There was no contract. They shook hands and the Walbrook was born
Palumbo 'dogsits' when his father, Lord Palumbo, is abroad and Luna is a regular at the City of London private members' club, and on the establishment's Instagram feed.
'Dogs light up any room that they enter into. And I hate the idea of them sitting at home waiting,' says Palumbo. Luna, who is far better behaved than my cockapoo, later joins us for lunch, lying obediently under the table, unnoticed until I accidentally nudge her during the main course.
The Walbrook will mark its 25th anniversary on Friday evening with a black-tie dinner at Mansion House for more than 300 guests. Over the past two and a bit decades the club has established itself as a favourite of City grandees and investment bankers. An elegant club for a discreet drink, lunch, or dinner.
The club may have opened in 2000, but its history dates back to 1997 and a lunch at the Connaught during which Mark Birley, the founder of Annabel's, suggested to Palumbo's father that he should convert what was then the family office in the City of London into a club. 'My father replied: only if you do it,' he explains. Birley agreed.
'There was no contract. They shook hands. And three years later, the Walbrook was born, twice over budget,' explains Palumbo over lunch in the Walbrook's dining room.
It is easy to see why Birley was tempted. The building that houses the Walbrook is as unique as the club itself.
Despite appearing to be a Queen Anne-style townhouse, it was actually built in the 1950s by Palumbo's grandfather, the property developer Rudolph Palumbo, who acquired the postage-stamp-sized site, sandwiched between Rothschild's headquarters and St Stephen Walbrook, as part of a larger property deal.
'He put our family office between the church and bank,' jokes Palumbo. The 'dolls house', as he describes it, wraps around the Sir Christopher Wren-designed church so has a Tardis-like quality.
'My father gave Birley more or less free rein.'
The club was filled with Palumbo family photos, paintings and artefacts. There are drawings and models of many of the buildings built by both Rudolph and Lord Palumbo, and the Mies van der Rohe-designed skyscraper that was not built, after a very public intervention by Prince Charles, as was.
A collection of dog paintings by India Jane Birley, Mark Birley's daughter, adorns the bar, which is dominated by a model of a luxury 1920s Italian liner which the Allies seized and used as a troop carrier ship in the Second World War.
'We don't have portraits of Wellington or English landscapes. The collection is extremely eclectic. I'm very proud of it,' says Palumbo.
'Birley rang my dad and said, don't be alarmed. I'm sending you a swan.' The stuffed swan still sits in the dining room.
Michel Roux Jr was recruited as chef for the opening. 'He would cook personally and author the menus. We used his suppliers. The layout of the kitchen to this day is how he left it.'
When Michel's TV career took off, his father, Albert Roux, stepped in. 'Our guiding principle remains the same: you should never leave hungry and recipes shouldn't be elaborate for the sake of being elaborate.'
Palumbo leaves the menus to the chef. 'He and I meet for coffee once a month to discuss his plans for the month ahead. I will volunteer, very sympathetically I hope, suggestions, but for the most part, he writes them. Our sommelier does the same with our wine list,' explains Palumbo.
My sea bass is cooked to perfection, and Palumbo's guineafowl looks delicious. On opposite walls of the dining room, staring at each other, are paintings of Rudolph, his grandfather, and his father.
There are also travel posters from a bygone Beirut, reflecting his mother's Lebanese heritage. Lady Hayat Palumbo ran the club before handing over to her son in 2018.
The dining room doubles as a venue for the club's guest speaker programme, which Palumbo has expanded to two or three speakers a month, ranging from Joanna Lumley to the former chancellor Nadhim Zahawi, who spoke to members two days before he was sacked.
Many of Palumbo's bookings have proved prescient: Liz Truss spoke two weeks before she was appointed foreign secretary; Kwasi Kwarteng spoke a month before he became chancellor.
As well as expanding the speaker programme Palumbo has added to the artefacts: including two Michelin men mascots he saw in a shop in Paris and a 'Buddha President Trump' donated by a member and former newspaper editor who picked it up in China.
'I see this as a canvas which I'm constantly adding to and tinkering with. I'm always trying to improve it. I want it to be reflective of the area and not to be stuffy and closed off … in the truest City traditions of the old coffee houses'.
One big change has been the dress code. In 2023, the club dropped the requirement for members to wear a jacket. 'The idea of invented Victorian traditions didn't sit well with me. I also think you can look smart without wearing a suit and tie.'
The West End has seen an explosion of private members' clubs over the past decade and in 2017 Nick Jones, the founder of Soho House, opened the Ned, a large hotel and members' club a short walk from the Walbrook. But Palumbo insists they are not in competition.
'We would recognise one another on the street, but we are fundamentally a different proposition. We are much, much smaller than Annabel's or 5 Hertford Street. And our membership profiles are different. I don't see other clubs as our rivals.'
When the club opened in 2000 membership was capped at 500, but post-Covid, Palumbo raised that to 650 as 'people's habits are now so unreadable'.
Covid was a challenge. The club's speaking programme moved online (as did a regular cocktail evening). Bonds were issued entitling members to a lunch or drink when the club reopened. 'Rather amazingly, we only lost two members because of resignations following the pandemic.'
But the pandemic has had a longer effect: 'Fridays were always pretty tricky in the City. But we've also lost Mondays.'
'I do worry whether people are as social as they once were, and whether they are placing enough emphasis on getting to know colleagues and indeed rivals. Because so much now is done by messenger or email or a quick Zoom chat, the more social aspect of the City is disappearing.'
More recently private members' clubs have been hit by HMRC using membership as evidence that non-doms are UK resident and therefore liable to pay tax.
'No matter how wonderful a club, if your advisers are warning you that it might be an issue, it's quite difficult to decide to stay a member just because it's such a nice club.
'A lot of people who've left have said that they'd come back in a heartbeat when the conditions are more favourable. The fundamentals are sound. We have to weather the storm.'
More than 30 per cent of the membership is now aged under 35 and the club has admitted women from day one: 'We could do with a few more female members, but then again, the buildings around us could do a bit better in that regard.'
'I want this place to be contradictory, young and old; traditional and contemporary; fun and serious without one being at the expense of the other.'
Potential members can be proposed by two existing members or apply directly and be interviewed by Palumbo; they then go before the membership committee with his recommendation.
'I'm very careful as to who we admit because this place is physically quite small. If there's a bad apple, you will take a bite,' he explains.
'The ethos is to bring people together. The architecture of the space lends itself to chance encounters and drawing up a chair and rearranging the furniture.'
Palumbo's main criteria for membership? Simple: 'Are you fun to sit next to at dinner?'.
Age: 32Education: Ludgrove School; St Edward's School, Oxford; School of Oriental and African Studies (First Class Hons)Career: 2018-present: managing director, the Walbrook Club; 2018-present: director, Frank Lloyd Wright's Kentuck KnobFamily: 'Perennially single'
Soup of the day £8.00Asparagus, lemon laper butter £12.50Supreme of guineafowl £22.00Sea bass £24.00New potatoes £5.00Spinach £5.50Radishes and peas £5.00Apple and rhubarb crumble £9.00Ice cream /sorbet selection £3.00Bottle Hildon water £4.50Glass tomato juice £4.00Discretionary service charge @ 10.00% £11.50Cover charge for two £8.00
Total £121.55
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Cash Isa bickering masks the real crisis for savers
The debate about whether Rachel Reeves should or should not limit the amount that people can save into a cash Isa has been heated. A good argument can be made that too much money has sat in low-yielding cash accounts that could be working harder in the stock market. But many people still feel, with some justification, that this is just another raid on prudent people trying to do the right thing. The problem with this debate is that most people expressing an opinion have a dog in the race. The Chancellor says she wants people to earn more on their savings – of course she does. But she also has her eye on £300bn of idle cash that would provide a useful boost to the growth promise on which she was elected if it were redirected towards UK-listed companies. That cash would also raise a useful amount of fresh revenue if, as is more likely, it simply moves from a tax-free cash account to a taxable one. You may not be surprised to learn that banks and building societies view that same money as a funding source for the mortgages and other loans they offer. They, therefore, make the case for precautionary saving, and they highlight the danger of putting money to work in the market that you might need soon to pay for a wedding, school fees or a house move. It is no surprise that their counterparts in the asset management and investment platform industry (full disclosure: that's me) prefer to focus on the historical outperformance of stock market investments over cash. We warn that holding too much cash for too long poses a different kind of threat to your financial security. We are all right, of course. There is a place for both cash and investments in our financial lives. The bigger problem is that most people don't understand financial risk. So they don't know how much importance to attach to the arguments on either side of this debate. Or what the right balance of cash and shares should be for them. Reeves highlights one risk of holding too much cash. Doing so usually means you are paying too high a price for certainty. You prefer a return of your money to a return on it. Which is reasonable for some of your savings, but not for all of them. Everyone should set aside a cash buffer before they start to think about investing in the stock market. But once they have done that, there is no reason to park any more in cash. How big that cushion should be is harder to say – it will vary according to your age, your ability to find new work if you lose your job and many other factors. Most people don't know how much cash they should sensibly hold. Consequently, some will hold too little and others far too much. But there is a long list of other risks over which they don't have a good grasp either. And, until they do, tweaking contribution limits may make less of a difference than the Chancellor hopes. You can lead a horse to water, as they say. There are a few things we, as an industry, have not done a great job of explaining. The first is the difference between volatility and risk. Volatility is the natural ups and downs of the market. This is only ever a risk if we sell our investments in response to a fall in their value and crystallise the loss. The stock market fell 20pc between February and April. But unless you sold at the bottom, you won't care now because it quickly recovered. Another point of the cash buffer is to prevent the next risk – being a forced seller. You should always have enough cash in the bank to be able to ignore short-term market volatility. Or to actively desire it as a chance to buy assets at a discount to their real value. Holding that cash is a first step towards avoiding another poorly understood risk: putting our eggs in too few baskets. One of the reasons I have been able to shrug off the market's change of heart on US assets this year is that America is only a part of my portfolio. Yes, there have been times in the past 10 years when I wished it was a bigger part than it was, but broad diversification has felt like a pretty good strategy in the first half of 2025. The biggest risk for most people when it comes to investing (or saving, come to that) is to put it off. I often tell a story about twin sisters, one who starts saving young and one who for too long finds other things to spend her money on. The prudent sister gets to a point in mid-life when she has so much capital that further saving is largely pointless. The other, meanwhile, can never catch up, no matter how long she keeps putting money aside. The point rightly made by the pro-investment lobby is that achieving the first sister's happy state is really only possible by tapping into the stock market's superior returns. The final risk that very few people properly understand is the ravage of inflation. Even those of us who think about how much we might need to fund our retirement fall into the trap of thinking about this in today's money. What we need to understand is that even at the Bank of England's 2pc target for inflation, the pot we manage to accumulate will buy us half as much in 36 years' time as it does today. At 3pc inflation, our purchasing power will halve in just 24 years. This is the strongest argument for shares over cash, which in the long run tends only to match, not beat, inflation. So while I support the Chancellor's desire to get people more focused on their investment returns than the return of their investments, this is just the start of it. Informing people how to save and invest sensibly is more important than bickering over whether they should do so via cash or the stock market.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Net zero fines ‘may force Vauxhall to shut factories'
The owner of Vauxhall has warned the carmaker will be forced to close factories in Europe because of tough net zero penalties. Jean-Philippe Imparato, a senior executive at Stellantis, said European Union carbon emission standards would force the business to make 'tough decisions' without changes this year. He said the only way to meet the targets would be to double sales of electric vehicles (EVs), or to scale back production of traditional petrol and diesel cars – known as internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. Speaking in Italy, Mr Imparato said: 'I have two solutions: either I push like hell [on electric] ... or I close down ICE. And therefore I close down factories.' The EU emission rules are designed to combat man-made climate change and require carmakers to cut the carbon emissions of the vehicles they sell by increasing the proportion that are electric. Those that do not hit the targets risk hefty fines. 'Unreachable' targets Carmakers have been lobbying for the targets to be delayed and relaxed, with the current regime set to be based on their average emissions from 2025 to 2027. On this basis, Stellantis – which owns brands including Vauxhall, Citroen, Peugeot and Fiat – fears it could be hit with potential fines of up to €2.5bn (£2.2bn) within two to three years. But Mr Imparato, who is Stellantis's chief of operations in Europe, dismissed the targets as 'unreachable'. Stellantis operates more than 50 factories globally, including around 20 in Europe. Mr Imparato did not say where the company's plant closures might fall but he did at one point mention the Italian van-making plant of Atessa in his remarks. Following the closure of its Luton plant earlier this year, the company's sole assembly plant in Britain is the Ellesmere Port facility near Liverpool. That site is undergoing a major upgrade to become an EV-only plant, with electric production set to begin late next year. A spokesman for Stellantis could not immediately comment on whether Ellesmere Port was at risk. However, the company has made significant investments in the site to produce electric vans. The Society for Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) recently warned that Britain requires 'a whole of government approach to competitiveness' to retain and attract investment from the car industry. 'Electricity costs remain, as we speak, the highest in the world,' said Mike Hawes, the lobby group's chief executive. 'Internationally, we're worst for business rates, amongst the worst for the burden of government regulation. 'With international conditions causing problems beyond our control, it makes sense to ease the burdens we do control ... We need a compelling offer that redefines the UK's appeal as a place to invest.' Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, has vowed that the Government is 'right behind' carmakers after designating them for support in the recent industrial strategy. 'Our collective job is to bring more investment, more product lines and more jobs here,' he said.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pound falls despite Starmer's reassurances over Reeves's future
The value of the pound slipped further despite Sir Keir Starmer's assurances that Rachel Reeves will remain as Chancellor 'into the next election'. Sterling dropped nearly 1pc on Wednesday and government borrowing costs surged after the Chancellor shed tears in the Commons and the Prime Minister failed to back her when questioned at the depatch box. He later backed her but the pound and gilt yields – the return the government promises to buyers of its debt – failed to recover from one of the sharpest moves since the Liz Truss mini-Budget crisis. Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic adviser at Allianz, said: 'The concern in markets is that a new chancellor may not be as committed to the fiscal rules.' In early trading, the pound was last down around 0.1pc against the dollar at $1.364 and was 0.2pc lower versus the euro, which was worth 86.5p. Asked about Ms Reeves's emotional state on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer told the BBC: 'It was a personal matter for the Chancellor and I've been absolutely clear with you it has got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with any discussion between me and Rachel, nothing to do with the matters of this week. 'She will be the Chancellor for a very long time to come. She is going to be the chancellor into the next election and for many years afterwards.'
