
Will I lose the Winter Fuel Payment if I make a pension withdrawal to replace my 'clapped out' car?
I have a small private pension plus my state pension. I now need to draw a lump sum of money from my pension pot, which I built up for nine years during self employment, to replace my 'clapped out' car.
This could take me over the £35,000 income for the year.
Do I now need to return my Winter Fuel Payment? We can't really afford to take out a loan for the car, nor would we want to with sufficient funds sitting in my pension pot.
Am I now to be punished once again for putting things in place for my old age?
Steve Webb replies: If your total income from your state pension, regular private pensions and lump sum pension withdrawal takes you over the £35,000 limit, then yes, your extra tax bill next year will wipe out the value of your share of this year's Winter Fuel Payment.
However, it is worth remembering that, assuming you and your partner are under 80 and not receiving benefits, you are probably each receiving an equal share of the total £200 Winter Fuel Payment.
It is only your share (typically £100) which is at stake if your income goes above £35,000, rather than the total household payment.
There are some further aspects of this which might be worth bearing in mind.
The first is that what affects your WFP is your individual income, not the combined income of you and your spouse or partner.
This means that if your partner had access to a pension pot or other savings and could do this without taking their income above the £35,000 limit, then the car could be purchased without affecting the payment at all.
Alternatively, if your partner was able to make some contribution to the car, but not the full amount, another option would be for you to chip in by taking a smaller pension withdrawal to 'mop up' any spare income between your current annual figure and the £35,000 limit.
You could do this without affecting your WFP entitlement.
Depending on the state of your 'clapped out' car, another angle to think about is whether you could hold on until the end of this tax year.
If so, you could take your withdrawal in two lumps, one before 6 April 2026 and one afterwards. Provided each individual lump kept you within the limit, then your WFP would be unaffected.
How do you send back a Winter Fuel Payment?
Turning now to your comment about 'returning' your WFP, it's worth being clear how the process will work from this winter onwards.
Under the new system, everyone who is over state pension age should be paid a WFP in full, regardless of their income.
HMRC will then identify at the end of the year those individuals who had income over £35,000 and will add an amount to their tax bill to offset the WFP they received the previous winter.
So you are not exactly 'returning' the WFP, you are simply facing a slightly higher tax bill next year.
If you prefer, the Government has said that it will be possible, in principle, to opt out of the WFP system.
But in your situation, where your income is only temporarily over the limit for one year, it's hard to see what you would gain by doing this.
It would probably be far simpler to simply get a WFP, put it in the bank and earn a bit of interest, and then use it to help pay your increased tax bill for one year.
If you are determined to avoid this situation you could in principle opt out this year, and then (presumably) opt in again the following year, but we have yet to see any details as to how all of this will work and how bureaucratic the whole process will be.
Ask Steve Webb a pension question
Former pensions minister Steve Webb is This Is Money's agony uncle.
He is ready to answer your questions, whether you are still saving, in the process of stopping work, or juggling your finances in retirement.
Steve left the Department for Work and Pensions after the May 2015 election. He is now a partner at actuary and consulting firm Lane Clark & Peacock.
If you would like to ask Steve a question about pensions, please email him at pensionquestions@thisismoney.co.uk.
Steve will do his best to reply to your message in a forthcoming column, but he won't be able to answer everyone or correspond privately with readers. Nothing in his replies constitutes regulated financial advice. Published questions are sometimes edited for brevity or other reasons.
Please include a daytime contact number with your message - this will be kept confidential and not used for marketing purposes.
If Steve is unable to answer your question, you can also contact MoneyHelper, a Government-backed organisation which gives free assistance on pensions to the public. It can be found here and its number is 0800 011 3797.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
British steelmakers will be able to sell more to the EU tariff-free from Friday in a boost for the beleaguered sector. The EU has agreed to more than double the UK's tariff-free quota for certain steel products in a move the Government described as a 'direct win' from Sir Keir Starmer's deal with the bloc earlier this year. At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'. The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US. An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month. UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU. He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.' The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs. The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market. In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports. Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power. In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity. British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business. 'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.' But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'. He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say. 'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fears over bioethanol plant ‘putting £1.25 billion jet fuel project in jeopardy'
A £1.25 billion green jet fuel investment could go overseas if the UK's largest bioethanol plant is forced to close, a firm has said. Crisis talk are ongoing to save Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, following the decision to end the 19% tariff on United States bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal. On Friday, Meld Energy said the situation is putting its plans for a 'world-class' green jet fuel project on the Humber in jeopardy. Earlier this year, Meld Energy signed a £1.25 billion agreement with Vivergo Fuels to anchor a Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) facility at Saltend Chemicals Park in Hull. Meld Energy CEO and founder Chris Smith said: 'We're excited about the potential to bring our sustainable aviation fuel project to the Humber – one of the UK's most important industrial and energy hubs. 'But, for projects like ours to succeed and the flow of vital investment to be forthcoming, we need a strong and integrated low-carbon ecosystem. 'A bioethanol plant on site at Saltend is a critical part of that mix. Without it, we'd have to consider alternative locations overseas where that infrastructure is already in place.' Mr Smith was speaking as the Vivergo plant was expecting its last scheduled wheat delivery from a farm in Lincolnshire on Friday, as the site continues to wind down. Vivergo Fuels managing director Ben Hackett wrote to wheat growers earlier this year explaining that the plant will only be able to honour existing contractual obligations for wheat purchases while uncertainty continues. Mr Hackett said: 'Building a future fuels cluster here in Hull would deliver major economic, environmental and strategic benefits not just for the Humber, but for the whole country. 'We have the site, the skills, the supply chain and the ambition to lead the way on sustainable aviation fuel. 'But, without urgent Government support for British bioethanol, the UK risks losing that opportunity, along with the jobs and billions of pounds in investment that depend on it.' Last month, the firm, which is owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is was beginning consultation with staff to wind down the plant, which employs more than 160 people, due to the uncertain situation – a process which could see production stop before September 13, if support is not provided. It said Britain's two largest bioethanol producers – Vivergo Fuels and Ensus in Teesside – are now in urgent negotiations with the Government. The firms say the UK-US trade deal and regulatory constraints on the industry have made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products. A Government spokesperson said: 'We recognise this is a concerning time for workers and their families which is why we entered into formal discussions with the company on potential financial support last month. 'We will continue to take proactive steps to address the long-standing challenges the company faces and remain committed to working closely with them throughout this period to present a plan for a way forward that protects supply chains, jobs and livelihoods.' The Government said officials and ministers have met with Vivergo and Ensus consistently over the last few months to discuss options to address 'significant challenges' that the bioethanol industry has been facing for some time. It said engagement with the companies 'continues at pace' and external consultants have been brought in to help.


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
We're backing Scotland with billions in investment, says Reeves ahead of visit
The UK Government is backing Scotland with billions in investment to grow the economy and create jobs, the Chancellor has said ahead of her visit to the country. Rachel Reeves said Labour is 'seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has to offer' in defence and energy. She will visit RAF Lossiemouth in Moray and the St Fergus gas plant in Aberdeenshire on Friday, exactly a week after she toured the Rolls-Royce factory near Glasgow Airport. The Chancellor will meet 200 Boeing staff at the military site where three new E-7 Wedgetail aircraft are being made. The UK Government said its plans to increase defence spending to 2.6% will raise Britain's GDP by around 0.3%, while adding 26,100 jobs to the Scottish economy. It also pointed to its £200 million investment for Aberdeenshire's Acorn carbon capture project, which could create 15,000 new jobs while safeguarding 18,000 more. A final investment decision for the project is yet to be made. Ms Reeves said: 'We're seizing the huge potential and opportunities that Scotland has on offer. 'Whether it's in defence to keep the UK safe, or clean energy to power all corners of the country, this Government is backing Scotland with billions of pounds of investment to grow the economy and create jobs.' Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the Government is investing in defence to 'ensure Britain's security and deter our adversaries and drive economic growth'. He added: 'This investment is a massive jobs opportunity for Scotland – this 'defence dividend' is good news for Scotland, where it will help create skilled jobs, drive economic growth, and help tackle the critical skills gaps facing the country in sectors such as nuclear, construction, maritime and project management.' Maria Laine, Boeing's UK president, said: 'Boeing has a long-standing presence in Scotland including at RAF Lossiemouth, the home to the UK's P-8 Poseidon fleet and where the E-7 Wedgetail will be based when it enters service. 'As a key partner of the UK Armed Forces, Boeing welcomes the defence spending increase and has seen first-hand how defence infrastructure investments, such as the £100 million Atlantic Building and new E-7 facilities at RAF Lossiemouth, can deliver for local jobs, suppliers and UK national security.' Michelle Ferguson, director of CBI Scotland, added: 'Scotland's energy and defence sectors are vital to our economy, driving investment and supporting thousands of skilled jobs. 'The Chancellor's announcement of £200 million for the Acorn energy project is very encouraging, but businesses are eager for final approval to unlock its full potential and secure North Sea jobs. 'Increased defence spending will further boost Scotland's skilled workforce and create growth opportunities across key supply-chain. 'Close collaboration between the Scottish and UK governments will be essential to fully realise these benefits, driving forward national security and Scotland's transition to a resilient, low-carbon economy.' Aberdeen & Grampian Chamber of Commerce urged the Chancellor to drop the energy profits levy (EPL), the so-called 'windfall tax' on oil and gas companies, which has a headline rate of 78%. Chief executive Russell Borthwick said: 'If we stick to course on the accelerated decline of the North Sea, then we'll only have a few short years and not prosperous decades of future oil and gas from our own waters. 'Instead, we'll import more, pay more and suffer further consequences of jobs and businesses lost, just at the time we need them to support the energy transition. 'We know the Chancellor needs to find growth from somewhere within the UK economy. With oil and gas, there's no need to start from scratch or build out a nascent industry. 'Simply by removing the confiscatory EPL, letting investment flow into projects and stimulating activity in a sector which has been hammered by policy for too long, we can unlock significant growth in the UK economy.'