logo
Reform of triple lock mechanism for deployment of troops overseas to go ahead following committee report

Reform of triple lock mechanism for deployment of troops overseas to go ahead following committee report

Irish Times6 days ago
The Government is to move ahead with its plan to reform the so-called triple lock governing overseas deployment of Irish troops after an Oireachtas committee reported on the matter.
The Coalition wants to remove the requirement for a UN mandate when deploying more than 12 troops overseas as part of an international force.
On Wednesday, the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Defence and National Security published the report of its pre-legislative scrutiny of draft Government laws on the triple lock.
The committee recommended an independent legal review should be commissioned in advance of any overseas mission by Irish troops if the Government proceeds with its plans.
READ MORE
The report argues for a strengthening of legal and Oireachtas oversight of Defence Forces activities abroad. It contends that the Oireachtas should have to vote on a regular basis to renew the mandate for deployment.
UN Security Council approval is one aspect of the triple lock consent mechanism, which also requires a Dáil vote and government decision.
Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris said that, following the report, he would progress the legislation in the autumn.
'We are living in a new era in Europe, in which Ireland also faces significant new security and defence challenges, and we must consider how best to respond. This legislation is an important part of that response.'
The matter has become a topic of heated debate within the political system, with the Opposition arguing removal of UN Security Council endorsement represents a dilution of Irish neutrality.
[
Irish neutrality protest: Hundreds march through Dublin city demanding triple-lock safeguard
Opens in new window
]
The Government argues the current system allows for an effective veto by the council's permanent members, such as Russia and China. No new peacekeeping mandate has been approved by the council since 2014.
Sinn Féin TD and committee chair Rose Conway-Walsh said the level of responses from the public indicated that the matter was 'really important to the Irish people'.
She said there was a 'direct conflict' between Government and Opposition on whether removal of the triple lock would affect Irish neutrality.
The Mayo TD said she would not accept the triple lock was on the way out. She said the Government members of the committee had refused an amendment which would have sought the retention of the triple lock.
The legislation would also allow for the deployment of up to 50 troops without a supporting Dáil resolution.
The report recommends that 'at minimum, there be a formal legal review of any proposed deployment, undertaken by an independent body'. At regular intervals during a deployment the government should need a 'renewed mandate' for the mission via a majority Dáil and government vote, and another formal legal review, it says.
Within 12 months of a deployment, a Dáil resolution should be sought for it to continue, it advises. The legislation should also allow the Dáil, Seanad or the Oireachtas defence committee to request an 'urgent review' of deployments.
[
Sinn Féin wants 111 changes to Bill reforming 'triple lock' Irish troop deployment
Opens in new window
]
Opposition sources are claiming as a victory the lack of a recommendation within the report to remove the triple lock. However, neither does it contain a recommendation to retain it in its current form.
In her foreword to the report, Ms Conway-Walsh said nothing within the triple lock 'deters the Irish Government from addressing the legacy of neglect of our Defence Forces'. She said Opposition members, several witnesses and 'hundreds of submissions' from the public were 'deeply concerned that this proposed legislation would present a threat to our neutrality', while Government members and other witnesses said it would have no impact.
The report outlines that evidence on this aspect of the Bill 'has been extensive but also often contradictory'.
The legislation contains provisions regarding the management of Defence Forces members charged with or convicted of serious criminal offences. These include options for their suspension from duty and new procedures to be followed during suspensions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leader of Haitian gang that kidnapped Irish woman Gena Heraty opens talks
Leader of Haitian gang that kidnapped Irish woman Gena Heraty opens talks

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Leader of Haitian gang that kidnapped Irish woman Gena Heraty opens talks

The leader of the kidnap gang holding Irish aid worker Gena Heraty and her colleagues hostage in Haiti has made contact with the organisation she works for via intermediaries. Two people representing the organisation have spoken to the gang leader and were awaiting further contact, The Irish Times has learned. Ms Heraty, a missionary who is director of the Sainte-Hélène orphanage run by Nos Petits Frères et Soeurs (NPFS, Our Little Brothers and Sisters) in Kenscoff, was taken with seven others, including a three-year-old child, on Sunday, about 10km outside the capital, Port-au-Prince. On Tuesday, Tánaiste Simon Harris raised Ms Heraty's case with the EU's high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, Kaja Kallas. Arising from the conversation, an EU diplomat in Haiti will be the point of contact in the case. READ MORE 'This is an important development, ensuring that this case is firmly on the agenda of the European Union and our EU colleagues,' Mr Harris said. 'The kidnapping of Gena Heraty, her co-workers and a three-year-old child is utterly devastating. This is a particularly difficult time for the Heraty family.' Mr Harris added he had been in constant contact with the Heraty family and would continue to provide them with supports. Furthermore, 'different avenues at both political and diplomat level continue to be exhausted' in a bid to free the hostages. The abduction has come during a period of deep crisis for Haiti, where law and order has collapsed and crime gangs, rather than the government, have control of vast parts of the country. It is believed the gang who led the kidnapping are associates - and come under the control and protection of - the Viv Ansanm group in the town of Kenscoff. Viv Ansanm, which means Live Together, was one of two major crime syndicates in Haiti sanctioned by the United Nations last month, with the EU having since amended its Haiti sanctions list to include the two groups. Viv Ansanm has also been sanctioned by the US department of the treasury's office of foreign assets control (OFAC), the same US office that sanctioned the leaders of the Kinahan Irish drugs cartel in 2022. A coalition of multiple gangs, Viv Ansanm is intent on taking control of Haiti, with the US declaring them a terrorist group and a threat to US national security. Messages sent to Ms Heraty's friends and colleagues by NPFS management confirmed direct contact with the kidnappers – who often demand ransoms in Haiti – but expressed concern that contact was limited and had not yet resulted in any breakthrough. 'We have only had two direct calls with the gang leader holding our people and while they were helpful to move things forward it's only two calls,' the message said. 'We are waiting for the third and preparing for it. Patience, understanding and prayers are needed and we appreciate yours.' If Ms Heraty and her colleagues continue to be held for some time, the Irish Government has a range of intervention options, including the creation of an 'emergency consular assistance team' (ECAT). These are teams comprised of experienced Irish diplomats and protected by Defence Forces personnel. They could be deployed to Haiti to co-ordinate local release efforts, as has previously been done to assist Irish citizens in Iraq, Sudan and Afghanistan. Ms Heraty is from a well-known family in Westport, Co Mayo, and is one of 11 siblings. In a statement, the family described themselves as 'absolutely devastated'. They said she had worked in the country since 1993 and was director of special needs programmes for NPFS, which supports children and young adults living with disabilities. 'The situation is evolving and deeply worrying. We are working closely with NPFS in Haiti and Ireland, the Irish Government, and international partners who are doing everything possible to ensure the safe and immediate release of Gena and her colleagues.'

Donohoe delayed approving sale of State's final shares in AIB
Donohoe delayed approving sale of State's final shares in AIB

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Donohoe delayed approving sale of State's final shares in AIB

Minister for Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe asked for a three-week postponement on the final sale of the State's stake in AIB so he could consult government about the bank's exit from 'crisis relationships'. Senior officials had sought permission to carry out a 'clean-up share disposal' on May 23rd to finally end state ownership in the bank after the financial crash. However, the Minister looked for extra time as officials said the sale would 'inevitably refocus the discussion around the topic of remuneration' and the salary cap for bankers. In a note on the submission, Mr Donohoe wrote: 'I am absolutely committed to the return of AIB to private ownership. However, I want to exit from crisis relationships with [the] bank at same time. READ MORE 'I will need to engage with government on this and will not have this complete by end of this week. Ask department to consider execution of same plan but in second half of June.' [ How AIB went from boom to bust and back again Opens in new window ] In mid-June, officials submitted a second submission on the sale saying it would 'trigger an opportunity re: salary cap.' It said the State was looking to offload nearly 44 million shares and hoped to bring in around €310 million through the sale. The submission said: 'The implication of this trade is that it will trigger an expectation to begin unwinding the crisis-era remuneration restrictions that remain in place (in particular the removal of the salary cap).' Officials wrote that AIB was one of the best performing banks in Europe and that strong momentum had continued since the last time the State sold some of its shareholding. It said the final sale would represent a 'natural point' to normalise the relationship between AIB and the State. The submission also cautioned that if pay restrictions from AIB were removed, it should also apply to PTSB . 'Absent of that happening, it would put PTSB at a severe disadvantage,' said the document. 'Such a scenario is not in taxpayers' interests.' In a note, Mr Donohoe wrote: 'I agreed to this process via phone yesterday. This is to indicate that approval was given and to conclude official documentation.' A separate presentation on the State's post-crash investment in banks said the taxpayer had invested €29.4 billion in AIB, Bank of Ireland, and PTSB. From that, around €28.7 billion had been recovered although this was over an extended period of a decade and a half. The presentation said as well as implications for the salary cap, other restrictions on how AIB operates would change. One slide said: 'These restrictions include monthly meetings with senior management, access to board papers, [and] various reporting/consent/consultation requirements. 'Since the State's exit from BOI ( Bank of Ireland ), that bank is no longer subject to these conditions. We recommend putting AIB on an equal footing with BOI in this context.' On pay caps, another slide said all restrictions were eliminated for Bank of Ireland apart from bonus payments exceeding €20,000 per year. 'While restrictions around variable pay up to €20,000 and fringe benefits were also removed for AIB and PTSB, both banks continue to abide by the total compensation cap of €500,000 per annum that is currently in place,' it said. This additional restriction relative to Bank of Ireland was 'anti-competitive and unsustainable'.

Could Conor McGregor really become the President of Ireland?
Could Conor McGregor really become the President of Ireland?

Irish Daily Mirror

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Could Conor McGregor really become the President of Ireland?

Conor McGregor announced in March of this year that he wished to run for the Irish presidency. And just days after losing a high-profile civil rape case appeal, the MMA fighter has launched a petition to get on the ballot paper. The Irish Presidential Election is imminent as Michael D Higgins' term ends on November 11 after 14 years in office. While a date has not yet been set, it must not be more than 60 days before this date, with the country likely to go to the polls in October. McGregor voiced his presidential wish just days after he visited US President Donald Trump at the White House for St Patrick's Day. In recent years the controversial fighter has emerged as a figure-head for the far-right and said he wants to be president as 'Ireland is at the cusp of potentially losing its Irishness'. As Donald Trump took up a second term as US President earlier this year, it isn't crazy to imagine a high-profile celebrity turning their head to politics this side of the pond. We have seen a rise in well-known figures trying to get into Leinster House- such as veteran criminal Gerry 'The Monk' Hutch and TV star Gráinne Seoige. So, could McGregor have a chance? Can McGregor simply put his name in the hat for the Irish presidency? No, he can't. While the people of Ireland vote for the president, it isn't a simple process to get your name on the ballot. It's a very different process compared to the local or general elections, where any Irish citizen over the age of 18 can run for council and anyone over 21 for the Dáil. To be eligible for election as President, you must be an Irish citizen over the age of 35 and be nominated by at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or at least four of Ireland's 31 local authorities. Former or retiring presidents can also nominate themselves. Has the MMA fighter been nominated for presidential candidacy? No, McGregor has not yet been nominated by at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or four local authorities. Out of 134 politicians who answered a question from Sky News if they would nominate him, not one said yes. There are 235 members of the Oireachtas, 174 TDs and 60 senators. Labour TD Duncan Smith said: 'I could not think of anyone more unfit for public office.' Fianna Fail TD Cathal Crowe said 'there isn't a snowball's chance' he will get elected, while an unnamed deputy said: 'He's a misogynist and a thug. On behalf of the women of Ireland he can f*** off." And it wouldn't appear that McGregor will have much luck with local authorities, as these are also mainly run by politicians affiliated with parties. Some councils, such as Westmeath County Council, have been vocal that they won't back the MMA fighter. Is Ireland really considered a democracy if nominations are needed for presidency candidacy? McGregor has hit out that Ireland isn't truly a democracy because of the nomination hurdles that are in place for the Irish presidency. While The President of Ireland might sound like the top of the political ladder, it primarily serves as a ceremonial head of state. They do have some significant constitutional powers, including signing legislation into law. However, they do not have the same executive powers as the leader of the government, the Taoiseach, who is nominated by a majority vote in Dáil Eireann. If McGregor hasn't been nominated, why has he relaunched his bid this week? McGregor says he is so determined to get his name on the ballot that he wants to change the nomination process. In a social media post, the Dubliner said 'the current constitutional framework presents a significant barrier to democratic participation.' He has launched an online petition calling for Irish citizens at home and abroad to 'have the unhindered right to determine the candidates who appear on the presidential ballot'. As of Tuesday evening, it had just under 10,000 signatures. If the Dubliner did get his name on the ballot, would he have any shot at winning? It doesn't seem likely. According to a poll by the Irish Mirror, only 9% of 4,616 respondents believe McGregor would be a good president for Ireland. Some 90% said he wouldn't be, while 1% are unsure. Particularly after he was found liable of sexual assault by a jury in a civil court, McGregor is not well liked in Ireland. Professor of political science at Trinity College Dublin, Gail McElroy, told Sky News there is 'close to zero' chance that the people of Ireland would vote for him. She said: 'There are people with right-wing views or populist views or anti-immigrant views but not enough to affect McGregor. It would be a small minority vote. He's so far out. There are many, many candidates ahead of him. "His reputation in Ireland has always been less glowing and the (civil) case certainly hasn't helped. The general view is that Nikita Hand was very brave and very impressive and very strong.' Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store