
How much India should trade with Russia must not be guided by Western diktat
Whatever be the quantum, if at all, of the penalty — a new bill introduced in the US Congress seeks to impose a 500 per cent duty on all goods and services imports from countries 'that knowingly engage in the exchange of Russian-origin uranium and petroleum products' — one thing is certain: The Western sanctions noose is tightening. For India, too, buying Russian oil cannot be business as before. The Narendra Modi government has so far — rightly — not been defensive over massively stepping up sourcing of Russian crude that is available at a discount relative to global benchmark prices. It has cited both the need to prioritise the energy security of India's people as well as the fact that the ban on imports of Russian oil by the US or European Union is not covered under any United Nations sanctions. That argument — about the purchase of this oil being well within India's legitimate and moral rights — still holds.
Pragmatic and matter-of-fact considerations have informed its expanding trade with Russia, even at the risk of Western displeasure, but at the same time, there are geopolitical costs. Those costs could significantly go up, as the EU and US (the Trump administration seems to have closed ranks) increasingly strike at Russia's war machine by targeting its energy revenue streams. That nearly 36 per cent of India's crude imports come from a single country isn't good in the best and safest of times. Prudence demands — and this is important from the standpoint of securing the country's long-term energy security — that costs beyond the immediate also be factored in. That would mean diversifying the sources of oil supply, similar to de-risking trade with China. Whether and how much India should trade with any country must be guided by its own national interest.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump repeats claim he settled wars, including between India and Pakistan, with trade
US President Donald Trump on Sunday yet again took credit for stopping conflicts around the world, including the recent one between India and Pakistan. US President Donald Trump walks off Air Force One at the Lehigh Valley International Airport on August 01, 2025 in Allentown, Pennsylvania.(AFP) Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a 'full and immediate' ceasefire after a 'long night' of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim on several occasions. Trump's latest claim comes days after White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for ending several conflicts around the world including the one between India and Pakistan. On Sunday, in a post on Truth Social, Trump slammed radio host and author Charlamagne Tha God, and said he (God) knows nothing about him or what he has done, 'like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda, where Seven Million people have died, and there was no end in sight.' 'He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy,' Trump said. Just a day earlier, Trump said in an interview on Newsmax that he has settled a lot of wars. 'You take a look at what's happened just over the last little while. We've settled a lot of, a lot of very beautiful wars have been settled… One of the wars India, Pakistan, nuclear,' Trump said adding that he settled conflict between Thailand and Cambodia as well as Congo and Rwanda. 'I settled that up. And I settled it up with trade. I settled a lot of them with trade. I said 'listen, you guys are going to fight. You can fight all you want. I mean, just fight your hearts out. But we're not doing a trade deal'. 'All of a sudden they end up not doing a war. I settled a lot of wars. I think I settled averaging about a war a month. But, you know, we're saving millions of lives,' he said. Trump on Wednesday announced the imposition of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. The tariff for Pakistan was 19 per cent, lower than the 29 per cent announced by Trump in April. In fact, Trump on Wednesday also announced sealing a trade deal with Pakistan and said that Washington will work with Islamabad to develop what he described as the South Asian nation's 'massive oil reserves.' At a White House press briefing on Thursday, Leavitt said that Trump has 'now ended conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Serbia and Kosovo and Egypt and Ethiopia.' She said that the president has brokered, on average, about one peace deal or ceasefire per month during his six months in office. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' she said. Since May 10, Trump has repeated his claim nearly 30 times that he 'helped settle' the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a 'lot of trade' with them if they stopped the conflict. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said in Parliament this week that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor launched by India in retaliation after the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam that killed 26 people. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Wednesday categorically said there was no third-party intervention in bringing about a ceasefire with Pakistan during Operation Sindoor, asserting that the halting of the military action was also not linked to trade as claimed by Trump. Intervening in the special discussion on Operation Sindoor in the Rajya Sabha, Jaishankar said Prime Minister Modi and Trump did not have any phone calls between April 22, when the Pahalgam terror attack took place, and June 16.


The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Congress to stage protest outside Assembly against slum demolitions
The Congress's Delhi unit on Sunday said it will stage a protest outside the Assembly on the first day of the Monsoon Session on Monday, primarily against the demolition drives carried out in slum clusters across the city. The party said it will raise other issues such as the 'deteriorating law and order' situation, the 'false promise' of ₹2,500 per month to the women, and waterlogging. It will also protest against the school education Bill for being 'anti-parent and anti-education'. Delhi Congress president Devender Yadav said party members met slum dwellers, who he said are living in 'constant fear of being displaced'. 'The BJP government, since it came to power, has already displaced 15,000 families,' the Delhi Congress chief said, adding that slum dwellers should not be displaced without alternative arrangements even if there is a need to relocate them. 'After Rahul Gandhi raised the issue of demolition of JJ Clusters in the Lok Sabha, the Chief Minister of Delhi [Rekha Gupta], under pressure, said that not a single slum in Delhi will be demolished, but on the other hand, asserted that the slums along the railway lines cannot be saved. He [Rahul Gandhi] urged the Delhi government to clarify its intentions towards the slum dwellers, instead of playing with the lives of the poor people,' Mr. Yadav said. Alleging that the Arvind Kejriwal government has locked thousands of flats constructed by the Congress under the Rajiv Rattan Housing Scheme, aimed at providing better living conditions for the poor, for 11 years, Mr. Yadav said, 'Those houses should be repaired and allotted soon to the residents of slums.' Meanwhile, on Saturday, Ms. Gupta inspected government flats built for economically weaker sections (EWS) in 2011 in Sultanpuri, which are in a dilapidated condition. She said that the government is working to meet the demand for one million houses.


Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
US top official signals Donald Trump's tariff rates ‘pretty much set' ahead of August 7 rollout
US President Donald Trump's global tariff policy is coming into sharper focus as his administration moves to implement revised trade measures. The updated slate of customised tariffs—ranging from 10% to 40%—is set to take effect on August 7, according to an executive order issued last week. 'These tariff rates are pretty much set,' said US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer during an appearance on CBS News. 'I expect I do have my phone blowing up... we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates.' Trump first unveiled a baseline 10% tariff on nearly all US imports on April 2, dubbed 'Liberation Day,' followed by a series of higher, country-specific rates. The initial announcement triggered a stock market downturn, prompting the administration to delay implementation twice to allow time for negotiations. In the weeks following 'Liberation Day,' Trump's trade team engaged in fast-track talks with numerous countries. Agreements were reportedly reached with the European Union, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Thailand, and others. 'Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country,' Greer explained. 'There are trade ministers who want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States,' said Greer. 'But I think that we have, we're seeing truly the contours of the President's tariff plan right now with these rates.' As part of Trump's broader trade strategy, a tariff truce with China is currently in place but is set to expire on August 12. Simultaneously, the administration has given Russia until August 8 to reach a peace agreement with Ukraine. Failure to do so may lead to secondary tariffs or sanctions on countries purchasing Russian oil. The sweeping tariff moves are also facing legal scrutiny. Last Thursday, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard arguments related to the administration's authority to impose such tariffs. Trump invoked emergency powers to justify the measures, but legal experts have raised questions about the extent of his authority.