logo
What to know about Texas ending in-state tuition for undocumented students

What to know about Texas ending in-state tuition for undocumented students

Yahoo14-06-2025
Texas will no longer allow students living in the state who are undocumented to pay in-state tuition following demands from the Trump administration to end the policy.
Soon after the federal government sued Texas last week over a state law allowing the practice, Texas quickly asked the court to side with the feds and deem the law unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor's ruling did just that and immediately blocked the law.
This is what is known so far about the ruling and its implications. This story will be updated as more information becomes available.
Under the 2001 Texas Dream Act, Texas university and community college applicants who lived in the state three years before graduating from high school (or receiving an equivalent diploma) could seek in-state tuition, even if they were not permanent residents or U.S. citizens. To qualify, those students had to sign an affidavit stating that they would apply to become a permanent U.S. resident as soon as they became eligible.
More than 19,500 students in the state signed this affidavit in 2023, according to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. This figure, however, includes not only undocumented students but also students with visas allowing them to legally accompany family members who have been approved to work in the U.S., according to state data.
[Undocumented students rethink their college dreams after Texas cuts their access to cheaper tuition]
Last week's ruling specifically blocks the Texas law 'as applied to aliens who are not lawfully present in the United States.' Because the Texas Dream Act didn't require tracking a student's immigration status, it is currently unclear how many affidavit signers are undocumented students or how colleges would determine which students no longer qualify for in-state tuition.
Students enrolled in summer classes are not yet expected to be affected since tuition bills and financial aid for those courses have already been distributed.
The federal ruling blocked the law immediately. The ruling was final, and Texas indicated it will not seek an appeal.
A group of undocumented students on Wednesday asked the federal judge in charge of the case to let them intervene in the case, the first step in their ultimate goal to overturn the ruling.
If U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor doesn't allow them, they could appeal to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
'The 5th Circuit's obviously a very conservative court, but part of that conservatism is a pretty limited view of the role the courts should play in legislation,' said David Coale, a Dallas appellate lawyer. 'It's a tricky case for them to review.'
The organization Immigrant Families and Students in the Fight, which goes by its Spanish acronym FIEL, also said it was considering its options to challenge the ruling. Executive director Cesar Espinosa said last week the group was talking with their lawyers to figure out how to bring a lawsuit.
How long a student has been living in Texas is one of the biggest factors in determining a student's tuition, or coursework bill. (Tuition does not account for other college fees and housing and living costs.)
Each college sets their own tuition residency criteria, according to the THECB. Community colleges may also offer even lower tuition rates for people who live within their tax district.
Students from outside the state or country can, in some cases, pay almost four times more than in-state students.
At the University of Texas at Austin, the state's flagship university, the flat-rate tuition for the fall 2025 and spring 2026 semesters costs $15,848 more for an out-of-state liberal arts student taking 12 or more credit hours than it would for a student with similar course work paying in-state tuition rates, according to the university. Tuition also costs $18,765 more for an out-of-state student studying business and $17,713 more for engineering.
At Lone Star College in Houston, tuition for 12 credit hours for an out-of-state or international student costs $768 more than for an in-state student, and $2,424 more than for a student who lives within the college's tax district, according to the community college's 2025-26 rates.
The Texas Tribune asked the six four-year universities and three community college districts with the most affidavit signers if they will request affected students who had already been billed or made a payment for summer classes to immediately pay the difference between in- and out-of-state tuition; what will happen if they can't pay; and if there will be a grace period. They were the University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley, UT-Dallas, UT-Arlington, UT-Austin, Texas A&M, University of Houston, Dallas College District, Lone Star College District and Houston Community College.
Five schools have responded. UT-Dallas and the UH and Lone Star College systems said they are still working to understand what the court ruling means for their students and colleges.
'At this time, the full impact on UH System institutions and our students remains unclear,' a UH official said.
A spokesperson for the Texas A&M University System said officials were coordinating with administrators across its campuses 'to gather information needed to develop an appropriate plan to implement the requirements of the order.'
A UT-RGV spokesperson said officials would notify affected students directly, but did not offer specifics.
'Our priority and focus are on minimizing disruption to student success consistent with applicable law and helping students navigate this transition with clarity and care,' the spokesperson said in a statement.
The full implications of the ruling may not be known until July or August, said Andrea Guengerich Harper, chief program strategy officer for Breakthrough Central Texas, which helps students who are the first in their family to pursue a post-secondary education. But she worries that students are already getting discouraged from continuing in higher education.
'Regardless of how this plays out in the fall, this is already having a negative impact,' Guengerich Harper said. 'It is uncertainty and fear and will knock students off of these post-secondary pathways that they are already enrolled in and committing to and have been working hard for years towards.'
As they await for more information, Breakthrough Central Texas' team has started to help students search for other sources of financial support or lower-cost education options that might fit each students' needs and situation.
'No one should be withdrawing, but I think you know planning is going to be necessary, and so [students should start] to think about what other options they have in terms of cheaper pathways potentially to pursue their same credentials, those alternative ways to access dollars,' said Will Davies, director of policy and research for Breakthrough Central Texas.
Taking general courses at a community college may be a more affordable option for new or younger students, but those colleges may not offer the more specialized courses upperclassmen need to finish their bachelor's degrees.
Private universities have a single tuition rate for all their students and can offer merit or need-based scholarships or grants to high-performing students. However, they are generally more expensive and selective, making them out of reach for most students, Guengerich Harper said.
Some private organizations, such as TheDream.US, provide scholarships for undocumented students, including in states where in-state tuition is not an option for them. But Davies said he worries a few foundations or funds won't be able to cover the vast need among undocumented students in Texas.
Since Texas became the first state to extend in-state tuition eligibility to undocumented students in 2001, Republican state lawmakers have filed at least 15 bills to undo the state law. While those efforts failed, immigrant rights advocates worried the push to repeal the law would gain more traction during the 2025 legislative session as the Trump administration promised to ramp up immigration enforcement and Texas sought to match its pace. The bill was voted out of committee for the first time in a decade, but failed to advance any further.
Immigrant rights advocates' relief was short-lived. They were caught off guard when the Justice Department sued Texas last week noting that U.S. citizens living outside of Texas don't qualify for in-state tuition in the state's public universities. The feds argued that Texas should not offer undocumented students any benefit not afforded to U.S. citizens.
The state agreed and asked the judge overseeing the case to side with the federal government, which he did and declared the law unconstitutional. Some legal experts have said the speedy way in which the case was resolved makes it seem like federal and state attorneys colluded to coordinate the outcome.
Monica Andrade, an attorney and director of state policy and legal strategy at the Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, said the argument that undocumented students were receiving benefits denied to U.S. citizens is false and misleading because, under the Texas Dreamer Act, both groups of people needed to meet the same criteria to qualify for in-state tuition.
Since President Donald Trump's election in November, several states have moved to end similar tuition policies for undocumented students, Inside Higher Education reported. In February, Florida passed a law that will eliminate in-state tuition for undocumented students starting July 1. Lawmakers in Michigan and Minnesota also filed similar bills. Meanwhile, some states like Indiana and New Mexico have sought to expand in-state tuition eligibility.
The Trump administration and Republicans have sought to end other benefits for immigrants. Under congressional and White House efforts, families with mixed immigration statuses — like those who have some children who are U.S. citizens and parents who are either undocumented or authorized immigrants, like refugees and asylum seekers — could be restricted from accessing programs like Medicaid, Medicare and federally subsidized housing.
Texas in recent years has increasingly mirrored Trump's aggressive immigration agenda, increasing its law enforcement presence and building its own wall along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Disclosure: Houston Community College, Lone Star College, Texas A&M University, Texas A&M University System, University of Texas at Austin and University of Houston have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer.
Get tickets.
TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump floats plan to legalize undocumented immigrant farmworkers
Trump floats plan to legalize undocumented immigrant farmworkers

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump floats plan to legalize undocumented immigrant farmworkers

President Donald Trump on Tuesday floated a plan to grant legal status to undocumented immigrant farmworkers, claiming that foreign-born migrants are 'naturally' better suited than 'inner city' Americans to menial agricultural jobs. In what would be a controversial partial break from his hard-line mass deportation plan, Trump said he wants to allow migrant farmworkers, millions of whom have lived in the country for years or decades, to remain in the U.S. indefinitely. 'In some cases, we're sending them back to their country with a pass back (so when) they're coming in, they're coming in legally,' Trump said in an interview with CNBC. 'We can't let our farmers not have anybody.' Trump used the present tense in the interview, even though no such plan currently exists. Any change to federal immigration laws would normally require congressional action, though Trump might seek to take executive action to achieve his goals, which he portrayed as helping farmers who rely on undocumented immigrant labor. Trump asserted that low-income American citizens are not as well suited to tough and low-paying farm work compared to immigrants, without offering any evidence. 'People that live in the inner city are not doing that work. They've tried, we've tried, everybody tried. They don't do it,' Trump said. 'These people do it naturally. They don't get a bad back.' Trump has spoken for months about creating some kind of legal status for undocumented immigrants who work in the agriculture and hospitality industries, both of which are highly dependent on them. He even briefly approved a pause in immigration enforcement actions aimed at California's vast agricultural heartland in the Central Valley, but it was quickly reversed. Big Ag and giant hospitality firms have lobbied the White House for a reprieve from his much-hyped mass deportation plan, which aims to oust up to 20 million undocumented immigrants from the U.S., regardless of how long they have lived here. The corporate titans, many of whom are also Republican donors, point out that America would have no way of feeding itself or running its restaurants and hotels without undocumented immigrants, a rare point of common ground with progressive advocates for immigrants. Any formal program to carve out a new legal status to groups of undocumented immigrants is likely to spark strong opposition from right-wing hard-liners, who decry such compromises as amnesty for law-breaking illegal immigrants. It's unclear if Trump has the stomach to push through a plan to ease his own immigration crackdown or if his MAGA base would back him if he does. _____

Eli Lilly stock drops after Trump unleashes 250% pharma tariff warning
Eli Lilly stock drops after Trump unleashes 250% pharma tariff warning

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Eli Lilly stock drops after Trump unleashes 250% pharma tariff warning

Aug 5 - Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) saw its stock dip on Tuesday after President Donald Trump amped up threats to impose massive tariffs on pharmaceutical imports. In an interview with CNBC, Trump floated the possibility of slapping a 250% duty on foreign-made drugs, his steepest proposed rate yet. He plans to start with a small tariff but warned it could rise significantly within 18 months. Trump's goal is to push drugmakers to bring more manufacturing back to the U.S. Amid this pressure, Eli Lilly has already pledged $27 billion to build four new production sites across the country. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with JOBY. Still, that commitment hasn't satisfied Trump, who recently sent letters to 17 pharma companies demanding they cut drug prices by September 29. The mere threat of triple-digit tariffs has rattled the sector. Investors worry that such duties could spike costs for American consumers while squeezing margins for global drugmakers. Analysts say Trump's trade tactics remain unpredictable, but the market isn't taking chances, LLY and other pharma names are already trending lower. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers
Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Got Instantly Fact-Checked On Live TV After Bragging About His Poll Numbers

President Donald Trump repeatedly boasted that he has 'the best poll numbers [he's] ever had' in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday morning, even though the majority of Americans disapprove of his performance in the job. Asked whether he would run for a third term in office despite the fact that the US Constitution's 22nd Amendment bars him from doing so, Trump replied 'probably not,' before going on to say he would like to do so. Related: 'I'd like to run. I have the best poll numbers I've ever had. You know why? Because people love the tariffs and they love the trade deal and they love that foreign countries aren't ripping us off anymore. For years they ripped us off, friend and foe,' Trump said, even though voter surveys suggest otherwise. Kernen interjected, clarifying that the president enjoys high support among Republican voters, but not the overall electorate. Trump didn't seem to blink. 'I have the best poll numbers I've ever had,' Trump said. 'I have poll numbers where I'm 71%.' 'Those are among Republicans,' Kernen replied. Related: Related: Trump would not relent, insisting Kernen was wrong. Trump also claimed that polls that showed him faring poorly with voters were 'fake.' The source for the figures cited by Trump is unclear. His approval rating currently stands at 44%, according to an average of polls compiled by the New York Times. Related: An issue that has garnered much attention in recent weeks appears to be a thorn in Trump's side as a majority of Americans disapprove of his administration's handling of documents related to the investigation into late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to an Economics/YouGov poll conducted late last month. You can watch the whole exchange here. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store