logo
Ukraine: Security Council Hears Of Escalating Attacks, Diplomatic Developments

Ukraine: Security Council Hears Of Escalating Attacks, Diplomatic Developments

Scoop22-06-2025
20 June 2025
'As we are facing renewed escalation on the ground and crisis elsewhere, it is critical to maintain focused attention on the urgent need for peace in Ukraine,' said UN Assistant Secretary-General Miroslav Jenča – one of two senior officials briefing the ambassadors.
In the three weeks since the Council last met on Ukraine, Russia has carried out unrelenting large-scale attacks on cities and towns, resulting in a significant rise in civilian casualties.
Deadly Kyiv attack
A combined drone and missile attack on the capital Kyiv overnight on 16-17 June was one of the deadliest there in a year. At least 28 civilians were killed and more than 130 injured. Many others are still reported missing under the rubble of the 35 apartments destroyed that night.
Attacks also reportedly occurred in Odesa, Zaporizhzhia, Chernihiv, Zhytomyr, Kirovohrad, Mykolaiv and Kyiv provinces that same night, with two civilians reportedly killed and scores injured in Odesa.
'These levels of death and destruction risk dimming hope for an immediate ceasefire and threaten to undermine prospects for a lasting peace,' he said.
'Dramatic increase' in casualties
Data from the UN human rights office, OHCHR, reveals that at least 13,438 civilians, including 713 children, have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Another 33,270 civilians have been injured, including over 2,000 children.
The number of civilian casualties in the first five months of this year alone totaled 5,144 – nearly 50 per cent higher than in the same period in 2024. Of this number, 859 were killed and 4,285 injured.
'This dramatic increase is a result of intensified use of long-range weapons, both missiles and loitering munitions, against cities across Ukraine,' said Mr. Jenča.
Ukrainian authorities report that between 1 and 17 June, Russian forces launched at least 3,340 long-range drones, including loitering munitions and decoy drones, and 135 missiles into the country. This compares to 544 long-range munitions launched during the whole of June 2024.
Attacks reported in Russia
Escalating violence also continues to be reported in Russian regions that border Ukraine, though at a far lower level.
In the Kursk region, a woman died in hospital a day after being injured in a Ukrainian drone attack while a man was killed, and five others injured, in a strike on a recreational centre. The UN was not able to verify these reports.
'Let me once again unequivocally state – attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure are strictly prohibited under international humanitarian law, wherever they occur,' said Mr. Jenča, reiterating the UN's condemnation.
Diplomatic developments welcomed
Meanwhile, 'important diplomatic developments have taken place on the challenging path towards a lasting peace in Ukraine.'
Ukrainian and Russian delegations held their second face-to-face meeting in Istanbul on 2 June. They reportedly exchanged written memoranda outlining their respective visions for a ceasefire and parameters for a future peace settlement.
The sides also reached agreement for the large-scale exchange of prisoners of war, mortal remains and civilian detainees. Swaps have been carried out since then, with the latest round taking place earlier on Friday. The mortal remains of 6,057 Ukrainian and 78 Russian servicepersons also have been returned as of 16 June.
'We welcome the continuation of all meaningful diplomatic efforts, including the recent talks in Istanbul. We urge the sides to make tangible progress towards a ceasefire and a lasting settlement through continued talks,' said Mr. Jenča.
In the face of escalation, he called for redoubling efforts 'to ensure that the fragile diplomatic process is not only sustained but becomes irreversible.'
Civilians bear the brunt
In the meantime, civilians continue to bear the severe consequences of the war, said Edem Wosornu, Director of Operations at the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
'As the war continues, millions of lives are impacted every day. Essential services are disrupted, and vulnerabilities are deepening for nearly 13 million people in need of assistance,' she said.
Roughly 3.7 million people are displaced inside Ukraine, including 60,000 newly displaced from frontline regions since January alone. Almost six million citizens are now refugees, mainly in Europe.
Amid the intensifying hostilities, the Government continues to order the mandatory evacuation of families with children from front-line villages, she said. However, for some people in these locations 'attacks are so frequent that evacuations themselves become a risky prospect.'
Humanitarians at risk
Ms. Wosornu noted that humanitarians also face growing threats. This year, two aid workers have been killed and 24 injured while delivering assistance, and some 68 incidents of violence impacting relief personnel, assets and facilities have been recorded.
She said that 'despite an operating environment beset by multiple risks and challenges,' humanitarians remain committed and engaged, and their operations continue. Between January and May, they reached some 3.4 million people with life-saving aid, including food, water, medicines, health services and livelihood support.
Humanitarians are seeking $2.6 billion for Ukraine this year, and $816 million, has been secured, she said, stressing the importance importance of 'timely financial support'.
End the war
Ms. Wosornu concluded her remarks by renewing earlier calls for the Council to take urgent, collective action in three areas, including protecting civilians and ensuring safe humanitarian access to all in need.
Ambassadors were also urged to ensure sustained financial support as 'declining funding trends' threaten aid efforts.
Her final request was an appeal to 'end this war, and until then, ensure that humanitarian concerns are a central part of discussions on a pause in fighting or longer-term agreement.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burned in France, sources say
US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burned in France, sources say

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

US-funded contraceptives for poor nations to be burned in France, sources say

By Ammu Kannampilly , Jennifer Rigby and Jonathan Landay , Reuters The logistics warehouse in Geel, Belgium, where millions of condoms and other contraceptives have been stored by the US development agency USAID. Photo: LUC CLAESSEN / Belga / AFP US-funded contraceptives worth nearly $10 million are being sent to France from Belgium to be incinerated, after Washington rejected offers from the United Nations and family planning organisations to buy or ship the supplies to poor nations, two sources told Reuters. The supplies have been stuck for months in a warehouse in Geel, a city in the Belgian province of Antwerp, following President Donald Trump's decision to freeze US foreign aid in January. They comprise contraceptive implants and pills as well as intrauterine devices to help prevent unwanted pregnancies, according to seven sources and a screengrab shared by an eighth source confirming the planned destruction. The US government will spend $160,000 (about NZ$265,000) to incinerate the stocks at a facility in France that handles medical waste, according to four of the sources with knowledge of the matter, following Trump's decision to shut down the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The US State Department did not respond to a request for comment on the negotiations to save the contraceptives from destruction or the plans to incinerate them. US lawmakers have introduced two bills this month to prevent the destruction of the supplies but aid groups say the bills are unlikely to be passed in time to stop the incineration. The Belgian foreign ministry said Brussels had held talks with US authorities and "explored all possible options to prevent the destruction, including temporary relocation". "Despite these efforts, and with full respect for our partners, no viable alternative could be secured. Nevertheless, Belgium continues to actively seek solutions to avoid this regrettable outcome," it said in a statement shared with Reuters on Tuesday. "Sexual and reproductive health must not be subject to ideological constraints ," it added. The supplies, worth $9.7 million (NZ$16.07m), are due to expire between April 2027 and September 2031, according to an internal document listing the warehouse stocks and verified by three sources. Sarah Shaw, Associate Director of Advocacy at MSI Reproductive Choices, told Reuters the non-profit organisation had volunteered to pay for the supplies to be repackaged without USAID branding and shipped to countries in need, but the offer was declined by the US government. "MSI offered to pay for repackaging, shipping and import duties but they were not open to that... We were told that the US government would only sell the supplies at the full market value," said Shaw. She did not elaborate on how much the NGO was prepared to pay, but said she felt the rejection was based on the Trump's administration's more restrictive stance on abortion and family planning. "This is clearly not about saving money. It feels more like an ideological assault on reproductive rights, and one that is already harming women." She added that many countries in sub-Saharan Africa had relied on USAID for access to contraception and that the aid cuts would lead to a rise in unsafe abortions. The United Nations' sexual and reproductive health agency, UNFPA, also offered to buy the contraceptives outright, three sources told Reuters, without disclosing the financial terms of the proposal. However, negotiations broke down, a source with knowledge of the talks said, in part due to a lack of response from the US government. UNFPA declined to comment. One of the sources with knowledge of the issue said that the Trump administration was acting in accordance with the Mexico City policy, an anti-abortion pact in which Trump reinstated US participation in January. The pact forbids the US government from contributing to or working with organisations providing funding or supplies that offer access to abortions. The source said there was no way for the US government to ensure that UNFPA would not share the contraceptives with groups offering abortions, violating the Mexico City policy. The source also said the matter was complicated by the fact that the contraceptives in Belgium were embossed with the USAID trademark and Washington did not want any USAID-branded supplies to be rerouted elsewhere. UNFPA did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the concerns raised by the source. MSI, which says on its website that it fights for a future where everyone can access contraception and abortion, accused the State Department earlier this month of being "hellbent on destroying life-saving medical supplies, incurring additional costs for the US taxpayer in the process." The State Department declined to comment. Abortion is a divisive issue in US politics and was a major issue in the 2024 election won by Trump. In 2022, the US Supreme Court ruled to eliminate a nationwide right to abortion, leaving abortion laws to each of the 50 states. One of the two sources who told Reuters the stocks of contraceptives were being trucked to France said it would likely take dozens of truckloads and at least two weeks to move the supplies out of the Geel warehouse, with a third source also confirming the scale of the operation. The French government did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Chemonics, the contractor managing the supply chain for USAID's family planning programme, declined to comment on the plans to destroy the supplies. An internal USAID memo, sent in April, said a large quantity of contraceptives was being kept in warehouses and they should be "immediately transferred to another entity to prevent waste or additional costs". - Reuters

Joint Statement In Response To Government Declaration On Gaza
Joint Statement In Response To Government Declaration On Gaza

Scoop

time12 hours ago

  • Scoop

Joint Statement In Response To Government Declaration On Gaza

We, the undersigned organisations, express grave concern over the recent joint declaration by New Zealand and 24 other nations condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and accusing it of obstructing humanitarian aid. This statement is not only misguided, it represents a dangerous inversion of reality, in which: Terrorists are excused, and defenders are condemned Hamas's propaganda is cited as fact, and verified Israeli efforts are ignored The thief is pitied, and those delivering food under fire are vilified Blaming the Rescuers, Not the Arsonists The joint statement accuses Israel of 'inhumane' killing and 'drip-feeding' aid. Yet it is Hamas (the very group that started this war with a massacre on October 7 2023) that: Steals aid, sells it, and redistributes it to fighters; Creates disturbances and fires on civilians at aid stations to induce panic and lay blame on Israel; Places bounties on aid workers not under its control. To accuse Israel of causing the humanitarian crisis while ignoring Hamas's central role is to blame the firefighter for the fire. Israel has worked hard to coordinate necessary aid to the extent that there are currently hundreds of truckloads of food on the Gaza side of the border in need of distribution. Thus, there is no "drip-feeding" by Israel. Treating Terrorist Casualty Reports as Gospel The casualty numbers cited (tens of thousands of 'civilians' killed) come directly from Hamas's so-called 'Gaza Health Ministry.' This is not a neutral medical authority. It is: A Hamas-run information weapon, whose sole aim is to inflate civilian casualties; A notoriously unreliable source. Due to inconsistencies the UN has quietly revised its own reporting; Completely opaque and unverifiable, with no distinction between combatants and civilians. When governments like New Zealand cite these figures without context or scrutiny, they lend credibility to terrorists and undermine genuine humanitarian reporting. Condemning What Works, Ignoring What Fails While condemning Israel, the joint statement says nothing about the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) — the one aid mechanism that actually works: GHF delivers aid using vetted drivers, uses GPS tracking and bypass routes around Hamas. It ensures direct civilian access to food and medicine. It has faced threats and sabotage from Hamas, and—most shockingly—refusal to cooperate from UN agencies and NGOs. According to a Times of Israel report (22 July 2025), these agencies have declined GHF's repeated offers to collaborate, even as they lament 'lack of access' and blame Israel. This is not humanitarianism — it is institutional dysfunction. Calling for Ceasefire While Hostages Rot in Tunnels The joint statement demands an 'immediate, unconditional ceasefire.' But what kind of ceasefire: Leaves 50 hostages in captivity? Enables Hamas to rearm, reorganise, and repeat the horrors of October 7? Forbids Israel from dismantling a terror regime that uses civilians as shields and hospitals as bases? A ceasefire without the above conditions does not end the war. It guarantees the next one. When Hamas Applauds You, Something Is Wrong That Hamas has celebrated the joint statement should alarm every signatory. If your position is being used by a terrorist group as vindication, it is time to re-examine whose reality you are serving. Why does NZ side with terrorists, when a tiny western style democratic state the size of Northland fights an existential defensive war? Israel did not start this war. She has an obligation to defend her citizens, to do everything possible to free the hostages and to protect her people from future 7 October style massacres. What Must Happen Now We urge the New Zealand Government and its partners to: Withdraw or amend the joint statement, explicitly naming Hamas as the source of Gaza's suffering; Publicly support the GHF and demand cooperation from UN and NGO agencies obstructing its work; Reject the inversion of truth, where democracies are condemned and terror groups are given a free pass; Recognise that Israel is fighting an existential war, and that peace is not possible if a genocidal terror regime is left in place; Demand the immediate release of all hostages and urge Hamas to accept the ceasefire. A Final Word: Reality Must Be Respected This is not a war between equals. It is a fight between a democracy that warns civilians and a death cult that hides behind them. Between those who seek peace and those who glorify death. Reversing that truth is not diplomacy. It is betrayal. We call on New Zealand to return to moral clarity — and stop legitimising the lies of Hamas. Dr David Cumin, Greg Bouwer - Israel Institute NZ Dr Sheree Trotter - Indigenous Embassy Jerusalem Rob Berg - Kol Israel Yifat Goddard, Ashley Church - Israel NZ Network Dennis Mcleod - Christian Friends of Israel

UN Secretary-General Seizes The Just Transition Moment: CAN Reaction
UN Secretary-General Seizes The Just Transition Moment: CAN Reaction

Scoop

time12 hours ago

  • Scoop

UN Secretary-General Seizes The Just Transition Moment: CAN Reaction

22 July In response to the 'Moment of Opportunity' speech today by the UN Secretary General, and the associated energy report, Climate Action Network welcomes the meaningful mention of the need for a Just Transition. The renewable energy transformation is here and it is unstoppable, as Mr. Guterres stated today, but without effort and political will, this power shift risks being unjust, exploitative and unsustainable. Jacobo Ocharan, Head of Political Strategies, Climate Action Network International, said: 'The Secretary-General was on the money when he said that the energy transformation must deliver equity, dignity and opportunity for all - this is the beating heart of what a just transition means. The just transition is about embracing the future and not being stuck in the polluting and unfair past, which is where the fossil fuel industry wants us trapped. COP30 can and must deliver on just transition with a path grounded in human rights, justice and equity. The brief mention of nuclear needing to be in the energy mix was a shame, but the focus overall was on the just transition to renewable energy. The call for international cooperation to support low-income countries that are highly dependent on fossil fuels is timely and welcome, especially as the world is in the throes of massive division and nationalism. Likewise, the calls to reform the global financial architecture and debt for developing countries are positive, while the creeping mentions of investment opportunities and private finance are a concern.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store