Ringgit ends lower as trade deal hopes dim ahead of US tariff deadline
At 6 pm, the local note depreciated to 4.2245/2305 versus the greenback from Tuesday's close of 4.1995/2005.
SPI Asset Management managing partner Stephen Innes said the ringgit, which had enjoyed solid momentum in recent weeks, is now facing headwinds as markets brace for the July 9 tariff deadline, with US President Donald Trump making it clear there will be no extension.
"With the deadline fast approaching, markets are shifting into defensive mode.
"Asia foreign exchange market feels like it is trading in the dark - nervous, reactive, and unsure where the next blow will come from,' he told Bernama.
Innes said that Trump's tough stance on Japan, particularly over rice and autos, has further fuelled regional tension, while his softened tone on India remains wrapped in diplomatic vagueness.
"Until clearer signals emerge, the market is expected to remain light on conviction and heavy on caution,' he added.
At the close, the ringgit traded mostly lower against a basket of major currencies.
It eased versus the British pound to 5.7859/7941 from 5.7797/7866, and fell against the euro to 4.9748/9818 from 4.9566/9625 yesterday.
However, it appreciated against the Japanese yen to 2.9316/9360 from 2.9351/9389.
The local note was also traded lower against its ASEAN counterparts.
It slipped against the Indonesian rupiah to 259.9/260.5 from 258.9/259.4, weakened against the Philippine peso to 7.49/7.51 from 7.45/7.46, shed vis-à-vis the Singapore dollar to 3.3167/3217 from 3.3015/3059, and declined against the Thai baht to 13.0233/0482 from 12.9363/9585 previously. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
42 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
MPs back foreign investors owning minority stakes in UK newspapers
LONDON: Foreign investors have stepped closer to buying part of the British newspaper The Telegraph, as members of parliament (MPs) backed relaxed laws on foreign ownership of UK newspapers that will allow them to own up to 15 per cent. The Commons voted overwhelmingly in favour of a change to the law by Labour, which would allow foreign firms to buy minority stakes. It is the latest turn in a tumultuous two-year takeover process for the 170-year-old newspaper business. It comes after the previous Conservative government put a block in place amid fears the Telegraph could be bought by a majority-owned UAE company, RedBird IMI. The investment vehicle is a joint venture with US financiers. The regulation was approved by 338 votes to 79, majority 259. Labour was boosted in the voting lobbies by four far-right Reform UK MPs, including its leader Nigel Farage, and seven Independent MPs. Meanwhile, former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, a vocal critic of China, was among those to vote against it. The Liberal Democrats, who forced the vote over fears foreign ownership would compromise editorial independence, also opposed it. The result will give the green light to RedBird IMI, with the cap in place now being supported by MPs. RedBird Capital, the US junior partner in RedBird IMI, agreed a deal in May to buy a majority stake in the newspaper for £500 million (US$683 million). Abu Dhabi's IMI will look to buy a minority stake as part of the consortium. RedBird has investments in AC Milan, film production giant Skydance and Liverpool FC owner Fenway Sports Group. It is also understood that the Daily Mail and General Trust (DMGT), which owns the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, the i, and the Metro, is also looking to buy a stake. This is in addition to Len Blavatnik, who owns the Theatre Royal Haymarket in the West End, who is considering a minority stake, according to Sky News reports. The rules were introduced after RedBird IMI looked to buy the Telegraph Media Group (TMG) from the Barclay Brothers. Former Conservative culture secretary Lucy Frazer told a Society of Editors Conference in April 2024: "I had concerns about the potential impacts of this deal on free expression and accurate presentation of news, and that's why I issued a public interest intervention." Culture Minister Stephanie Peacock told MPs last month that appropriate safeguards had been introduced. She said: "The Government need to balance the importance of creating certainty and sustainability for our newspaper industry with the need to protect against the risk of foreign state influence by setting a clear threshold for exceptions within the regime at 15 per cent. We believe that we have done that effectively." Speaking after the vote, the Liberal Democrats' spokesman on media, Max Wilkinson, said: "Freedom of the press is a historic and inviolable cornerstone of our democracy. That the government is pushing to sell off stakes in our British papers to foreign governments is astonishing. "It's outrageous that Labour and the Conservative MPs failed to stand up, do their patriotic duty and block this legislation. The leader of the opposition sponsored the Bill that restricted foreign states owning British newspapers last year — yet even she failed to vote against the measure. "Liberal Democrats have already successfully forced the government to backtrack on their senseless plan to let multiple states club together to buy whatever-sized stake in a British outlet they fancied. Now my colleagues in the Lords and I will deliver a showdown to overturn this Bill entirely — rallying Conservative and crossbench peers to defeat the government on this misguided policy."
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Beijing braces for US trade deals that aim to shut out China
BEIJING: The trade truce between Washington and Beijing may be holding for now, but China is increasingly wary about what's happening elsewhere: US efforts to forge deals that could isolate Chinese firms from global supply chains. Ahead of a July 9 deadline, US officials are deep in talks with major trading partners in Asia and Europe, pushing for new agreements that would include restrictions on Chinese content, or secure commitments to counter what Washington sees as China's unfair trade practices. In the first such deal, President Donald Trump on Wednesday (July 2) announced a tiered tariff agreement with Vietnam. Exports to the US from the South-East Asian nation will be charged a 20% rate, Trump said in a social-media post, with 40% levied on any goods deemed to be transshipped through the country. That will hit products with components from China and possibly other nations, which are routed through Vietnam or subject to only minimal final assembly before being exported to the US. The approach mirrors provisions in an existing US trade agreement with Mexico and Canada. India, another nation seen as close to a deal, has also been negotiating over "rules of origin.' Washington wants at least 60% of a product's value added locally to qualify as "Made in India' and benefit from the deal, Bloomberg News previously reported. India has pushed to bring that down to around 35%, according to the report. "Asia's dilemma when it comes to Trump's trade war is all about dependence on US final demand while relying heavily on China's value added in domestic production,' Alicia Garcia Herrero, Asia-Pacific chief economist at Natixis SA, said in a recent report, adding that Vietnam, Cambodia and Taiwan were among the most exposed. China, a larger trade partner than the US for most Asian economies, has warned of consequences if its interests are threatened, and Foreign Minister Wang Yi is likely to raise that again on his visit to Europe this week for talks in Brussels, Germany and France. "China firmly opposes any party reaching a deal at the expense of Chinese interests in exchange for so-called tariff reductions,' the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement Saturday, repeating earlier warnings. "If this happens, China will never accept it and will resolutely counter it to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' Trump's 90-day pause on what he called "reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of America's trading partners ends on July 9. Unless those countries reach trade deals with the US, they could potentially face much higher tariffs. Some governments are making moves to stay on the right side of Washington. Vietnam, Thailand and South Korea have all put in place measures to stop goods from being rerouted through their countries to the US since Trump's tariffs were unveiled in April. South Korean customs announced a crackdown on transshipments, citing a rise in the practice. Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te also flagged the issue and followed up with new rules requiring all US-bound exports to carry a legal declaration they were made on the island. Another concern for Beijing is whether the US could convince others to impose or tighten export controls on high-tech equipment, which would further hamper Chinese efforts to buy the tools it needs to produce advanced semiconductors. Taiwan in June added Huawei Technologies Co. and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. to its so-called entity list, barring Taiwanese firms from doing business with them without government approval. The pressure isn't limited to Asia. Europe, too, finds itself in a delicate position. The EU is China's largest export destination for electric vehicles, and investment from Chinese firms into the bloc plus the UK hit 10 billion euros (US$12 billion) last year, according to recent research from Rhodium Group. Yet trade tensions are rising. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen recently accused Beijing of "weaponising' rare earths and magnets and warned of the risks posed by Chinese overcapacity. Beijing is particularly concerned that the EU might sign up to provisions similar to those in the UK's deal with the US, which included commitments around supply chain security, export controls, and ownership rules in sectors like steel, aluminum and pharmaceuticals. While the language did not name China, Beijing criticised the agreement in a rare public statement, interpreting it as a direct challenge, the Financial Times reported. "China is clearly worried that the EU will accept the same wording as the UK did on export controls,' said Joerg Wuttke, a partner at the Albright Stonebridge Group in Washington and former president of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China. "They are pushing the EU not to do this, and the US is pushing the EU to do it.' Brussels and Washington are aiming to reach some form of an agreement before July 9, when Washington is set to impose a 50% tariff on nearly all EU products. With European exports to the US worth more than double the amount to China, the bloc sees Washington as the more important partner, giving the US leverage in the talks. China's weekend statement is "obviously aimed entirely at Brussels,' said Hosuk Lee-Makiyama, director of the European Centre for International Political Economy in Brussels, who was recently in Beijing for meetings ahead of an EU-China summit this month. "China is concerned what the EU might agree with the US.' The long-term risk for Beijing is that these efforts coalesce into a broader shift - not just a US-led campaign to curb Chinese exports, but a reshaping of global trade around "trusted' supply chains, with China increasingly on the outside. In a visit to South-East Asia earlier this year, President Xi Jinping urged the region to stand together as an "Asian family,' warning against trade fragmentation. Beijing has often responded to actions it opposes with targeted trade measures. When the EU imposed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles last year, China launched anti-dumping probes into European brandy, dairy and pork. It halted Japanese seafood imports in 2023 after Group of Seven meetings in Japan were seen as critical of China. A spat with Australia in 2020 led to trade restrictions on billions of dollars' worth of goods, including lobsters, wine and barley. "If some agreements explicitly list China as a target and show that some countries are cooperating or collaborating with the US to 'contain China,' then China will definitely respond,' said Tu Xinquan, dean of the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing and a former adviser to the Chinese Commerce Ministry. - Bloomberg
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Asian stocks mixed as traders shrug at US-Vietnam trade deal
HONG KONG: Stocks struggled in Asia on Thursday (July 3) as investors gave a lukewarm reception to the US-Vietnam trade deal, while the dollar eased ahead of key US jobs data that could impact Federal Reserve interest rates plans. Attention was also on Washington as Republicans struggled to push Donald Trump's tax-slashing budget bill through the House of Representatives amid warnings it will inflate an already ballooning national debt. While the Vietnam agreement provided hope that other governments can reach agreements with Washington, dealers were cautious as it emerged that the country must still pay tolls of as much as 40 per cent for certain exports. With less than a week left until the US president's July 9 deadline to hammer out pacts to avoid his "reciprocal" levies, just three countries have done so - stoking worries his "Liberation Day" measures will kick in and spark fresh market turmoil. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote: "It is my Great Honor to announce that I have just made a Trade Deal with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam after speaking with To Lam, the Highly Respected General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam." He said that under the "Great Deal of Cooperation", imports of Vietnamese goods will face a 20 per cent US tariff, while goods that pass through Vietnam to circumvent steeper trade barriers - so-called "transshipping" - will see a 40 per cent tariff. The news means Hanoi will avoid paying the 46 per cent tolls initially applied on the April 2 tariff blitz, though the cost of goods going into America will still surge. Hanoi traders were unimpressed, with the Vietnamese capital's stock market down in early trade. A third record close in four days for Wall Street's S&P 500 and Nasdaq also did little to lift buying sentiment elsewhere in Asia, with Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo, Sydney and Wellington all falling. Singapore, Seoul, Taipei, Manila and Jakarta edged up. Trump said this week he will not push back his deadline to make more deals though he and some of his officials have said a number were in the pipeline. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said Thursday his administration was doing its "utmost" to secure an agreement. However, he warned that "it's certainly not easy, that much is clear. And to be honest, I can't say with confidence that we'll be able to wrap everything up" by the deadline. The dollar continued to struggle as traders boosted rate cut bets after data showed the private sector unexpectedly shed jobs last month for the first time since March 2023, suggesting the labour market was slackening. The reading came a day before the much-anticipated non-farm payrolls report that is used by the Fed to guide policy. Traders widely expect the bank to cut rates twice this year but there is growing speculation that it could make three, with one possibly at the July meeting. "Payrolls is the focus (Thursday), where consensus is for a 110,000 payrolls gain and a slight lift in the unemployment rate to 4.3 per cent," said National Australia Bank's Taylor Nugent. "It would take more than that to dent (policy board) members' comfort (that) the labour market is resilient enough to wait beyond July for more clarity on inflation and the outlook." Meanwhile, US Treasury yields rose amid fresh worries in the bond market over Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" that cuts taxes as well as spending on programmes such as Medicaid. Independent analysis suggests it will add US$3 trillion to the already-colossal US debt mountain, which observers warn could deal a fresh blow to the world's top economy. - AFP
