Samsung Foundry plans to pay for top sales talent to take business away from TSMC
TSMC is the world's largest foundry with a market share in the 65%-67% range. Samsung Foundry is a distant second thanks to the low yields it has achieved on advanced chip production. This makes it more costly for Samsung's customers to use the foundry instead of TSMC since low yields mean fewer chips can be produced at the same price. This is the exact reason why Qualcomm dropped Samsung Foundry in 2022. At the time, Samsung Foundry was manufacturing the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and reportedly had a 35% yield. TSMC's 4nm yield rate was 70% at the time.
As a result, Qualcomm picked up all of its marbles from Samsung's playground and moved them to TSMC. The latter built the slightly reconfigured Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and has manufactured all of Qualcomm's flagship Snapdragon application processors since then. There is no denying that the Taiwan-based chip foundry has a star-studded list of clients that are among the top names in tech including Apple, AMD, Nvidia, MediaTek, Qualcomm, and more.
Thanks to Samsung Foundry's poor yields, Qualcomm switched to TSMC to make the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. | Image credit-PhoneArena Samsung Foundry might catch a break if it can improve yields on the production of Samsung's own Exynos 2600 application processor which will be built on the foundry's 2nm process node. If Samsung Foundry can get its yield up enough to ensure the production of the number of chips Samsung needs, the Exynos 2600 will power the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 + in most markets and those models will become the first smartphones to feature a 2nm application processor.
Usually, the iPhone has been the device that welcomed the next cutting-edge process node. But next year, if Samsung plays its cards right, this honor will belong to the Galaxy S26 and Galaxy S26 +. Ironically, the Galaxy S26 Ultra, the top-of-the-line model, will be powered by a 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 for Galaxy and won't be involved in any record-breaking historical moments. Samsung has been supposedly looking to spin off or sell its Foundry. Until a deal can be made to its liking, Samsung hopes to generate more revenue for the unit by trying to convince TSMC's customers to make the switch to Samsung Foundry. The latter hired away a former TSMC sales executive earlier this year and a report out of Korea states that Samsung is willing to pay as much as $300,000 to pros looking to join Samsung Foundry's sales team in the U.S.
Both Samsung and TSMC have built U.S. fabs and TSMC has started producing 4nm chips in Arizona and will build 2nm components in 2028. Samsung's timeline has it ahead of TSMC in the States. In Taylor, Texas, Samsung Foundry will mass produce 2nm chips in 2026. Samsung needs a strong order flow to keep the Taylor, Texas line humming, churning out advanced chips. That is why Samsung Foundry will pay California-based salesmen as much as $300,000.
A foundry sales director can earn as much as $319,800 and a senior manager inside a foundry's customer service unit, can draw a salary within the $180,950 to $289,050 range. The salaries Samsung is willing to pay in the U.S. top what it is paying for the same jobs in South Korea.
The new hires will have the task of increasing Samsung Foundry's market share in the United States. Some of TSMC's customers in Taiwan will also take delivery of chips built in the U.S. including Apple, AMD, Nvidia, and Qualcomm. TSMC is already shipping 4nm chips from its Arizona fab to Apple and Nvidia. Semiconductors built in Arizona will not face any tariffs which is part of the appeal of purchasing domestically manufactured chips.
Depending on which report you read, the third largest foundry globally is China's SMIC. The latter manufactures the chips designed by Huawei and is the largest foundry in the country.
Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
7 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Apple turns to OpenAI and Anthropic for Siri, considers abandoning in-house models
Do you think Apple should abandon its own models? Yes, it's too late to catch up No, I still think Apple can do it Yes, it's too late to catch up 0% No, I still think Apple can do it 0% Apple Intelligence Receive the latest iOS news By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy Apple Intelligence features promised back in WWDC 2024. | Video credit — Apple Such an approach would be very similar to what Samsung has done: using Google's Gemini for If this goes through, we may even see the new Siri that Apple has promised before its currently expected release of 2026, though I wouldn't hold my breath given past broken promises. Apple has usually been fashionably late to emerging technologies, but AI just isn't a field where it can afford to follow its code of conduct. New product categories are taking shape: for example, AI-powered smart Such an approach would be very similar to what Samsung has done: using Google's Gemini for Galaxy AI on its devices. The Galaxy S25 series is leagues ahead of the iPhone 16 when it comes to AI, but a new Siri powered by either ChatGPT or Claude would catch up almost this goes through, we may even see the new Siri that Apple has promised before its currently expected release of 2026, though I wouldn't hold my breath given past broken promises. Apple has usually been fashionably late to emerging technologies, but AI just isn't a field where it can afford to follow its code of product categories are taking shape: for example, AI-powered smart AR glasses . If Apple doesn't catch up in AI, then it will be way too late to the market with these new products. And, considering CEO Tim Cook's new obsession , I doubt that that's something that the company is willing to let happen. Grab Surfshark VPN now at more than 50% off and with 3 extra months for free! Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer In a massive U-turn, Apple has reached out to OpenAI and Anthropic for help with Siri, asking for custom models of Claude and ChatGPT that can run on the company's private servers. Apple is also weighing the pros and cons of abandoning its in-house Foundation Models, which currently power some of the company's Apple Intelligence suite of AI isn't the first time in recent days that news about Apple considering a third-party solution has surfaced. Apple is also considering buying Perplexity AI for Siri , which it can use to power a new search engine on Safari if the courts tell it to end its $20 billion agreement with Google. Using Claude and ChatGPT for Siri will help Apple catch up in a field where it has fallen significantly wants to use custom models of both companies' flagship AI offerings so that everything can still stay private. This way, the company can continue to marketas a service that values user data a new Siri is still under research and development, the project will likely be scrapped if this agreement goes through. ChatGPT already helps out on Apple devices, but Siri itself still uses the company's own models.
Phone Arena
8 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Galaxy Z Fold 7 battery less than 4,400 mAh, IP rating also disappoints
If a new report from a very reliable source is to be believed, then the upcoming Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is going to disappoint in two key aspects. The battery on the phone is apparently still less than the 4,400 mAh that Samsung markets it as, and its IP rating is also not great. Galaxy Z Fold 7 Still Supports iP48 Only Rating. — PandaFlash (@PandaFlashPro) June 30, 2025 Galaxy Z Fold 6 was marketed as having a 4,400 mAh battery, but the actual capacity was around 4,273 mAh. The battery capacity on the Fold 7 will continue that trend, and will actually be 4,272 mAh. Of course, the all but confirmed 25W wired charging is also underwhelming. Furthermore, the Fold 7 will carry over its predecessor's IP48 rating. An IP48 rating means that the phone will only be able to keep out larger dust particles, while smaller ones can enter the device. Whereas an IP68 rating, seen on most flagships, is completely resistant to dust. An IP48 rating also offers much lower protection against water than an IP68 rating. Leaked render of the Fold 7. | Image credit — Evan Blass Despite these two underwhelming features, however, the Fold 7 is still shaping up to be quite an excellent foldable smartphone. In fact, the Fold 7 sold me on foldables before the foldable iPhone could, and that's saying something. It's just a shame that Samsung is still falling behind its competitors in some aspects, while it catches up in others. The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a bigger battery ( 4,650 mAh ) and can withstand water much better with its IPX8 rating. Meanwhile, other excellent foldable options from Chinese manufacturers blow the Fold 7 out of the water that it can't protect itself Oppo Find N5, for example, has a battery capacity of 5,600 mAh and an IPX9 rating. Honor Magic V5, currently the slimmest foldable in the world, has a battery capacity of 6,100 mAh. Even Samsung's traditional Galaxy flagships don't hold a candle to the V5's battery. All of these battery-related miracles have been possible due to silicon batteries. But now silicon batteries are reaching their limits, before Apple or Samsung could even use them. The Fold 7 excels in many key areas over the Fold 6, so I'm hoping that a similar level of improvement takes place again, and the Fold 8 gives the others a run for their money for a change. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
8 hours ago
- Phone Arena
iPhone 17 Air displays cracking, Apple excludes BOE from supply
*Image credit — iDeviceHelp Apple is facing multiple display-related issues with the iPhone 17 series. Earlier, it was reported that Apple might be forced to cut ties with BOE this year. Not only has that come to pass, but the company's new iPhone 17 Air model is apparently having a problem where its super slim displays keep BOE has been after Apple's heart for years, and the latter can't deny the savings that will come if it chooses the former to supply it with displays. However, BOE always seems to be falling behind in one aspect or another, and keeps failing to secure as many orders as Samsung and year, however, BOE will not be supplying any displays for the upcoming iPhone 17 series at all. That's because Apple plans to use LTPO — or 'ProMotion' as the company calls it — displays across every model. Even the base iPhone 17 model will have a 120 Hz refresh rate, and be able to downclock that to only 1 Hz. BOE has been unable ( translated source, subscription required ) to produce satisfactory panels that are up to Apple's standards. As such, Apple is having to resort to using only Samsung Display and LG Display. This means that it will cost more to manufacture the iPhone 17 lineup, and Apple is trying to score a discount by pointing out flaws with the panels being used for the Air. The Air is ridiculously slim. | Image credit — Majin Bu The iPhone 17 Air is Apple's new flagship model for this year, and it will be replacing the iPhone Plus model, which had previously replaced the mini model. Apple is hoping that, unlike the mini and the Plus, the Air will be a more successful model that won't sell as poorly as its predecessors. Though, I think we can all see where the iPhone 17 Air is headed. As evaluations of the models take place, it's been observed that the iPhone 17 Air display is so thin that it's having actual structural issues. The phone is expected to be around 5.5 mm thin, so its OLED panel is slimmer than to this, the micro coating layer is cracking at the edges where the panel curves. This layer of coating is used to keep dust, moisture, and even oxygen out of the panel. If this layer cracks, it leads to a much shorter lifespan for the display, in addition to other problems as is arguing for a reduction in manufacturing costs by pointing out these cracks, saying that they will lead to further expenses on the company's part down the line. Samsung and LG are still competing for more allocation, and how this situation is resolved could change the outcome. As of now, it is expected that Samsung will provide around 70 million units, while LG will be supplying Apple with around 43 million units. If BOE is able to pass Apple's quality requirements next year, then it may be able to start supplying panels for the iPhone 17 series as well. That would also ensure that it's able to start preparing for the iPhone 18 lineup. iPhone 16 cost the same as the iPhone 15. | Video credit — Apple The main takeaway from all of this, for the average consumer, is that the iPhone 17 series will most likely cost more than the iPhone 16 series. It's not just the displays that are seeing an upgrade, but the RAM too. The iPhone 17 line is expected to feature 12 GB of RAM across the board, though the base model may be left out due to ongoing supply chain shortages. When the iPhone 16 came out, I questioned the 60 Hz display. Such a low refresh rate, in this day and age, would only be acceptable to someone who had never used a phone with a better display. I'm stoked that the iPhone is finally catching up to modern times. However, LTPO displays, RAM upgrades, and the upcoming mass adoption of 2 nm processors is most definitely going to make smartphones a lot more expensive. The iPhone 17 is still sticking with 3 nm chips, but the iPhone 18 — and the special 20th anniversary iPhone Pro — will undoubtedly feature much higher price tags. While the iPhone 17 Air isn't exactly what I would've personally asked for, I'll keep my fingers crossed that it doesn't pull an iPhone 6 and bring back 'bendgate'. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
