Lloyd is bringing back his acclaimed production and putting a fresh spin on it.
Buy tickets now Evita
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Graziadaily
an hour ago
- Graziadaily
Love Island: Toni's Mum Shares Concern After Harrison Recoupling And Admits She 'Wouldn't Mind' If Toni Came Home
For audiences at home, it's hard to tell what hypnotic aftershave Harrison Solomon has been wearing in the Love Island villa, but the girls, especially the shows first American contestant Toni Laites, are intoxicated. Ever since Toni and Harrison laid eyes on each other, Toni has been under his spell. For the first week or so it was sweet to witness; they have a natural chemistry and make each other laugh. However, Harrison quickly exposed himself as a serial playboy, and his favoured technique is to keep Toni interested while getting to know as many other women as possible. When Helena Ford showed interest in him, he quickly brushed Toni and their connection aside. That was until Helena went back to Harry Cooksley and Harrison came crawling back to Toni. Then came Casa Amor. Toni and Harrison were on fairly good terms when the boys left the villa, but it took Harrison approximately 10 minutes to kiss someone else, and then recouple with a different person. Last week, he returned to the main villa with Lauren Wood, which was a surprise to exactly no one. Knowing what he's like, Toni also re-coupled with Cacherel Mercer, much to Harrison's dismay. What followed in the week since Casa Amor has been difficult to watch with thousands of viewers taking to social media to say so. After being flirtatiously questioned by Harrison, Toni admitted that she still has feelings for him and that she preferred being in a couple with him to Cach. At this point, Harrison decided to stay with Lauren and Lauren later revealed they had slept together on two different occasions. The next day, he returned to Toni and asked her to take him back. Then in a shock re-coupling Toni decided to forgive and pick Harrison, still unaware that he has slept with Lauren. Another victim of the situation, Cach told Toni, 'That was one of the most embarrassing things I've been through in my entire life. You knew what decision you wanted to make, you were just waiting for the go ahead from someone else.' Watching all of this unfold from home, Toni's mum Leslie has taken to social media to share her thoughts on the situation. Breaking down in tears, Leslie said she was 'devastated' by Toni's decision to take Harrison back. 'I feel like I just watched my daughter walk out onto the train tracks and there is a bullet train coming for her, and I can't scream to her, I can't grab her from the tracks,' she said. 'I am really disappointed, and I'm sure there are many of you that are as well. I felt like at one point she really woke up and was like "I'm done". I feel like him doing this sneaky "come to the terrace" thing before the re-coupling is another really calculated move to keep him in the villa.' Leslie added that her daughter is 'smarter than this' and has 'more pride than this', but she 'doesn't know what is happening in that villa'. 'I am devastated by this decision that she has made,' Toni's mum continued. 'I've devastated that Cach was so hurt in this and that she blew her chance with a really good guy, who would have treated her with respect.' She also admitted that she's 'all for a comeback' but does not believe Harrison is genuine. 'Someone give me a best case scenario after this episode,' she concluded, 'because I've got nothing. If Toni came home now, I'd be ok with it at this point.' Viewers at home agree. 'Harrison is genuinely one of the most sickening men ever to be on Love Island ,' reads on X post. 'All he has done is make Toni and Lauren feel crazy, and he fully enjoys watching them mentally struggle.' Another viewer asked, 'Is Harrison the biggest villain we've seen?' While a third wrote, 'All jokes aside. I feel so bad for Lauren. I don't think men understand the emotional toll it has on women – when you give your body to someone and they move like Harrison.' Leslie is not the only one to voice her concerns about the show. Jessye Werner, communications manager at Women's Aid, has said: 'In recent years, Love Island and other forms of reality TV have been repeatedly called out by viewers for allowing in contestants that had a history of abusive, coercive and manipulative behaviour in previous relationships. As a result, production companies have been more careful when it comes to selecting contestants and calling out toxic behaviours when we see them.' 'Despite these positive steps,' she continued, 'we still see unhealthy patterns of behaviour on these shoes, showing just how steeped in misogyny and sexism our society still is. Women are often lied to, slut-shamed and manipulated, as well as laughed at behind their backs. Misogyny and sexism lay the foundation for the tolerance of abuse and violence – it reinforces a culture that excuses and trivialises violence against women and girls. More must be done to educate contestants on sexism and misogyny, and it is a great credit to viewers who take to social media, continuing to call out these behaviours as soon as they see them.' History has a habit of repeating itself and Love Island is once again becoming toxic and uncomfortable to watch. As Leslie's emotional video attests, it's not only the islanders who stand to get hurt from the toxic mind games and manipulation, but their loved ones and viewers relating from home too. Even after all these years, the producers seem to underestimate the level of support the contestants need while overestimating our appetite for schadenfreude. At what point do we switch off for good? Nikki Peach is a writer at Grazia UK, working across entertainment, TV and news. She has also written for the i, i-D and the New Statesman Media Group and covers all things pop culture for Grazia (treating high and lowbrow with equal respect).
Graziadaily
an hour ago
- Graziadaily
Love Island: This Is What A 'Handy Carroll' Is
'Do Bits', NVQs, handballs – if there's one thing Love Islanders know how to do, it's create an utterly bizarre code word to describe a sexual act. With the villa hotting up, it's no surprise then that islanders are coming up with creative ways to disguise their bedroom antics. Last night, a new code word entered the chat – with Helena Ford saying, 'Handy Carroll was in the building yesterday.' The phrase is in someways a nod to ex-England international Andy Carroll. As the name suggests, the word 'handy' is in reference to sex acts involving hands. To quote singer/songwriter CMAT, it's 'hand stuff.' How 36-year-old Andy feels about this crude tribute, we can only guess. For anyone who has reached this point and still isn't quite sure on what on earth these islanders are talking about, we've got you. To spell it out in the simplest terms: a Handy Carroll is a handjob. Andy Carroll (Not to be confused with 'Handy Carroll') ©Jacques Feeney/Offside/Offside via Getty Images The phrase quickly caught on, with Lauren Wood teasing Helena that she'd heard 'Handy Carroll' was in the villa. American star Toni Laites telling Shakira Khan and Yasmin Pettet, 'If you give Handy Carrolls to keep your man close then by all means go for it.' The comment was in reference to Lauren's relationship with Harrison Solomon – who has both women in a love triangle. While Toni thought 'Handy Carrolls' were all that happened in the bedroom, she's yet to learn what really went down. One scene saw Harrison admit to his fellow boys that he had had sex with Lauren, cryptically saying, 'The full time whistle blew. Game done. It was great, honestly, a nice little 2-0 win.' That night in bed, Harrison was seen leaning over to Helena and Harry to ask for a condom. Lauren and Harrison have been growing close ©ITV Meanwhile, Helena voiced her frustration that a 'Handy Carroll' was as far as she'd gone with footballer Harry Cooksley. 'He's done f*ck all to me,' she said. The islanders may be having fun with their lingo, but it seems viewers aren't enjoying it quite so much. After their 'Handy Carroll' talk, one viewer commented, 'Gross, it makes me feel sick to watch!' 'Handy Carroll is the worst euphemism I've ever heard,' added another. Others were left confused by the lingo. 'Watching Love Island, and what the hell is a Handy Carroll? Surely not a nod to a footballer,' asked one. Why is it 8 AM on a Wednesday and I'm wondering who the f*ck is Handy Carroll' another tweet read. Whether it's a term you want to add to your own vocab, or something you'd rather scrub from your brain, the choice is all yours... Charlotte Roberts is a news and entertainment writer at Grazia UK. She spends her days covering everything celebrity, culture, and entertainment.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, are we on the road to Idiocracy?
As we race headlong into our glorious AI-powered future, a long-forgotten flick from the naughties is gaining cult status by posing a simple question: are we on the road to Idiocracy? In the tradition of Bill and Ted, Idiocracy, a 2006 American sci-fi comedy, depicts an average guy transported 500 years into the future to find he is the smartest man on earth. A wrestler is president, people worship 'the profit' and the world's biggest corporation is a sports drink company whose market strategy has taken humanity to the brink of collapse. Idiocracy is not a flawless film; it's jarring class eugenics and casual sexism seem more dated than its 20 years would suggest. But what it does brilliantly is challenge the assumption that the human race is on an uncontested journey to higher consciousness. This is a timely counterpoint to the zeitgeist about the self-evident benefits of machine learning built by large tech companies under the conceit of 'artificial intelligence'. Already we are seeing academic studies suggesting that Large Language Models are linked to cognitive decline, with a recent MIT study finding lower brain engagement among students using GPTs in writing essays. We've also seen AI chatbots accused of inducing vulnerable people to suicide and cheery predictions about the hollowing out of entry level knowledge economy jobs which loom as our next inter-generational betrayal. The question is whether these dumb outcomes are features or bugs of our emerging information ecosystem. Evidence is mounting it is the former. Exhibit A is OpenAI's Economic Blueprint for Australia, an embarrassing document seeking rapid government adaptation, investment and minimalist regulation for 'the most significant economic and strategic opportunity of our time' You could drive a truck through the holes in OpenAI's analysis: $115bn in predicted productivity improvements based on crude calculations of hours saved at work, with no trade-off for the costs of the jobs already being destroyed. To realise this promised dividend OpenAI says the government would need to lean into resource-sucking datacentres, socialising the costs of energy and water, steamrolling communities and putting new pressures on the grid and fast-tracking development at the cost of the energy transition. As our creativity is being stolen and repurposed, trading off our collective empathy for automated culture, OpenAI wants us to 'streamline and update copyright law', with industry groups already pushing hard for a general right to mine our data. But these self-serving policy asks are not the worst of the OpenAI blueprint; it is the very fact that this massive corporation purports to set our future agenda at all, defining rather than responding to our collective needs. This design principle could represent the inflection point between a smart future and an impending Idiocracy. It is true this technology carries amazing power to synthesise information and challenge higher order thinking in new and profound ways. OpenAI is right to describe the technology as 'like electricity' something that can illuminate the night sky. But would you get a power company to set the rules for electrical safety? The truth is OpenAI is nether open or intelligent: it's a play to dominate a new technology on commercial terms for its material benefit, using their copious venture capital as a shield against competitors and a sword against government to create a policy environment to suit them. We are witnessing the next phase of their corporate history. ChatGPT is a compelling shop front, but what if it is intellectual heroin? It tricks us to feel smarter, more seen and even loved, while actually providing the opposite by convincing us to commoditise our collective intelligence. Short of returning to a genuine not-for-profit mission, OpenAI can never be a good faith partner. Theirs is an operating model to be resisted but that relies on us having the time, the understanding and, yes, the leadership to do this intelligently. In the latest episode of my podcast Burning Platforms one of the godfathers of artificial intelligence, Prof Toby Walsh, differentiates between the richness of distributed intelligence and the homogeneity of the concentrated intelligence that chatbots serve up. High quality data is earned not stolen property; it is used mindfully to address problems humans identify, not commoditised to fill some market niche. While the tech broligarchs battle for world domination, maybe the smart money should be on the design and value of small data models, designed for purpose not for producing mainstream slop and brain rot, that chew up less energy and eradicate fewer jobs. Because of the power of the tech sector, all of whom have well-paid and well-positioned Canberra lobbyists, we also need to resist. Since shouting out the Luddites in my last column I've been delighted to discover there are people already doing this. Ben Zhao, a University of Chicago computer scientist has developed programs like Glaze which protects private photos being harvested to train facial recognition technology and Nightshade, a filter for artists that tricks AI into seeing a cat as a dog, like putting ink in a bag of stolen bank cheques. And Cloudfare, one of the dominant cybersecurity companies, has announced it will ban AI web crawlers from scraping content from their sites without paying compensation to the owner of those sites. As Cloudfare CEO, Matthew Prince, says: 'I go to war every single day with the Chinese government, the Russian government, the Iranians, the North Koreans, probably Americans, the Israelis, all of them who are trying to hack into our customer sites. And you're telling me, I can't stop some nerd with a C-corporation in Palo Alto?' In the battle for our future intelligence, we need to deploy all the grey matter at our disposal: workers' intelligence, cultural intelligence, collective intelligence and the power of technologists in the face of the artifice. Spoiler: in the movie the sports drink company, 'Brawndo' extends its market dominance in electrolytes by expanding into agriculture, poisoning the land in pursuit of 'The Profit'. Open AI's Blueprint for Australia would be a similar triumph of Idiocracy. Peter Lewis is the executive director of Essential, a progressive strategic communications and research company that undertook research for Labor in the 2025 election and conducts qualitative research for Guardian Australia. He is also the host of Per Capita's Burning Platforms podcast
