Texas lawmakers discuss bills to clarify, toughen abortion laws
Texas lawmakers discussed three bills to address abortion laws in the state
One bill noted that certain abortions are allowed in Texas to address serious emergencies
None of the bills provide exemptions for rape and incest
AUSTIN, Texas - Texas has one of the toughest abortion laws in the country. It's essentially a total ban that abortion advocates claim puts lives at risk.
On Thursday, the Senate State Affairs committee took up three bills to address confusion about what's on the books.
None of the bills provide exemptions for rape and incest.
The backstory
"The intent of this bill is to remove any excuse from a doctor or a hospital treating a mom, for example, with an ectopic pregnancy," said State Senator Bryan Hughes (R) Mineola.
SB 31 known as the "Life of the Mother Act" codifies a recent Texas Supreme Court ruling. In upholding the law, the court noted that certain abortions are allowed in Texas to address serious emergencies.
Supporters of the bill described it as a compromise.
"The unification of the definition should give mothers in Texas the security that their health and life will be respected and protected. Pro-Life advocates can also be assured that this bill in no way allows for additional exceptions or expansions of legal abortion in Texas," said Jennifer Allman with the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops.
The backstory
The committee also considered legislation that toughens existing law.
SB 33 would prevent cities and counties in Texas from allocating public money to help women travel out of the state to get an abortion. The city of Austin has already earmarked $400,000 for what's called a reproductive justice fund.
During the hearing, a similar effort in San Antonio was called a wasteful diversion of taxpayer money.
"22% of our streets are in poor or failing condition. We are more than 200 police officers short. We have so many things that we need to spend our taxpayers' money on that. I hear about every single day in the community meetings that I go to, and not once in any of those community meetings have I ever heard the residents of San Antonio telling me that they want their tax dollars to be spent sending women to other states to receive abortion-related services," said Marc Whyte, who is a member of the San Antonio city council.
The backstory
The committee also considered a broad enforcement bill that could trigger out-of-state court fights.
SB 2880 targets providers of abortion-inducing medications that are prescribed and sent in the mail. The bill classifies paying for/ or reimbursing costs for an abortion as a felony.
The bill would authorize the attorney general to prosecute abortion crimes, and it would allow wrongful death and injury lawsuits six years after an abortion takes place.
The other side
Several abortion advocates voiced opposition to all the bills, arguing that they are unconstitutional.
"I oppose this bill because I am scared. I am scared because myself and those that I love, live here already. Many of my loved ones have left as those who are hoping to start families are afraid to be pregnant in Texas, as they are not sure what kind of care they will receive. Should the worst situations happen," said UT Law student Karly Bruder.
Dig deeper
The committee also took up several other issues.
Hearings were held on legislation to reign in the veto power and emergency powers of the governor.
They also discussed a bill that would address the sale of new types of synthetic drugs that are currently unregulated.
The Source
Information from a Texas legislative session hearing
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
4 hours ago
- Politico
Sen. Eric Schmitt on being a White House whisperer and Senate budget reformer
Sen. Eric Schmitt on being a White House whisperer and Senate budget reformer | The Conversation lead image
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Asks Senate Leader to Cancel Summer Recess to Confirm His ‘Incredible Nominees'
President Donald Trump said Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) should cancel the Senate's summer break and long weekends in order to confirm Trump's nominees, which include some controversial picks, more quickly in a Truth Social post Saturday. 'Hopefully the very talented John Thune, fresh off our many victories over the past two weeks and, indeed, 6 months, will cancel August recess (and long weekends!), in order to get my incredible nominees confirmed,' Trump wrote. 'We need them badly!!!' The Senate is expected to go on recess from Aug. 4 to Sept. 1. It is one of 14 breaks or long weekends on the 2025 calendar. Their most recent break was June 30 to July 4, and then there is another break toward the end of September. Even when the Senate is in session, lawmakers are generally only in their Capitol Hill offices a few days a week, with ample time to travel back home. Senators are scheduled to vote on six nominations on Monday, including Bradley Hansell for under secretary of defense for intelligence and security, and John Hurley for under secretary for terrorism and financial crimes. The Senate is also slated for a major vote on a funding bill. The Senate could soon vote on Emil Bove, a controversial nominee to become a judge on a federal appeals court. He served as one of Trump's personal lawyers before taking a role at the Justice Department. A whistleblower said in June that Bove told lawyers at the Justice Department they 'would need to consider telling the courts 'fuck you' and ignore any such court order' that would block Trump from sending immigrants to prison in El Salvador. A Senate Judiciary Committee advanced his nomination earlier this week, prompting Democrats to walk out. 'I have respect for you Mr. Chairman, but this is outrageous, this is unacceptable, this is wrong,' said Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.). 'This is an abuse of power. It is an undermining of the wellbeing and the integrity of this Senate.' More than 75 former judges asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to reject Bove's nomination. 'Mr. Bove's egregious record of mistreating law enforcement officers, abusing power, and disregarding the law itself disqualifies him for this position,' the group wrote. Another controversial nominee is former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, who is up for the role of U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C. Trump's first choice for the position was Republican lawyer Ed Martin, but he dropped the bid amid opposition. The Senate Judiciary Committee also voted to advance Pirro's nomination. Brian Christine, Trump's nominee for assistant health and human services secretary, is an Alabama urologist who said the issue of teen pregnancy should be left to 'the purview of the parents.' He also said that 'society works best when men and women are fulfilling their roles, when they are doing what they're supposed to do, raising children and propagating the species.' Dozens of people in Malaysia protested the possibility of 'alpha male' influencer Nick Adams becoming U.S. ambassador to the country over his posts criticizing Islam and supporting the Israeli military. Another nomination drawing controversy is that of law professor Jennifer Mascott, Trump's nominee for a federal appeals court seat in Delaware, who is not licensed to practice law in the state. More from Rolling Stone Tulsi Gabbard Helps Boost Trump's Russia Crusade, Calling for Prosecution of Obama Officials Democrats Are Preparing a Deliberately Incomplete 2024 Election Autopsy These Right-Wingers Won't Shut Up About Epstein, No Matter What Trump Says Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrats scramble to torpedo controversial Trump judicial nominee
Senate Judiciary Democrats are scrambling to make their case as the panel weighs the controversial judicial nomination of a Trump official accused of proposing the Justice Department (DOJ) defy court orders. Emil Bove, the principal deputy attorney general, has been nominated for a lifetime appointment to a bench of the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. Democrats made a last-ditch effort Tuesday to call a hearing with the whistleblower who said he heard Bove suggest the Trump administration should consider ignoring potential court rulings on their plans to send migrants to foreign prisons, with Bove saying they may tell the courts, 'F‑‑‑ you.' But Bove looks poised to proceed, as the one Senate Judiciary Republican who has opposed the nominee, Sen. Thom Tillis (N.C.) has signaled he would back his confirmation, which would bring a vote before the full Senate. Bove is expected to have the votes to win confirmation on the Senate floor, where Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said the committee must hear from the whistleblower behind the accusations: Erez Reuveni, who was fired after a disclosure he made in a related case, telling a judge that Kilmar Abrego Garcia was deported in error. 'I don't think we should move forward with this vote until we've given the whistleblower an opportunity under oath before the committee to tell us what happened, what we have here. Mr. Bove was in a position where he was encouraging members of the Department of Justice to mislead the judge on the case. That is just unacceptable, unprofessional conduct,' Durbin said Tuesday on CNN referencing the planned Thursday vote. 'This gentleman is prepared to go under oath and to speak to the committee about what he saw and what Mr. Bove did. We should get that done before there's any vote in the committee on his nomination.' Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), however, says the vote will go forward as planned. Bove, previously a member of Trump's personal criminal defense team, currently serves in the No. 3 spot in the DOJ. Should his nomination advance Thursday, he would be launched to a sphere of the judiciary from which Supreme Court justices are often chosen. Numerous groups have also objected to Bove's nomination. Seventy-five formal federal judges signed on to a letter opposing his nomination, calling his dismissal of prosecutors, involvement in killing the bribery prosecution of New York Mayor Eric Adams (D), and nods to defying court orders 'disqualifying.' Last week, the committee released substantial documentation from Reuveni showing other DOJ employees present for a March 14 meeting referencing the expletive, as well as floating the directive to defy the courts as President Trump pushed ahead with plans to ignite the Alien Enemies Act and fly some 200 Venezuelan men to a Salvadoran prison. According to a complaint on file with the inspector general, Bove 'made a remark concerning the possibility that a court order would enjoin those removals before they could be effectuated. Bove stated thatthe DOJ would need to consider telling the courts 'f‑‑‑ you' and ignore any such court order. Mr. Reuveni perceived that others in the room looked stunned, and he observed awkward, nervous glances among people in the room.' 'Mr. Reuveni was in disbelief, because, on the contrary, the Department of Justice consistently advises its clients of their obligation to follow court orders, not to ignore them. Mr. Reuveni knew that it was absurd and unlawful to do otherwise,' the whistleblower relayed in his disclosure. The documents released by Durbin provide greater details about an episode that prompted the judge overseeing a challenge to the flights to conclude there was probable cause for criminal contempt, finding Trump administration willfully defied his order to halt or turn around the planes of migrants. In an exchange with colleagues, Reuveni can be seen discussing Bove's remarks with coworkers, saying they were reaching 'a decision point on f‑‑‑ you.' Bove said he couldn't recall whether he used the expletive but sidestepped questions about whether he ordered defiance of the courts. 'I've certainly said things encouraging litigators at the department to fight hard for valid positions that we have to take,' Bove said at his confirmation hearing. 'I certainly conveyed the importance of the upcoming operation,' he added about the Alien Enemies Act flights. Democrats have grilled Bove about his stance on the Jan. 6, 2021, riot, as the DOJ official was involved with dismissing prosecutors who worked on the cases of rioters and also demanded a list of FBI personnel who helped investigate the cases. They had hoped Tillis might side with them, given his statement in a recent CNN interview after announcing his retirement that those who 'excused' Jan. 6 would not get his backing. Bove, in written questions for the record, said he could not recall where he was as rioters stormed the Capitol but otherwise said he does not see his skepticism of Jan. 6 prosecutions as being at odds with his stance of opposing violence against law enforcement. 'As a former prosecutor with almost a decade of experience enforcing criminal laws, I condemn all forms of illegal activity. That is especially true with respect to acts of violence against law enforcement,' Bove wrote in documents obtained by The Hill. 'At the same time, based on a variety of professional experiences, I find overreach and heavy-handed tactics by prosecutors and law enforcement to be equally unacceptable.' Tillis previously opposed the nomination of another Justice Department nominee, Ed Martin, who had said Jan. 6 rioters were unfairly prosecuted. 'It was just disqualifying. I mean — he literally was excusing some of the behavior of people who entered the building,' Tillis said of Martin. 'The president should know, if there is anyone coming up for a nomination through any committee of my jurisdiction that excused January the 6th, that they're not going to get confirmed in my remaining tenure in the U.S. Senate.' But speaking with The Hill on Tuesday, Tillis reiterated his plans to follow the staff recommendation on the Bove nomination. 'Right now, the staff has a yes recommendation. I don't see any reason to oppose them,' he said. 'Anybody who excuses that behavior has a problem with me,' Tillis said about Jan. 6, but said he hadn't seen that from Bove. 'But I haven't seen that yet, and Dick Durbin didn't add any to the conversation last week,' Tillis added. For his part, Grassley also pushed back on Reuveni's allegations, saying the documents released by Durbin didn't directly show wrongdoing by Bove. 'I do not believe that they substantiate any misconduct by Mr. Bove,' Grassley wrote in a Tuesday letter to Durbin. 'Almost none of the additional documents you published include, reference, or even cite Mr. Bove. Most of the communications merely reflect Administration attorneys internally debating or discussing litigation strategy and the scope of court orders. Debate about the scope of court orders is fundamentally inconsistent with an intention to ignore them.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
