
Anatomy of a deportation flight: How the Government's removals work
He sat down in a row of three seats where he was joined by his mother. Officials guided his father to the row in front where he was seated between two official escorts. The rows in front and behind them were left empty to separate the family from the other 29 passengers who were loaded on the plane.
It was unlikely the young boy was aware he was part of what the Garda had called Operation Trench 9, the first dedicated deportation flight commissioned by the Government in six years.
In all, 32 Georgian nationals were flown to Tbilisi aboard the aircraft.
READ MORE
It is part of a tougher approach to immigration adopted by Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan and his predecessor, Helen McEntee, in response to record numbers of asylum seekers arriving in the Republic.
Chartered deportation flights had previously been discontinued by the Government on the basis that they did not provide value for money.
However, officials believed resurrecting them would not only allow the State to efficiently deport migrants in bulk but would also serve as a public deterrent to other potential asylum seekers.
[
Deportation orders triple as Ireland enforces a 'firmer approach to migration'
Opens in new window
]
'If you're seeking asylum and you're not entitled to asylum, don't come to Ireland,' said Mr O'Callaghan the morning after the operation.
Documents released to The Irish Times, along with interviews with two officials involved in the operation, provide an insight into the huge amount of planning and resources needed for these deportation flights.
Planning for Trench 9 began a year earlier when the Government sought expressions of interest from private carriers as it attempted to 'normalise' its approach to deportations.
In November 2024, it entered into a €5 million contract with Air Partner Ltd, a UK-based aviation services company with offices worldwide and which carried thousands of tonnes of military cargo to Iraq during the first and second Gulf Wars.
It was an obvious choice for the Government. Air Partner has been the go-to broker for the UK government for deportation flights, including its aborted plans to fly asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing.
Air Partner also has a contract to provide deportation flights for Frontex, the European Union border security agency.
With the deal signed, organisation of the first Irish flight began in early 2025. A list of Georgians whose asylum claims had been rejected and who had refused to leave the country was drawn up. Gardaí were instructed to locate and detain about 30 adults.
The Georgians were arrested by the Garda National Immigration Bureau and held in Cloverhill Prison for up to three weeks while the flight was arranged.
A human rights monitor, understood to be a retired senior civil servant, was hired on February 5th and briefed on the operation. His job would be to accompany the flight and report on any breaches of human rights, as required by the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture.
Those involved in the 'National Chartered Forced Return Operation' underwent a two-day training course. On February 20th, a series of meetings were held to discuss security concerns, along with legal, logistical and human rights issues regarding the flight.
On the day of the flight, Air Partner provided a medium-sized passenger aircraft with the logo of Smartwings, a Czech airline, on its side.
Most of the seats would be taken up not by deportees but by gardaí and other officials. Two escorts would accompany each deportee, while a large backup team would also travel for additional security. A doctor and translator would also fly.
The first deportees to arrive were four Georgian men and one woman who had been previously arrested and held in rural prisons before being driven to the Garda station at Dublin Airport.
[
Just 6% of 2,400 deportation orders this year are enforced or confirmed
Opens in new window
]
They were held in a room with an interpreter and several gardaí. When the human rights monitor visited the room, they said they were being treated well. He noted in his report that they had an 'ample supply' of sandwiches, fruit and water.
One deportee told the monitor they wanted to stay in the Republic but was informed this was a matter they should discuss with their legal team.
Two prison vans subsequently arrived, carrying another 24 Georgians from Cloverhill. They were put in individual cells on the vans but not otherwise restrained.
The deportation team were informed that they would be carrying one less passenger than expected. That afternoon, one man had successfully applied to the High Court to prevent his removal. However, his baggage still ended up in Tbilisi and had to be sent back by express delivery.
Further meetings were held to discuss the rules of the use of force aboard. Gardaí on the backup team were issued with handcuffs and cable ties to restrain passengers if needed.
However, according to the human rights monitor, these were only to be used 'as a matter of last resort'. It was repeatedly emphasised to the team that only one of the deportees had a criminal record, for theft and fraud offences.
However, one of the men had been labelled as 'high risk' due to his erratic behaviour while in custody. Another two men were deemed 'medium risk' by officials as they were leaving their families behind in Ireland and, as a result, may be more likely to resist deportation. Additional escorts were assigned to these men.
Before boarding, a full search was conducted of the plane and the deportees were screened by airport security. The human rights monitor said the deportees seemed relaxed as they were taken to the aircraft. The family of three were brought separately in a van.
On board, one man complained he could not sit comfortably in his seat and was transferred to an exit row with more space.
The flight departed a few minutes behind schedule and was largely uneventful, aside from two minor medical incidents. Deportees were escorted to the toilets on request by two officers.
The captain briefed the passengers in English on their progress and detainees could communicate with each other between rows.
Shortly after boarding, peanuts were handed out, followed by a full meal – chicken or vegetarian- and dessert. Shortly before landing, they got an apple and a biscuit. 'No alcohol or hot drinks were offered,' said the monitor.
After five hours and 15 minutes, the plane landed in Tblisi, where they 'were greeted by the Georgian police and customs authorities', reported the monitor.
The cost for the flight, not including Garda wages, was €102,000 or almost €3,200 per head. Two similar operations have since taken place. In April, another 39 Georgians, including five children, were deported to Tbilisi.
[
Jim O'Callaghan's public theatrics mask the truth about asylum seeker deportations
Opens in new window
]
In June, 35 Nigerians, including five children, were deported to Lagos. The Department of Justice said no human rights monitor was present on that flight 'due to technical reasons' outside its control.
The three charter operations cost €530,000, leading to criticism over the value for money of such flights.
There has also been criticism of the deportation of children on such flights. Witnesses described the Nigerian children as having been 'put in the back of a black van' with 15 minutes notice.
According to one account, the children were prevented from saying goodbye to their
friends at the asylum seeker accommodation centre
.
Last week, Mr O'Callaghan said he has no plans to cease the deportation of children. 'Any such policy would make Ireland an outlier in Europe and could encourage more people to come here with children, knowing that they could not be removed regardless of the outcome of their case,' he told the Dáil.
Meanwhile, more flights are planned for later in the year, while the Government also intends to book seats on deportation flights run by other EU countries.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
37 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Trafficked women can spend their life recovering from mental trauma, says campaigner
Women trafficked for sexual exploitation can spend their lives trying to deal with the mental trauma of what they have endured, a campaigner against sexual violence has revealed. Barbara Condon, the chief executive of Ruhama, said that human trafficking for sex has been described as 'the worst example of what one human being can do to another human being.' Speaking at the official launch of Ruhama's Cork-Kerry support service, Ms Condon revealed that the service, which has been operational since April 2024, has helped support some 80 women who were the victims of sexual exploitation in the southwest. She explained that Ruhama, which supports women impacted by prostitution and human trafficking, works with 'a hidden cohort of women, often ignored, overlooked and marginalised, trafficked women who are highly transient with no addresses, no bank accounts who are subjected to sexual violence in every town and city across Ireland.' She said that human trafficking and sexual exploitation brings with it complex trauma, not just physical but also mental with many victims developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which can often lead to addiction, homelessness and further exploitation. 'But the biggest thing probably that the women face is the stigma and the discrimination and the shame,' she said. 'Nobody should be stigmatised because they've been sexually assaulted or sexually violated – recovery from sexual violence and sexual exploitation is lifelong because of what they've endured.' Ms Condon said that there was 'a huge silence around sexual exploitation' which made it difficult for people to speak about it, but Ruhama helped through talking and listening to the victims of such exploitation, but society needs to step up more to address the problem and the stigma. 'And the shame, the shame is what keeps women stuck long after they've exited and the shame really comes from most of depraved and degrading acts that nobody in this room can actually imagine unless they've been through and it really is unbelievable.' Ms Condon said that one the findings of a new study commissioned by Ruhama entitled Room for Recovery – Housing Hope After Exploitation was that accommodation was an essential part of the set of assistance measures necessary for victims of trafficking if they are to recover. 'Both the National Action Plan on Trafficking and the Third National Strategy for Domestic Sexual and Gender Based Violence are crystal clear on the crucial importance of gender-specific specialist accommodation for victims of human trafficking for sexual exploitation,' she said. 'The continued accommodation of these victims-survivors with their particular vulnerabilities among the general asylum reception and the general International Protection Accommodation Service is inhumane and untenable.' One survivor of human trafficking and sexual exploitation, who wished to remain anonymous, said that the new Cork-Kerry service will offer not just support and safety but also compassion and hope for those who have endured great trauma from what they have been through. 'I carried enormous shame especially after discovering there was footage of my abuse – videos taken without consent, passed around like I was an object- that kind of violation leaves scars deeper than words,' she said. 'It makes you question if you are even human any more – I wanted to disappear – the new Ruhama Cork-Kerry service will be a place where trauma is named, shame is lifted and women come home to themselves.' Taoiseach Michéal Martin paid tribute to Ruhama for the work that the organisation is doing and he said the opening of the Cork-Kerry service was a vital step towards providing vital support and to 'some of the most vulnerable women in appalling circumstances' so they can rebuild their lives. 'The services delivered by Ruhama in this sector and on the frontline with victims are essential as we move forward with the Government's National Action Plan on Trafficking and our zero tolerance strategy for tackling domestic, sexual and gender-based violence,' he said.

The Journal
2 hours ago
- The Journal
Sinn Féin to lead protest outside GPO today over plans for more shops and offices on site
SINN FÉIN IS holding a protest today in Dublin over proposed changes to the GPO that involve opening more shops and offices on the site. The controversial plans are part of wider efforts to revamp the city centre. However, Sinn Féin has hit out at the , saying it would be better to take a 'visionary approach' to the redesign. Dublin South-Central TD Aengus Ó Snodaigh told The Journal that if the site is to be repurposed, it should only be for historical and cultural uses, because of it's central role in the Easter Rising of 1916. 'The public are adamant that the GPO is hallowed ground and should be respected, and can play a part in telling our story,' he said. He wasn't prescriptive about the specifics of what should be done with the site, saying instead that a conversation should be had. The GPO already has retail units that open onto Henry Street, which are rented by businesses. There were a number of ideas about what could be a better use of the complex, including a suggestion that it become home to RTÉ. The idea was shot down. Ó Snodaigh says the government needs to be 'imaginative'. 'What Irish people, I believe, are saying is this space should be different to the retail and office space around it. Advertisement 'It could help regenerate and revitalise that part of the city if it was approached properly,' he said. 'There are a lot of cultural institutions around the city that don't have enough space. There are artists with no space. They can't display their wares, they can't do their work. There's a shortage of small venues in the evening time.' The protest, which kicks off at 1pm time today, coincides with the All-Ireland hurling semi-final. Ó Snodaigh hopes the sporting event combined with the good weather will encourage people to join the rally. Revitalising the city centre Bringing the GPO proposal to cabinet last month, the Taoiseach said Dublin has become 'less welcoming' since the pandemic. He said that in recent years safety concerns in the capital have been highlighted. To address this, the Taoiseach proposed that a Designated Activity Company be set up to regenerate parts of the city, similar to the approach taken in the 1990s when Temple Bar was redeveloped. While that is being set up, a Project Management Office will be established by the council to begin the work urgently. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald described the GPO revamp as 'another shameful betrayal of Ireland's proud revolutionary history'. Junior Minister for Heritage Christopher O'Sullivan said some of the points made by her party in opposing the plan are 'absolutely outrageous' . The Cork South West TD argued that his party and Fine Gael have invested in commemorating the early revolutionary period of the Irish State and noted that €10m has already been invested in the current GPO experience and exhibition. 'We absolutely hold this period of Ireland's history dear to our hearts…Sinn Féin don't own this. They don't own the narrative. We all have a connection to that revolutionary period,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
When the world's most powerful banker issues a warning about Donald Trump's tariffs, we should listen
The financial markets are too relaxed about Donald Trump's policies. So said Jamie Dimon, chief executive of JP Morgan Chase , the world's biggest bank, at an event in Dublin this week. Even as the US president became 'tariff man' again this week – issuing threats right, left and centre – the stock markets rose higher, convinced that the worst on tariffs won't happen and that the US economy will find a way forward. Dimon is an ace communicator – crystal-clear and opinionated – and the word he used to sum up the current mood of the market is 'complacency'. And as investors are, in effect, betting on the economic outlook, the point is that we have all become so fed up and disorientated by Trump's constant tariff threats that they have become some kind of background noise. [ JP Morgan chief Jamie Dimon says markets too complacent on tariffs and interest rates Opens in new window ] While the Liberation Day announcement in early April caused shares to tumble and bond markets to shake – leading to a brief Trump retreat – stock markets have made ground strongly since and this week's flurry of threats caused barely a ripple. Everyone seems to be working on the assumption that Trump, in most cases, won't go ahead. After all, amid all the noise this week, the deadline for trade deals to be done was pushed out from this week to August 1st . Trump, on the other hand, is taking the rise in US shares to record highs as a vote of confidence in his policies. Indeed, he has become so encouraged that he has taken to issuing unilateral decisions on tariffs relating to various countries, without waiting for negotiations at all. Something, you would have to think, is going to have to give here sooner or later. Because the reality is – as has been the case all along – that Trump's policies are contradictory, illogical and hugely risky. READ MORE That doesn't meant that a recession is definitely on the way. But it does mean that Trump's tariff madness is going to cost US businesses and consumers and that his budget bill will pile on extra national debt, leaving the US more reliant on bond investors to fund the gap between spending and revenue. And we know how fickle they can be. Markets tend to move in waves, driven as much by mood as by new facts or data. What is taken as positive one day and seen as a reason to buy can turn around the next and be seen as supporting the case to sell. This is rationalised at the time by a particular piece of information – the latest US jobs report, EU inflation figures or the latest outpouring from the White House on tariffs – being better or worse than 'the market' expected at the time. This week the markets' attitude to Trump's announcements is they 'could have been worse and probably won't happen'. In a different mood, the interpretation might have been that the US president is doubling down on his dangerous trade war. Markets can remain detached from so-called fundamentals for long periods – and there is a host of academic studies on this. But the mood can turn on a sixpence, too, as facts that have been hiding in plain sight become the focus: like the risks from tariffs and the extraordinarily narrow economic path that the Trump administration is going to have to walk in the months ahead if something is not to go seriously wrong. Pressure on Federal Reserve Board chair Jay Powell to step down also has the potential to unnerve the markets. You can argue, or hope, that the worst will be avoided. That Trump can somehow navigate a way to pursue his tariff agenda while avoiding big economic damage and keeping the markets on board. But you can't say that Trump has found some kind of magic formula. Donald Trump, left, announces his 'Liberation Day' import tariffs plan at the White House in April. Photograph: Mark Schiefelbein/AP Just look at the figures. The average US tariff rate – according to researchers at Yale University – is now around 17 per cent, the highest since the 1930s. They calculate that this will add 1.8 per cent to inflation, costing US households $2,400 (€2,050) this year, with particular effects in areas such as clothing and footwear. Growth is hit, unemployment will be higher. Trump needs the cash to help shore up his budget. But look at the cost. Perhaps the time lag before the economic impact is fully evident is one factor in the lack of market reaction and the general view that tariffs will go up a bit and we will all be okay. And perhaps we will all muddle through. In Ireland, for example, economic indicators for growth and consumer spending are holding up, even though sources say that more recently there is a widespread slowing in investment and signs of the same in hiring. But here, too, familiar concerns remain. Ireland has escaped the worst of the tariff hit so far – suffering an additional 10 per cent on most exports to the US, but with pharma excluded. But the dangers ahead are clear, with Trump getting more bullish on generalised tariff threats as the EU/US talks come to a head and the story in relation to pharma still to play out, as the US president signals a longer-term push to get investment back 'home.' This does not mean the sky is about to fall in on the Irish economy. But as well as short-term uncertainties and the risk of rising transatlantic tensions, the brand of economic nationalism being peddled by Trump does pose longer-term issues in terms of trade with the US and investment from American companies. Ireland will hope for some accord between Washington and Brussels and for damage-limitation on pharma, but there is a lot to play out here. And as it does, the domestic economic debate, like that in the financial markets, seems strangely divorced from the risks. Ministers have put in spending demands for the new National Development Plan – the State's investment programme – billions of euro in advance of what will be available. There is no sign of a wider Cabinet agreement on the need to slow down the growth in day-to-day spending. Budget ministers Paschal Donohoe and Jack Chambers make the case, but are other ministers – including the Taoiseach and Tánaiste – bought in? Trump's meanderings on Truth Social and increasingly bizarre policies are not just some kind of reality television show. Jamie Dimon has a point. We have all become a bit complacent.