Nepal investigates deadly violence in pro-monarchy rally
By Gopal Sharma
KATHMANDU (Reuters) - Nepal's government is investigating deadly violence that occurred during a rally by the supporters of the former king seeking the restoration of constitutional monarchy, a minister said on Saturday.
Two people were killed on Friday and at least 112 injured, including 77 security officials, authorities said, after police used force to stop the stone-throwing crowd from marching towards the parliament building in the capital Kathmandu.
Protesters vandalised homes, shops, a hospital, a political party office, vehicles and a shopping mall and snatched a weapon from the police, the authorities in the Himalayan nation said.
'This is sheer vandalism, arson, looting and anarchy. It cannot be a protest,' cabinet spokesman Prithvi Subba Gurung, the minister of communication and information technology, told Reuters.
Rishiram Tiwari, Kathmandu's chief district officer, said 105 protesters including some pro-monarchy leaders were taken into custody.
Nepal's 239-year-old monarchy was abolished in 2008 by a specially elected assembly as part of a deal with Maoist former rebels, ending an insurgency that killed 17,000 people between 1996 and 2006.
The last king, 77-year-old Gyanendra, lives as a commoner with his family in a private house in Kathmandu.
Political instability has rocked Nepal, one of the world's poorest countries, with 14 governments since the abolition of the monarchy, hampering economic growth and discouraging investment.
Public frustration has risen over the failure of successive governments to deliver on commitments to develop the economy of the country, a natural buffer between Asian giants China and India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
One NY Republican has a massive edge in possible primary to face Gov. Kathy Hochul: poll
Upstate Rep. Elise Stefanik has a massive edge over other Republicans in a hypothetical party primary to take on Gov. Kathy Hochul next year, a new poll found. Some 64% of Republicans would support Stefanik — while only 8% would back Hudson Valley Rep. Michael Lawler, the survey of 1,108 likely Republican voters conducted by the firm co/efficient found. Another 6% polled said they'd support Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman in a hypothetical matchup, while 22% are undecided or back another candidate ahead of the 2026 gubernatorial race. Advertisement 4 A new poll found that 64% of Republican voters in New York state would back Rep. Elise Stefanik in the Republican primary for governor. AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana 'Among the most likely contenders Congresswoman Elise Stefanik is widely known AND widely loved,' co/efficient pollster Ryan Munce said. 'Over the last several years, Stefanik has become a fixture in both statewide and nationwide politics and is the face of change for New York State.' Still, Munce was surprised that Stefanik amassed a 56- percentage point lead over Lawler, a popular lawmaker and also a rising star in the GOP. Advertisement 'If I had my chips on the table, I thought Lawler would be in the mid-20s percent,' Munce told The Post. 'Typically, this early in an election cycle, a significant percentage of voters are still undecided and waiting to see who else may join the race,' the pollster added. 'Today in New York, that is not the case. Minds are made up and Elise Stefanik looks all but guaranteed to be the Republicans' choice to become the next Governor of New York.' Stefanik, Lawler and Blakeman are eyeing a run for governor against the Democratic incumbent but no formal campaigns have kicked off — yet. 4 Rep. Mike Lawler finished a distance second in the poll. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz Advertisement Stefanik, first elected to the House in 2014, has more widespread name recognition and popularity among Republican voters than Lawler or Blakeman, according to the poll. For example, 64% of Republicans had a favorable view of Stefanik, 11% an unfavorable view and 24% had no opinion or did not know her. By comparison, 25% of Republicans had a favorable view of Lawler, 9% an unfavorable view but a whopping 66% were unsure or never heard of him, the poll showed. Blakeman was viewed favorably by 17% of Republicans, unfavorably by 11% and 72% were unsure or never heard of him, according to the survey. Advertisement 4 Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman recieved 6% in the gubernatorial poll. Heather Khalifa for the NY Post Munce attributed some of Stefanik's edge to the fact she is chairwoman of the House Republican Leadership and has a higher national profile because she has served in GOP House leadership for a number of years. She was also nominated to be President Trump's US Ambassador to the United Nations — but the president withdrew the selection earlier this year over concerns he needed her vote in Congress as the GOP holds only a razor-thin majority in the House. Stefanik also had a prominent role grilling Ivy League college presidents over anti-Israel campus protests and antisemitism. 4 Another recent poll found that Lawler had a better chance at beating Gov. Hochul in the general election. Aidin Bharti/Office of Governor Trump suggested he was leaning toward giving Stefanik his blessing last month when he posted to TruthSocial an unsolicited endorsement of Lawler's re-election campaign for Congress — even though the lawmaker hasn't announced his intentions for 2026. Lawler took a jaunt upstate two weeks ago, making stops in six counties and meeting with over a dozen county GOP committee chairs, as well as elected officials and other party faithful. Advertisement Several of the local Republican leaders who met with Lawler said they would be happy to back him should he choose to go up against Hochul next year. One survey by Harper Polling claimed that Lawler — who represents the battleground 17th House District that takes in Rockland, Putnam and and portions of Westchester and Dutchess counties — would have a better shot at defeating Hochul than Stefanik, whose 21st District in the North Country borders both Vermont and Canada. Lawler's camp, when informed of the GOP primary poll, said Sunday the congressman is the stronger candidate in the general election. 'The real race is against Kathy Hochul and the data universally shows that Mike Lawler is the only Republican who can defeat her and actually get elected governor,' Lawler campaign spokesman Chris Russell said. Advertisement Lawler, first elected to Congress in 2022, has been a vocal critic of the controversial congestion pricing toll to enter Manhattan and has fought to increase the state and local tax deduction on federal returns for New Yorkers that was capped during Trump's first term as president. Munce anticipates that Stefanik, Lawler or a generic Republican would poll well against Kathy Hochul, given the governor's underwhelming public approval ratings in surveys. The co/efficient survey was conducted from June 18-20 via mobile texts and landline interviews and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.76% points.
The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
Mamdani says he doesn't believe ‘that we should have billionaires'
New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani said Sunday he doesn't believe 'that we should have billionaires.' 'You are a self-described democratic socialist. Do you think that billionaires have a right to exist?' NBC News's Kristen Welker asked on 'Meet the Press.' 'I don't think that we should have billionaires because, frankly, it is so much money in a moment of such inequality. And ultimately, what we need more of is equality across our city and across our state and across our country,' Mamdani responded. 'And I look forward to working with everyone, including billionaires, to make a city that is fairer for all of them,' he added. Mamdani shocked American political observers this week as he seemed to be on a path to clinching the Democratic nomination for the Big Apple's mayor while facing down former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. If Mamdani secures New York City's top job, he would be its first Muslim and Asian mayor. 'In the words of Nelson Mandela: it always seems impossible until it's done. My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it. I am honored to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City,' Mamdani said in a post on the social media platform X early Wednesday. In his 'Meet the Press' appearance, Mamdani said that 'one in four New Yorkers are living in poverty, and the rest are seemingly trapped in a state of anxiety.' 'And what we've seen is that this is a city that needs to be affordable for the people who build it every day,' he added.
Hamilton Spectator
14 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
For Mark Carney, every decision has trade-offs — but that's not slowing him down
OTTAWA—If there is a Carney 'doctrine' taking shape more than 100 days into the prime ministership of Mark Carney, maybe it is this: get it done, and damn the details. A few short months ago, Carney was blunt: 'I am a pragmatist above all. So when I see something that's not working, I will change it.' That's what the former central banker and UN climate finance envoy said when he captured the Liberal party leadership to replace Justin Trudeau. He went on to win the 2025 federal election on his outsider's pitch to rescue the economy from the threat of Donald Trump's tariff war. Pragmatism was how he justified abrupt domestic moves: ditching the consumer carbon tax, reversing capital gains tax hikes, and lowering income taxes while jamming 'nation-building' red-tape-cutting bills through Parliament to juice the economy. Pragmatism helps explain why, in his single mandate letter to cabinet ministers, Carney told them, 'We must redefine Canada's international, commercial, and security relationships.' But in an era where Trump is the one defining Canada's closest relationship, it's not clear if Carney's pragmatism can win over the U.S. president's chaos. On Friday, the unpredictable Trump cancelled talks towards a new deal with Canada, angry at Canada's deadline Monday for Big Tech giants to pay a digital services tax. Retroactive to 2022, it would collect $2.3 billion at first, and about $900 million yearly after that. Small potatoes compared to what Carney has already put on Canada's tab. In hopes of getting along with Trump, Carney in the past week promised to ramp up Canada's spending, along with NATO allies — all under intense pressure from the U.S. president — to a whopping $150 billion a year on military and related spending, a level almost unthinkable last year, as he vows to shift Canadian economic and security ties away from America towards Europe and beyond. In a spate of a few weeks, Carney signed what he calls a new economic, security and defence partnership with the European Union, increased aid to Ukraine, hosted a G7 summit where he offered backing of Trump's leadership efforts to end the Russia-Ukraine war and left a wide open runway for Trump to handle the Iran-Israel conflict as he saw fit. Carney defended his vow to lead where the U.S. does not, telling CNN it should be seen as a 'positive' not a negative reaction 'against' the U.S. or Trump. 'The way we would like to lead, the way European Union would like to lead, a number of Asian countries as well, is in a positive respect. If the U.S. is pulling back from multilateralism, as it is with respect to trade … effectively U.S. trade policy is now bilateral — if the U.S. is pulling back, there are others of us who do believe in multilateralism,' the rule of law, 'fair and open' trade, and in defence co-operation, said Carney. 'Do something,' seems to be the Carney mantra, said Kerry Buck, a former Canadian ambassador to NATO who welcomed the prime minister's commitment hit the new NATO military spending goal of five per cent of GDP. Although Justin Trudeau eventually committed to reaching the old NATO two per cent target at the end of last year's summit, he did so without a clear plan and with a 2032 timeline that was 'clearly going to damage our bilateral relations with the U.S. under Trump, where we're very vulnerable on trade,' said Buck, speaking before Trump's move Friday. In contrast, two weeks ahead of this week's NATO summit Carney accelerated action, said he'd hit two per cent this year, and at the summit adopted the bigger five per cent goal by 2035 with no hesitation. ' It was smart transactionally to do that. And I think in terms of content, it was also necessary,' Buck said. Others wonder how Carney is going to pay for it all. Questions remain about how the government will reach its two per cent promise this year, with the independent Parliamentary Budget Officer saying it can't verify Carney's plan to hit the old target. 'Some might start to think that he has a guns-before-butter kind of approach to foreign policy … a muscular foreign policy focused on defence,' but Buck said Carney had no choice, given it was 'our most vulnerable point' with the U.S. in ongoing trade talks. Forget the 'peace dividend' that Canada and other western allies hailed at the end of the Cold War, welcoming the ability to spend less on the military and more on social welfare systems. Now Carney and the other leaders challenged by Trump are embracing what NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called a 'defence dividend,' claiming that spending five per cent of GDP on defence will create 'an engine of growth for our economies, driving literally millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic.' Carney echoed the claim, acknowledging higher military spending may one day entail federal spending trade-offs or sacrifices, but for now, 'more of it will help build our economy at the same time as it improves our defence. And we'll get the benefits.' There is more continuity than many think between Trudeau and Carney: Carney continued the imposition of counter-tariffs against the U.S. that Trudeau launched. But he has withheld tit-for-tat retaliation against the 50 per cent steel and aluminum penalties Trump levied pending the outcome of trade talks. Carney has continued Trudeau's staunch support for Ukraine and its embattled president Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Carney backs a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict, a ceasefire in Gaza, and went so far as to sanction two Israeli cabinet ministers. Like Trudeau, Carney believes government has a role and responsibility to address climate change. That Carney has moved swiftly on foreign and defence files is partly due to the flow of the international summits that coincided with his first two months after winning the April 28 election. It's also due to the urgency of the threat posed by the 'tariff' president in the White House. Carney, though, has a view of the larger global economic imbalances and the roles of China and the U.S. in those imbalances, that he shares with leaders like France's President Emmanuel Macron, and as they try to persuade Trump to drop tariffs, Carney seeks to position Canada's critical mineral, AI and quantum computing sectors for a world in which those imbalances continue. Janice Gross Stein said it is too early to describe a Carney 'doctrine' but it's clear 'the fundamental thing for him is that he, like everyone, is defining a path to dealing with a very different United States.' Carney is of necessity pursuing a new more predictable economic and security deal with the U.S. at a time of crisis , 'but it's an eyes-open arrangement,' Stein said. 'Yes, we need to diversify our partnerships — that's not a new idea in Canadian foreign policy … and yes,' Carney is focusing especially on Europe and like-minded states, and NATO, 'but that's built in to dealing with the more demanding United States.' Stein sees a pragmatic streak too in Carney's overtures to countries like China, India and Saudi Arabia. Carney identified China as the biggest threat to Canada's national security during the federal election. But in office, he's taken steps to thaw relations and ease Beijing's penalties on Canadian agricultural products. At the same time he is moving to block Chinese steel dumping via higher tariff rates against transshipment countries — in line with U.S. concerns. He rolled out a G7 welcome mat to India's Narendra Modi as a criminal investigation struggles to probe India's role in the killing of a Canadian Sikh in Surrey. And Carney invited Saudi Arabia Crown prince Mohamed bin Salman, the kingdom's de facto ruler, who declined to attend, in a week where the Saudi regime executed a journalist. Those three countries, China, India and Saudi Arabia are key economic players that are ignored at Canada's peril, said Stein. 'Where he's a pragmatist is in the recognition that every decision has trade-offs. You cannot make it a high priority to diversify your partnerships when you are the smaller next-door neighbour to a country that you are sending 75 per cent of your exports to and buying 75 per cent of everything that you buy in defence from that one country, which is the United States, and then continue to exclude others in the international community.' In parallel, said Stein, Carney is acting to ensure that Canada's economy is 'fit for purpose.' The bill to fast-track 'nation-building' development projects is part of that effort, as is his move to do 'important' consultation with Indigenous groups, but done simultaneously with other reviews, 'not sequentially,' she said. Carney is 'connecting defence, foreign policy to the Canadian economy because that's his comfort zone,' said Margaret McCuaig-Johnston, a senior fellow in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa. But she worries the emphasis on 'pragmatic' sends the wrong signal to countries like China, India or Saudi Arabia which will interpret it to mean Canada is ready to overlook human rights concerns in favour of doing business. Jonathan Berkshire Miller, director of foreign affairs, national defence and security policy at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, said Carney is necessarily focused on 'two imperatives: mending the relationship with the United States and diversification from it.' And while Carney's experience gives him credibility in Washington 'where he is well known among economic and diplomatic elites,' Trump's second term makes traditional diplomatic approaches 'increasingly unrealistic,' he said. There is an inevitable geographic and economic reality, he said in a written response to the Star. 'America remains Canada's largest trading partner.' So rather than a drastic shift or severing of ties, he said, 'Expect, instead, a policy of pragmatic hedging: building multilateral ties while trying to be on balanced terms' with who is in the White House. For now, Carney may have some latitude, he believes. Increased defence spending can bring Canada greater strategic autonomy on Arctic sovereignty, cybersecurity and intelligence sharing. The narrow question is 'one of political will' where the requirements for sustained federal spending 'and public support' will be the big test, he said, particularly in an era where 'fiscal retrenchment' (Carney has vowed to bring the operating budget into balance) and 'domestic political division are the contemporary realities.' The broader question is whether Carney's pragmatic approach can secure both.
