logo
Now You See Josh Hawley, Now You Don't

Now You See Josh Hawley, Now You Don't

New York Times07-07-2025
Senator Josh Hawley sure knows how to scurry away.
The Missouri Republican showed as much on Jan. 6, 2021, when he gave that infamous clenched-fist salute to the unruly mob bound for the Capitol — go get 'em, tigers! — then sprinted like terrified prey through the halls of Congress to evade them. He later wrote and plugged a book titled 'Manhood: The Masculine Virtues America Needs.' It extolled virility, valor, grit. All the qualities that he embodied on that heroic day.
And which he just modeled anew in voting for President Trump's monstrously big but not even marginally beautiful domestic policy bill. For months before Hawley fell meekly in line last week, he sought and got enormous attention for being a holdout, a maverick, someone willing to tell the president uncomfortable truths and determined to prove that the MAGA movement really was looking out for the little people. His fist was once again clenched, his arm once again raised, this time in defense of the health insurance on which so many less privileged Americans depend.
'We must ignore calls to cut Medicaid and start delivering on America's promise for America's working people,' he wrote in a guest essay for Times Opinion in May. It was 'must,' not should. It was declarative, not ruminative. He explained that 'slashing health insurance for the working poor' would be 'both morally wrong and politically suicidal.' He sounded like a warrior — and a masculine one, at that! — manning the barricades.
Which, inevitably, he abandoned. The arc of Republican lawmakers in the Trump era bends toward complete submission. That's the posture in which Hawley and other Senate Republicans granted the president his financially reckless and needlessly cruel agenda.
Back in November, I observed that the second Trump administration would test the Senate even more than the first one had, revealing 'how shamefully far from its onetime description as 'the world's greatest deliberative body' it has strayed.' The verdict is in. Having rubber-stamped many ridiculous senior administration officials, Senate Republicans have now signed off on a sprawling policy package that will, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, add more than $3 trillion to the federal debt over the next decade, even as it cuts over $1 trillion from Medicaid and results in nearly 12 million Americans losing their health insurance.
The legislation makes a mockery of the party's longtime claims of prudent fiscal stewardship. And as Senator Thom Tillis, Republican of North Carolina, explained in a Senate speech, it 'will betray the very promise' that Trump made not to go after people's Medicaid.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Copper Prices Plunge as Trump Tariffs Exclude Refined Metal
US Copper Prices Plunge as Trump Tariffs Exclude Refined Metal

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US Copper Prices Plunge as Trump Tariffs Exclude Refined Metal

(Bloomberg) -- US copper prices collapsed by more than 19% in minutes after US President Donald Trump excluded the most widely imported form of copper from his planned import tariffs. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Tariffs of 50% will apply to imports of semi-finished copper products from Aug. 1, but not to imports copper ore or cathodes, the White House said on Wednesday. The move sent shockwaves through the global copper market, after months in which US copper futures have been trading far above the rest of the world in anticipation of Trump's import tariffs. US copper futures on Comex tumbled by more than 19% after the announcement, the largest intraday fall on record. Until Wednesday afternoon, US copper prices had been trading around 28% above benchmark copper futures on the London Metal Exchange, as traders anticipated the tariff would be applied to all refined metal imports. The move to exclude refined copper — known as cathodes — from the tariffs is likely to further upend global trade flows of the metal, which plays a crucial role in the global economy thanks to its widespread use in electrical wiring. Traders have shipped huge volumes of copper to the US in recent months in an attempt to front run the tariffs — a huge stockpile that now may be re-exported. US copper miner Freeport-McMoRan Inc. dropped more than 8%. Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump signs order implementing additional 40% tariff on Brazil, White House says
Trump signs order implementing additional 40% tariff on Brazil, White House says

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump signs order implementing additional 40% tariff on Brazil, White House says

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order implementing an additional 40% tariff on Brazil, bringing the total tariff amount to 50%, the White House said on Wednesday, citing Brazil's recent policies that the Trump administration disagrees with. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Fed holds interest rates steady despite Trump's push for cuts
Fed holds interest rates steady despite Trump's push for cuts

Fast Company

time24 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Fed holds interest rates steady despite Trump's push for cuts

The Fed's decision Wednesday leaves its key short-term rate at about 4.3%, where it has stood after the central bank made three cuts last year. Chair Jerome Powell has said the Fed would likely have cut rates already if not for Trump's sweeping tariffs. Powell and other Fed officials say they want to see how Trump's duties on imports will impact inflation and the broader economy. So far the duties have lifted costs of some goods, such as appliances, furniture, and toys, and overall inflation has risen a bit, though less than many economists had expected. There were some signs of splits in the Fed's ranks: Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman voted to reduce borrowing costs, while 9 officials, including Powell, favored standing pat. It is the first time in more than three decades that two of the seven Washington-based governors have dissented. One official, Governor Adriana Kugler, was absent and didn't vote. The choice to hold off on a rate cut will almost certainly result in further conflict between the Fed and White House, as Trump has repeatedly demanded that the central bank reduce borrowing costs as part of his effort to assert control over one of the few remaining independent federal agencies. Trump argues that because the U.S. economy is doing well, rates should be lowered. But unlike a blue-chip company that usually pays lower rates than a troubled start-up, the Fed adjusts rates to either slow or speed growth, and would be more likely to keep them high if the economy is strong to prevent an inflationary outbreak. Earlier Wednesday, the government said the economy expanded at a healthy 3% annual rate in the second quarter, though that figure followed a negative reading for the first three months of the year, when the economy shrank 0.5% at an annual rate. Most economists averaged the two figures to get a growth rate of about 1.2% for the first half of this year. Some of the disagreement likely reflects jockeying to replace Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Waller, in particular, has been mentioned as a potential future Fed chair. Bowman, meanwhile, last dissented in September 2024, when the Fed cut its key rate by a half-point. She said she preferred a quarter-point cut instead, and cited the fact that inflation was still above 2.5% as a reason for caution. Waller also said earlier this month that he favored cutting rates, but for very different reasons than Trump has cited: Waller thinks that growth and hiring are slowing, and that the Fed should reduce borrowing costs to forestall a weaker economy and a rise in unemployment. There are other camps on the Fed's 19-member rate-setting committee (only 12 of the 19 actually vote on rate decisions). In June, seven members signaled that they supported leaving rates unchanged through the end of this year, while two suggested they preferred a single rate cut this year. The other half supported more reductions, with eight officials backing two cuts, and two — widely thought to be Waller and Bowman — supporting three reductions. The dissents could be a preview of what might happen after Powell steps down, if President Donald Trump appoints a replacement who pushes for the much lower interest rates the White House desires. Other Fed officials could push back if a future chair sought to cut rates by more than economic conditions would otherwise support. Overall, the committee's quarterly forecasts in June suggested the Fed would cut twice this year. There are only three more Fed policy meetings — in September, October, and December — and some economists forecast that a cut will occur in September. Wall Street investors also expect cuts in September and December, according to futures pricing. When the Fed cuts its rate, it often — but not always — results in lower borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards. Some economists agree with Waller's concerns about the job market. Excluding government hiring, the economy added just 74,000 jobs in June, with most of those gains occurring in health care. 'We are in a much slower job hiring backdrop than most people appreciate,' said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed Income. Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a note to clients this week if the pair were to dissent, 'it would say more about auditioning for the Fed chair appointment than about economic conditions.' The Fed's two-day meeting comes after a week of extraordinary interactions with the Trump White House, which has accused Powell of mismanaging an extensive, $2.5 billion renovation of two office buildings. Trump suggested two weeks ago that the rising cost for the project could be a 'firing offense' but has since backed off that characterization. Notably, Trump argues that the Fed should cut because the economy is doing very well, which is a different viewpoint than nearly all economists, who say that a healthy, growing economy doesn't need rate cuts. 'If your economy is hot, you're supposed to have higher short-term rates,' Porcelli said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store