logo
'Florida's got a great shot': Push begins to bring NASA headquarters to Space Coast

'Florida's got a great shot': Push begins to bring NASA headquarters to Space Coast

USA Today10-02-2025
'Florida's got a great shot': Push begins to bring NASA headquarters to Space Coast
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Haridopolos discusses Chinese threat to U.S. space interests
FLORIDA TODAY's John A. Torres discusses a variety of topics with Mike Haridopolos, the Republican representing Florida's 8th Congressional district.
U.S. Rep. Mike Haridopolos wants to move NASA headquarters out of its underutilized, leased building in Washington, D.C. — and he hopes to help convince President Donald Trump to bring it to Florida's Kennedy Space Center instead of potential contending states like Alabama and Texas.
The week after Trump won the November election, NASA issued a press release saying it seeks options for a future headquarters building. The lease at Mary W. Jackson NASA Headquarters expires in August 2028.
This building in the nation's capital has 545,731 usable square feet — but that space was only about 15% occupied during 2023 amid the post-pandemic work environment, according to a Public Buildings Reform Board interim report to Congress.
Cape Canaveral: Is there a launch today? Upcoming SpaceX, NASA rocket launch schedule at Cape Canaveral
"As a Floridian — and as the president is a Floridian — I'd love to have the NASA headquarters here at KSC. But it's one step at a time. And I think we need to make the best pitch for the (return on investment) and the effectiveness of it," Haridopolos, an Indian Harbour Beach Republican, said during an interview in his Viera district office.
"And talk to not just NASA — but remember, more and more, NASA and commercial space are being tied together. The people that are making our space operations so successful, we want to get their input as well before we make this big decision," Haridopolos said.
"You're talking about at least a half-a-billion-dollar building where NASA operates out of. The smart thing to do is to ask the people who are actually the boots on the ground — or in this case, the rockets taking off — of their opinion. And I'm optimistic that Florida's got a great shot to get that headquarters," he said.
In its Nov. 14 press release, NASA officials said they were searching for a new headquarters with about 375,000 to 525,000 square feet of office space in Washington or the immediate surrounding area.
"The NASA Headquarters building lease is up in 2028, and the agency continues to work through options," KSC News Chief Patti Bielling said in a Tuesday email.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis made headlines last month when he called for NASA headquarters to move to KSC during a press conference. Late last month, Haridopolos was appointed chair of the House Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, which is tasked with overseeing America's space policy and programs.
Longtime Space Coast resident Bill Nelson stepped down as NASA administrator last month, and Trump appointee and Polaris Dawn commander Jared Isaacman awaits confirmation to replace him.
"It's a two-phased fight. First phase is, we need to make sure that the NASA headquarters is taken out of Washington, D.C. There is no need to have those headquarters in Washington, D.C. The action is taking place primarily here in Florida," Haridopolos said.
"The closer we are to the action, the more effective the agency's going to be," he said.
How would moving headquarters impact NASA?
Don Platt, director of the Florida Institute of Technology's Spaceport Education Center in Titusville, questioned the strategic effectiveness of moving NASA's headquarters to the Space Coast.
Why? He said NASA's interesting and important work happens at technical sites like KSC, Johnson Space Center in Texas, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California — while the Washington, D.C., headquarters are populated by "bean counters" and "policy wonks, if you will."
"I think that a key for any government agency is the ability to interact with their funding source, and that's Congress. And I'm not sure that being located in Florida would really enable that key element of NASA's requirements," Platt said.
"Congress holds the purse strings. And so, it's much easier to just run up to Capitol Hill when you need to try to lobby for more NASA funding, for instance, than being here in Florida and having to fly up there all the time," he said.
Platt said the influx of jobs would benefit the Space Coast, and the addition of NASA's command post would help cement Florida's status as "the space state." But he questioned the nationwide impact across the agency.
"I'm not sure that being isolated in one state is really the best for the ability for NASA to make sure that other important states — related states such as Alabama, Virginia, Texas, California — are supporting the mission as well. And so, I think there are some concerns there," Platt said.
"I'm sure that Florida would offer some impressive incentives for headquarters to come here. But I think overall, for the vision and mission of NASA, I'm not sure that it's really the best fit for them," he said.
Elsewhere in Florida, U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-St. Petersburg, wrote a Jan. 22 letter to Trump supporting the relocation of NASA's headquarters to Florida's Space Coast.
Writing the move "would offer significant strategic, economic, and logistical advantages to NASA and the United States," Luna cited major private space industry players like SpaceX, Blue Origin and Boeing.
"Additionally, the presence of the U.S. Space Force in Florida presents a unique opportunity for NASA to collaborate more closely with military space operations. Such proximity would enhance coordination on key projects like satellite technology, national security space initiatives, and advanced space exploration missions," Luna's letter said.
"By co-locating NASA with the Space Force, the two agencies could share resources, streamline operations, and increase efficiency in both military and civilian space programs," the letter said.
NASA HQ move draws laughter during SpaceCom
SpaceCom, a major annual industry conference, took place late last month at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando. During a Jan. 30 panel discussion on public-private partnerships, the No. 1 question submitted by audience members dealt with NASA headquarters relocating to Florida.
Jonathan Baker, chief of spaceport development at Kennedy Space Center, was placed on the spot and asked to reply as the agency's lone representative on stage — drawing smiles and laughter from the crowd.
"We're focused on exploration and innovation. And so, we want to enable that in whatever way possible, right? So however the agency deems best to accomplish that here at KSC, we're ready and on board to support that," Baker replied.
"Whether that means a move for headquarters or not, we are ready to support whatever the agency needs to move forward," he said.
"Excellent answer," said panel moderator Kevin Brown, eliciting more laughs. He is senior vice president of business development with All Points Logistics on Merritt Island.
"I mean, it would make a lot of sense to move NASA headquarters to Kennedy Space Center. Just saying," Space Florida President and CEO Rob Long, a fellow panelist, said in return.
Palm Bay leaders invite NASA to their city
The Palm Bay City Council unanimously approved a resolution Jan. 16 supporting Brevard County as a permanent location for NASA headquarters, Space Force command or similar agencies.
Specifically, the resolution supported expanded governmental use of the Space Force Malabar Transmitter Annex, citing the economic impact of high-skill, high-paying jobs. Military personnel occasionally conduct training at this 462-acre facility, a former U.S. Navy airfield controlled by Space Launch Delta 45.
"We have a giant chunk of federal land, right off Minton Road, that is very sparsely used," Councilman Chandler Langevin said during that brief discussion.
"That could be very easily converted into a federal building or an expansion of the Space Force. I just wanted to pass this resolution to send up to our congressman and our federal lobbyist to let them know in Washington, D.C., that we are on the menu," he said.
The resolution was seconded by Mayor Rob Medina, who works as a case manager in Haridopolos' office.
NASA HQ mentioned during county wastewater discussion
Brevard County Commissioner Thad Altman also raised the topic during the county commission's discussion on $130 million in potential Space Florida upgrades to boost capacity at the Sykes Creek Wastewater Treatment Facility on Merritt Island to accommodate commercial space industry growth.
"I would assume that we did include the possibility of NASA moving its headquarters to Kennedy Space Center. Would that growth be included in these numbers?" Commissioner Thad Altman asked during the Jan. 28 discussion.
The wastewater expansion project could accommodate NASA's headquarters, replied Dale Ketcham, Space Florida vice president of government and external relations.
"We can adjust for that. We are pursuing that, as per the governor's directive. We were looking at that even in advance," Ketcham said.
Altman is president and CEO of the Astronauts Memorial Foundation at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex. The spaceport project would increase the Merritt Island wastewater facility's treatment capacity by 300,000 gallons per day by 2027 and 700,000 gallons per day by 2034.
For the latest news from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center, visit floridatoday.com/space.
Rick Neale is a Space Reporter at FLORIDA TODAY. Contact Neale at Rneale@floridatoday.com. Twitter/X: @RickNeale1
Space is important to us and that's why we're working to bring you top coverage of the industry and Florida launches. Journalism like this takes time and resources. Please support it with a subscription here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress slashes aid to Colombia over drug use allegations in Petro's government
Congress slashes aid to Colombia over drug use allegations in Petro's government

Miami Herald

time25 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Congress slashes aid to Colombia over drug use allegations in Petro's government

A powerful congressional panel led by Florida Republican Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart is moving to sharply cut non-military U.S. aid to Colombia, citing a combination of rising instability, weakening rule of law and growing concerns about drug use within the highest levels of President Gustavo Petro's government. In a report released this week alongside the 2026 National Security, Department of State and Related Programs Appropriations Bill, the House Appropriations Committee criticized Petro's government for what it called 'detrimental policies, erratic behavior and malign relationships.' The report also flagged concerns about increased drug use in Colombia, including among top government officials, and what it described as a deteriorating security situation. As a result, the committee is proposing a 50% reduction in non-military assistance to Colombia compared to 2025 levels. The move, driven by Díaz-Balart — chair of the subcommittee that oversees foreign aid — signals a shift in what has long been a bipartisan consensus supporting Colombia as a close strategic ally in the U.S.-led fight against narcotrafficking. The bill still requires approval by the full House and reconciliation with Senate legislation before becoming law. Still, the proposed cuts point to a significant cooling in relations between Washington and Bogotá, adding pressure on Petro's government amid growing domestic and international scrutiny. The committee report referenced the June 7 assassination attempt against opposition senator and 2026 presidential candidate Miguel Uribe Turbay as emblematic of Colombia's mounting political instability. It also cited the resurgence of armed groups in regions previously reclaimed under Plan Colombia, the multi-billion-dollar U.S. security initiative launched in the early 2000s. 'The security environment is deteriorating, and political volatility is on the rise,' the report states, warning of escalating violence in several parts of the country. Among the more unusual elements of the report is its focus on domestic drug consumption in Colombia—traditionally seen as a drug-producing nation rather than a consumer one. The congressional committee directs the secretary of state to consult with Congress within 90 days on launching drug demand-reduction programs in Colombia. The report's reference to alleged substance abuse among government officials comes amid renewed political turmoil in Bogotá. Earlier this year, a leaked audio recording surfaced in which former Foreign Minister Álvaro Leyva — once a key Petro ally — appeared to call for Petro's removal from office, reportedly citing health concerns. According to the Madrid newspaper El País, Leyva traveled to Washington in April and attempted to meet with Republican leaders, including Díaz-Balart and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. It remains unclear whether any of those meetings actually took place or whether U.S. officials seriously entertained Leyva's claims. The committee also raised alarms over judicial proceedings against former President Álvaro Uribe Vélez, a staunch U.S. ally. The report cites alleged due process violations, unauthorized surveillance and judicial politicization as cause for concern, framing the case as part of a broader trend of democratic erosion worldwide. 'These challenges reflect a troubling pattern of threats to due process and judicial independence,' the report reads. Despite the proposed cuts to development and civilian law enforcement aid, military support remains largely unchanged. The bill allocates $38.5 million in Foreign Military Financing and $67.3 million for National Security Investment Programs. The International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement account would receive $103 million, underscoring the continued importance of counternarcotics efforts in the bilateral relationship. If adopted, the bill would mark a rare and dramatic recalibration of U.S.-Colombia ties, long rooted in security cooperation but now increasingly strained under Petro's leftist government.

These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure
These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

These 11 Republicans are backing the Khana-Massie Epstein measure

A bipartisan effort to force a binding House vote on releasing the 'Epstein files' has picked up Republican support, though just how many in the GOP ultimately support the measure won't be seen at least until the lower chamber returns from its August recess. The bipartisan bill from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) is one of two measures related to the Epstein files, which have effectively stymied the entire chamber and prompted Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) to send members home early. It has the 11 Republican and nine Democratic co-sponsors as of Wednesday. Massie and Khanna have vowed to file a discharge petition to bypass House leadership and force their bill to the floor with 218 signatures. Discharge petitions are rarely successful, and seldom used by members of the majority. But Massie and Khanna's could be successful if all 11 GOP co-sponsors sign on with all Democrats. It would not be ready for a vote until September due to procedural rules. The measure would require Attorney General Pam Bondi to make public 'in a searchable and downloadable format' all 'unclassified records, documents, communications and investigative materials in the possession' of the Justice Department (DOJ) related to the late sex offender and disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. Massie has led the charge from the GOP side and taken heat from Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who on Tuesday said he was baffled about Massie's motivations. The House will now leave town Thursday, a day earlier than scheduled, for its recess. Democrats have hammered Johnson for avoiding any summer votes on the Epstein bills. Here are the Republicans who are backing the measure. Lauren Boebert Rep. Lauren Boebert (Colo.), a fierce ally of President Trump, was one of the first lawmakers to call for a special counsel to investigate the government's handling of the files. 'People are frustrated. We want to know if there's more information,' the Colorado lawmaker said on NewsNation last week. Boebert was among the lawmakers who celebrated the Trump administration's move in February to reveal what it claimed were the Epstein files — a move that ended up disappointing many observers who hoped for new revelations. In 2020, while Boebert was running for her first term in Congress, she appeared to indulge a conspiracy theory that Epstein did not die by suicide. 'Is 2020 a set up so we all forget Epstein didn't kill himself?' she wrote then on X, adding a chin-scratching emoji. The medical examiner ruled that Epstein, who was in New York City jail awaiting trial, died by suicide in 2019. The DOJ and the FBI reaffirmed the cause of his death in an unnamed memo earlier this month, where officials also said that the disgraced financier did not keep the so-called 'client list.' Jeff Van Drew Rep. Jeff Van Drew (N.J.) switched from the Democratic Party to the GOP in 2020 over Trump's first impeachment. The New Jersey Republican, who represents a South Jersey district that includes Atlantic City, has not commented extensively on the Epstein files. 'The American people deserve full transparency,' Van Drew said in a post on X announcing his support. Marjorie Taylor Greene Epstein is one of the rare issues on which Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), one of the most prominent MAGA Republicans in Congress, has not been in lock-step with the president. The Georgia lawmaker has warned that voters could turn on Trump over the controversy. 'If you tell the base of people, who support you, of deep state treasonous crimes, election interference, blackmail, and rich powerful elite evil cabals, then you must take down every enemy of The People,' she wrote on X Monday. If not, 'The base will turn and there's no going back.' Greene celebrated Trump's move to ask to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein last week, and derided Democratic outrage on the issue as 'fake.' Eric Burlison Rep. Eric Burlison (Mo.), a two-term congressman, has blamed both the DOJ and the 'deep state' for hiding files related to Epstein. He expressed skepticism early on about the DOJ-FBI memo, as well as their release of hours of surveillance footage from outside Epstein's cell. The footage is missing about one minute around midnight, which Bondi has said was due to standard resetting of the prison's security cameras every night. 'What is a reasonable person supposed to conclude when they're first told the footage doesn't exist, only to see it later released, showing a different cell and missing a full minute?' Burlison wrote on X the day the footage was released. Tim Burchett Rep. Tim Burchett (Tenn.) successfully pushed Tuesday for a subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee to subpoena Maxwell, Epstein's longtime associate who is serving a lengthy prison sentence. 'It's about to get real. I just did this,' he wrote on X after moving to issue the subpoena. Burchett has also criticized the Democrats, who celebrated the subpoena, for not caring about Epstein until Trump had been encircled in the controversy. 'If Democrats were serious about this issue, they wouldn't have waited four years to bring it up,' he said on CNN last week. Cory Mills Rep. Cory Mills (Fla.) has not yet publicly commented on his decision to co-sponsor the resolution. He garnered headlines for a different reason last week after news broke of court filings alleging that he owed $85,000 in back rent at his D.C. apartment. Mills blamed an online processing error and has since said the debt is settled. Mills was previously a Trump appointee on the Defense Business Board. He represents a coastal district in north-central Florida, centered on the town of New Smyrna Beach. Max Miller Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio) said last week he signed on the petition because he believes in 'transparency and delivering the truth' to the American people. Miller previously was Trump's senior advisor during his first White House term and was in the Marine Corps Reserves for six years. Also in recent but unrelated news, Miller said last month he was run off the road by a 'deranged man' who was waving a Palestinian flag and hurled death threats before driving off. Eli Crane Rep. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.), a staunch Trump defender and member of the conservative Freedom Caucus, announced he would co-sign Massie's measure last week, writing 'Add me. Transparency matters.' The former Navy SEAL, who sits on the subcommittee on border security enforcement, told Axios 'that's been something that I've supported from day one … I think there needs to be transparency, and I'm glad to see that this is bipartisan because it should be.' Nancy Mace Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) has linked her support for Epstein transparency to her own alleged experience with sexual violence. In February, she accused four men, including her former fiancé, of a range of sex crimes. All four men have denied accusations. 'I've always been an advocate for women and children. The Jeffrey Epstein case is no different. I want to see arrests. I want to see any one who raped underage girls in handcuffs and behind bars,' Mace, who is mulling a run for South Carolina governor, said in a X post last week. 'No more passes for predators,' she added. 'May God bless President Trump – he's never let us down before!' Mace said in an interview that she was in favor of appointing a special counsel to probe who might be involved in trafficking girls and young women, along with investigating if anyone destroyed evidence. 'If the Justice Department can be more transparent on this, it would be best for the country. People don't trust the government, and we haven't given them much reason to over the past few years,' Mace told The New York Times last week. Keith Self Rep. Keith Self (R-Texas), a military veteran, said during an interview on Wednesday that the bipartisan Massie-Khanna measure will 'easily pass' the lower chamber if it comes to a full vote. 'We want to expose the criminals, we want to protect the victims. Recent reports said there were 1000 victims, we need to figure out who perpetrated the crimes against those victims and this seems to be the only way that we're going to get to do it,' Self told Newsmax. Self noted that the release of the Epstein files has widespread support among the American public and predicted that the petition will secure 218 votes in the House. 'But again, this is an issue of justice. It's an issue of transparency and frankly, accountability of the government. The American people want to see a government that is accountable to our employers, who are the citizens, the voters of the United States,' the Texas Republican said. 'It is as simple as that.' Tom Barrett Rep. Tom Barrett (R-Mich.) said last week there are too many 'questions and not enough answers' about the Epstein files. 'I agree that it's time to release them, which is why I put my name on a resolution to force their release and give the American people the transparency they deserve,' Barrett wrote on X. Democrats At least nine Democrats have signed onto the measure, as the party looks to fuel GOP angst over the Epstein files and force tough votes on the issue. The co-sponsors are: Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Rashida Tlaib (Mich.), Jim McGovern (Mass.), Hank Johnson (Ga.), Jamie Raskin (Md.), Ryan Patrick (N.Y.), Debbie Dingell (Mich.), Joe Neguse (Colo.), Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Nydia Velazquez (N.Y.).

Dems mount surprise 11th-hour push to subpoena Epstein files
Dems mount surprise 11th-hour push to subpoena Epstein files

Axios

time25 minutes ago

  • Axios

Dems mount surprise 11th-hour push to subpoena Epstein files

Democrats are launching a last-minute effort to subpoena the Department of Justice for its files on Jeffrey Epstein before the House leaves for its five-week summer recess. Why it matters: It is not clear how Republicans will respond after spending the last two weeks blocking similar Democratic efforts at President Trump's urging. Trump and his GOP allies in Congress have faced an uproar from their MAGA base after the DOJ said earlier this month that Epstein had no "client list" and died by suicide. Democrats have spent the ensuing weeks gleefully forcing Republicans to go on the record opposing rogue measures to force the release of the documents. What happened: Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), the ranking member of the House Oversight Subcommittee on Federal Law Enforcement, introduced a motion to subpoena the documents during an unrelated hearing on immigration. She and other Democrats noted that a majority of Republicans on the panel are members of the right-wing Freedom Caucus who have made the Epstein matter a cause célèbre for years. "The Republican members of the committee, including the chair, have all called to release the Epstein files, so now they have an opportunity to make true on their words," said Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the full Oversight Committee. The other side: Republicans on the subcommittee were seemingly blindsided by the move. Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), the chair of the subcommittee, suspended the motion until the end of the hearing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store