logo
DWP PIP benefit changes announced by government ahead of major shake up

DWP PIP benefit changes announced by government ahead of major shake up

Wales Online19-06-2025
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
The government has revealed plans to provide three months' worth of Personal Independent Payment (PIP) benefits to claimants whose subsequent applications are rejected, as outlined in the newly published welfare bill.
As part of proposed changes to PIP, the government has introduced additional safeguards for the most vulnerable benefit recipients, which will be enshrined in law. However, the proposed reforms have been met with criticism, being labelled as "cruel" and "unjust".
The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, set to be presented to Parliament, includes a 13-week financial safety net for claimants impacted by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who risk losing Carers Allowance and the carer's element of Universal Credit.
According to the government, this temporary protection aims to provide individuals affected by the changes with time to adapt, access tailored employment support, and plan for their future following reassessment and the end of their entitlement.
Furthermore, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has announced that over 200,000 individuals with severe, lifelong conditions will be exempt from future reassessments for Universal Credit entitlement. Those meeting the Severe Conditions Criteria, who are deemed unable to work, will not undergo reassessment and will receive the higher rate of UC health top-up, amounting to £97 per week, reports the Manchester Evening News.
However, as part of the Bill, the government is planning on cutting the health rate of new Universal Credit claims to £50 from April 2026.
It comes after Labour announced its major overhaul to the disability benefit in March, with proposed changes affecting the eligibility criteria of the benefit in a bid to cut down welfare spending. The changes are expected to take effect from November 2026, impacting both new and existing claimants.
It has not yet been confirmed how many will be affected by the cuts - however it is thought the changes to PIP will slash benefits for about 800,000 people.
In the coming weeks, legislation will also be drafted for a Right to Try Guarantee - meaning that trying work will not lead to a reassessment or award review of your benefit claim.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: "Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it.
"This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.
"This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change."
National disability charity Sense has called the Bill "unjust" and "cruel" and has said it is extremely concerned about these proposed changes to disability benefits.
Research from the charity has revealed that half of disabled people with complex needs are already in debt due to benefit payments not going far enough.
Chief Executive James Watson-O'Neill said: "The government's proposed cuts to disability benefits will have devastating consequences for disabled people across the country - pushing thousands further into poverty, hardship, and isolation.
"Many disabled people already find themselves in debt because current benefits don't stretch far enough. Cutting support further at a time when the cost of living remains high is not only unjust - it is cruel.
"We urge MPs to listen to disabled people and reject this legislation. Our welfare system should support those who need it most - not abandon them.
"We're especially alarmed by plans to cut the Universal Credit uplift for those with the greatest barriers to work. Many of the disabled people and families we support have told us they're frightened - uncertain how they'll afford food, heating, or other basic needs without this vital support. This comes on top of worrying changes to PIP, which we've heard from many of our disabled staff and community helps them to stay in work."
James Taylor, Director of Strategy at disability equality charity Scope, called the bill 'catastrophic'. He said: "This bill will be catastrophic for disabled people.
"Cutting benefits will plunge hundreds of thousands into poverty. Over 800,000 will lose at least some financial support from PIP. It will have a devastating effect on disabled people's health, ability to live independently or work.
"A transition period will only temporarily delay a cut and disabled people will continue to be living with extra costs when it comes to an end.
"Life costs more if you are disabled, whether or not you are working. The government needs listen to disabled people and change course."
Mark Rowland, Chief Executive at the Mental Health Foundation, added: "This bill is a disaster for disabled people, and we urge MPs to reject this legislation in its current form. It will take vital financial support away from hundreds of thousands of disabled people, many of whom have mental health problems. Previous austerity measures worsened people's living conditions, undermined their mental health and increased the risk of suicide and premature deaths – and that's likely to be the case here too.
"These plans will not help the UK government reduce the number of disabled people out of work. Personal Independence Payment is also granted to disabled people who are in work to help them meet the cost of their disability – and removing this support will make it harder for them to remain in the workforce. The Office for Budget Responsibility has also said there is no robust analysis showing this will encourage anyone to return to the workforce. Given that, our view is that these cuts are counterproductive and cruel.
"A more effective alternative for the government would be to move forward with its progressive policies that encourage people to return to work, such as the Right to Try scheme and improvements to support in job centres, and evaluate how these help people return to the workforce. Cutting support for disabled people without knowing that is a recipe for disaster."
At Prime Minister's Questions earlier today, Angela Rayner said she knows some people are "fearful" of changes to Personal Independence Payments and carer's allowance, but that Labour will support those who need it.
Liberal Democrats deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: "Liberal Democrat analysis of the Government's own data suggests that 1.3 million disabled people are at risk of losing some support. So can the Deputy Prime Minister honestly say, hand on heart, that this is a change that one million disabled people and their carers were promised?"
Ms Rayner responded: "Labour is the party of work, and also the party of fairness and social justice. We've announced a plan to get Britain working again, and we're clear on the principles and I want to be clear on that. Those who want to work should be able to work, and those who can never work should be protected...
"I know how some people are fearful of the changes, but this Labour Government put its values into place and will ensure that people are supported into work where they can and, where they can't, they are supported."
Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox
Find out what's happening near you
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DWP benefits and HMRC payments to be issued early next month
DWP benefits and HMRC payments to be issued early next month

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

DWP benefits and HMRC payments to be issued early next month

The upcoming bank holiday is expected to have a significant impact on some payment dates for DWP and HMRC claimants The upcoming bank holiday is set to significantly alter the payment dates for some benefit claimants. ‌ HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has already confirmed changes to scheduled payments due on that date, with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) expected to follow suit. Those due to receive State Pension or benefits on August 25, including Universal Credit, Personal Independence Payment (PIP), Child Benefit and Attendance Allowance, will receive their money earlier, on Friday, August 22. ‌ Payments are typically issued on the first working day prior to a bank holiday to ensure people receive their payment on a day when offices, webchat services and phone lines are open. The DWP is also expected to confirm that Jobcentres across Great Britain will be closed on the bank holiday. ‌ Below is a comprehensive list of DWP and HMRC payments which could be affected by the bank holidays on Monday, August 25. It's important to note that if your upcoming payment does not fall on the bank holiday, it will be paid as normal, reports the Daily Record. DWP payment date changes ‌ The DWP has yet to confirm the payment date changes, but it is anticipated that Payments due to be made on Monday, August 25 will be issued on Friday, August 22. We will update this article as soon as the information has been confirmed. Payments which could be affected include: Employment Support Allowance (ESA) Carer's Allowance Attendance Allowance Income Support Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA) Universal Credit State Pension Personal Independence Payment (PIP) Pension Credit HMRC payment date changes HMRC has confirmed that payments scheduled for Monday, August 25 will be issued on Friday, August 22. Affected payments include:

How I plan to survive retirement without a state pension
How I plan to survive retirement without a state pension

Times

time4 hours ago

  • Times

How I plan to survive retirement without a state pension

Generally speaking, I'm not a huge fan of risky moves. I would rather wait an extra hour at the airport than stress over missing a flight, I find it hard to negotiate on price for fear of losing a deal completely and I refuse to get behind the wheel if I've had a single drink. With all these decisions, the anxiety caused by the potential loss outweighs any positive that the risk brings. Rushing through security to walk straight on to a flight may be exhilarating for some, but my heart rate would still be elevated when I landed at my destination. There is one area, however, where I'm simply going to have to take more risk: my pension pot. As a young (ish) saver, the safest thing to do is to assume that the entire responsibility of funding my retirement will fall to me. And that requires more risk. This week the work and pensions secretary, Liz Kendall, said she was 'formally announcing' the next government review of the state pension age. As the last review concluded in 2023 — and the government only has to review the age every six years — this was earlier than expected. It's looking likely that the age at which you get your state pension will rise sooner than planned. The state pension age is 66, increasing to 67 between 2026 and 2028. Another jump to 68 is pencilled in for 2046, but will probably be moved forward. To assume that the state pension age will stay at 68 by the time I get there (in about 38 years) would be foolish. In fact, to assume there will be any state pension at all is unwise. The state pension is a financial headache for the government. It costs about 5 per cent of GDP, up from about 3.5 per cent in the year 2000, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and is forecast to be 7.7 per cent by 2070. It's also getting harder to find the cash to fund it. People are living longer and having fewer babies — aka future taxpayers. The UK's old-age dependency ratio, the population aged 65 and over as a percentage of those of working-age (16 to 64), is set to increase from about 33 to 50 by the mid-2060s, according to the OBR. So my private pension is going to have to do the heavy lifting in my retirement — at least if I want to stop working before I'm 75. And the easiest and cheapest way to boost my pot is to increase my level of investment risk. • How to get a nation of savers investing 'It's important for younger savers to take risks with their pension — that just means investing in the stock market, not taking a punt on bitcoin. If you have 30 or 40 years until retirement, your pension should be heavily, if not exclusively, invested in shares,' said Laith Khalaf from the investment firm AJ Bell. 'The exception would be if you have a nervous disposition and can't bear to see a fall in the value of your savings. Even then, the fact that you are saving regularly into a pension means you get a smoother journey even with a relatively high content invested in the stock market.' Historically, the stock market has provided the best investment returns in the long run. If, 30 years ago, you had invested £1,000 in the Investment Association's global sector of funds that are invested entirely in stocks, you would have £8,150 today. The sector of funds that are 40 to 85 per cent invested in the stock market would have returned £5,657, while the 20 to 60 per cent stocks option would have returned £4,362. But most pensions are not invested in 100 per cent equities, even for workers who are just starting out. Most pension savers are automatically enrolled into workplace pensions and put into 'default' funds — a one-size-fits-all option that has to be appropriate for 20-year-olds and 50-year-olds. This means that many default funds will only have about 60 to 70 per cent of their pot invested in shares. The rest will be in assets such as cash or bonds, that are considered less volatile but are also unlikely to grow at the same rate. Effectively, these pots are simply the least worst fit for the workforce as a whole. • How to stop the taxman taking a big slice of your pension I confess that this is still how my pension savings are invested. James Coker from the wealth manager Quilter Cheviot said this was unlikely to be my best chance at building a hefty pension pot. He said: 'Moving your pots into an equity portfolio will serve you well over the long term. Someone in their thirties or forties is arguably decades away from retirement and stocks have the greatest inflation-adjusted growth potential. Stocks have to form the basis, if not all, of your portfolio.' With the ever-increasing likelihood that my income in retirement will be on my shoulders alone, it's time to make the move. The cheapest way for me to do this is to move my pension pots into a global tracker fund, a low-cost option that replicates the performance of global stock markets. It may feel risky, but the alternative — a pot that doesn't plug the hole left by a disappearing state pension — feels even riskier. • Top of the pension pots: the best place for your Sipp

Edinburgh transport convener bidding to be Labour candidate at next year's Scottish Parliament elections
Edinburgh transport convener bidding to be Labour candidate at next year's Scottish Parliament elections

Scotsman

time8 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Edinburgh transport convener bidding to be Labour candidate at next year's Scottish Parliament elections

Edinburgh council's Labour transport convener Stephen Jenkinson is bidding to stand for election to the Scottish Parliament. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... And he will be up against Lothian list MSP Foysol Choudhury in the battle to become the male candidate for either Edinburgh Northern or Edinburgh South Western in next year's Holyrood elections. Under the party's system to achieve gender balance, the two seats have been twinned. Together, the local parties will vote to select one man and one woman - and whoever gets the most votes chooses which seat they stand in. Stephen Jenkinson and Foysol Choudhury will go head to head | collage Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There is a shortlist of two men and two women. Cllr Jenkinson and Mr Choudhury will go head to head for the male nomination. Cllr Jenkinson took over as the Capital's transport convener a year ago, replacing Scott Arthur who won Edinburgh South West for Labour at the general election, helped by Cllr Jenkinson who acted as his election agent. Mr Choudhury was elected as a Lothian Labour MSP at the last Scottish Parliament elections in 2021. And the contest to be the female candidate is between local activist Rebecca Bell and Catriona Munro, who stood in the recent Fountainbridge / Craiglockhart council by-election, coming top in first preferences but narrowly losing to the Lib Dems when votes were redistributed. The selection process is due to be completed in the week beginning August 11.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store