Don't vilify Air India crash crew: Indian pilots' association
The Indian Commercial Pilots' Association (ICPA) said the crew "acted in line with their training and responsibilities under challenging conditions and the pilots shouldn't be vilified based on conjecture".
"To casually suggest pilot suicide without verified evidence is a gross violation of ethical reporting and a disservice to the dignity of the profession," it added.
A preliminary report did not blame the pilots. It said seconds after take-off, both of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner's fuel-control switches moved to the "cut-off" position, starving the engines of fuel.
The report released on Saturday gave details of the cockpit voice recording with one pilot asking the other why he "did the cut-off", to which the other replies that he didn't. The recording doesn't clarify who said what. Data shows the switches were then moved to "run" position, but the plane crashed within seconds.
Aviation experts and pilots say the fuel switches are designed to prevent accidental activation and they must be pulled up to unlock before flipping. Protective guard brackets further shield them from accidental bumps.
The preliminary report does not throw any light on how the switches were moved to cut-off, but since its release, sections of media and social media has been awash with unsavoury speculation about the role of pilots.
"We are deeply disturbed by speculative narratives emerging in sections of the media and public discourse - particularly the reckless and unfounded insinuation of pilot suicide," the Indian Commercial Pilots' Association (ICPA) said in a statement released late on Saturday night.
"Let us be unequivocally clear: there is absolutely no basis for such a claim at this stage, and invoking such a serious allegation based on incomplete or preliminary information is not only irresponsible - it is deeply insensitive to the individuals and families involved."
The statement added that until the official investigation was concluded and the final report was published, "any speculation - especially of such a grave nature - is unacceptable and must be condemned".
The preliminary investigation was led by Indian government with experts from Boeing, General Electric, Air India, Indian regulators and participants from the US and UK. A final report is due to come out in a year.
On Saturday, another pilots' grouping - the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA India) - had raised concerns over the way the investigation was being handled.
It highlighted that the report also mentions that in December 2018, the US Federal Aviation Administration issued a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB) highlighting that some Boeing 737 fuel control switches were installed with the locking feature disengaged.
While the issue was noted, it wasn't deemed an unsafe condition requiring an Airworthiness Directive (AD) - a legally enforceable regulation to correct unsafe conditions in a product.
The same switch design is used in Boeing 787-8 aircraft, including Air India's VT-ANB which crashed. As the SAIB was advisory, Air India did not perform the recommended inspections.
Taking note of the bulletin, ALPA India said "it demands clarity on whether the recommendations outlined in the bulletin were implemented before the flight". (Air India hasn't commented on the specific issue.)
The US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said the fuel control switches in Boeing aeroplanes were safe and noted that its own 2018 advisory "was based on reports that the fuel control switches were installed with the locking feature disengaged" - but added that it did not believe this made the planes unsafe.
The ALPA India also said it was "surprised at the secrecy surrounding these investigations" and alleged that "suitably qualified personnel were not taken on board for the probe".
"We feel that the investigation is being driven in a direction presuming the guilt of pilots and we strongly object to this line of thought," ALPA India's president Captain Sam Thomas said in the statement.
The union also urged the authorities to allow it to join the process "even in the capacity of observers so as to provide the requisite transparency in the investigations".
Following the report's release on Saturday, Indian Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu told reporters to not "jump to any conclusions at this stage. Let us wait for the final report".
Describing the pilots and crew in India as the "backbone of this civil aviation", he said India had "the most wonderful workforce in terms of pilots and the crew in the whole world".
Flight 171 had taken off from the western Indian city of Ahmedabad for Gatwick in London on 12 June with 242 people on board. The crash killed 241 onboard - one passenger miraculously survived - and 19 people on the ground.
The report says the pilots, based in Mumbai, had arrived in Ahmedabad the previous day and were adequately-rested. They had passed breathalyser tests and were cleared to fly, it adds.
Why cockpit audio deepens the mystery of Air India crash
What we know so far about Air India crash investigation
'Was this avoidable?': Families of Air India crash victims seek answers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SINOVAC Board of Directors Strongly Denounces Deceptive and Illegal Claims by SAIF and the Imposter Former Board
Special Meeting was validly adjourned until the appropriate court can make a final decision on the validity of the PIPE shares SAIF's "announcement" about voting results demonstrates blatant disregard for the law and the Company's bylaws and a repeated pattern of self-serving and unlawful actions by the Imposter Former Board Current Board remains the only valid board of directors of the Company and will continue to govern SINOVAC BEIJING, July 09, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Board of Directors of SINOVAC Biotech Ltd. (NASDAQ: SVA) ("SINOVAC" or the "Company"), a leading biopharmaceutical company in China, categorically rejects the recent deceptive and illegal claims by SAIF and the Imposter Former Board that it purported to "reconvene" the adjourned Special Meeting of Shareholders (the "Special Meeting") and announced sham voting results of the shareholder proposals. At the July 8, 2025 Special Meeting, SINOVAC Chairman Chiang Li validly adjourned the meeting, to preserve the integrity of the Special Meeting and protect shareholder interests, pending the resolution of litigation in Antigua related to the validity of the 11.8 million shares purportedly issued following an invalid private investment in public equity ("PIPE") to Advantech/Prime and Vivo Capital (together known as the "Dissenting Investor Group"). SINOVAC shareholders should ignore SAIF's lies. SAIF and the Imposter Former Board did NOT have the authority or any legal basis to "reconvene" the Special Meeting following the valid adjournment. SAIF's self-declaration of a final tally of shareholder votes was a complete sham. SINOVAC is evaluating its legal remedies with respect to the deceptive and unlawful conduct of SAIF and the Imposter Former Board, including with authorities in Antigua and the United States. William P. Fiske, Head of M&A and Contested Situations at Georgeson, SINOVAC's proxy solicitor, stated, "At the time of the Special Meeting, according to our preliminary voting tallies, the Company's White Proxy Card secured overwhelming support from valid shareholders for the current SINOVAC Board. Had the injunction granted by the Antigua Court not been temporarily stayed, the shareholders would have voted in favor of the current SINOVAC Board." SAIF and the Gold Proxy Card secured little support outside of the same incumbent group that has propped up the Imposter Former Board to seize control of SINOVAC and destroy value for all valid common shareholders – just as they did during the seven years that they held SINOVAC hostage. The Imposter Former Board's refusal to acknowledge the lawful adjournment of the Special Meeting and their fabrication of the meeting's outcome are wholly illegal, invalid, and reckless. The rightful SINOVAC Board remains in place and will continue to govern the Company. The Board has a duty to implement the UK Privy Council's judgment and order, which includes resolving the question of the validity of the PIPE shares. The Board will continue to fight on behalf of all SINOVAC shareholders and remains committed to its mission of restoring fairness, delivering value and protecting the rights of all valid shareholders. About SINOVAC Sinovac Biotech Ltd. (SINOVAC) is a China-based biopharmaceutical company that focuses on the R&D, manufacturing, and commercialization of vaccines that protect against human infectious diseases. SINOVAC's product portfolio includes vaccines against COVID-19, enterovirus 71 (EV71) infected Hand-Foot-Mouth disease (HFMD), hepatitis A, varicella, influenza, poliomyelitis, pneumococcal disease, etc. The COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac®, has been approved for use in more than 60 countries and regions worldwide. The hepatitis A vaccine, Healive®, passed WHO prequalification requirements in 2017. The EV71 vaccine, Inlive®, is an innovative vaccine under "Category 1 Preventative Biological Products" and commercialized in China in 2016. In 2022, SINOVAC's Sabin-strain inactivated polio vaccine (sIPV) and varicella vaccine were prequalified by the WHO. SINOVAC was the first company to be granted approval for its H1N1 influenza vaccine Panflu.1®, which has supplied the Chinese government's vaccination campaign and stockpiling program. The Company is also the only supplier of the H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine, Panflu®, to the Chinese government stockpiling program. SINOVAC continually dedicates itself to new vaccine R&D, with more combination vaccine products in its pipeline, and constantly explores global market opportunities. SINOVAC plans to conduct more extensive and in-depth trade and cooperation with additional countries, and business and industry organizations. Important Additional Information and Where to Find It In connection with SINOVAC's Special Meeting, SINOVAC has filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and mailed to shareholders of record entitled to vote at the Special Meeting a definitive proxy statement and other documents, including a WHITE proxy card. SHAREHOLDERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND ALL OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTS WHEN FILED WITH THE SEC AND WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THOSE DOCUMENTS WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Investors and other interested parties will be able to obtain the documents free of charge at the SEC's website, or from SINOVAC at its website: You may also obtain copies of SINOVAC's definitive proxy statement and other documents, free of charge, by contacting SINOVAC's Investor Relations Department at ir@ Safe Harbor Statement This announcement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "aim," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "believe," "potential," "continue," "is/are likely to" or other similar expressions. Such statements are based upon current expectations and current market and operating conditions and relate to events that involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the Company's or Board's control, which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Further information regarding these and other risks, uncertainties or factors is included in the Company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company and Board do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required under law. View source version on Contacts Investor and Media Contact FGS GlobalSinovac@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Singapore Proposes to Strip Money Launderers of Directorships
Singapore is considering stripping directorships from persons who have been convicted of money-laundering offenses in the city state after a S$3-billion ($2.34 billion) scandal that dented the Southeast Asian country's reputation as a global financial center. The government is seeking feedback on such a proposal from the public as it contemplates changes to several legislations, including the Companies Act 1967, the Ministry of Finance and the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority said in a request for public comments on Monday.
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Why Does Malaysia Want to Seize $700 Million From a Dead Tycoon?
It's been eight months since Daim Zainuddin, the business tycoon credited with helping to pull Malaysia out of the Asian Financial Crisis, died and was buried in Kuala Lumpur. But the Malaysian government is still pressing ahead with its investigation into the late businessman over accusations that he hid parts of his vast fortune — charges he denied.
