
The experts are being proved wrong about the Trump economy
One is the US, which, like some kind of levitational trick performed by an Indian swami, seems to defy gravity, together with almost anything else that is thrown at it.
Hardly anyone thought the US economy could withstand the post-pandemic surge in interest rates from virtually zero all the way up to 5.33pc without inducing a recession, yet here we are nearly two years after the Federal Funds Rate hit its peak, and there is still little sign of a significant downturn.
Similarly with Trump's tariff threats. Most economists thought they would be as damaging to the US as those they targeted, with rising inflation undermining household spending, but thus far apparently not.
It's true that Trump's protectionism is proving less severe than initially threatened, but the tariffs are still substantial by historical standards – slightly bigger, for instance, than the infamous Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the Great Depression.
The same might be said of the crackdown on immigration. Without a constant infusion of migrant labour, crops would be left unharvested and fruit would rot on the tree, it was widely said.
Similarly, the entire low-wage economy, from meatpacking to Uber drivers, would grind to a halt.
No doubt instances of these afflictions can be found, but in aggregate there's little sign of the much anticipated damage in the wider economic data.
It may be that all these matters are on a long fuse. It is still early days, and a slowdown may be just around the corner.
Goldman Sachs, for one, has been steadily reducing its forecast of US growth for this year, and at the last count was down to just 1.1pc, with a high risk of outright recession.
But Goldman's gloom is not reflected in the stock market, which continues to hit new records. To date at least, the economic establishment has been largely wrong-footed, prompting Trump to gleefully declare that 'the Fake News and Experts were wrong again. Tariffs are making our country BOOM'.
The situation is similar in some respects to the economic debate that surrounded Brexit here in the UK. Once the immediate shock of the vote to leave the EU had worn off, the economy carried on much as before; the more gory predictions of serious economic harm turned out to be ill-founded.
The big lesson, perhaps, is that abrupt changes in trade policy are not as significant as imagined in fundamentally shifting the dial in large and diverse advanced economies with high dependence on service-based industries.
The other country in my tale of two economies is the UK, which has indeed slowed markedly, and may even have contracted in the second quarter. As it is, the economy shrunk by 0.3pc in April, and again by 0.1pc in May, according to initial ONS estimates.
Here in Britain, the problem is almost entirely self-inflicted. Despite an autumn Budget which in overall terms was strongly expansionary, the decision to raise employer National Insurance contributions and other forms of business taxation has dealt a hammer-blow to business confidence.
In anticipation of harder times to come, consumer confidence has also sagged.
Meanwhile, rising concern over how the Labour Government might seek to fill a ballooning shortfall in the public finances is causing capital flight and other forms of precautionary behaviour among the asset-rich.
Nobody can say that Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, wasn't warned about the likely counterproductive effects of her tax raid. More tax threatens to spawn less tax.
Shortly after the last Budget, she told business leaders that she would not be coming back with more tax rises and more borrowing. It is now abundantly clear that she will be.
That she is unlikely to be able to keep that promise has no doubt instructed her more recent refusal to rule out wealth taxes as a way of filling the fiscal hole. She is wary of further tying her hands.
Yet her ambivalence has served only to heighten anxiety among those who might be targeted, further fuelling evasive action. Even if she eventually does nothing, failure to rule out further wealth taxes has already inflicted considerable damage.
All this against a backdrop of still elevated inflation, which at the last count remained stubbornly adrift of target at 3.6pc, slightly up on the month before.
This is unlikely to deter the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee from further trimming interest rates at its meeting next week.
Even so, the combination of nil growth with still-higher-than-acceptable inflation is proving particularly awkward for policymakers. The Bank is under no obligation to help the Government through an economic mire which is almost entirely of its own making.
Back in the US, there are two main reasons that the economy is continuing to hold up relatively well.
One is the continuation of massive fiscal stimulus. This is in fact just an extension of the Biden-era stimulus, only done in a different way – via the tax side of the ledger rather than the spending side.
Trump has taken to blaming Biden for any slight hiccup in progress, but in truth it may be the other way around: that the economy is continuing to enjoy the tail-end of the Biden boom.
The other major prop is all the excitement around artificial intelligence (AI). This has prompted record levels of investment by Silicon Valley in data centres, supercomputing and other aspects of the developing technology.
It's a bubble, undoubtedly, which also helps explain continued buoyancy in the stock market, sustained as it is by the surge in AI valuations.
But for now, the music plays on, and as Tim Congdon of the Institute of International Monetary Research points out, the monetary indicators support the idea of continued growth.
This might be further enhanced by plans to ease back on so-called Basel III capital controls, encouraging banks to load up with US Treasuries and further expand credit provision.
Combined with what is already a plainly unsustainable fiscal trajectory, it might be thought an accident waiting to happen, and no doubt it is. But today is not that day.
In any case, the idea that the US economy is careering towards some kind of Trump-induced recession – brought about by a combination of protectionism and policy uncertainty – is proving to be not quite right.
In fact, the economy is showing a remarkable degree of resilience to the president's iconoclasm, and actually might in some ways be benefiting from it.
Thanks in part to the revenue raised from tariffs, the Federal budget actually slipped into surplus in June. Even if something of an anomaly, it nonetheless makes you think.
Sadly, the same cannot be said of the UK, where the economy is becalmed even as government borrowing continues to swell ever higher.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Brussels will ‘punish' Britain for not following its demands as PM's deal pushes UK into clutches of EU, economist warns
BRUSSELS will dole out punishments to the UK for not adhering to its demands, a top economist warns. Eurocrats are pushing Britain into the clutches of the customs union and single market without the ability to make our own rules, Catherine McBride says. The revelation comes after the UK and the EU agreed a new framework back in May on post-Brexit trading arrangements on areas such as farming, defence and trade. The expert insists that new documents outlining the EU Commission's full demands from the reset will see the continent take "retribution" through our current trading relationships. She says this will strip the UK of any ability to foster the latest farming techniques or even import food from non-EU countries. McBride says that the EU Commission will have control all over the UK's agriculture and industrial imports - and also affecting our independent trade policy with the rest of the world. McBride, in a Briefings for Britain article, writes: "The UK government has effectively given the EU a free pass to penalise or, more likely, fine the UK for any transgression. "The EU will be the lawmaker, the policeman and the Judge – there will be no jury." She even echoes comments from former Prime Minister Boris Johnson who said that Sir Keir Starmer was ready to make us the EU's "gimp". When Britain voted to leave the EU it left the single market, customs union and also left the freedom of movement arrangements. Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel last night said: 'The stark cost of Labour's EU surrender plan is on full display. 'Keir Starmer and his cronies have bent the knee to Brussels at every turn, and no matter the price the British public will have to pay, and now the EU is coming back for more. 'The Conservatives will always defend the democratic will of this country, and won't let Labour give up anymore of our hard earned sovereignty without a fight.' A Labour source said: 'The report is riddled with nonsense claims. "If the Shadow Foreign Secretary wants to talk about surrender, let's look at how she designed a post-Brexit migration system that was supposed to be controlled, but led to record levels of net migration. "Labour is resetting our relationship with the EU - delivering a new deal that protects jobs, lowers bills, and strengthens our borders." A Government spokesperson said: "Since 2020, British traders and shoppers have faced red tape, rising prices and delivery delays. We set out to fix this with a new partnership with the EU that will add nearly £9 billion a year to the UK economy. 'We will always act in Britain's national interest and have been clear there will be no return to freedom of movement, the customs union or the single market.'


Reuters
13 minutes ago
- Reuters
Indian shares drop on Trump's renewed tariff threats over Russian oil purchases
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Indian shares declined on Tuesday as investors stayed cautious after U.S. President Donald Trump's renewed threat of harsh tariffs on goods from India over the country's purchases of Russian oil and ahead of the local central bank policy decision. The Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab fell 0.3% to 24,649.55 points and the BSE Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab lost 0.38% to 80,710.25. Trump on Monday threatened to impose higher tariffs on goods imported from India, prompting New Delhi to call the move "unjustified" and pledge to safeguard its economic interests, further straining ties between the two nations. Twelve of the 16 major sectors declined, with broader small-cap (.NIFSMCP100), opens new tab and mid-cap (.NIFMDCP100), opens new tab indexes down 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively. Yogesh Patil, CIO-equities at LIC Mutual Fund, told Reuters' Trading India forum that he expects U.S. trade uncertainty to keep Indian markets volatile in the short term, but is optimistic about their medium- to long-term prospects given strong domestic fundamentals. Meanwhile, investors are waiting for the Reserve Bank of India's policy decision on Wednesday, in which it is expected to hold its key rate at 5.50%. However, calls for a rate cut have also risen after the U.S. slapped 25% tariffs on goods from India. Reliance Industries ( opens new tab, which is India's largest company by market value and earns the biggest chunk of its revenue from the oil-to-chemicals segment, dropped 1.4% on the day. The drop was fuelled by concerns over the negative impact on the profitability of the firm's refineries due to the potential shift in crude oil sourcing from Russia. State-owned oil refiners slipped on the day as well. Also down were stocks exposed to the U.S. - pharma (.NIPHARM), opens new tab and information technology (.NIFTYIT), opens new tab fell 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively. Private lender IndusInd Bank rose 1.9% after naming industry veteran Rajiv Anand as CEO for a three-year term. Exchange operator BSE ( opens new tab dropped 4.8% after news reports, opens new tab said the finance ministry and the markets regulator are in talks to reduce speculation in the options market.

Leader Live
27 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Nato to deliver more military aid to Ukraine after Dutch minister announces deal
The equipment that will be provided is based on Ukraine's priority needs on the battlefield. Nato allies then locate the weapons and ammunition and send them on. 'Packages will be prepared rapidly and issued on a regular basis,' a Nato spokesperson said. Air defence systems are in greatest need, as the United Nations said that Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians. Russia's bigger army is also making slow but costly progress along the 620-mile front line. Currently, it is waging an operation to take the eastern city of Pokrovsk, a logistical hub whose fall could allow it to drive deeper into Ukraine. European allies and Canada are buying most of the equipment which they plan to send from the United States, which has greater stocks of military material, as well as more effective weapons. The Trump administration is not giving any arms to Ukraine. The new deliveries will come on top of other pledges of military equipment. The Kiel Institute, which tracks support to Ukraine, estimates that as of June, European countries had provided 72 billion euros (£63bn) worth of military aid since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, compared to 65 billion dollars (£49bn) in US aid. Dutch defence minister Ruben Brekelmans said that 'American air defence systems and munitions, in particular, are crucial for Ukraine to defend itself'. Announcing the deliveries on Monday, he said Russia's attacks are 'pure terror, intended to break Ukraine'. Germany said on Friday that it will deliver two more Patriot air defence systems to Ukraine in the coming days. It agreed to the move after securing assurances that the US will prioritise the delivery of new Patriots to Germany to backfill its stocks. These weapon systems are only made in the US.