logo
5 Harmful Foods To Avoid For Better Health & Weight Loss

5 Harmful Foods To Avoid For Better Health & Weight Loss

Forbes17-06-2025
When people decide it's time to eat healthier to lose weight or manage a health condition, they ask the same question: What should I eat? Answers typically come in the form of which diet to follow: keto, paleo, plant-based, Mediterranean or something else. But here's a better question and one that may lead to bigger, longer-lasting change: What harmful foods should I not eat?
We've lost sight of a deceptively simple truth. Most health improvements from dietary change don't come from adding so-called superfoods. They come from removing the foods that are actively hurting our health.
There may be individual reasons to follow a specific diet — food sensitivities, religious or cultural preferences or a physician's guidance. But for most, focusing on what not to eat may be the most impactful and sustainable diet of all.
The modern American diet is dominated by ultra-processed, calorie-dense nutrient-poor foods. More than 60% of the average American's calories come from ultra-processed products. Think packaged snacks, sugary drinks, frozen meals, fast food and refined carbohydrates.
These foods are actively harmful to health. Study after study links diets high in ultra-processed foods to obesity, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and early death. In one randomized trial, just two weeks on an ultra-processed diet led to significant weight gain and increases in hunger hormones — even when calories and macronutrients (e.g. proteins, carbohydrates and fats) were matched.
Ultra-processed foods don't just make us sick, they're designed to override satiety signals, encouraging us to eat way more than we need.
People often begin a diet by trying to add in healthier foods: a protein shake, oatmeal with blueberries or a salad at lunch. That's great — unless it's followed by a soda and a bag of chips later.
Here's what works better: subtraction first.
Cutting out refined sugar, white flour, ultra-processed snacks and heavily refined seed oils creates space for healthier choices to naturally take their place. People often report feeling better, craving less and even losing weight without counting calories. Just by cutting out the junk food.
Think of it as nutritional minimalism: instead of obsessing over what to eat, ask what you can do without. This gives you flexibility. You can eat Mediterranean on Monday, Asian on Tuesday and plant-based on Wednesday. As long as the foods are whole and minimally processed, you're moving in the right direction.
Yes, calories matter. But where they come from matters more.
Two-hundred calories from salmon and broccoli is not the same as 200 calories from soda and cookies. The former fuels satiety, muscle repair and leads to stable blood sugar levels. The latter triggers glucose spikes, inflammation and rebound hunger.
The real issue isn't just overeating — it's over-consuming 'bad' calories. When you remove the foods that spike insulin, disrupt hormones and hijack appetite regulation, you naturally eat fewer total calories because your body self-regulates more effectively.
No matter the diet philosophy, there's surprising consensus among experts about what to avoid. Here are the top offenders:
Removing these — even partially — can improve energy, sleep, mood and hunger. Unlike restrictive diets, this lets you eat in any style that works for you — as long as you're cutting out the worst offenders.
Most diets fail not because people don't know what to eat, but because they're too complicated or rigid. A subtraction-first approach is simpler and more sustainable.
You don't have to adopt a 'perfect' diet overnight. Start with a single rule: no sugary drinks. Or avoid any product with more than five ingredients. These changes add up —gradually shifting habits often without requiring calorie tracking, apps or special meal plans.
This is also empowering. You're not relying on a meal delivery service or overpriced powders. You're simply removing low value and harmful foods.
There's a hidden psychological advantage too. When you focus on what not to eat, you reduce decision fatigue. Saying 'I don't drink soda' or 'I don't eat fast food' provides a mental shortcut. These are called identity-based habits — and research shows they're more durable than external rules, according to Atomic Habits author James Clear.
Yet taken to an extreme, this mindset can be problematic. It's not about cutting everything. It's about avoiding the foods most linked to fatigue, cravings and disease—not creating anxieties.
Importantly, it's not about perfection. A diet that's 90% clean is dramatically better than one that's 50%. Even halving your (or your kids') intake of ultra-processed food can yield meaningful results.
This 'cut the junk' strategy is increasingly backed by science. A 2024 BMJ study linked high ultra-processed food intake to higher risk of death from all causes.
Yet many diet plans still push complex and unsustainable approaches: 'Eat these 12 superfoods" or 'Only eat high-fat, high-protein, low carbohydrate foods.'
Sometimes the best advice is the simples: Eat real food; cut out the harmful foods; and let your body do the rest.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CRISPR and Lab-on-a-Chip Technologies Set to Revolutionize Pathogen Detection
CRISPR and Lab-on-a-Chip Technologies Set to Revolutionize Pathogen Detection

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CRISPR and Lab-on-a-Chip Technologies Set to Revolutionize Pathogen Detection

The Global Food Pathogen Testing Market, valued at USD 10 billion in 2025, is projected to grow at a CAGR of 10%, reaching USD 23.5 billion by 2034. Growing food safety concerns and advancements in rapid testing methods, AI, and blockchain are driving this expansion, optimizing food supply chain transparency. Food Pathogen Testing Market Dublin, July 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Food Pathogen Testing Market Size, Share, Trends, Analysis, and Forecast 2025-2034 | Global Industry Growth, Competitive Landscape, Opportunities, and Challenges" report has been added to Food Pathogen Testing Market is valued at USD 10 billion in 2025. Further, the market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 10% to reach USD 23.5 billion by 2034. The Food Pathogen Testing Market is expanding rapidly as global food safety concerns continue to intensify. With rising instances of foodborne illnesses and outbreaks caused by bacteria such as Salmonella, Listeria, and E. coli, food manufacturers and regulatory authorities are prioritizing stringent testing protocols. Food pathogen testing plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety and quality of food products by detecting harmful microorganisms at various stages of production, processing, and distribution. Regulatory frameworks across regions, including the FDA's Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) in the U.S. and the European Union's strict food safety directives, are pushing companies to adopt advanced testing in rapid testing methods, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunoassay-based techniques, are enabling faster and more accurate pathogen detection. Additionally, the growing consumption of processed and packaged foods, along with increased global trade in perishable goods, is further propelling market demand. As food safety regulations become stricter worldwide, investment in food pathogen testing technologies and automation is expected to grow 2024, the Food Pathogen Testing Market has witnessed several key advancements driven by the growing emphasis on foodborne disease prevention. The demand for rapid and automated testing solutions has increased, with food manufacturers investing in next-generation molecular diagnostics and biosensors to achieve quicker turnaround times. AI-driven predictive analytics are being integrated into testing processes to enhance contamination risk assessments and prevent outbreaks before they occur. Regulatory bodies worldwide have intensified surveillance and enforcement, leading to a higher rate of recalls and penalties for expansion of microbiological testing services in developing economies, particularly in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, has also gained momentum due to increased food exports and a growing middle-class population demanding higher food safety standards. Meanwhile, the adoption of blockchain technology in food supply chains is improving traceability and ensuring transparency in pathogen testing, allowing for swift action in case of contamination. The market is also experiencing a shift toward portable testing kits that enable on-site detection, reducing dependency on centralized ahead to 2025 and beyond, the Food Pathogen Testing Market is expected to see further advancements in automation, precision, and regulatory alignment. AI and machine learning will play a more significant role in predictive food safety monitoring, helping manufacturers identify contamination risks before they escalate into widespread issues. The development of CRISPR-based diagnostics is set to revolutionize pathogen detection by providing ultra-sensitive and rapid testing solutions. Additionally, the rise of lab-on-a-chip technology will enable decentralized testing, making food safety monitoring more accessible and the increasing focus on sustainability, manufacturers will also seek eco-friendly testing solutions that minimize chemical waste and energy consumption. Governments and international organizations will likely standardize food safety regulations further, ensuring consistency across borders and streamlining compliance processes. As food production scales up to meet global demand, investments in robust pathogen testing infrastructure will become essential for ensuring public health and maintaining consumer trust in food Trends in the Food Pathogen Testing Market Adoption of AI and Big Data Analytics: AI-driven predictive modeling is being integrated into pathogen testing to analyze contamination patterns, optimize food safety protocols, and minimize risks before they lead to outbreaks. Rise of Rapid and Portable Testing Solutions: The demand for on-site pathogen testing kits is increasing, enabling food manufacturers and regulators to conduct immediate contamination assessments and reduce response times. Integration of Blockchain in Food Safety: Blockchain technology is enhancing traceability and transparency in food supply chains, ensuring accurate record-keeping and quick identification of contamination sources. Expansion of CRISPR-Based Pathogen Detection: Emerging CRISPR diagnostic technologies are offering ultra-fast and precise detection of harmful foodborne pathogens, promising a new era of molecular food safety testing. Growth of Outsourced Testing Services: Many food companies are partnering with third-party laboratories for pathogen testing, ensuring compliance with evolving regulatory requirements while reducing in-house testing costs. Key Market Drivers Increasing Foodborne Illness Outbreaks: Rising global cases of foodborne diseases are driving the demand for stringent pathogen testing measures to ensure consumer safety and prevent large-scale outbreaks. Stringent Government Regulations: Enhanced regulatory frameworks across regions are compelling food manufacturers to comply with mandatory pathogen testing standards, increasing market growth. Surge in Packaged and Processed Food Consumption: The growing consumption of ready-to-eat and processed foods necessitates rigorous testing to ensure microbiological safety and extend shelf life. Technological Advancements in Testing Methods: Innovations in molecular diagnostics, biosensors, and AI-powered analytics are improving pathogen detection efficiency, making testing faster and more reliable. Key Market Challenge High Cost of Advanced Testing Technologies: The implementation of sophisticated pathogen testing solutions, such as molecular diagnostics and AI-driven analytics, involves significant investment, posing challenges for small and mid-sized food businesses. Key Attributes: Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 150 Forecast Period 2025 - 2034 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2025 $10 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2034 $23.5 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 10.0% Regions Covered Global Companies Featured Bureau Veritas SA Lloyd's Register Quality Assurance Limited Intertek Group plc Asurequality Ltd. Genevac Ltd. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. Merck Co. & KGaA Neogen Corporation bioMerieux SA Agilent Technologies Inc. Qiagen NV Shimadzu Corporation SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance SA Genetic Id Na Inc. RapidBio Systems Inc. Merieux NutriSciences Corp. FoodChain ID Inc. Ring Biotechnology Co. Ltd. Genon Laboratories Ltd. PerkinElmer Inc. Randox Food Diagnostics Ltd. Omega Diagnostics Group plc Romer Labs Inc. Eurofins Scientific SE Charm Sciences Inc. Hygiena LLC MilliporeSigma Hardy Diagnostics Luminex Corporation Market Segmentation By Type Salmonella Listeria Other Pathogens By Technology Traditional Rapid Immunoassay Convenience Based PCR Other Technologies By Application Meat And Poultry Fruits And Vegetables Dairy Other Applications By Sales Channel OEM Aftermarket By Geography North America (USA, Canada, Mexico) Europe (Germany, UK, France, Spain, Italy, Rest of Europe) Asia-Pacific (China, India, Japan, Australia, Vietnam, Rest of APAC) The Middle East and Africa (Middle East, Africa) South and Central America (Brazil, Argentina, Rest of SCA) For more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment Food Pathogen Testing Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Dozens of beaches close before July Fourth weekend due to fecal bacteria
Dozens of beaches close before July Fourth weekend due to fecal bacteria

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dozens of beaches close before July Fourth weekend due to fecal bacteria

Just ahead of the long Independence Day weekend, beaches across the country have closed and issued advisories because of excessive levels of harmful bacteria. The culprit is fecal waste, a common summer problem in both freshwater and oceans that can cause gastrointestinal illness and skin infections. At least six states have issued closures or advisories for certain beaches and lakes that have tested positive for above-safe levels of fecal bacteria. In Massachusetts, almost two dozen beaches are closed due to excessive bacteria levels. Four beaches in New York are closed. Illinois has issued at least eight advisories in the past few weeks. Los Angeles County had released eight ocean water quality advisories as of Tuesday. Michigan has closed three beaches. The bacteria causing havoc for summer swimmers include and Enterococcus — nasty germs often found in the feces of people and animals. The contamination can occur because of sewage, manure or storm runoff. is more likely to be found in freshwater, whereas enterococcus can form in both marine and freshwater. Edward Dudley, director of the E. Coli Reference Center at Pennsylvania State University, said testing bodies of water used for swimming is routine and common, as are closures. Beach closures are more likely around the summer months, when ocean surface temperatures are high and bacteria can grow more easily, said Antarpreet Jutla, associate professor of environmental engineering sciences at the University of Florida. However, a variety of factors — including human activity, temperature and water movement — can affect bacterial growth, he said. Jutla also said that beach closures due to fecal bacteria are very common. In North Carolina, officials warned about cyanobacteria algae blooms in Lake Norman, urging people to keep children and pets away from water that appears bright green, blue or scummy. Different from fecal bacteria, cyanobacteria are the most common cause of algae blooms in freshwater, such as lakes or rivers, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Research suggests that climate change may be triggering cyanobacterial algae blooms more frequently. Although the Environmental Protection Agency sets guidelines on safe levels of fecal bacteria, states can set their own water quality and monitoring standards. Some, such as Illinois, test public beaches every two weeks. 'I would say, the higher the levels, probably the higher the risk,' Dudley said. While fecal waste can lead to many harmful diseases, experts are worried by recent increasing levels of another harmful bacteria: vibrio. Vibrio is a potentially deadly bacterium that has caused similar beach closures in recent years. The flesh-eating bug thrives in warm, coastal waters. Jutla, who researches vibrio bacteria, has seen vibrio gradually migrate north across the United State. Testing for vibrio depends on each state as well as its concentration limits, he said. 'It's a rare thing right now with increasing trends in the entire country, but that's something that we are really concerned about — what is going to be present in the coastal waters,' Jutla said about vibrio. The deadly V. vulnificus is a rare type of the bacterium, but infections have been growing in recent years as it follows warming ocean water up the eastern coast of the U.S. This article was originally published on

RFK's proposal to let bird flu spread through poultry could set us up for a pandemic, experts warn
RFK's proposal to let bird flu spread through poultry could set us up for a pandemic, experts warn

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RFK's proposal to let bird flu spread through poultry could set us up for a pandemic, experts warn

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. High-ranking federal officials have suggested that bird flu virus should be left to "rip" through poultry farms across the U.S. — but experts warn that this hands-off approach could hasten the beginning of a new pandemic Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services, and Brooke Rollins, secretary of Agriculture, have floated the notion that instead of culling birds infected with the highly pathogenic H5N1 virus, farmers should let it spread through flocks. The idea is that by doing this, farmers can "identify the birds, and preserve the birds, that are immune to it," Kennedy told Fox News on March 11. Now, a perspective piece authored by a group of virologists, veterinarians and health security experts argues that the plan would not only be ineffective, but could also increase the risk of the virus spilling over into humans and sparking a new pandemic. The researchers published their arguments July 3 in the journal Science. "Essentially, the longer you allow a virus that has shown to be effective in infecting multiple hosts survive in an environment, the greater the chance you give it to spread, to mutate, and to try its luck at adaptation," perspective first-author Erin Sorrell, a virologist at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, told Live Science. "Worse case scenario, the virus adapts and expands its host range to become transmissible in humans … Now we have a pandemic." H5N1 is a subtype of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), a type of bird flu that can cause severe disease and death in poultry and other birds. Since the virus began spreading widely among U.S. birds in January 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported that more than 174 million birds across all 50 states have been infected with the disease. The virus's transmission among wild aquatic birds, commercial poultry and backyard, hobbyist flocks, has led to massive culls in farms and sent egg prices skyrocketing. The virus typically transmits among wild birds and poultry, but it's known to have also infected more than 48 mammal species, including foxes, skunks, raccoons, seals and polar bears. It has also spread to dairy cattle, causing outbreaks in more than 1,000 herds across 17 U.S. states, according to current estimates. Related: How to avoid bird flu Isolated human cases have been reported amid the ongoing outbreak in animals, primarily among farm workers, according to the CDC, although the agency states that the current health risk to the general public remains low. This is because, while the disease can spread among different animals, it currently can't be passed from human to human. Rollins recently issued updates about the U.S. government's plan to combat the infection's spread and lower egg prices. The five-pronged strategy denotes $500 million to improve farm biosecurity, $400 million in financial aid to farmers and $100 million for vaccine research. The government is also exploring ways to slash regulations and increase temporary import options for eggs. Current regulations state that when infections are detected among commercial poultry, farmers must cull the affected flocks to contain the disease's spread, for which they are financially compensated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Yet suggestions made by officials for more radical ways to manage bird flu have left experts concerned. In May, Kennedy and Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator for the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, voiced their support for the owners of a Canadian ostrich farm whose 398 birds faced a cull following confirmed cases of H5N1 bird flu in December 2024 and January this year. "We believe significant scientific knowledge may be garnered from following the ostriches in a controlled environment," Kennedy wrote in a letter posted to the social platform X and addressed to the head of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which had ordered the cull. Kennedy suggested that the ostriches may have already acquired some "downstream immunity" to the virus, and Oz offered to relocate the birds to his Florida ranch for further study. Sorrel told Live Science that these statements imply "there is still an expectation that those in the Trump administration, at least on the human health side, believe this approach has merit." But Sorrel and her report collaborators disagree. Allowing widespread infection of commercial flocks would kill billions of birds, drive poultry and egg prices up, as well as destabilize local economies and global trade through import restrictions imposed on U.S. products, the authors wrote. Simultaneously, it could also foster reservoirs of H5N1, increasing the virus' odds of making the leap to humans — and gaining the ability for human-to-human infection. "Rapid culling of [H5N1] positive flocks is central to containment of the virus on a farm," Sorrel said. "Poultry infected with H5 shed a tremendous amount of virus. If effective controls designed to mitigate the quantity of viral shedding and known transmission pathways are removed, the exposure risk for other animals and humans on site and on neighboring farms will increase, and the opportunity for H5 to evolve to be a more effective poultry pathogen increases." Kennedy's proposal is also very unlikely to work the way he's claimed it would — the birds that provide eggs and meat on farms are descendants of separate breeding populations and do not breed themselves. So even if there were a population of resilient birds that survived H5N1 infection, that doesn't mean they're passing on their genetic traits to a subsequent generation. What's more, the mortality rate of H5N1 is extremely high among common poultry, reaching 100% in domestic chickens. Instead of letting bird flu tear through farms, the scientists propose that government agencies should enhance surveillance of the virus' spread, along with improving data sharing and outbreak response measures shared between poultry producers, industry members and veterinarians. The USDA should not work alone on these measures, Sorrel said, as "interdisciplinary teams need to have the authority and means by which to activate at the state and federal levels." RELATED STORIES —A single gene mutation could enable H5N1 to spread between people, study finds —Avian influenza: Bird flu spread triggers state of emergency in California —Teen sickened with Canada's first human case of bird flu is in critical condition — and the source remains a mystery Other experts agree with the team's suggestions, although they highlighted areas that need further discussion. Dr. Rocio Crespo, a poultry veterinarian at the North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, told Live Science that further details on potential vaccine strategies and biosecurity at farms should be explored. But the USDA is now facing billions of dollars in federal funding cuts, and Crespo says that providing economic support to farmers facing outbreaks — alongside making investments to understand bird flu evolution, preventive measures and control methods — could become increasingly difficult. "The current policies on poultry farms are effective at preventing spread to other farms," Crespo told Live Science. "However, the USDA's approach does not consider spill over and influences from other crop or animal agricultural activities." "It appears we are continuing with the same strategies without sufficient improvement," she added. "Greater transparency and collaboration is crucial." This article is for informational purposes only and is not meant to offer medical advice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store