Grattan Institute pitches blueprint to 'save' NDIS as foundational supports rollout stalls
A new report has recommended four policy changes to "save" the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), as federal and state governments continue to negotiate a funding deal for a new tier of services to be set up outside the scheme.
That new system — called foundational supports — was agreed to in 2023 and initially slated to begin by July 2025, but those services are still a long way off and yet to be properly defined.
The Grattan Institute's report, released on Sunday evening, posited that a "rebalancing" of current NDIS spending could help save tens of billions of dollars while also making sure more people outside the scheme could get support.
The NDIS has been projected to cost $48 billion this financial year, before overtaking spending on defence by 2026-27 and reaching $63 billion by 2028-29.
However, most Australians with disability are not supported by the scheme. The NDIS' 717,000 participants account for about 13 per cent of the estimated 5.5 million Australians with disability.
The Grattan report has called for "firmer boundaries" clarifying who the NDIS was for, changes to how claims were managed to make outcomes more consistent, and a new National Disability Agreement to define the responsibilities of different levels of government.
But the biggest saving would come from a "modest" redirection of funds from the pool of money set aside for individual plans, into a new tier of foundational supports specifically for kids with developmental delay and people with psychosocial disability.
Overall, the thinktank estimated its blueprint could save $12 billion over 10 years and then a further $34 billion over the same period by not requiring new money to fund foundational supports.
Do you have a story to share? Email Specialist.Team@abc.net.au
Grattan senior fellow Alistair McEwin, a former disability discrimination commissioner, said the institute was in "no way" proposing anyone be kicked off the scheme unnecessarily.
"What we're saying is that supports for some children with developmental delay and people with psychosocial disability can be provided more effectively, more quickly and more fairly in other state or territory-based schemes," he said.
In a statement, NDIS Minister Mark Butler said the government would consider the report.
"[This is a] really important piece of work focusing on securing the sustainability and original intent of the NDIS so it works for participants and their families," he said.
Alongside foundational supports, the Albanese government has been making other changes to the NDIS in pursuit of the 8 per cent annual growth target it set two years ago.
The scheme is now growing at around 10 per cent, down from more than 20 per cent when Labor was elected in 2022.
Source: National Disability Insurance Agency
This year's budget projections had the scheme on track to meet the 8 per cent target by 2026-27.
However, they assumed foundational supports and the shifting of services back to the states (which ceased most disability services when the NDIS began) would have started by this financial year.
Mr Butler said this week that funding negotiations with the states and territories were ongoing, and the Commonwealth was working to finalise them as soon as possible.
Before the states sign up, they want the federal government to scrap its 6.5 per cent annual growth cap on hospital funding.
One of the main drivers behind the NDIS's growth is the larger than expected numbers of kids — many of whom are autistic or have developmental delays — joining and then not leaving the scheme due to the lack of services elsewhere.
Melbourne University associate professor Sue Olney, who has been researching the NDIS for more than a decade, said the scheme was never designed to support all people with disability.
She said too many previous changes to the scheme's rules happened before alternative supports were put in place, and it was crucial that was not repeated going forward.
Muriel Cummins of advocacy group Every Australian Counts said the disability community was diverse and what foundational supports eventually offered needed to reflect that.
The NDIS has transformed the lives of its participants, enabling many to live more independently, gain employment, and give back to the economy through taxes.
A 2021 report from thinktank Per Capita found that for every dollar spent on the scheme, $2.25 was returned to the economy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
44 minutes ago
- ABC News
The economic reform round table should discuss AI and robots, not just tax and productivity
Let's hope the economic reform round table in August does not turn into a three-day argument about tax reform. Nobody can ever agree on whether a sustainable budget is best achieved by less spending or more tax, let alone what taxes should be increased or new ones imposed. The 25 citizens in the assembly would be better off trying to come up with a decent set of policies on artificial intelligence and robots. And they could start with a briefing about what US President Donald Trump will reveal in his AI Action Plan to be announced on July 23, and follow up with a rundown on China's eight-year-old strategy to become the global leader in AI by 2030. As for the five reports on productivity's five pillars commissioned from the Productivity Commission by Jim Chalmers in December, and the 453 ideas people have sent in, a way for PC chair Danielle Wood to instil a sense of urgency into the round table might be to read out this article from the Financial Times last week about Meta Platforms Inc offering as much as $150 million sign-on bonuses for AI engineers working for the developer of ChatGPT, OpenAI. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is trying to build a team that will help him create AI that is smarter than human beings. And the staff at OpenAI have apparently been knocking him back! The combined market value of the five leading AI companies – Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Nvidia – is $20 trillion, almost twice the value of all houses and units in Australia. The only way any of this makes sense is that Meta, OpenAI and the other peddlers of AI are going make more money from it than from any other technological revolution in history. And the only reason the rest of the business world will pay so much money for AI software and robots is because they will make even more money by replacing humans and increasing the productivity of those still employed. There are two ways of applying AI in a business: top down and bottom up. At the risk of over-simplifying it (but not much) top-down involves a business's executive leadership team deciding to use AI to replace a bunch of human workers by, say, getting it to write software code, or do data entry, answer phone calls or write articles like this one. Bottom-up is where individual employees use AI to become better at their jobs. The key to making the bottom-up use of AI work is writing a good prompt, which is rapidly becoming one of the more important modern workplace skills. An AI consulting business called Fourday is building a 'prompt library' for clients and has developed a prompt writing assistant called Prompt Cowboy. You write into it a sort of lazy, plain language prompt and it spits out a much longer one that is better designed to get the best answer from the AI. ChatGPT performs better with a more detailed, better-written prompt. Fourday founder Henry Badgery says it is possible to get productivity increases of 30-40 per cent with AI but many businesses are reporting no extra value at all because: "You're not using it correctly. You're not asking the right questions because that's essentially what a prompt is, you're asking it the right question, you're giving it the right information to answer your question." If the round table is going to be pragmatically useful in lifting productivity, it should do two things: first, develop a national system for helping small to medium enterprises and employees to write better AI prompts, and second, modernise the welfare safety net so people don't have to be scared of it, allowing companies to replace workers with AI without worrying about contributing to societal breakdown. Specifically, the government needs to rethink unemployment benefits. The current JobSeeker system is not fit for purpose because it's assumed to be a temporary payment for a job seeker. The money is not enough, and the points system that includes the need to apply for four jobs each month won't work if there aren't any jobs to apply for. A Universal Basic Income for everyone, as some are pushing, is going too far, but the government needs to prepare for a period of more permanent unemployment – even if it's not needed in the end because AI does not cause mass unemployment. Business executives and staff need to embrace AI and a good safety net is needed for that to happen. It's another reason for more tax revenue, along with the need for more public housing. And more tax revenue comes down to a new tax – either a wealth or inheritance tax – or increasing the GST. Australia's two previous bouts of major tax reform when tax revenue was falling short of government spending also involved new taxes: capital gains and fringe benefits in 1985 and GST in 2000. Twenty-five years later revenue is short again because of the aging of the population, the NDIS and the decision to increase defence spending. But the near-hysterical response to the plan to reduce the tax break on superannuation balances above $3 million suggests that a new wealth or inheritance tax is too hard. Lifting the GST rate towards the global average of 15-20 per cent is what it will probably have to be. The problem with GST is that it's regressive – it hits the poor more than the well-off. But there is a solution to that, invented by UNSW Professors Richard Holden and Rosalind Dixon. In their book From Free to Fair Markets Holden and Dixon suggest increasing the GST rate to 15 per cent and applying it to all goods and services, but only levying it on spending above a threshold of $12,000 per year. How? By giving back each taxpayer 15 per cent of $12,000, or $1,800, each year, preferably in two six-monthly payments of $900 – simply put it in their bank accounts. Holden and Dixon have modelled the outcome and say the higher GST on a broader base would double GST revenue from $90 billion to $180 billion and that the refunds would give back half that, leaving $45 billion in net extra revenue which they say could be spent on income tax cuts and eliminating the budget deficit. Whether $12,000 ($1,000 per month) is the right threshold for GST-free spending could be debated, but the idea is worth spending an hour or two on at the round table. Then the 25 round tablers could get on with the real business of AI and robots. Alan Kohler is finance presenter and columnist on ABC News and he also writes for Intelligent Investor.
ABC News
44 minutes ago
- ABC News
Melbourne lawyer fled Australia with $1.2m after filing for bankruptcy, court case alleges
What do you do if the bank accidentally sends you more than $1 million? A court has heard this happened to former lawyer Chaim Geron, who's accused of quickly transferring the money offshore, declaring bankruptcy and leaving the country under a false name. What followed was an international pursuit by the person charged with handling Mr Geron's bankruptcy, in a bid to have it recognised in Israel — a move which could allow any of Mr Geron's assets to be used to pay any Australian debts. The former lawyer has now asked to have the bankruptcy set aside in the Federal Circuit Court, where the allegations against him have been detailed in a series of filings by his bankruptcy trustee. According to court documents, the ANZ bank made its million-dollar error in June 2019, when Mr Geron had recently broken up with his wife. At around the same time, he was also embroiled in a disciplinary dispute with the legal regulator that later saw him suspended from practising law over findings of misconduct in relation to his dealings with an elderly client. "Following the breakdown of my marriage and after one year of legal proceedings I ended up losing everything I had, including my practice and any savings and decided to relocate to Israel where I was born and bred and have a family," Mr Geron said in an affidavit. He held the family home in the Melbourne suburb of Elsternwick in his name, but it was mortgaged to ANZ and he owed the bank $1.5 million. He sold the property, but about $1.2 million — which should have been paid to the bank — ended up in the trust account of Mr Geron's lawyers. According to a lawyer for his bankruptcy trustee, Innis Cull from accounting firm PKR, the money was instead moved offshore into a company named Hilazon, "a Hebrew word which translates to 'shelled creature' or 'snail'." "Mr Geron refused to return the money, and instead transferred the funds overseas to bank accounts in Israel, and subsequently to his brother and a company he controlled, Hilazon Inc," Mr Cull's lawyer said in an affidavit filed with the court. Mr Geron denies Mr Cull's version of events. "This is not true," he told the ABC. "I paid debts and Mr Cull has all the information." Mr Geron declared himself bankrupt in 2021, two years after the ANZ transaction, and at a time when the COVID pandemic meant there was no easy way to get back to Australia. In his affidavit, Mr Geron told the court that his bankruptcy was motivated by ANZ suing him over the home loan payment. He told the court that, after realising he needed an Australian address to declare bankruptcy, he asked an acquaintance to sign a lease that was backdated by several months — something Mr Cull's lawyer alleges in a court document amounts to "fraud". Mr Geron provided Mr Cull with a copy of the lease showing he was renting a room in Elsternwick. The bankruptcy went through and there things sat until October 2022, when Mr Geron told Mr Cull he wanted to visit Australia. Within weeks of his return to Australia, Mr Cull ordered Mr Geron to come to his office in Melbourne and face questions about his affairs. By that stage, Mr Cull had appointed a lawyer to comb through Israeli records and identify any assets Mr Geron held there, court documents show. The search turned up an apartment in Mr Geron's name, held without a mortgage, in Rishon LeZion, about 8 kilometres south of Tel Aviv, along with up to four current or former Israeli bank accounts. Mr Cull also began proceedings in Israel to have the Australian bankruptcy recognised over there — the first step towards seizing control of any Israeli assets held by Mr Geron. The court heard that during his January 12, 2023, meeting with Mr Cull, Mr Geron confirmed his address in Australia was the place he rented from his friend and denied having multiple bank accounts. Mr Geron also "claimed that whilst in Israel, he was staying with his mother, or in short-term rented accommodation for which there was no lease agreement," according to court documents. Asked about whether he held the property and bank accounts, and failed to declare them to Mr Cull, Mr Geron told the ABC: "This is not true at all." On the morning after they met, Mr Cull wrote to Mr Geron and used his power, as his bankruptcy trustee, to ban him from leaving Australia. Mr Geron also informed Australian Federal Police (AFP) of the decision. Mr Geron wrote back to say that he "answered your questions in full" at the interview. Later that day, at around 12.20pm, the AFP called Mr Cull's office to say Mr Geron had tried to leave the country, but had been stopped. According to Australian Border Force (ABF), Mr Geron left the country on January 15, 2023, three days after his interview with Mr Cull, using a New Zealand passport in the name of Shane Green. "Unfortunately he has departed Australia without triggering any alert as he used an alias," an ABF officer told Mr Cull in an email tendered to the court. Authorities also told Mr Cull they would update their records to show Mr Geron and Mr Green are the same person. Mr Geron provided the ABC with an extract of official movement records, dated last month, "showing that [I] entered and exited Australia legally under my name". "I emphasise that no criminal actions were ever taken against me for using [a] 'false passport,'" he said. Mr Geron turned up again in February last year, when he filed a response to Mr Cull's Israeli proceedings that court documents say was witnessed before the "consul at the Israeli consulate in Panama City, Panama". Court documents show that until December last year, Mr Geron told the Israeli court he lived in Australia. "I deny court [sic] in Israel have jurisdiction in respect of my matter, since I am an Australian citizen and the correct forum to deal with any issue in respect of myself is in Australia," Mr Geron said in one document, filed with the Israeli court in February last year. "I attach a tax invoice issued to me a few days ago involving a purchase of a car in Australia in my name and bearing my address." The invoice shows the car was a $1,625 Mazda with no plates, sold as a write-off by auctioneers Pickles. More recently, Mr Geron has used his Israeli address in correspondence with the court there. Mr Geron told the ABC that the law required a person to be physically present in Australia in order to file for bankruptcy. He has been seeking to have the bankruptcy set aside on the grounds the required Australian connection never really existed, and has said in court documents that he really lives in Israel and hasn't lived in Australia since April 2019. Mr Cull opposes Mr Geron's attempt to annul the bankruptcy. Mr Geron said courts have previously annulled bankruptcies based on the residency test. Last month, Federal Circuit Court judge Simone Bingham made orders that Mr Geron appear in person at a hearing set down for July 2. "There will be no dispensation to have an online hearing in this case — it is a matter of credit," she said during a brief hearing on May 29. She agreed with counsel for Mr Cull that there were "serious matters" that needed to be examined, including "escaping the jurisdiction" by using a New Zealand passport under a different name. But Mr Geron told the ABC that he's concerned that the financial burden of hiring a lawyer and potentially having to provide security to cover legal costs "will not allow [me] to expose the truth". The case continues.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Turnbull and Kovacic are the latest to weigh in over quotas for women in the Liberals
As the Liberal Party grapples with its spectacular election loss and works out how to rebuild, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley is approaching it as if there's a giant sign above her head that screams, "I'm not Peter Dutton". Her speech at the National Press Club this week was loaded with hints that fit this thesis. Even the decision to address the National Press Club itself — a forum Dutton viewed as a space of the Canberra journalistic elite and snubbed consistently — was a signal. She has also flooded the youth and women's podcast space to send the same point. And from the moment she was on her feet at the press club she acknowledged the traditional owners of the land — a sentence that had not only become absent from the Liberal leadership lexicon — it was by the end of the election campaign a full-blown culture war that put even more nails in the Liberal Party's already bolted-in coffin. If you swim in right wing algorithms — especially on X — you'll see that all of these choices by Ley are being mocked as symbols of "Labor Party-light". In the subterranean online world Ley's leadership is being painted as too "woke". Ley's job over the next year is fraught with danger. She might be given a period of brief peace but most Liberals you speak to privately concede that it will be difficult to keep that peace for the entire term. One of those big debates that's just starting to get heated is the issue of women's representation. On this issue you will hear a lot of over the top language. Ley says she will be a zealot for women's representation in the party. Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor says he will crusade to have more women elected. Fancy words. But after the two previous elections, leaders said similar things. The issue of gender quotas is the one philosophical and cultural mountain that the Liberal Party has never been prepared to climb. And even by the party's own reckoning, it is failing. Beyond the hard arithmetic of imposing quotas, every other strategy is little more than vibes and positive thinking. Vibes don't get women elected, and if women are not at the table in large numbers Australian voters will continue to turn their backs on the Liberal Party. If everyone agrees with such a passion that the party needs a stampede of women — what's the hold-up? Opposition Defence spokesperson Angus Taylor this week rebuked gender quotas for political parties, a move that was widely regarded as undermining Ley's openness to the idea. Timing is everything in politics and just six weeks earlier Ley and Taylor fought for the Liberal Party leadership. One pitched her credentials as the modern Liberal centrist leader — the other as the centre right cultural figure that could re-engage the existing base. The problem is the existing base is old, white and male. Ley's National Press Club speech featured her claims she would consider quotas if the party's state divisions saw them as the solution to gender equity. Days later Taylor said mentoring and recruitment was a better way to do it, adding that the Labor Party "subverted democracy" with its quota strategy. "I believe in democratic processes, and I don't believe in subverting them, but I also know from my past experiences that mentoring, recruitment support is the way to make sure you have the people you need," Taylor said. "The Labor Party will do things their own way. And they do subvert democracy, and that's a matter for them. At the end of the day, if you're going to have quotas, it means you are going to subvert democratic processes." Subverting democracy? Labor women were lining up to respond. The numbers speak for themselves. Only one-third of Liberal MPs are women. That compares to 56 per cent of Labor MPs who are women. Cabinet Minister Tanya Plibersek told Insiders the Liberals used quotas for Nationals MPs on their frontbench pointing out the contradiction in the tools they use for promotion and representation. "They've got a quota of National Party MPs that have to be on the frontbench," she said. "So they're happy to have quotas for National Party MPs. It's just quotas for women that they're not prepared to use. "Does Angus Taylor really want people to believe that the 28 most talented Liberals in the whole country are the people who've made it into the federal parliament?" Plibersek pointed out that the Liberals had ignored a non-binding 50 per cent target for female representation put in place after the 2022 election. Here is some free advice to the Liberal Party. Every time they talk about women and quotas and anyone implies that the Labor quotas have led to the promotion of women without merit the ALP has a literal party. They won this debate so long ago it provides Labor with a free kick of monumental proportions. I was a high school girl when Labor had this debate and settled it. Now, here we are 30 years later and the Liberals are still having a debate the community resolved in the 1990s. Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull told this column senior Liberal men, including former prime minister Tony Abbott and Angus Taylor, left the impression that they were happy with the male dominated party as it is. "The Liberal Party has said it needs to recruit more women into its parliamentary ranks for years and for just as long resisted quotas on the basis it undermines the right of party members freely to choose their own candidates. But nothing has changed and the party room has fewer women than ever," Turnbull told me. "Those who oppose quotas need to explain what their alternative is, otherwise people will reasonably conclude they are quite happy with the male dominated status quo." Opposition frontbencher Julian Leeser has called for preselection primary contests, instead of quotas, and other Liberals including former minister Simon Birmingham and NSW senator Maria Kovacic have called for mandated quota systems. Kovacic tells this column that quotas are no longer a philosophical discussion, but have become a source of urgency. "We must address the persistent and systemic under-representation of women in our party, the temporary implementation of quotas is now both necessary and urgent," she tells me. "Quotas will serve as an effective interim measure to correct these structural imbalances." Kovacic believes the scale of the gender imbalance in the Liberal Party demands "immediate and decisive action". "Delaying the adoption of quotas in favour of softer incremental approaches alone, such as mentoring and leadership programs is no longer viable. That opportunity has passed. We must change, and change now." The NSW Liberal Women's Council will debate gender quotas at a meeting in Sydney this week. Those pushing for change won't go down without a massive fight. Patricia Karvelas is host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
