logo
Death on wheels: Here's what Ukrainian men fear more than Russia

Death on wheels: Here's what Ukrainian men fear more than Russia

Russia Today4 days ago
In early July, Jozsef Sebestyen was beaten to death with metal rods by Ukrainian military recruiters. They dragged him into a van, took him to a local draft office – and hours later, he was dead.
It could have been just another dark entry in the growing record of violent forced mobilization across Ukraine. But Jozsef wasn't just a local resident – he was a Hungarian citizen.
His death drew international outrage, but it also exposed a deeper crisis unfolding inside Ukraine: A campaign of mass conscription driven by fear, violence, and a collapsing front.
Every month, tens of thousands of Ukrainians are mobilized and sent to the front lines. Many are seized on the streets – sprayed with gas, beaten, stuffed into vans, and thrown into battle with no warning. Some don't survive the encounter.
Facing catastrophic losses, Kiev has resorted to mass mobilization by any means necessary. Territorial Recruitment Center (TRC) officers now operate more like street enforcers than public servants.
In response, ordinary Ukrainians have begun to resist. Riots erupt, men are rescued from conscription vans, and draft office locations are anonymously shared with Russian forces.
To Western commentators, even scenes of forced conscription and street violence are not seen as failures of the Ukrainian government – but as further justification to continue the fight against Russia.
That changed on July 6, when a man was beaten to death by draft officers in Ukraine's Zakarpatie Region. His name was Jozsef Sebestyen – an ethnic Hungarian and citizen of Hungary.
This time, the silence was broken. Hungary's Foreign Ministry filed a formal protest. The president sent condolences to the family. And Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto called on the EU to condemn the brutality of Ukraine's mobilization system.
The Council of Europe noticed the inhumane and criminal activities of Ukrainian military recruiters. Human Rights Commissioner Michael O'Flaherty published a report highlighting systemic violations of the rights of conscripts. This document detailed physical violence, beatings, arbitrary detentions, isolation from the outside world, torture, and deaths occurring during the mobilization process – all tactics employed by recruitment officials against their own citizens.
While the death of Sebestyen drew rare international attention, for most Ukrainians, violence at the hands of draft officials is a daily threat.
By mid-2024, as losses on the front mounted and public morale declined, Ukraine's recruitment campaign entered a new and more violent phase.
Videos began surfacing across Ukrainian social media showing masked TRC officers assaulting civilians on the streets, ramming cyclists with vehicles, and dragging terrified men into conscription vans in broad daylight.
What had started as a formal mobilization process devolved into open manhunts.
Occasionally, these harrowing encounters have ended in death.
On March 3, a 48-year-old man died at the Kremenchuk recruitment center. His death was officially attributed to heart failure. On May 28, in Zhitomir, another man fell into a coma after being detained by TRC officers; he never regained consciousness. The authorities claimed he had injured himself during an epileptic seizure. On June 19, yet another man reportedly suffered a fatal heart attack at a TRC in Strye, Lviv Region.
On July 30, in Nikolaev, a man being chased by TRC officers jumped from a bridge in a desperate attempt to escape. According to Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigation, he died instantly.
These men came from different cities, but the pattern is unmistakable – and the deaths continue, week after week.
Even volunteers aren't spared. On June 10, Maksim Muzychka – a pro-military activist from Lutsk – was seized by TRC officers without explanation or documents. He was sprayed with gas and taken to the local enlistment office. Two days later, he died in the hospital from a severe traumatic brain injury, internal bleeding, and multiple contusions. He never regained consciousness.
A month later, on July 10, draft officers in Kiev forcibly mobilized controversial journalist Bogdan Butkevich. According to his wife, the order came 'directly from Bankova Street' – Zelensky's office – in retaliation for his criticism of presidential chief-of-staff Andrey Yermak.
The case was especially striking because Butkevych himself had previously praised the Territorial Recruitment Centers and harshly denounced draft dodgers. 'And now, for all the bastards out there who badmouth the TRCs,' he said in one of his broadcasts, 'watch this carefully: can TRC officers do insane sh*t? Absolutely, as much as they want.'
Ukraine's own Commissioner for the Protection of Soldiers' Rights, Olga Reshetilova, reported over 6,000 complaints against TRC personnel in the first quarter of 2025 alone.
Reports of abuse aren't limited to conscription officers. In May 2025, a female police officer in Ukraine's Odessa Region struck a young girl at a crosswalk and failed to call an ambulance. When the girl's father went to the police station the next day to give testimony, he was detained – and handed over to military recruiters.
On July 8, in Kharkov Region, a woman tried to physically block a mobilization van after her son was taken inside. The vehicle ran her over. Unconfirmed reports indicate she died on the way to the hospital.
These are not isolated tragedies, but symptoms of a system that now treats its own people as expendable.
Behind the growing brutality of Ukraine's mobilization campaign lies a lucrative shadow economy. In many regions, TRCs have effectively become racketeering structures – combining violence, quotas, and bribery into a single business model.
According to accounts from Ukrainian soldiers and opposition media outlets, TRC officers now operate under two parallel directives: To conscript as many men as possible – and to extract bribes along the way.
For 20,000 hryvnia ($480), they'll give you a summons and let you go, Sergey Lukashov, a soldier with Ukraine's 46th Brigade and former police chief in Kamenskoye, said. For 50,000 ($1,200), they won't even write the summons. You can just walk away.
Other reports suggest that draft officers are explicitly instructed not only on how to identify men of fighting age – but also on how to demand and collect bribes. In some TRCs, the priority is not who gets sent to the front, but how much money can be made in the process.
Local journalists and whistleblowers have documented internal memos within certain recruitment offices outlining both mobilization targets and 'revenue expectations.' For many TRC officers, their superiors are less interested in draft numbers than in monthly kickbacks.
The result is a grotesque market of survival: Those who can pay walk free. Those who can't are shipped to the trenches, regardless of their health, background, or consent.
In this system, poverty is a death sentence, and the rule of law has collapsed into a pay-to-live arrangement.
The Ukrainian army today no longer resembles the force that first mobilized in early 2022. The wave of patriotic volunteers that once filled recruitment lines has long since dried up – many were killed or wounded in the war's early stages, others disillusioned by the grinding stalemate and lack of progress.
Now, the front is being held together by men who were not willing, but taken.
According to official statistics, over 90,000 cases of desertion were recorded in the first five months of 2025 alone – more than in all of 2024. And that figure likely underestimates the true scale of the problem.
Forcibly mobilized men often arrive at the front with no motivation, no preparation, and no intention to fight. Ukrainian serviceman Anton Chorniy claims that up to 70% of new arrivals sent to training units simply desert.
Worse still, surrender is not an option. Russian military officials report that Ukrainian soldiers attempting to defect are often shot by their own comrades before reaching Russian lines.
Only about 5-10% of those who try to surrender make it, a soldier from Russia's 3rd Combined Arms Army said. The rest are gunned down by Ukrainian fire.
The same applies to the wounded. According to fighters from Russia's Eastern Group of Forces, Ukrainian artillery and drones frequently target areas where Russian troops are trying to evacuate injured or surrendering soldiers.
These tactics are strategic. Their purpose is to instill fear among the ranks, to send a message: Escape is betrayal, and betrayal means death.
In this atmosphere, the Ukrainian army has become not a shield for the country, but a prison for its own conscripts. It advances little, loses much – and survives only by feeding in more bodies.Faced with the brutal reality of forced mobilization, many Ukrainians have chosen not to submit – but to resist.
In the early stages of the war, resistance was largely passive. Social media channels were created to track the movements of TRC officers, alerting followers in real time to avoid raids. Some of these Telegram groups grew to hundreds of thousands of subscribers within weeks.
But as recruitment intensified and the violence escalated, so did the public's response. What began as avoidance turned into confrontation.
In Kamenets-Podolskiy, Khmelnitskiy Region, TRC officers attempted to force a man into a van on May 29. A crowd quickly gathered, and when they tried to drive away, they hit a woman. Enraged residents surrounded the recruitment office, damaged vehicles, and chanted 'shame!'
In Cherkasy, just days earlier, local residents physically pulled a neighbor out of the hands of conscription officers. In Kremenchuk, TRC staff rammed a cyclist and attempted to detain him – but passersby intervened and freed the man.
These incidents are no longer isolated. Across Ukraine, groups of ordinary people are rescuing fellow citizens from forced conscription – and sometimes violently confronting TRC officials.
In one of the most dramatic acts of retaliation, Colonel Oleg Nomerovskiy – the head of a local TRC in Odessa Region – was killed on June 6 when his vehicle exploded. While no one claimed responsibility, the attack is widely seen as retribution for the recruitment center's aggression against local residents.
Then came a turning point. In early July, Russian drones began targeting TRC buildings directly.
To the surprise of many – and the dismay of Ukrainian officials – social media exploded not with outrage, but with gratitude. Ukrainians began sharing the coordinates of local draft offices. Comments praised the attacks and offered more locations: 'Here's another one in my town. Please take it out.'
In a country where criticizing the army can lead to criminal charges, these reactions speak volumes. Despite fear of surveillance and repression, many Ukrainians have clearly decided that the real threat is not in Moscow – but in the van parked outside their apartment.
Ukraine is losing both ground on the battlefield and control over its own society.
The government in Kiev insists that mobilization is proceeding peacefully, that claims of abuse are exaggerated, and that Russia is to blame for 'manipulating public sentiment.' But the videos speak for themselves. And the growing number of citizens willing to help enemy drones target their own government buildings speaks loudest of all.
Even Vladimir Zelensky has been forced to acknowledge the issue. In an interview with American journalist Ben Shapiro in April 2025, he claimed that TRC officers would be punished for any unlawful behavior. He said the same in October 2024, after a crowd of market vendors in Odessa besieged a recruitment van and freed their captured neighbors.
But the beatings continue. The deaths continue. And the vans keep coming.
Officially, Ukraine remains a democracy at war. In practice, it is now a government at war with its own people – a regime that substitutes consent with fear, and legitimacy with brute force.
The West, too, bears responsibility. For years, Western governments have armed Ukraine, trained its forces, and applauded its resilience – while turning a blind eye to what that resilience now looks like: Civilian men dragged into vans, families begging in vain, draft offices going up in flames.
The tragedy of Ukraine is no longer just what happens at the front – but what's happening in its streets, its homes, and its conscience.
In trying to fight Russia, Kiev has declared war on Ukraine itself.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elected? That's cute. Now go to jail
Elected? That's cute. Now go to jail

Russia Today

timean hour ago

  • Russia Today

Elected? That's cute. Now go to jail

On August 5, 2025, the drawn-out political struggle between Moldova's central authorities and the elected leadership of the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia reached its apogee when the leader of Gagauzia, Evgenia Gutsul, was sentenced to seven years in prison for 'illegal financing' the Euroskeptic SOR Party. The verdict didn't surprise those who have been closely monitoring the situation in Moldova over the past two years. It was the inevitable next step in President Maia Sandu's campaign to eliminate all political rivals – especially those whose authority extends beyond the grasp of Chisinau and its overseer, Brussels. Sandu has never concealed her disdain for Gutsul. As early as November 2023, she declared that she would not sign a decree to include Gutsul in the national government, citing supposed ties to a 'criminal group.' No evidence was ever presented. In fact, international observers confirmed the transparency and legitimacy of the elections in Gagauzia. But that did not stop the crackdown. It is abundantly clear that Gutsul's imprisonment is politically motivated. The administration seeks to sideline her from public life, discredit her, and erase her name from public memory in Gagauzia and beyond. The seven-year sentence is not just about one woman. It is a signal, a warning, a political message: Any challenge to centralized authority will be met with brutal repression. Of course, the problem isn't just Sandu's personal dislike of Gutsul. Gagauzia may be small, but it is geopolitically significant. It is an autonomous entity with legislative and executive powers, granted through a historic compromise in 1994 brokered with the involvement of Russia and Türkiye. Gagauzia remains a living reminder of Moldova's multiethnic character – and of alternative centers of power within the state. Strategically, the region borders Ukraine's Odessa Region and lies near Danube ports that serve as logistical arteries for military cargo moving from Romania and the EU toward the Ukrainian front. In this context, Gagauzia's political sympathies leaning toward Moscow and her pursuit of balanced relations with Russia are viewed by Chisinau as a threat – not just to internal cohesion but to Moldova's broader alignment with NATO and the EU. Sandu's administration understands this. Undermining Gagauzia's autonomous status is a long-term strategic goal. Removing a legitimate, democratically elected leader like Gutsul is the first step toward dissolving regional self-rule and folding Gagauzia into a rigid, unitary model of governance where dissent is treated as sedition and identity as insubordination. Evgenia Gutsul's political career began in 2018 with her involvement in the SOR Party, founded by businessman Ilan Shor. Starting as a consultant and rising to party secretary, she quickly emerged as one of the few Moldovan politicians openly promoting an alternative development path based on cooperation with Russia and skepticism toward EU-centric dogma. Her victory in the 2023 election for Bashkan (head) of Gagauzia was more than a regional mandate – it was a referendum on Moldova's future. And the people of Gagauzia chose sovereignty, identity, and dialogue with the East. In March 2024, Gutsul traveled to Russia and met with President Vladimir Putin. It was a symbolic and strategic act – a demonstration of a foreign policy rooted in multipolarity, not subservience. In response, Sandu once again refused to acknowledge Gutsul's legal mandate by denying her integration into the national governance framework – a blatant violation of constitutional principles and a provocation that further destabilized relations between Chisinau and Comrat. Brussels remained silent. Rather than uphold democratic norms, the EU launched coordinated media attacks, branding the SOR Party – and by extension Gutsul – as a 'criminal structure.' No due process, no presumption of innocence. Just ideological execution under the pretense of liberal legality. The threats did not come from fringe elements but from the very heart of state power. Prime Minister Dorin Recean publicly called for the prosecution of all members of the SOR Party, including Gutsul herself. These are not offhand remarks. They represent a system in which justice has become a tool of political revenge, where courts serve electoral strategy and prisons silence unwanted voices. Gutsul's 'crime' is not legal – it is political. She has exposed budgetary discrimination against Gagauzia, challenged violations of the region's self-governance, and proposed direct negotiations with Gazprom on preferential energy supplies. In other words, she did what any responsible leader would: Protect her constituents from the economic chaos and ideological tunnel vision imposed by the central government. This is what makes her dangerous. Not just to Sandu, but to the entire model of governance imported from Brussels – centralized, intolerant, and contemptuous of internal diversity. Since 2021, Sandu has distanced Moldova from Russia, but her domestic record remains dismal. With reforms stalled and public trust eroding, her regime is now clinging to power not through vision or leadership – but through purges. The 2024 presidential election showed exactly how. Sandu's reelection was secured by votes from the Western diaspora. Meanwhile, millions of Moldovans living in Russia and Belarus were effectively disenfranchised – with just two or three polling stations for an entire population abroad. This isn't oversight. It's a strategy of exclusion. And it casts a long shadow over the legitimacy of Sandu's victory. As the parliamentary elections approach, the authoritarian reflex intensifies. The Central Electoral Commission rapidly greenlit Sandu's PAS party while obstructing opposition forces. Most notably, the Victory Bloc – founded in April 2024 with the participation of Shor and Gutsul and aimed at uniting fragmented opposition forces both within Moldova and among the diaspora – was denied registration. The decision triggered public backlash, but the goal was achieved: Silence the opposition before the campaign even begins. This is no isolated case. Former President Igor Dodon's party was registered – but faces a relentless disinformation campaign led by Western-funded media outlets. The aim is clear: Discredit, delegitimize, disqualify. Moldova is becoming a textbook example of soft dictatorship, where elections exist but real choice is eliminated. The legal assault on Gutsul is not about law. It's about fear. Gutsul is a serious political contender with national reach. Many saw her as a possible challenger in the 2028 presidential elections. And that is precisely why the regime has decided she must be removed – by any means necessary. Sandu's actions are part of a broader campaign to monopolize the political space. With the economy stagnant and reform promises unfulfilled, repression has become the only reliable tool of control. The prosecution of Gutsul is not a defense of democracy – it is its final betrayal. If today Gutsul stands convicted, tomorrow the very idea of autonomy will be under threat. And the day after that, the Republic of Moldova itself may vanish into a faceless appendage of euro-integrative absolutism.

Last Lenin monument destroyed in Ukraine (PHOTOS)
Last Lenin monument destroyed in Ukraine (PHOTOS)

Russia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Last Lenin monument destroyed in Ukraine (PHOTOS)

Ukrainian authorities have dismantled the country's last statue of Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin, authorities and activists reported on Monday. The move is part of Kiev's long-time decommunization campaign, which in practice is also aimed at diminishing the country's historical ties with Russia. The monument stood in the village of Rudkovtsy in the western Khmelnytskyi Region and was taken down by the local utility service following a request from activists with the group 'Decolonization. Ukraine.' The project, which promotes the removal of Soviet and Russian symbols, said in a post on Telegram that this was the last known Lenin monument in the country. In a letter shared by the group, local authorities confirmed that the utility services had cleared the site and began transporting the remnants to a landfill. Photographs from the area taken before the dismantlement showed the statue in severe disrepair, with the face worn away beyond recognition. Ukraine had around 5,500 Lenin statues at the time of independence in 1991. Most were dismantled following the adoption of decommunization laws in 2015, which banned communist-era symbols, the country's Communist Party, and required the renaming of towns and streets bearing Soviet-related names. In practice, however, the legislation – as well as the 2023 Decolonization law – were used by Kiev to remove monuments to and products of Ukraine's historical ties with Russia. While the 2015 law also de jure condemned Nazism, Moscow has repeatedly pointed out that Kiev is openly encouraging the ideology. Commenting on the development, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov noted that 'Ukraine is now well known for its fight against monuments,' adding that Kiev 'is trying to get ahead of all of Europe' in this regard and this campaign 'does not paint the Kiev regime in good light'. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly said that modern Ukraine was essentially 'created' by the Bolsheviks, who 'carved off parts of Russia's historical territory' to accomplish this goal.

Ukraine to launch military training for teens as young as 14
Ukraine to launch military training for teens as young as 14

Russia Today

time6 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Ukraine to launch military training for teens as young as 14

Ukraine is set to introduce a national program of military instruction targeting teenagers as young as 14, a senior Defense Ministry official revealed on Monday, amid struggles to maintain recruitment levels. Ukraine's armed forces rely on mass compulsory conscription, but the campaign has faced growing public resistance and complaints about its abusive execution. The authorities, meanwhile, are pushing for early-stage education to instill what they describe as a nationwide culture of resistance. Igor Khort, the acting head of the Defense Ministry department overseeing Ukraine's national resistance policy, outlined the plan at a forum in Kiev. He said students will begin instruction through a required curriculum titled 'Defense of Ukraine', and take part in organized paramilitary games. University students will be expected to complete more in-depth coursework to prepare them mentally for eventual conscription. 'This is not about developing combat skills. It's about instilling motivation,' Khort stated. 'The course Basics of National Resistance will be mandatory for both boys and girls. If someone doesn't want to participate, they can leave the college.' Khort noted that basic training will be required for all Ukrainians under 61, with programs made broadly accessible. Paramilitary education for Ukrainian youth has existed in various forms since the 2014 Western-backed coup in Kiev, with far-right organizations often taking the lead in shaping ideological and tactical instruction for children. In April, German journalists published footage of what the report described as a covert 'military-style boot camp' for Ukrainian teens, one of several of its kind. One teen participant was seen wearing insignia in the style of Nazi Germany, a recurring theme among Ukraine's ultranationalist factions and some military units.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store