Uterine cancer projected to rise in US, Black women likely to be hit hardest
Uterine cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S. In 2024, there were almost 70,000 cases, according to the National Cancer Institute.
Over the past 30 years, uterine cancer cases and deaths have jumped. NCI data shows that between 2015 and 2019, there was about a 2% increase in new cases per year, the highest for any cancer in women.
FDA considers issuing proposed rule to ban formaldehyde in hair straightening products
Researchers at Columbia University used population data and computer modeling to predict how many people will get uterine cancer -- and how many will die from it -- over the next 30 years. They predict that the number of new uterine cancer cases will increase by over 50% for Black women compared to about 30% for white women by 2050.
Elena Elkin, one of the study's authors and a Ph.D.-level researcher at Columbia's Mailman School of Public Health, pointed to an aging population as one major cause of the projected increase.
"Like many cancers, uterine cancer is a disease of aging. Another major factor is the increase in overweight and obesity in the U.S. population," she said.
Elkin pointed to decreases in hysterectomies -- surgery to remove the uterus -- for conditions like fibroids and endometriosis as another reason uterine cancer rates are increasing. More women are living with their uterus, putting them at risk of developing the disease, she noted.
The uterus is a hollow, pear-shaped organ located in a woman's pelvis where a fetus develops and grows. Uterine cancer refers to any cancer that arises in this organ, including endometrial cancer, the most common form. Uterine sarcomas that develop in the muscles or the tissues of the uterus are more rare -- and more fatal.
Overall, uterine cancer has an 81% five-year survival rate.
"Survival outcomes are generally good, because most cancers are diagnosed at an early stage," Elkin said.
Cancer diagnoses rising faster in women, especially those under 50: Report
Unfortunately, this is not the case for all.
For those diagnosed with more aggressive forms of the disease, five-year survival drops to 20-50%. Black women are already more likely to have aggressive forms and are two times more likely to die from uterine cancer compared to white women, NCI statistics show.
The American Association for Cancer Research study projects worsening racial disparities. By 2050, Black women could be three times more likely to die of the disease.
"Studies have shown that these disparities are due to delays in diagnosis, barriers to accessing care, and receiving sub-optimal care," Elkin said.
Some research has linked chemical hair relaxers to uterine cancer. In the U.S., about 95% of Black women under age 45 have used chemical hair relaxers at least once in their lives.
Chemical relaxers have been found to have toxins like formaldehyde, heavy metals, and endocrine disrupting chemicals like phthalates and parabens. Many have been linked to cancer.
Although chemical relaxer use has declined significantly in recent years, women who used them at all during their lifetime are still at risk of possible long-term impacts.
There are currently no routine screening tests for uterine cancer. People are often diagnosed once they start having symptoms like abnormal vaginal bleeding typically after menopause, pelvic pain and weight loss.
"We don't yet have a test that is accurate enough to provide the maximum benefit and minimum harm," Elkin stated.
The study model found that if there was an accurate screening test for women at age 55, rates of uterine cancer cases would significantly decrease.
Woman has uterine fibroids removed that equaled the size of a 6-month pregnancy
"We can use models like this one to evaluate emerging technologies for screening," she said.
Although the study's uterine cancer projections are concerning, Elkin said she remains optimistic. She pointed to emerging treatment like immunotherapy and bio marker-based therapies as promising options.
Elkin also emphasized targeting risk factors as a way to lower the number of new cases.
"Population level changes in overweight and obesity, perhaps through improved access to the current generation of weight loss medications, could lead to reductions in uterine cancer cases in the future," she said.
Dr. Adeiyewunmi (Ade) Osinubi is an emergency medicine resident physician at the University of Pennsylvania and is a member of the ABC News Medical Unit.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump slams Elon Musk as megabill drops AI protections and hits snags in Senate
President Trump slammed Elon Musk's subsidies, and Republican senators struck down a plan to shield artificial intelligence from state regulations. These two middle-of-the-night developments on Tuesday reinforced a growing schism between Trump and Silicon Valley supporters over his "big, beautiful bill." The first development came at 12:44 a.m. ET, when Trump responded to Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk's ongoing critiques of the package, focusing on the government grants that Musk's companies receive. "Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," wrote the president in a Truth Social post, adding, "perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this?" The president was referring to the government efficiency group that Musk ran until recently. The president's missive came after Trump's signature legislation underwent key changes in recent days that set off many in the tech industry, Musk most of all, with new measures to tax green energy companies and further support for fossil fuels, as well as a growing price tag. The divide between many in Silicon Valley and the "big, beautiful bill" has been evident for over a month. It appeared set to deepen further when, a few hours later, a closely watched artificial intelligence provision was stripped from the bill itself. This plan, which had many Silicon Valley supporters, was meant to shield the quickly growing AI industry from state and local regulations. But the idea now appears to be dead after Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee turned against a compromise plan Monday evening and stripped it from the bill. It wasn't close in the end, with the Senate voting 99-1 to adopt Blackburn's subsequent amendment in a count that wrapped up a little after 4:00 a.m. ET. Trump's overall package also appears to be teetering Tuesday morning after a series of overnight developments saw two key Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine — uncommitted to vote yes. Those two senators could join two Republicans already committed to voting no, which would be enough to sink the package. The drama between the president and the world's richest man has been up and down for weeks, but it escalated Monday afternoon when Musk offered new electoral threats against Republicans. Musk had already amplified Democrats' critiques and talked about the need for a new political party. He offered a striking promise Monday afternoon that lawmakers who vote for the bill "will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk, of course, was the biggest donor during the 2024 campaign, spending at least $288 million, most of which was offered in support of Trump. Trump reiterated his critiques of Musk Tuesday morning, speaking to reporters and saying of Musk's objection to losing EV subsidies, "Elon can lose a lot more than that." The president also called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) a "monster that might have to go back and eat Elon." And when asked by a reporter if he would consider deporting Musk, he demurred: "We'll have to take a look." What is unclear for the days ahead is how much the Trump-Musk fight will impact the actual chances of the bill's passage, with Senate amendment votes ongoing. Musk is clearly focused on a debate likely coming later this week, when the House is set to take up the amended measure if it passes. The House is where a vocal bloc of fiscal conservatives — who often vote as part of the "Freedom Caucus" — warily supported a previous version of the bill, saying a previous smaller price tag was too big. Musk even tagged some of these House Republican lawmakers in some of his latest posts, which continued throughout the night with dozens of messages. Musk also responded to Trump's comments about his subsidies by saying his companies like Tesla and SpaceX ( would be fine and that oil and gas subsidies should be removed as well. The back-and-forth over AI also came to a head overnight after the House passed a plan in May that included a complete ban on state regulations of AI for a decade. The little-noticed measure gained wider attention in the weeks that followed, with many of Trump's most loyal supporters opposing it. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene even admitted that she hadn't been aware of the provision when she voted yes. The Georgia lawmaker then announced her opposition and plans to vote no if this "violation of state rights" stayed in the bill. Trump himself doesn't appear to have taken a position on the measure, but it had the backing of his Silicon Valley-aligned aides, most notably the vocal support of AI and crypto czar (and longtime venture capitalist) David Sacks. But Republican opposition grew, and Sen. Blackburn of Tennessee became a leading voice of opposition in the Senate. She entered into negotiations over the issue and appeared to have found a compromise in recent days around the idea that instead of a decade-long ban, the provision would be amended to be a "temporary pause" of five years. States would be strongly discouraged from regulating AI, as lawmakers linked it to access to millions of dollars in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. But even that wasn't enough. Blackburn renounced the compromise, said a moratorium "could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives," and teamed with a top Democrat to strike the provision entirely. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (a former Trump press secretary) congratulated Blackburn on the move in a post the senator quickly reposted. "This is how you take on big tech!" Sanders wrote. This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Thanks to Netflix's NASA+, You Can Go Out of This World with International Space Station Livestream
This year, we've already gotten a Sally Ride documentary and another Ryan Gosling astronaut movie, but the biggest space-centric development in 2025 is all thanks to Netflix's unprecedented partnership with NASA: meet NASA+. Starting this summer, audiences can view live NASA space expeditions and watch each second of the International Space Station capturing out of this world (literally) footage of Earth. 'The National Aeronautics and our Space Act of 1958 calls on us to share our story of space exploration with the broadest possible audience,' Rebecca Sirmons, general manager of NASA+, said in an official statement. 'Together, we're committed to a Golden Age of Innovation and Exploration — inspiring new generations — right from the comfort of their couch or in the palm of their hand from their phone.' More from IndieWire David Koepp on Why It Took Him Almost 30 Years to Return to the 'Jurassic Park' Franchise He Helped Create 'The Running Man' Trailer: Glen Powell Sprints to Survive in Edgar Wright's Take on Dystopian Stephen King Novel Audiences will be able to stream rocket launches, astronaut spacewalks, and mission coverage through the NASA+ live programming. NASA+ will be available for free, without ads, through the NASA app and on the NASA website. As today's announcement notes, the work of NASA will become 'even more accessible, allowing the agency to increase engagement with and inspire a global audience in a modern media landscape, where Netflix reaches a global audience of more than 700 million people.' Netflix has been doubling down on educational efforts in recent months: the streamer now has exclusive worldwide premiere rights for beloved PBS show 'Sesame Street.' The platform scooped the rights to the iconic series after Warner Bros. Discovery's HBO Max opted to not take on the contract again. 'Sesame Street' will continue to be available on PBS KIDS and across their digital video and games platforms to continue providing free public television. 'Sesame Street' is created by Sesame Workshop, a global nonprofit. Netflix is debuting a reimagined Season 56, as well as airing 90 hours of previous episodes and unveiling spinoff storylines. In addition to the series, Netflix will also further expand the 'Sesame Street' franchise by developing video games for both 'Sesame Street' and 'Sesame Street Mecha Builders.' Netflix also famously has been the platform for a slew of nature docs, including 'Our Living World' narrated by Cate Blanchett, and 'Our Planet' with Sir David Attenborough, Salma Hayek, and Penélope of IndieWire Guillermo del Toro's Favorite Movies: 56 Films the Director Wants You to See 'Song of the South': 14 Things to Know About Disney's Most Controversial Movie Nicolas Winding Refn's Favorite Films: 37 Movies the Director Wants You to See
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Researchers issue warning after discovering game fish infected with parasite in California: 'These parasites are here in the US'
If you're eating freshwater fish in Southern California, you'll want to take extra precautions since fish have become infected with parasites. A study by the University of California, San Diego found that over 90% of game fish studied had been infected with a parasite. The study, published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, found "two species of [parasitic] flatworms called trematodes," which typically cause weight loss, lethargy, or gastrointestinal problems when humans get infected. In rare cases, it can cause heart attacks or strokes. Haplorchis pumilio and Centrocestus formosanus were the "two species of parasitic trematodes," identified, per UC San Diego. These parasites are typically found in Southeast Asia, but it is likely that an aquatic invasive snail, known as the Malaysian trumpet snail or red-rimmed melania, brought them to the U.S. over 10 years ago. The researchers examined 84 different species of fish in 2023 from five fishing sites in San Diego County, including bluegill and largemouth; 93% were infected with the Haplorchis pumilio parasite, and "Centrocestus formosanus, was found at two of the five locations where it occurred in 91% of the fish," per UC San Diego. UC San Diego's Scripps Institution of Oceanography ecologist and parasitologist, and senior author of the study, Ryan Hechinger, said, "These parasites are here in the U.S., and they're infecting fish that people are eating." These parasites, which are appearing in freshwater fish, serve as an example of why invasive species can be dangerous. While not all non-native species are harmful, those that are can cause damage to the ecosystem and pose health risks, as in this case. The Asian tiger mosquito is another invasive species that can carry disease. It entered the U.S. in the mid-1980s, and some harbored the West Nile virus. The mosquito also invaded Europe in 2024, carrying the dengue fever virus. Invasive species also wreak havoc on the economy, causing damage to crops, livestock, and fish, costing the U.S. $20 billion a year for cleanup. Additionally, they are harmful to the environment because they take resources from native species, sometimes causing them to go extinct. How often do you worry about the quality of your drinking water? Never Sometimes Often Always Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Hechinger said there is "no need to panic," because you can thoroughly cook or freeze your fish "for at least one week" to kill the parasites, if you plan to eat it raw, per Food and Drug Administration guidelines, as reported by UC San Diego. There have been no reported cases yet, but researchers want the parasite to be added to the diseases that public health officials are required to report. Hechinger said, "This kind of research is so important to identifying new public health threats, and it wouldn't have been possible without NIH funding." Invasive species such as this aquatic snail that is spreading parasites are one of the critical climate issues that are vital to understand to protect the public from these threats. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.