
Farm investment boom puts squeeze on TAMS fund
Today at 21:30
Farmers are being warned that future applications for TAMS grants may face tougher rules, as the Department scrambles to keep the scheme within budget.
Agriculture Minister Martin Heydon has confirmed that applications under the next tranche of TAMS may be subject to ranking and selection criteria for the first time due to 'prudent budget management'.
Over 42,000 applications have flooded in under the scheme since February 2023, with nearly 12,000 of those submitted in just the last three tranches, which closed between March and early June.
The surge comes off the back of strong beef and dairy prices, which have given many farmers the confidence to invest in sheds, safety equipment and renewables.
Extra demand also followed emergency supports introduced after Storm Éowyn.
The total TAMS budget under the current CAP is €370m, set to run until 2027. But with €70.5m already paid out to just 8,000 farmers, should the remaining 34,000 applicants invest in similarly sized projects, it could cost a further €300m if all are approved, nearly wiping out the scheme's budget with over two years still to go.
In a statement last weekend, Mr Heydon hailed the success of the scheme and said around €2m in payments are issuing to farmers on a weekly basis.
However, he warned TAMS is a demand-led scheme with a defined budgetary allocation.
'Given that we are now just halfway through the current CAP Strategic Plan (CSP), it is prudent that we are mindful of the budget available for the remaining TAMS tranches.
'In order to ensure that the available budget is distributed fairly over the remainder of the CSP, it may be necessary to limit the number of approved applications per tranche going forward by applying ranking and selection criteria, including for the upcoming Tranche 9, which opened on June 7 and will close on September 6,' he said.
Under TAMS, applications are ranked based on the age of the farmer, the size of their farm, previous grant aid payments, eligibility for ANC payments and their nitrates position.
ADVERTISEMENT
It is very disappointing to hear that the Government is signalling plans to restrict eligibility in future tranches of TAMS solar PV supports
The minister's comments are already causing concern, particularly around the popular solar PV grant, which gives up to 60pc support for installing panels on farm buildings.
Micro-Renewable Energy Federation chairman Kieran Kells criticised the Government for what he says is a backward step.
'It is very disappointing to hear that the Government is signalling plans to restrict eligibility in future tranches of TAMS solar PV supports,' Kells said.
He went on to say that the current criteria – where farmers are scored on factors like BISS or ANC status – makes little sense when applied to energy-saving investments.
'What has a farmer's ANC payment got to do with whether or not he should qualify for a solar grant?' he said.
'If you've high energy bills and want to cut costs and carbon, you should be supported.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Extra.ie
an hour ago
- Extra.ie
US pharma deal can be 'creative' but Harris admits 10% tariffs are new norm
Simon Harris has said the US is open to 'creative solutions' on a pharmaceutical trade deal with the EU, sparking hope that the industry may escape Donald Trump's tariffs. While the Tánaiste conceded that US tariffs of 10% will be the 'new normal' regardless of any deal reached in the coming days, he indicated that the US is now recognising its 'interdependence' with Ireland and the EU in relation to pharmaceuticals. The comments came as EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic travelled to Washington to meet with his US counterpart, with just six days left to agree on a trade deal before President Trump imposes 50% tariffs on European imports. Maros Sefcovic. Pic: Getty Images Tánaiste and Foreign Affairs Minister Harris told the Government trade forum yesterday that despite EU efforts, 'the new normal' will be a baseline tariff of 10% on all goods being shipped to the US. But he did acknowledge ongoing negotiations to 'maximise' the number of sectors where there is a zero-for-zero tariff situation, citing aviation and pharma as two key sectors for Ireland. Irish medicinal and pharmaceutical exports were valued at €99.8billion in 2024 and accounted for almost half of our total goods exported. Of this, €44.3million was exported to the US, with many economists warning that the inclusion of the pharma sector in any tariff war would significantly damage the Irish economy. Mr Harris said he had been assured by US trade representative Jamieson Greer that the Trump administration was open when it comes to the place of pharma in an EU trade deal. Simon Harris. Pic: Pool Via 'He made it clear that he was open to creative solutions when it comes to pharma and I think that's an important recognition that actually pharma between the US and the EU, the US and Ireland, is much more interdependent than perhaps people were led to believe in certain quarters at the start of this process,' he said. Mr Harris added that while a brief extension to the July 9 deadline is something that can be considered by the EU and US, it would be preferable to, at the very least, deliver a framework agreement to provide certainty to businesses. Mr Harris and Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe also sought to reassure trade representatives that the Irish economy will continue to grow next year, even with an additional 10% US tariff. However, this growth will come at a 'lower rate than we would otherwise have expected'. Fine Gael leader Simon Harris, Helen McEntee, and Paschal Donohoe. Pic: Rolling News Mr Donohoe said: 'Our scenario for this year and for next year, on the basis of what we currently know, is that we will still have public finances that will be in surplus, that will be performing well. But as we approach the budget and conclude our work on Budget 2026, it is very likely that those levels of surpluses will be revised. They will be adjusted, but they will still be surpluses.' Asked how the global economic uncertainty might impact the country's finances, Mr Donohoe said that the Government is 'clear that if we find ourselves confronting an economic shock, we would reprioritise how we maintain capital investment, how we can invest in energy, create and build more homes'. 'That is why the work that is underway at the moment to stabilise the global trade environment is so important, and we are pushing for that work to conclude in a way that recognises and protects national interests that we have,' he said. Mr Donohoe also said that the Coalition's position will be reflected in October's budget, which will 'prioritise the creation and retention of jobs and keeping our public finances safe while investing in our future'. He said this approach will come with sacrifices. 'We will make decisions closer to the time regarding what is the way in which we will do that. And clearly, if the Government does decide to make investments and decisions in particular areas, we will then decide there are other things that we cannot do. That's the right thing to do. And we'll make the case for that on budget day,' he said. Separately, Mr Harris confirmed that a decision to defer warning labels on alcohol will be made later this week. The controversial measure was due to come into effect in May 2026; however, there have been rumblings that the plans will be shelved. Mr Harris said the policy 'came up quite a lot at the trade forum. I'm very much of the view that we need to defer the implementation. It will be a matter for the Minister for Health [Jennifer Carroll MacNeill]… but I expect we'll be able to bring clarity to this in the coming days.'


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Starmer backs ‘excellent' Rachel Reeves after chancellor's tears in House of Commons
Britain's prime minister Keir Starmer said he did not appreciate how upset Rachel Reeves was in the House of Commons, because he was focused on answering prime minister's questions (PMQs). The prime minister said all people could be caught 'off guard' by their emotions, but the chancellor had to deal with it while on camera in parliament. He said she was doing an excellent job, would remain in place beyond the next general election, and that they were both absolutely committed to the chancellor's 'fiscal rules' to maintain discipline over the public finances. UK Government bonds rallied and the pound steadied on Thursday, after reassurances from the prime minister about the chancellor's future. READ MORE The sight of Ms Reeves in tears on Wednesday, and the £5 billion black hole in her public spending plans as a result of the welfare U-turn, had spooked the markets, triggering a sharp sell-off of bonds, with the yield seeing the sharpest increase since US president Donald Trump's tariff plans shook up financial markets in April. Mr Starmer told Virgin Radio he had spoken to the chancellor on Wednesday evening and she was 'fine', and her tears were as a result of a 'purely personal' matter rather than the 'ups and downs of this week'. Ms Reeves was visibly upset as she sat beside Mr Starmer in the Commons on Wednesday, but he said: 'I actually personally didn't appreciate it was happening in the chamber, because I came in, I've got questions being fired at me in PMQs, so I'm constantly up at the despatch box and down. 'I think we just need to be clear, it's a personal matter, and I'm not going to breach Rachel's privacy by going into what's a personal matter for her.' He said that 'in politics, you're on show the whole time, there's no hiding place'. Ms Reeves was a 'great colleague, she's a friend of mine and I'll be working with her for a very long time to come'. 'But like all human beings, we're also personal. 'There are moments that catch us off guard and if you're in front of a camera for large periods of your life, unfortunately, that could be caught on camera in a way, if it had been anybody else at work, it would have not really been noticed.' The sight of the Chancellor in tears on the front bench and Mr Starmer's initial lack of public support for her caused jitters about the government's borrowing plans, as Ms Reeves's commitment to her rules to control spending are a key reassuring factor for the bond markets. Mr Starmer said: 'She is an excellent chancellor, she will be chancellor for a very long time to come, into the next election and beyond it. 'She and I are absolutely committed to our fiscal rules and the economic stability that is so important to this country, and that is the rock on which we build everything else. 'On that issue, Rachel and I are in lockstep, and have been for years.' – PA


Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
‘The Government needs to stand up for policyholders' – backlash as motor insurance premiums to keep rising
There was a big jump in the number of claims in the first half of last year and increased costs of repairing vehicles, a report from the Central Bank shows. Drivers have seen motor insurance premiums rise for more than a year-and-a-half, with premiums up by more than 8pc in the year to May alone. Now the Alliance for Insurance Reform says the increase in claims would push premiums even higher. This is because the Central Bank said the cost of settling claims was 23pc higher in the first half of last year when compared with the previous six months. 'This is primarily driven by an increasing trend in both the number and cost of damage claims,' the Central Bank's H1 2024 Private Motor and Liability Mid-Year Reports show. When compared with pre-Covid times, the cost of settling injury claims is down 16pc. This was driven by a fall in the number of claims settled. The fact that the cost of settling motor damage claims shot up by 23pc in six months meant there was no justification to increase the official guidelines on award levels further, the Alliance said. T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months The Judicial Council has proposed that personal injury award guidelines should be increased by almost 17pc. Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan is to bring a memo to the Cabinet next Tuesday, paving the way for draft legislation that would give effect to a planned rise in award levels. The Alliance said: 'T he cost of settling motor claims went up 23pc in just six months – now is not the time to increase these costs further.' The Central Bank report also shows that there is no financial benefit for claimants to have their case taken away from the State's Injuries Resolution Board. Injuries claims can be litigated if a settlement from the board is rejected. The Central Bank's report found that the average award paid by the board and one that is litigated both come in at €24,000. Legal fees for cases settled through the Injuries Board average €597. Litigated cases have average legal costs of €24,786. The Alliance said this needs to be specifically addressed in the Government's forthcoming action plan for insurance reform. Alliance board member Tracy Sheridan said: 'The increase in awards will raise premiums further and adversely impact the volume of claims settled at the Injuries Resolution Board. We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases 'The Government has not said a word about the planned increase [in the award guidelines] for the last six months and there has been no opportunity for public debate either. This is wrong.' Ms Sheridan said that if the Government increases award guideline levels by 17pc, there will be no check on costs. 'We are already seeing month-on-month premium increases as the cost of living continues to spiral out of control. 'The Government needs to stand up for policyholders, not make things more difficult for them,' she said. The Central Bank also released a report on business liability insurance, showing claims were down 10pc in the first half of last year compared with the previous half year.