
H-word, M-word & fading K-word. India-Pakistan alphabet soup, with a side of Trump
Let's call the first the 'zero-sum game'. If Washington sees the Subcontinent in a hyphenated manner, then it must balance the relationship. Gain for one is loss for the other. It brings an equivalence India detests. It believes it stands in a class by itself and linking with Pakistan demeans it.
And its return is dreaded because our successive governments have laboured for three decades to rid us of what we see as the equivalence the big powers (read the US) used to draw between us and Pakistan. Three things follow.
Much as I would've wanted to use 'khota sikka', the challenge of finding an exact translation brings me to the usual bad penny. Let's say, therefore, that like a bad penny, the dreaded H-word is back with us. H, as in hyphenation with Pakistan.
The second can be called 'stature denial'. Given its growing Comprehensive National Power (CNP), India believes it deserves a sphere of influence. If ally Washington sees the region through an India-Pakistan prism, it's unacceptable. Rather than endorse India's sphere of influence, this undermines it.
This is double trouble as China is already working hard at denying India that pre-eminence, which Pakistan calls hegemonism. And whereas India would expect US backing in this competition, it is galling when the US keeps saying sweet somethings to Pakistan. What's the point of the Quad then? We thought we were partners in a project to contain China.
And the third, this means the return of the M-word that so triggers us. M for mediation. For Indian public opinion, Donald Trump has undone the work of the past decades by continuing to insist that he mediated the India-Pakistan ceasefire.
Now, we know that his interest isn't in any mediation but in getting credit: 'nobody gives me credit for stopping a nuclear war', 'they never give me credit for anything', 'I stopped a nuclear war and I haven't seen any stories about it,' and so on.
You can't blame the Pakistanis for latching on to it. They think Trump's renewed interest in the region emanates only from a fear of nuclear conflict. Therefore, they think they've been able to switch the global attention back to the nuclear threat, from the case India had built across decades for partnership in the global war on terror. Personifying this rediscovered mojo is Bilawal Bhutto, who said, in his usual breathless hyperbole, that the US will drag India to the negotiation table, if necessary, by the ear. Pakistani establishment has thrown everything in their desperation to revive their faded American connection, even a bunch of crypto. But anybody who's sidled up to Trump has ended up singing that sad old song: 'ik bewafa se pyar kiya… haye re hum ne yeh kya kiya' (best-effort translation: I fell in love with one who knows no love, how the hell did I get into this mess?).
Also Read: Op Sindoor is the first battle in India's two-front war. A vicious pawn in a King's Gambit
This is a very transactional Trump with no loyalties, and as focused on his domestic base as Narendra Modi in India. Any US partner who doesn't accept this, is setting themselves up for a feeling of grand betrayal and humiliation.
The good thing is, our policy establishment is still wise not to respond emotionally and avoiding any public expression of anxiety. They are quietly progressing on the issue that matters right now, an India-US trade deal. If that works, much clutter would die down. In any case, nobody has brought back that other demon, the K-word as yet.
Nobody is saying India and Pakistan should negotiate over Kashmir, and further that we are willing to mediate. I am not even sure Trump is aware of an issue like that.
That said, Trump is now reshaping the world in his own vision uncluttered by history, facts and ideology. He's gutting NATO, ridicules the western alliance, serially insults Canada's prime ministers (Trudeau and Carney), and is impatient with Netanyahu. He detests Zelenskyy, adores Putin. Check out the latest gem from him: 'Putin says they lost 51 million people (in WWII) and we were your allies. Now everyone hates Russia and they love Germany and Japan. Let's explain that sometimes. It's a strange world.'
It's unrealistic to expect that somebody making radical shifts not confused by history would even know or appreciate our concern over de-hyphenation.
Modi government's current approach of social media noise-cancellation is wise. The nominated Assistant Secretary of State Paul Kapur's full testimony to the committee voting on his appointment is mature and fine for India. But just that one line saying he'd work with Pakistan where it suits America's interest has made so many in India sulk like a jilted lover.
And the Centcom Commander, General Michael Kurilla calling Pakistan a phenomenal partner against terror comes from the essential geostrategic division the Pentagon has followed historically where Centcom covers Pakistan and India falls under Pacific Command.
Ask any crime reporter worth her next scoop and she will explain to you how the first interest of any station house officer (SHO) at a police station is to curb crime in their own jurisdiction even if it means making deals with even the baddest guys. You might get a different answer from the Pacific Command chief. On top of this, our own news TV rumour machine, which has done more to undermine India's strategic credibility, invented its own fiction that Pakistan's newly self-minted field marshal was invited for the US Army Day parade. We were saved from mass neurosis by White House saying they weren't inviting any such guests.
While such touchiness rules our larger public opinion which loves that self-defeating 'we have to do it all alone' obsession, it will be challenging for the Modi government to immunise serious policy from public responses. This government is obsessed with the buzz on social media.
Also Read: Asim Munir just stole his 5th star & has nothing to show for it. It'll make him desperate, dangerous
Finally, if you can use that noise-cancellation device again, and see what foreign involvement in our crises has meant. It will also help us distinguish mediation, intervention and involvement. After the Cold War, India endured about four years of intense American pressure over Kashmir over human rights. But, as India's economy grew post-reform, so did its stature. By 1998, the equation was changing.
Not only was the second Clinton Administration quick to embrace the reality of a nuclear-armed India, the next year, 1999, it played a very constructive role during the Kargil crisis. Clinton hauled in Nawaz Sharif to Washington even on the US Independence Day (4 July) to give him a face-saver to retreat from Kargil.
During Operation Parakram, repeated American interventions and frantic visits (most significant Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld on a day we seemed closest to war) helped both sides stay calm. The solidarity in war on terror over 26/11 and onwards served a dual purpose. One, to largely dehyphenate India from Pakistan. And second, to stick the 'terror state' label on Pakistan's chest.
However, times do change. And with the return of Trump, how. Every crisis in the subcontinent has drawn American involvement to defuse it. That's the fire truck at our doors. Trump has only changed the language, junking old-fashioned diplomatic discretion. Trump seeks credit like a five-year-old. It's the new reality for the world, especially for America's friends and allies.
PostScript: when Musharraf came for the Agra Summit (14-16 July, 2001), Vajpayee hosted a lunch for him at the biggest banquet hall in New Delhi's Taj Palace Hotel. He was also clever enough to invite Farooq Abdullah to it, and seat him just one table away. Dessert time, Farooq predeterminedly got up and walked to the head table with a big, mischievous smile. 'Arrey, yeh dekhiye, yeh toh third party intervention ho gayi,' a startled Musharraf found a good escape line, and everybody laughed.
Next week: The perils of self-hyphenation
Also Read: There's an all-new N-word now. And India's soft power has become its hard liability

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
37 minutes ago
- Hans India
India Accelerates Deployment Of 52 Military Surveillance Satellites Following Operation Sindoor
India has expedited its ambitious military satellite program, announcing plans to deploy 52 defense surveillance satellites by 2029 as part of a comprehensive strategy to strengthen space-based monitoring capabilities across sensitive border regions with China and Pakistan, as well as the Indian Ocean Region. The substantial Rs 26,968 crore initiative represents a direct response to China's expanding military space infrastructure and aims to establish continuous real-time surveillance and enhanced border security measures. The program has gained urgency following strategic insights gained from Operation Sindoor, which demonstrated the critical importance of indigenous and commercial satellite-based tracking systems. Under the third phase of the Space-Based Surveillance program, the Indian Space Research Organisation will be responsible for launching 21 satellites, while three private sector companies will develop and deploy the remaining 31 satellites. This public-private partnership approach marks a significant shift in India's defense satellite strategy, emphasizing rapid deployment capabilities and technological innovation. The satellite constellation's deployment timeline begins with the first satellite launch scheduled for April 2026, with the entire network expected to achieve full operational capacity by the end of 2029. The system will provide high-resolution imaging capabilities and enhanced revisit frequencies to support India's Army, Navy, and Air Force in monitoring adversary movements within enemy territory. A key innovation in this program involves ISRO's plan to transfer Small Satellite Launch Vehicle technology to private partners, enabling swift satellite deployment during emergency situations. This capability ensures rapid response times for critical surveillance needs and maintains operational flexibility during periods of heightened tension. Air Marshal Ashutosh Dixit, Chief of Integrated Defence Staff, emphasized the strategic importance of early threat detection, stating that India must identify and track potential threats while they remain in staging areas, airfields, and bases deep within adversary territory, rather than waiting until they approach Indian borders. The Integrated Defence Staff is supervising the comprehensive project, which will utilize both low Earth orbit and geostationary orbit configurations to maximize coverage and surveillance effectiveness. The satellite network is designed to serve as both a deterrent and countermeasure against China's developing anti-satellite capabilities, including kinetic weapons and electronic warfare systems. The acceleration of this program reflects India's recognition of space as a critical domain for national security, particularly given the evolving threat landscape in the region. The constellation will significantly enhance India's ability to monitor strategic locations, track military movements, and maintain situational awareness across vast geographical areas. This initiative positions India among the leading nations in military space capabilities, demonstrating its commitment to maintaining strategic autonomy and defensive preparedness in an increasingly complex security environment. The project's success will establish India as a formidable player in space-based defense systems while providing essential intelligence capabilities for national security operations.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
38 minutes ago
- Business Standard
China shows tech resilience against Trump's export curbs over Rare earths
As Donald Trump brandishes US export controls on technology as a bargaining chip to wrest supplies of rare earth magnets from Beijing, China is showcasing what it can do without the most advanced American semiconductors. On a government-organized trip this month to Jiangsu and Zhejiang, two of China's richest provinces that spawned AI darling DeepSeek, authorities lined up a host of executives from technology companies to meet with journalists from Bloomberg News and other media outlets. The message was ultimately one of defiance: China's technology sector still aims at world dominance despite US curbs. Take Magiclab Robotics Technology Co., a firm in the eastern city of Suzhou founded barely more than a year ago. Its president, Wu Changzheng, said it had independently developed more than 90 per cent of the parts it uses to make humanoid robots. The rest consists of semiconductors and micro-controller units procured domestically and overseas, he said, adding that they don't use US chips. 'China doesn't have many weak links in this industry,' Wu said, as he demonstrated a human-sized robot destined for factory floors. He brushed off Trump's recent ban on US firms exporting semiconductor design software to China, saying his robots only require 'standard chips.' Other entrepreneurs emphasized self-reliance over the five-day trip with companies spanning bio-pharmaceuticals, humanoid robotics, AI and autos — all sectors pivotal to President Xi Jinping's manufacturing ambitions. Many in China's business sector have rallied around Xi's government in the face of Trump's tariffs and expanding US export curbs. Access to so many executives at once is typically difficult for foreign journalists in a country where media access is tightly regulated and company officials can be reluctant to speak freely for fear of reprisal. The trip exemplifies Beijing's desire to boost global investor confidence in its $19 trillion economy, which has been plagued by a property crash, deflation and now the US's highest tariffs in a century. Although DeepSeek's surprise AI breakthrough earlier this year proved China can innovate with a limited supply of chips, Beijing still faces difficulty catching the US while being denied access to Nvidia Corp.'s most advanced semiconductors. On the press tour, the Chinese government mostly presented firms that don't require top-tier chips such as AISpeech Co, which makes in-car AI-powered audio and video tools. For companies pioneering autonomous driving models or artificial general intelligence — systems that possess human-level cognitive abilities — accessing the latest chips is likely to be far more important. Tiptoeing around sensitive topics like state subsidies, eight tech executives who addressed reporters throughout the trip downplayed the impact of a yearslong US campaign to curtail China's technological ascent, emphasizing the country's increased self-reliance as government officials listened attentively on the sidelines. The executives spoke about how they are instead leveraging local advantages they consider disruption-proof, from a vast talent pool to supply chains walled off from the outside world. Yu Kai, AISpeech's co-founder and chief scientific officer, said the company has hired more than 700 people in research centers in Beijing and Suzhou, after starting off with fewer than 10 people developing an algorithm in Cambridge. It has set up a subsidiary in Shenzhen for its proximity to smart equipment manufacturing and also runs a unit in southern China to produce software for cars built by a local auto-making partner. Illustrating the deep concern in Beijing on US tech controls, Xi has restricted China's rare earth magnets in recent months in a bid to unwind some of Trump's recent export curbs. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last week that the US and China signed a document to codify trade terms reached last month in Geneva, including a commitment from Beijing to deliver rare earths used in everything from wind turbines to jet planes. China's economic stamina was a common theme of the trip that began in Nanjing, a city in Jiangsu where researchers publish three times more scientific papers than those in New York. Ferried by two buses, dozens of journalists went to Suzhou and neighboring Zhejiang province by high-speed train, as the focus of discussions shifted more to the development of green technologies. There's debate in China over how it matters to access state-of-the-art chipmaking machines, and Nvidia's most-advanced AI accelerators. Ren Zhengfei, the founder of Huawei Technologies Co., recently said Chinese firms can adopt means such as chip stacking to get results similar to the most cutting-edge semiconductors. Beijing also blocks most AI services from US rivals, meaning domestic players don't have to compete against American leaders. China has to put on a display of 'confidence and window dressing' after years of tech curbs, according to Julian Mueller-Kaler, director of the Strategic Foresight Hub at the Stimson Center in Washington. High-end chips for AI data centers, for example, can be replaced with less capable models, at the expense of more energy usage, he said. 'The reason the Chinese didn't really retaliate that much after the chips restrictions a few years ago is Beijing actually likes them, to a certain degree,' he said. 'It forces Chinese companies to develop their own capabilities and reduce the reliance on American tech — a political goal Chinese decision-makers had for a long time but was hindered by economic realities.' Still, for all the savvy on display, few companies will emerge unscathed from deteriorating ties with the US. Some executives on the trip mentioned they were feeling the pain as Trump's America First policy seeks to limit US investment in China's high tech sectors. 'The impact on financing is significant,' said Zhang Jinhua, chairwoman of IASO Biotechnology Co., which makes a life-saving cancer treatment. 'I tell my team to stop asking when this winter ends. We must treat winter as the four seasons and adapt to prolonged uncertainty.'


The Hindu
41 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Japan auto trade ‘unfair', could buy more U.S. oil, Trump tells Fox News
Japan engages in "unfair" automobile trade with the United States and should increase its imports of U.S. energy resources and other goods to help reduce the U.S. trade deficit, President Donald Trump said in an interview broadcast on Sunday (June 29, 2025). Tokyo is scrambling to find ways to get Washington to exempt Japan's automakers from 25% automobile industry-specific tariffs, which are hurting the country's manufacturing sector. Japan also faces a 24% so-called reciprocal tariff rate starting on July 9 unless it can negotiate a deal. Also Read | Threatened by President Donald Trump's tariffs, Japan walks delicate tightrope between U.S. and China "They won't take our cars, and yet we take millions and millions of their cars into the United States. It's not fair, and I explained that to Japan, and they understand it," Mr. Trump said in an interview on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures with Maria Bartiromo". "And we have a big deficit with Japan, and they understand that too. Now we have oil. They could take a lot of oil, they could take a lot of other things." The automobile sector accounted for about 28% of the total 21 trillion yen ($145 billion) worth of goods Japan exported to the U.S. last year.