The $115 billion a year boost to Australia at the touch of a button
Artificial intelligence could provide a $115 billion annual boost to the economy within five years, lifting the quality of goods and services while generating more jobs, the first examination of the technology's impact on Australia has revealed.
Compiled by OpenAI, the organisation behind ChatGPT, it argues the nation's economic success will depend on the uptake of AI with its chief economist likening the technology to the advent of electricity.
The Albanese government is holding a three-day productivity roundtable in early August with business groups, unions and community organisations to map out ways to lift the pace at which the economy can grow while boosting living standards.
Labour productivity – the amount produced by the number of staff or hours worked – has effectively flatlined in Australia over the past five years, although the IT sector has outperformed almost every other part of the economy.
While AI is promising massive productivity gains, companies involved in its development – including OpenAI – have come under fire on a range of issues, including massive job losses, copyright infringement from information producers such as newspapers, and theft of intellectual property.
Loading
According to OpenAI, the ability of Australia to lift living standards, increase wages and expand growth opportunities will be tied to AI.
It estimates AI adoption would produce $115 billion annually in economic benefits to Australia by 2030, or almost $4000 a person, with 70 per cent of that flowing directly from higher productivity. Its broad findings mirror previous research on the possible gains from AI.
Another $4 billion would flow from new jobs, $6 billion from new businesses and $25 billion from improved quality of goods and services.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Melissa Price blasts NDIS reforms as blow to remote providers
Member for Durack Melissa Price has slammed upcoming changes to the National Disability Insurance Scheme, warning the reforms will hurt regional WA's practitioners and their clients. The changes to the NDIS Pricing Arrangements and Price Limits, due to come into effect from today, are part of the Albanese Government's push to rein in the scheme's rising costs. The plan aims to reduce annual spending growth from 15 per cent to 8 per cent by aligning therapy prices with national benchmarks. While Ms Price agrees the NDIS needs reform, she says uniform pricing ignores the higher costs of delivering services across remote areas like Durack. 'The NDIS has blown out beyond its original intent and clearly needs serious reform,' Ms Price said. 'However, that reform must be fair, informed and grounded in real world experience. Ripping funding out of the regions should not be the first step.' Ms Price said she had been contacted by allied health professionals across Durack, particularly in the Pilbara, and the Kimberley, who fear the removal of regional loadings and reduced travel support will force them to cut services or shut up shop altogether. 'These are small, often women-led, businesses — speech pathologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists etc. — who have chosen to work in remote communities,' she said. 'These changes put their livelihoods, and their clients' care, at serious risk.' The Coalition has also raised concerns about the sudden nature of the announcement, which it says came with no warning and leaves little time for providers or participants to adjust. 'It is not feasible for providers and participants to adapt service delivery at such short notice,' Ms Price said. 'This is yet another example of the Albanese Government's failure to consult the sector or understand the reality on the ground.' In response, Ms Price said she and the Coalition have written to the Minister for Disability and the NDIS, Mark Butler, calling for a three-month deferral of the changes to allow proper planning and consultation. 'The Government must explain how regional providers are expected to adapt without harming participants,' she said. 'The Coalition will continue to monitor the impact and hold the Government to account for any negative outcomes for NDIS participants.' The Kimberley Echo has contacted Minister for the NDIS Jenny McAllister for comment.


Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Not good enough': Defence Minister Richard Marles starved of formal updates on military readiness for more than two years
Defence Minister Richard Marles was not kept informed of the Australian Defence Force's readiness for more than two years, the latest defence report has revealed. The Auditor General's performance audit of the Department of Defence exposed the lack of formal reporting on ADF readiness between 2023 and 2024. The revelation, uncovered by the AFR, has sparked political pressure on the Albanese government over Australia's military preparedness and low levels of defence spending. Shadow defence minister Angus Taylor described the situation as unacceptable and called on Mr Marles to clarify whether he had been left in the dark about military readiness. 'Every dollar spent by the Australian Defence Force is taxpayers' money,' Mr Taylor said in a statement provided to Sky News. 'It is critical Defence continues to meet the highest standards in its expenditure and risk practices. 'It is clearly not sufficient for formal reporting on something as critical as Australia's preparedness to be conducted informally and verbally. 'The minister must clarify what he knew, when he knew it, and whether he was satisfied from these informal reports about the status of Australia's maritime preparedness.' Senior defence strategy analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute Alex Bristow told Sky News that defence policy relies on "evidence-based advice to government". 'ASPI's Cost of Defence, published in May, also highlighted issues with the readiness of the Australian Defence Force and the progress of key acquisition and sustainment projects," he said. 'The defence readiness of the nation is a matter of legitimate public concern, especially when the Chinese ambassador is writing in the national press to dissuade the government from increasing defence spending." The report, which examined the sustainment of the Navy's Canberra-class amphibious assault ships confirmed formal reporting was suspended throughout 2023 and 2024. 'Preparedness reporting had not been provided to the Minister in 2023 and 2024 due to development of the 2023 Defence Strategic Review,' the report said. 'Defence expects the updated preparedness reporting to be in place by mid-2025.' The report added that advice to Mr Marles on preparedness has been through 'other means' over the two years, including via 'conversations'. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese rejected suggestions the government was unaware of Australia's defence posture, calling them 'ridiculous'. 'That's just absurd. That's just absurd,' Mr Albanese told Nine's Today programme on Tuesday. 'Frankly, I haven't seen that report, but we sit in the National Security Committee with the chief of the Defence Force. 'We meet regularly. I certainly have met with heads of all of the armed forces regularly.' Mr Albanese said his government had made major investments in defence since coming to office, including committing billions in new funding. NATO allies have agreed to boost military spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035, while the Albanese government has committed to a modest target of 2.3 per cent by 2033. Asked whether he was worried about a backlash from US President Donald Trump, Mr Albanese said, 'We will invest in the capability that Australia needs'.


Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Albo hits back at ‘absurd' defence claim
Anthony Albanese has rejected a report detail revealing his deputy, Defence Minister Richard Marles, did not get warship readiness briefings for years. An audit published on Friday found the Royal Australian Navy (RAN) has failed to properly maintain Australia's biggest battleships – the HMAS Canberra and HMAS Adelaide. It also revealed Mr Marles did not get 'preparedness reports' from Australian Defence Force (ADF) officials 'in 2023 and 2024 due to development of the 2023 Defence Strategic Review'. Instead, Mr Marles was briefed 'through 'other means', including during conversations'. The Prime Minister flatly rejected the finding when asked about it on Tuesday. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese (right) has rejected revelations his deputy and Defence Minister Richard Marles (left) did not get key readiness briefings for years. Credit: News Corp Australia, Martin Ollman / NewsWire 'Well, that's just absurd, that's just absurd,' Mr Albanese told Nine's Today. Pressed further, he said Mr Marles was 'of course' briefed. 'That's just ridiculous, frankly,' Mr Albanese said. 'I haven't seen that report, but we sit in the National Security Committee with the Chief of the Defence Force. 'We meet regularly. I certainly have met with heads of all of the armed forces regularly, and that is just completely incorrect.' He said the extra $57bn Labor had pumped into expanding capability 'has come directly after discussions and engagement, obviously with Defence'. 'And in the last budget in March, indeed, we brought forward a billion dollars of additional spending, bringing to over $10bn our additional commitments over the forward estimates as well,' Mr Albanese said. Preparedness reports detail what can be deployed in the event of a war or natural disaster – key information against a backdrop of looming conflict in the Indo-Pacific and increasingly common extreme weather events. Labor's handling of defence has come under a microscope since the US last month demanded Australia hike the ADF's budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP. Mr Albanese has resisted, saying Australia's national security was a matter for Canberra, not Washington. He has also said his government would first determine need and then allocate funds rather than set a flat GDP target. But the government's position has put Australia at odds with its allies across the world, with all NATO members bar Spain agreeing to lift defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP last week. Closer to home, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea have all recently committed to spending more amid warnings from the Trump administration the region faces graver threats than Europe. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt took a thinly veiled shot at Australia last week, saying if European countries can agree to hike defence spending, then US allies in the Indo Pacific 'can do it as well'. 'I mean, look, if our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do it, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia-Pacific region can do it as well,' she said, responding to an Australian journalist. 'But as for our specific relations and discussions, I will let the President speak on those.' Though whether the Trump administration would actually seek to mirror a NATO target for allies in the Indo Pacific remains unclear.