Carberry residents decry proposed RCUT as 'dangerous and unsafe' at tense forum over future of intersection
Social Sharing
Transportation engineers presented their plan for a Carberry-area intersection on Wednesday, pushing forward a controversial design that scores of community members rallied against last month.
More than 100 community members confronted officials at a tense public forum at Carberry Collegiate about the fate of the Highway 1 and Highway 5 intersection, where 17 people died in a crash two years ago.
The event was billed as a public open house, hosted by the Winnipeg-based firms Landmark Planning & Design and WSP Canada Inc., on behalf of Manitoba Transportation and Infrastructure.
Some community members raised voices, saying they didn't feel like they were being heard, while others interrupted the companies' representatives as they attempted to answer questions from the crowd.
A petition with more than 2,100 signatures was handed to the firms' representatives, imploring the province not to move forward with the RCUT intersection design. In May, more than 100 protesters rallied near the intersection voicing concerns the proposed design would create safety issues and confusion.
A restricted crossing U-turn — or RCUT — at that intersection would mean traffic attempting to cross the Trans-Canada on Highway 5 would have to turn right onto the Trans-Canada, then cross the median by making a left U-turn, before turning right to resume travelling on Highway 5.
Here's the RCUT design proposed for Manitoba intersection
2 days ago
Duration 0:11
Jordan Dickson, who helped organize the May protest, expressed her frustration directly with engineers on Wednesday night, encouraging others to do the same.
"Absolutely no one in attendance is in support of the RCUT," she said.
"It is dangerous and unsafe for this area of the Trans-Canada. Hopefully the province doesn't actually go through with this and they decide to actually spend some money on rural citizens for once," Dickson said, stressing the RCUT will make driving more stressful for farmers driving large trucks and farm equipment along the highway.
Last year, engineers with Manitoba's transportation and infrastructure department shortlisted three potential solutions for the intersection: widening the median, a roundabout or an RCUT.
On Wednesday, the RCUT was presented as the department's "preferred alternative."
Dustin Booy, the transportation department's executive director of highway engineering services, said the RCUT is their top choice because it reduces the number of "conflict points," or areas where drivers cross traffic travelling a different direction, which could make accidents less likely.
"The primary objective of our team is safety. So we looked to the RCUT because its use in other areas have shown quite dramatic results in terms of safety performance," Booy said.
Canada's only RCUT intersection is along Highway 16 near Saskatoon. Booy said they have improved safety in some parts of the United States.
Wednesday's contentious open house was the third and final public engagement event for this project.
Booy said the department will only be presenting provincial leaders with the RCUT as its preferred design for this intersection, but it won't be set in stone until the government weighs in.
An exact cost estimate isn't available yet, but Booy says it could cost about $20 million.
"At this point, it's up to the government to make a decision about how we proceed," he said, adding that the province typically chooses the department's preferred option, but that isn't always the case.
"The local community has expressed a measure of concern with the intersection treatment and that's fair. It's their local community," Booy said.
Carberry Mayor Ray Muirhead said he was disappointed to see that Transportation Minister Lisa Naylor wasn't at the meeting, after cancelling a stakeholder meeting earlier this week.
Muirhead's council is calling on the province to build an overpass, something community members have been asking for since he first joined local government in the late 1980s.
"Nobody wants the RCUT. We're all opposed to it. We feel that there should be an overpass," he said.
"I think it's time to spend the money and do it right the first time."
The government has previously said it's not considering an overpass because there isn't enough traffic to warrant one.
Community organizer Dickson said transportation engineers should come back in the fall to see how busy the highway gets during harvest season. Booy said his team plans to return in the fall to collect more data.
Despite tensions between engineers and Carberry residents, Debra Steen said this was the first time she felt the community was heard throughout the engagement process.
"Our concerns have been dismissed since Day 1. And I don't think they could dismiss us today. I think the message was clear, the petition is there, and we have our MLA on board," Steen said.
Opposition Progressive Conservative MLA Jodie Byram, who Agassiz riding includes Carberry, said she agrees that the province needs to consider other options for the intersection.
"I do believe that there needs to be further consultation and review of what it might look like here for this community at [Highway] 1 and [Highway] 5," Byram said.
Mayor Muirhead said he feels like the RCUT may be inevitable, but he's hopeful Wednesday's community turnout will cut the RCUT from consideration.
"I've seen in my experience over the years, that if there's enough of a public outcry … certain situations have changed course. The government seems to find money in certain situations. I'm hoping that will happen here," he said.
Engineer Booy said he hopes community members will keep open minds about the intersection.
"I truly believe in the safety of this solution," he said, hopeful his team can move forward with the RCUT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Trump trade war: Alcohol sales dropped after provinces pulled U.S. products
An employee removes American wines from an SAQ liquor store in Montreal on Tuesday, March 4, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Christinne Muschi Alcohol sales are down this year in Canada amid persisting economic uncertainty and a collapse in imports of beer, wine and spirits from the U.S. As U.S. President Donald Trump's global trade war marches on, provincial boycotts of American alcohol have begun to reflect in sales figures -- all amid a third financial crisis in five years for Canadian consumers. The available data show declining sales for alcohol of all kinds this year, compared to the same time in 2024 — down more than $100 million across six provinces in the last quarter alone. 'The consumer is just feeling very fragile,' said CJ Hélie, president of Beer Canada, a trade association for beer makers, in a Thursday interview. 'People are just pulling back on discretionary spending, and we're seeing that big-time. Real softness in the market.' With provincial retailers halting American alcohol purchases and pulling bottles from shelves earlier this year, Statistics Canada (StatCan) data show that in April, roughly $3 million in U.S. wine entered the country, down 94 per cent from $54 million for the same month in 2024. 'We are deeply concerned that U.S. tariffs on imported spirits from Canada and Mexico will significantly harm all three countries and lead to a cycle of retaliatory tariffs that negatively impacts our shared industry,' reads a joint statement from North American spirits industry groups on the eve of the trade war in February. 'Our industries have thrived due to the level playing field established across our borders.' While U.S. beer imports have seen a less pronounced decline, they also make up a fairly small portion of the Canadian market. 'In some cases for generations, some of these iconic American brands have been made in Canada,' Hélie told 'Your Bud Lights, your Michelobs, your Pabsts … they're made in Canada, almost all from Canadian grains, in our plants.' Beer Canada noted in a February release that of all the beer consumed nationwide last year, 88 per cent was made in Canadian breweries. Hélie says that for beer, the trade war's impacts have been most pronounced in the manufacturing process, where aluminum tariffs threaten to make it far more expensive to produce the billions of cans filled at plants each year. '[Brewers] saw this coming; they stockpiled as much as they could,' he said. 'We haven't seen that price spike yet, into the price of beer into the marketplace. But if you're thinking Labour Day, this isn't resolved … it's going to be catastrophic for lots of brewers.' Meanwhile, Canada has historically been the world's number-one buyer of American wines, accounting for roughly a third of the U.S. export market last year. But for the month of April 2025, data compiled by the American Association of Wine Economists shows that figure fell to just four per cent, following the steepest decrease in purchases among America's top 15 buyers. On the other end of the transaction, American wines accounted for one in every five bottles (20 per cent) purchased at Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO) stores in early 2024, but by the same time this year, that proportion had dropped to 15 per cent, losing the U.S. its top spot for import sales. 'Wine firms here in the U.S. thought that a tariff on (imported) goods, including wine from Canada, would be a boon, but it has turned out the other way around,' said Karl Storchmann, executive director of the American Association of Wine Economists, in an interview with BNN Bloomberg last week. 'Canada pulled the plug.' Sales down across Canada Early numbers show declining alcohol sales across provincial retailers. Shortfalls in the opening months of 2025 range from roughly a tenth of a percentage point in New Brunswick, to eight per cent in Newfoundland and Labrador. In Quebec, the liquor control board attributed a recent trend toward lower sales including a $90-million drop last fiscal year at government and specialized network stores to 'changes in customers' shopping habits.' The latest numbers come from the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024-25, which varies by province, but generally ran from January to March, this year. Of the six provinces with available data, Nova Scotia was the only jurisdiction showing increasing sales, though the province's board notes that the total volume sold is still down nearly two per cent between last year and the year before that. Since March, the province says it has held roughly $14 million in U.S. products in storage, rather than selling it, and that sales for products made in Nova Scotia have grown nearly 14 per cent in that time. The Yukon Liquor Corporation told CTV News that U.S. imports made up 3.6 per cent of net sales in the territory between January and May of this year, down from 5.4 per cent for all of 2024. And in British Columbia, where Premier David Eby described his March order to pull U.S. products as a response to "escalating threats from south of the border," wholesale net sales of American alcohol are down three per cent for whisky, 23 per cent for wine and nearly 60 per cent for beer. Meanwhile, according to an emailed statement from the province's Liquor Distribution Branch, this April and May have seen 'increased customer interest and demand for products made in Canada.' While U.S. alcohol remains available under some circumstances, and imports have resumed in parts of the country, a 25 per cent tariff remains in effect on wine, spirits and beer crossing into Canada. The trade war isn't the only factor in decreasing alcohol sales. StatCan notes that, on a per-litre basis, they've been on the decline for years, even before Trump's return to the White House. Between the 2019-20 and 2023-24 fiscal years, alcohol sales revenue only grew by around two per cent annually, on average, even as prices per-bottle have risen, the agency notes. By volume, sales fell 3.8 per cent last year, in what a March release from StatCan called a "historic" drop. 'This was the largest volume decline ever recorded since Statistics Canada began tracking alcohol sales in 1949,' it read. To Hélie, recent declines are a sign that consumers have been reacting to years of economic challenges, from a massive drop in out-of-home dining amid COVID-19 restrictions, to the inflationary spike that followed as customers returned to restaurant tables — what he calls 'menu shock.' 'I'm going to go (from) $80 to $95 (for a night out), but that $95 meant I also had to cut out either the dessert, or the coffee, or the extra beer,' he said. 'We've seen that in the numbers, for sure.' With files from BNN Bloomberg's Jordan Fleguel
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Canada's liquefied natural gas touted — and doubted — as a green ‘transition' fuel
The LNG Canada industrial energy project is seen under construction in Kitimat, B.C., on Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck CALGARY — Canada's first liquefied natural gas cargoes will soon arrive on Asian shores, a milestone touted — and doubted — as a boon for global emissions-cutting efforts. 'Cleaner energy around the world is what I think about when I think about LNG,' Shell Canada country chair Stastia West said in an onstage interview at the Global Energy Show in Calgary earlier this month. Shell and four Asian companies are partners in LNG Canada in Kitimat, B.C., the first facility to export Canadian gas across the Pacific in an ultra-chilled liquid state using specialized tankers. A handful of other projects are either under construction or in development on the B.C. coast. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith told the energy show that Canadian oil and gas exports can be an 'antidote' to the current geopolitical chaos. 'And it comes with an added benefit: lower global emissions. By moving more natural gas, we can also help countries transition away from higher emitting fuels, such as coal.' Smith cited a recent Fraser Institute study that suggested if Canada were to double its natural gas production, export the additional supply to Asia and displace coal there, it would lead to an annual emissions cut of up to 630 million tonnes annually. 'That's almost 90 per cent of Canada's total greenhouse gas emissions each year,' Smith said. The authors of the Fraser Institute study, released in May, argued that Canada's ability to reduce emissions elsewhere should be factored into its climate policy. 'It is important to recognize that GHG emissions are global and are not confined by borders,' wrote Elmira Aliakbari and Julio Mejía. 'Instead of focusing on reducing domestic GHG emissions in Canada by implementing various policies that hinder economic growth, governments must shift their focus toward global GHG reductions and help the country cut emissions worldwide by expanding its LNG exports.' Some experts see a murkier picture. Most credible estimates suggest that if liquefied natural gas were to indeed displace coal abroad, there would be some emissions reductions, said Kent Fellows, assistant professor of economics with the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy. But the magnitude is debatable. 'Will all of our natural gas exports be displacing coal? Absolutely not. Will a portion of them be displacing coal? Probably, and it's really hard to know exactly what that number is,' he said. Fellows said there's a good chance Canadian supplies would supplant other sources of gas from Russia, Eurasia and the Middle East, perhaps making it a wash emissions-wise. He said the Canadian gas could actually be worse from an emissions standpoint, depending on how the competing supply moves. LNG is more energy intensive than pipeline shipment because the gas needs to be liquefied and moved on a ship. In China, every type of energy is in demand. So instead of displacing coal, LNG would likely just be added to the mix, Fellows added. 'Anyone who's thinking about this as one or the other is thinking about it wrong,' Fellows said. A senior analyst with Investors for Paris Compliance, which aims to hold Canadian publicly traded companies to their net-zero promises, said he doubts a country like India would see the economic case for replacing domestically produced coal with imported Canadian gas. 'Even at the lowest price of gas, it's still multiple times the price,' said Michael Sambasivam. 'You'd need some massive system to provide subsidies to developing countries to be replacing their coal with a fuel that isn't even really proven to be much greener.' And even in that case, 'it's not as if they can just flip a switch and take it in,' he added. 'There's a lot of infrastructure that needs to be built to take in LNG as well as to use it. You have to build import terminals. You have to refit your power terminals.' What LNG would be competing head-to-head with, Sambasivam said, is renewable energy. If there were any emissions reductions abroad as a result of the coal-to-gas switch, Sambasivam said he doesn't see why a Canadian company should get the credit. 'Both parties are going to want to claim the emissions savings and you can't claim those double savings,' he said. There's also a 'jarring' double-standard at play, he said, as industry players have long railed against environmental reviews that factor in emissions from the production and combustion of the oil and gas a pipeline carries, saying only the negligible emissions from running the infrastructure itself should be considered. Devyani Singh, an investigative researcher at who ran for the Greens in last year's B.C. election, said arguments that LNG is a green fuel are undermined by the climate impacts of producing, liquefying and shipping it. A major component of natural gas is methane, a greenhouse gas about 80 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 20-year time frame, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Methane that leaks from tanks, pipelines and wells has been a major issue that industry, government and environmental groups have been working to tackle. 'Have we actually accounted for all the leakage along the whole pipeline? Have we accounted for the actual under-reporting of methane emissions happening in B.C. and Canada?' asked Singh. Even if LNG does have an edge over coal, thinking about it as a 'transition' or 'bridge' fuel at this juncture is a problem, she said. 'The time for transition fuels is over,' she said. 'Let's just be honest — we are in a climate crisis where the time for transition fuels was over a decade ago.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 29, 2025. Lauren Krugel, The Canadian Press
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Interest in ‘elbows up' merchandise waning ahead of Canada Day, businesses say
Stephanie Tomlin stands for a portrait in her workspace where she prints Canadian-themed apparel, in Toronto, Friday, June 20, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Cole Burston When Rachael Coe decided to launch an 'elbows up' merchandise line at her store in Yarmouth, N.S., in March, she said it was an immediate bestseller. Within a week, Coe said her Timeless Memories shop had already made 400 sales. By the end of the first month, she had sold 2,500 products ranging from T-shirts to hoodies to car decals. Demand for items bearing Canada's rallying cry against U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and annexation threats was so high that Coe launched a website to keep up with the surge. 'It was a response from all over Canada,' she said. 'We reached every single province then we started covering worldwide. Our 'elbows up' merch went everywhere.' Many Canadian businesses hopped on the patriotic trend that also saw Ontario Premier Doug Ford wearing a 'Canada is not for sale' ball cap ahead of a January meeting with Canada's premiers and prime minister. But Coe's sales started slowing down by May. And despite a slight boost ahead of Canada Day, she said the 'elbows up' line is now selling at similar rates to the classic red-and-white merchandise she sells every year around this time. Although business owners say they are selling more Canada-themed products this year leading up to July 1, many have also noted a decline in 'elbows up' merchandise sales. The rallying cry, initially embraced as a grassroots movement at the height of cross-border trade tensions and Trump's musings about making Canada the 51st state, has shifted to a more generic expression of Canadian pride amid continued tensions, retailers and experts say. Others note that the phrase 'elbows up' has increasingly been used in a partisan context, contributing to the marketing shift. Stephanie Tomlin, Toronto-based owner of the online business Shop Love Collective, said she saw an explosion in 'elbows up' merchandise sales in March, selling as many as 10 or 15 products per day. Similarly, her sales began to stagnate in May. Leading up to Canada Day, she said she's selling 'quite a bit more' merchandise compared with previous years, but that's due to interest in Canada-themed products across the board. 'I think the climate in Canada is a little bit more settled after the election and that … we feel like we will never be the 51st state,' Tomlin said, adding that Canadian patriotism is becoming less combative as annexation talks have died down. Howard Ramos, a professor of sociology at Western University, said 'elbows up' became 'more partisan than it used to be' when Prime Minister Mark Carney embraced the phrase in his election campaign ads in late March. 'It's just added to how the expression is dying down as a pan-Canadian claim,' he said. 'Now you see on social media, especially from Conservative handles, the use of 'elbows up' in a sarcastic way to criticize Mark Carney or Liberal policies.' Negative online comments about the 'elbows up' movement have discouraged Coe from promoting her products on Facebook. But when she's interacting with customers in her Yarmouth shop, she said the phrase isn't as divisive. 'It's not a political term, and it simply means that you're defending your country, and everyone should be defending our country, just like you would defend (against) a goal in hockey,' Coe said. Danielle McDonagh, owner of Vernon, B.C.-based Rowantree Clothing, said she stopped promoting her 'elbows up' merchandise on a large scale when she noticed the phrase being interpreted as an 'anti-Conservative' and 'boomer' movement. For McDonagh, increased concern about the political climate in the United States has also chipped away at the lightheartedness of the 'elbows up' movement. 'I think some of the levity is gone for me,' she said. While sales of her 'elbows up' products have dropped by about 90 per cent since hitting 1,000 in the first month, she said she continues to promote the merchandise in small batches at local markets in Vernon. Business owners say their customers continue to prioritize supporting the Canadian economy, as they are routinely answering questions about where their products are manufactured. And the push to buy Canadian isn't just coming from this side of the border. Coe said many American tourists arriving by ferry from Maine visit her shop in search of Canadian merchandise. '(Tourists) want to support us just as much as Canadians want to support us,' Coe said. McDonagh said her business sees similar interest from Americans. 'I'm shipping a lot of Canada-centric merchandise to the States, which I just love,' McDonagh said. 'People chat with me on my site and say … we're supporting you." This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 25, 2025. Natasha Baldin, The Canadian Press
