
Will speeding up the rail line for Northern Metropolis entice Hong Kong developers?
Amid a depressed property market, developers have voiced concerns over their profit margins if they commit to building in the hub, which Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office Director Xia Baolong urged the city to complete as soon as possible.
Sources told the Post that a key topic for Xia during his recent visits to Hong Kong was the Northern Metropolis and its potential as the city's next game changer for its economic future.
On Tuesday, the Transport and Logistics Bureau announced a first-phase deal with the MTR Corporation that would lower the cost of construction and bring forward the completion of a cross-border spur line by at least two years to 2034.
The deal covers the creation of the Northern Link spur line, which will start at Chau Tau station and end at Shenzhen's Huanggang Port station, allowing commuters to cross the border with greater ease.
Financing for the Northern Link will be boosted by the government granting the rail giant 10 development sites and deducting HK$39.05 billion (US$4.97 billion) from its land premiums. It also opens the door for the company to work with mainland partners.
Professor Lau Siu-kai, a consultant with Beijing's semi-official think tank, the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macau Studies, said the government was seeking to show its determination to expedite the project while at the same time incentivising private companies to invest in the development.
'Last year, Director Xia began urging Hong Kong to accelerate development, especially by having developers participate. He even led a group to Shenzhen to discuss this. To some extent, I believe the push to speed up railway construction is partly a response to the central government's particular concerns,' Lau said.
He said he expected that the acceleration of the development of the Northern Metropolis would be a key theme of the next five-year plan covering national development strategies.
'If this is indeed the case, Hong Kong will need to drastically pick up the pace, cutting back on excessive procedures, fast-tracking the approval process for projects and even reducing unnecessary bureaucratic steps and rules,' Lau said.
Formed around the San Tin Technopole and the neighbouring Hong Kong-Shenzhen Innovation and Technology Park in the Loop, the Northern Metropolis is viewed as critical for Hong Kong's future economic growth, with its potential to create about 650,000 jobs. About 2.5 million people are expected to live in the new area.
In January, the Hong Kong Real Property Federation and the China Real Estate Chamber of Commerce urged the government to expedite infrastructure construction to enhance the development potential of sites and reduce uncertainties for investors.
'The early completion of transport infrastructure will benefit the relocation of residents, businesses, and academic institutions, leading to thriving human traffic that will boost overall economic development and increase developers' willingness to invest,' Louis Loong Hon-biu, a lawmaker and also the secretary general of the Real Estate Developers Association, said.
Asked if the acceleration of infrastructure development could prod investors into action, Loong said the completion times of the different infrastructure projects would influence their plans.
He also expressed hope that the government would communicate effectively with companies to introduce details of mainland standards to be used in the construction of the spur line, so players could prepare accordingly.
Construction of the spur line is due to begin in 2027 and end in 2034, the same year the Northern Main Line is scheduled to go into operation.
Kathy Lee, head of research at commercial property agency Colliers, said the earlier completion date and the HK$39.05 billion (US$4.97 billion) in financing the government has offered to the MTR Corporation could boost market interest in the Northern Metropolis.
But she noted it would still take nine years to complete the rail lines, while facilities would be ready to be occupied in the coming few years.
'The major concern of developers is about the occupancy rate, whether businesses are interested in setting foot in the project and need that much floor space,' Lee said. 'The market still has questions about that.'
She suggested the government could help line up developers and innovation and technology companies hoping to set up offices in the city to tackle developers' concerns.
But Vera Yuen Wing-han, an economics lecturer at the University of Hong Kong, said the government's new time frame might not incentivise developers to buy plots due to their current financial position.
'Many are grappling with substantial debt, which limits their capacity to bid on new land due to their cash flow,' she said.
Last November, 85 business heavyweights pledged to support and participate in Hong Kong's Northern Metropolis megaproject.
Yuen added that a critical factor influencing developer sentiment was the Northern Metropolis' proximity to the mainland and the ongoing integration between the two jurisdictions.
Some fear investing heavily in the new development could lead to property values being benchmarked against mainland prices, which are generally lower. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Zuckerberg squaring off against Meta investors
MARK Zuckerberg is expected to appear as a star witness in an unusual US$8 billion trial that kicks off this week at which the Meta chief executive officer is accused of operating Facebook as an illegal enterprise that allowed users' data to be harvested without their consent. > Shareholders of Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, sued Zuckerberg and other current and former company leaders, saying they continually violated a 2012 agreement between Facebook and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to protect users' data. The case dates back to 2018, after it emerged that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful campaign for United States president in 2016. Shareholders want Zuckerberg and the other defendants to reimburse the company for more than US$8 billion in fines and other costs paid by Meta after the Cambridge Analytica scandal came to light, including a record US$5 billion fine imposed on Facebook by the FTC in 2019 for violating the 2012 agreement. Defendants in the case include former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, as well as former board members Peter Thiel, the Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, the co-founder of Netflix. Zuckerberg and the other defendants, who declined to comment, have dismissed the allegations in court filings as "extreme claims". Meta, which is not a defendant, also declined to comment. The non-jury trial in Wilmington, Delaware, is scheduled to last eight days. It will mostly focus on decade-old events and board meetings to determine how Facebook leaders implemented the 2012 agreement. While the trial will cover long-ago policies, it comes as privacy concerns continue to dog Meta, which is under scrutiny for its training of artificial intelligence (AI) models. The company says it has invested billions of dollars since 2019 in its programme to safeguard users' privacy. Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers, said the case would fill in details about what the board knew — and when — regarding the data of users, who now total more than three billion daily across Meta's platforms. "There's an argument we can't avoid Facebook and Instagram in our lives," he said. "Can we trust Mark Zuckerberg?" Two years ago, the defendants sought to dismiss the case before trial, which the judge declined. "This is a case involving alleged wrongdoing on a truly colossal scale," said Travis Laster, the judge handling the case at the time. The trial in the Court of Chancery will be overseen by Kathaleen McCormick. Now the plaintiffs, individual investors and union pension funds, including California's State Teachers' Retirement System, must prove what is often described as the most difficult claim in corporate law — showing that directors utterly failed in their duty of oversight. Legal experts said it appeared to be the first trial on such a claim. Zuckerberg and Sandberg are alleged to have knowingly caused the company to violate the law. While Delaware law protects directors and officers for bad business decisions, it does not protect them from illegal ones, even if they are profitable. Defendants said in court filings that plaintiffs could not deliver the evidence. The shareholders in pre-trial court papers said they could prove that after the 2012 agreement, Facebook continued deceptive privacy practices, at the direction of Zuckerberg. The defendants said the evidence would show that the company built a team to oversee privacy and hired an outside compliance firm and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's "studied deceit". In addition to the central privacy claims, plaintiffs also allege that when Zuckerberg could see that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was about to break and send company stock lower, he was motivated to offload his stock and reaped at least US$1 billion in profit. Defendants said evidence would show he used a stock-trading plan that could protect against insider-trading allegations. They also said the motivation was to benefit his charitable pursuits.


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Miti's AI chip export rule to have no impact on data centres
KUALA LUMPUR: MIDF Amanah Investment Bank Bhd believes that data centres will not be affected by the Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry's (MITI) latest directive on artificial intelligence (AI) chips. The ministry has issued a directive which requires all exports, transshipments and transits of high-performance AI chips of United States (US) origin in Malaysia to obtain a Strategic Trade Permit (STP). In a research note today, the investment bank said the import of US-made advanced AI chips for use in domestic servers does not fall under the scope of the new rules unless the data centre operators intend to move the chips out of Malaysia. "There is zero impact from this directive in our opinion, as far as data centres in Malaysia are concerned. This is not an additional red tape that could delay the process of setting up a data centre in Malaysia,' it said. MIDF noted that since the beginning of the year, it has consistently reiterated that most new data centres are AI-ready, though some may eventually be used for non-AI purposes. The investment bank said the directive primarily addresses the movement of AI chips out of Malaysia, which it views as a prudent move by MITI to prevent suspected smuggling of chips into China through intermediaries. "This shows Malaysia's willingness to take responsibility for the movement of US-origin AI chips out of the country by stepping up its enforcement,' it added. MIDF said negotiations between Malaysia and the US will likely focus on regulatory enforcement, end-user monitoring, and the seriousness in addressing violations of the control measures. "MITI's latest directive covers all these. It is hoped that this will be able to placate the US when negotiating the restrictions of AI chip exports under Trump's refashioned AI Diffusion Rule,' it said. It added that speculation is growing around a possible shift from the current three-tiered country system to a licensing regime based on government-to-government agreements. This could mean that firms headquartered in the US or its close allies may no longer be restricted by the current seven per cent AI computing power limit for countries outside Tier 1, which allows for more AI capacities to be planned in countries such as Malaysia. "Regardless of the changes from Biden's rescinded Framework of AI Diffusion to the new rule being rewritten by the Trump administration, MIDF believes the essence remains, which is to contain China's AI advancement and ensure that US AI chips are not used to train Chinese AI models,' noted MIDF. - Bernama


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Ringgit strengthens against US dollar as China economic data boosts sentiment
KUALA LUMPUR: The ringgit finished higher against the US dollar at the close on Tuesday as market sentiment improved on the back of better-than-expected economic data from China. News that NVIDIA can resume microchips sales to China also suggested that US tariff shocks could be managed, further lifting sentiments. At 6 pm, the local note rose to 4.2395/2440 from Tuesday's close of 4.2505/2560. SPI Asset Management managing partner Stephen Innes said the ringgit "caught a gentle tailwind' after China's second quarter gross domestic product surprised to the upside, which is a regional morale boost driven not by American demand, but by "China's resilience in non-US export lanes.' "It's a reminder that ASEAN currencies, particularly the ringgit, can still find traction when Beijing's supply engine hums and its trade compass pivots south and east rather than west,' he added. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid agreed that external factors had driven the ringgit and other currencies to a stronger level today. At the close, the ringgit was traded higher against a basket of major currencies. It strengthened against the British pound to 5.7047/7107 from 5.7305/7379, improved against the Japanese yen to 2.8702/8734 from 2.8858/8897 and was up versus the euro at 4.9539/9591 from 4.9693/9757. The local note also trended higher against ASEAN currencies. It traded higher vis-à-vis the Singapore dollar at 3.3095/3133 from 3.3184/3229 yesterday, improved against the Indonesian rupiah to 260.6/261.0 from 261.5/262.0 and strengthened versus the Philippine peso to 7.47/7.49 from 7.50/7.51. It gained against the Thai baht to 13.0784/0988 from 13.1213/1439. - Bernama