Sickness absence rate down to just four days a year for every worker
The sickness absence rate – the percentage of working hours lost because of sickness or injury – was 2.0% in 2024, 0.3 percentage points down on the previous year.
Read more ➡️ https://t.co/ASDXs2K9GA pic.twitter.com/GBxqj4pCtc
— Office for National Statistics (ONS) (@ONS) June 4, 2025
Minor illnesses were the most common reason given for sickness absence in 2024, accounting for almost a third of cases, followed by musculoskeletal problems at 15.5%.
Groups with the highest rates of sickness absence in 2024 included women, older workers, those with long-term health conditions, people working part-time and public sector workers, said the ONS.
It added that time lost averaged 4.4 days per worker in 2024.
Minor illnesses were the most common reason given for sickness absence in 2024, accounting for 30.0% of occurrences, followed by musculoskeletal problems at 15.5%. pic.twitter.com/r3Litl8gbz
— Office for National Statistics (ONS) (@ONS) June 4, 2025
Amanda Walters, director of the Safe Sick Pay campaign, an alliance campaigning for sick pay reform, said: 'The fall in sickness absence may seem a positive development but the figures mask the fact that far too many UK workers regularly go to work when they are too ill.
'We are amongst the least likely to take sick days in Europe as our woeful statutory sick pay system is forcing millions of people to drag themselves into work ill, risking their long term health because they need to pay the bills. This costs the economy billions in lost productivity.
'The Government is fixing one part of the problem by improving sick pay coverage for some lower earners in the employment Bill, but is not doing enough to sort out the sorry state of our sick pay system.
'The weekly rate of sick pay remains just £3 an hour for a full time worker. If we are serious about improving the health of the working age population, the Government needs to stop ignoring the elephant in the room and put statutory sick pay in line with the minimum wage.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
10 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Flamingo Land: SNP ministers accused of falsifying documents in controversial Loch Lomond resort case
SNP ministers are being accused of 'unlawful and biased' conduct over the calling-in of the Flamingo Land planning application. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Scottish Government is being accused of falsifying key documents in the handling of the Flamingo Land resort on Loch Lomond. SNP ministers are being accused of 'unlawful and biased' conduct over claims they have made a series of 'deeply questionable' decisions in handling the planning application for the £43 million resort in Balloch. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Green MSP Ross Greer has lodged a letter of complaint through his lawyer raising the fear of falsified documents. His lawyer has also submitted a separate letter to Scotland's chief planner warning that ministers' handling of the planning application appeal appears 'unlawful'. An illustration showing what Flamingo Land at Loch Lomond would look like | Contributed Mr Greer said the sped-up draft planning agreement led by Flamingo Land's developers was among the 'deeply questionable' decisions the Government had made in handling this case. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This comes as principal reporter David Buylla was reappointed to organise the case and make recommendations to ministers, despite being the civil servant to originally approve the controversial resort. Speaking to the Sunday Mail, Mr Greer said: 'They refuse to hold any public hearings and have asked the same official who tried to approve the plans to mark his own homework by making recommendations for a fresh decision. 'Now they're asking Flamingo Land to draft their own planning conditions or their own terms against the wishes of the national park. Is it any wonder the local people get the feeling that the cards are being stacked against them?' Flamingo Land protestors outside the Scottish Parliament with Ross Greer MSP. | Andrew Milligan/Press Association Only last week lawyers for the national park criticised the new process as 'highly unorthodox'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Ian Cowan, Mr Greer's lawyer, has also warned ministers are not following proper procedure. He said the handling of the called-in appeal 'appears to be both unlawful' and 'tainted by bias'. Mr Cowan said the process should be 'abandoned' and replaced with a fairer one. 'My client does not question Mr Buylla's professionalism, but the recall of the appeal should have meant that he played no further part in it,' he said. Mr Cowan also questioned 'anomalies' in key files published by the government's appeals division last month. A 'minute of appointment' reappointing Mr Buylla to prepare a report for ministers was published on July 4, but reportedly signed off by senior planning officials on June 24. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The document does not carry the official's digital signature. The document's properties show it was created on July 4 - just 15 minutes after a letter from Mr Buylla setting out the new process was published. Mr Cowan has questioned officials on why the document appears to be backdated. Mr Greer said: 'I hope there is a simple explanation for this inconsistency in the date of the official's appointment, because it is hugely concerning. There needs to be full transparency here if the public are to have any confidence in this process.' The Scottish Government said it recalled the application approval as 'the proposed development raises issues of national significance'. A spokesperson said: 'As this is a live planning appeal, it would not be appropriate to comment further.'
Glasgow Times
40 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Hundreds of children from Gaza to be brought to UK for medical treatment
The plans are reportedly set to be announced within weeks. A parent or guardian will accompany each child, as well as siblings if necessary, and the Home Office will carry out biometric and security checks before travel, the Sunday Times reported. This will happen 'in parallel' with an initiative by Project Pure Hope, a group set up to bring sick and injured Gazan children to the UK privately for treatment. More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer making a statement in Downing Street following a Cabinet meeting to discuss the situation in Gaza (Toby Melville/PA) Sir Keir Starmer said last week that the UK was 'urgently accelerating' efforts to bring children over for treatment. A Government spokesperson said: 'We are taking forward plans to evacuate more children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care. 'We are working at pace to do so as quickly as possible, with further details to be set out in due course.' The UK and Jordan have been working together to air drop aid amid warnings of widespread malnourishment in Gaza. It comes as the UK seeks to put pressure on Israel to change course with a plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September ahead of the UN General Assembly. Sir Keir has said the UK would only refrain from recognising Palestine if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. Concerns have been raised this could see a Palestinian state recognised by the UK without Hamas releasing the remaining Israeli hostages. British families of hostages say the Government has made clear to them that releases would 'play no part' in the UK's plans to recognise Palestine and that it could see those still held 'rot in Hamas dungeons'. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the UK's demands for Hamas to release all hostages and play no role in the future of Gaza are 'absolute and unconditional'. He told The Sunday Times: 'The UK position on recognition is part of (a) co-ordinated international effort. It must begin with an immediate ceasefire that frees the hostages and ends the agony of their families, and which lifts the inhumane aid restrictions.'
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
AI isn't to blame for the graduate jobs crisis
You should think about being a powerboat driver. Or perhaps a railway builder. Or, although it might not be great for your online dating profile, a sewage worker. On absolutely no account should you consider anything that requires a degree. Microsoft last week released a study of the careers that are most likely to survive the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI). It joins a whole series of reports pinning the blame for the graduate jobs crisis on super smart chatbots. But while there is a desperate shortage of vacancies out there, it is the Government that is to blame and AI is just a convenient excuse. If you graduated from university this summer, being a sewage worker was probably not vying with law, consulting or finance as your top career choice. According to Microsoft, however, perhaps you should be thinking about it after all. After examining 200,000 conversations with chatbots to determine which roles were most at risk from the rise of AI, it concluded that historians, translators and sales reps were the most likely to be replaced by machine, along with anything that traditionally required a degree. By contrast, blue-collar jobs were a lot safer, with pile drivers and dredge operators up there with the sewage guys at the very top of the 'safe for life' list. It turns out the chatbots don't want to get their hands dirty any more than the rest of us. It joins a host of reports pinpointing AI as the explanation for the terrifying collapse in graduate recruitment. The online jobs board Adzuna said only last month that the number of entry-level jobs on offer in May was down 32pc from three years ago, before ChatGPT and all its rivals were released. Meanwhile, we have now learnt that 'Mickey Mouse' degrees are paying less than ever. Figures released this week showed that 630,000 graduates are now collecting benefits, which hardly suggests their careers are accelerating into the fast lane. All those student loans are unlikely to be paid back. There is no question that the job market for new graduates is grim right now. It has always been tough to get your foot on the career ladder, but right now it is harder than ever. But should we really blame AI for that? In fact, there is a far simpler explanation. It is the Government that has no idea how the economy works that is the real problem. Over the year since it took office, the Labour Government has made employing someone, and especially a new graduate, about as unattractive as it possibly could be. In her first Budget, Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, imposed a steep rise in the rate of National Insurance that employers have to pay, while reducing the threshold at which it starts to kick in. If you put a big new tax on jobs it should not come as any surprise if, not long afterwards, there are fewer of them. That is what happens. Next, the reform of employment legislation by Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, has made it harder to sack anyone if they don't work out. In the graduate jobs market in particular, companies want to try people out and figure out if they have the skills and attitude for the working world before offering them a full-time position. But that is no longer possible. If you hire a 22-year-old now, you are stuck with them for 40 years, no matter how completely hopeless they are, or else you have to pay a huge bill for getting rid of them. The flexibility has gone, and the safest thing to do is not to hire anyone in the first place. Finally, the economy has been crushed by taxes and regulations. Output shrank again last month, and with yet more tax rises likely to be imposed in the autumn, we may soon be in a full blown recession. The Institute of Directors reported on Friday that business confidence had fallen to its lowest level on record, below even the levels reported during the Covid pandemic. With the outlook so bleak, the easiest thing for any company to do is simply to slash graduate recruitment. If you are not planning to expand, you don't need the extra people anyway, and at least it will save some money. Over time, AI will almost certainly change the labour market, and potentially radically so. It will automate a lot of routine white collar work, and that may eliminate some jobs. We should however, keep two points in mind before falling for too much of the hype. To start with, we have a couple of hundred years of industrial history to tell us that new technologies don't ever lead to a reduction in the overall amount of work available. We just find new stuff to do that we had not thought of before. And, just as significantly, it is surely far too early to see the impact on employment. Most companies are experimenting with AI and trying to figure out where it can help them. But very few of them have yet got to the stage of replacing their workers in droves. They don't trust it enough yet, and probably rightly so. The blunt truth is this. The Government has taken a wrecking ball to the jobs market. It has punished employers with tax rises, crushed the market with regulations, and killed growth stone dead. Against that backdrop, it is easy to blame AI for the shortage of graduate jobs. But it is really just a convenient excuse. It is destructive government policies that are really to blame. And we should focus on fixing that before telling all the English, philosophy and history graduates this summer to send their CVs straight to the sewage works.
