PM needs to be wary of becoming too reliant on China
Yes, Australia is being forced to grow out of its adolescence due to Trump's disruption of the world order and the decline of America's central global role. No one, except the myopic opposition, can have any criticism of the way Albanese has been navigating the diplomatic US-China tightrope. His attitude is sensible: 'You don't have time to see me and want to put tariffs on our goods and threaten delivery of the submarines? No problem, we have other friends who want us to join their party.' While the US has been a reliable ally over the past eight decades, its star is waning due to tyranny of distance, its unfettered economic model and its choice of leadership. During this time, a cold, calculated focus on our own long-term self-interest is what Albanese is demonstrating, while not being threatened by pressure from either China or the US. Unless the opposition has a solid game plan to counter the Albo-Wong strategy, it should work with the government to achieve what is best for us. Manbir Singh Kohli, Pemulwuy
Capital gains pains
Sorry, William Lloyd (Letters, July 19), but most economists expected a CGT to do what any tax does – discourage people from investing in that area. That is what happened to housing from 1985 to 1988, when the entire economy took off. This lasted just two years and property prices fell and remained low until 1999, when John Howard introduced his 50 per cent discount on the amount taxed for CGT. While I know that correlation does not prove causation, house prices took off immediately on the introduction of that amendment and have continued that upward trajectory for 26 years since. Why income from property profits should be taxed at a fraction of the rate that income from any other source is taxed remains a mystery to me. Barry Harrod, Fig Tree Pocket (Qld)
Valid criticism
Richard Flanagan expertly draws on Jewish writers to demonstrate the folly if our PM adopted the Segal report's recommendations (' PM must disavow and abandon Segal report ', July 19). Antisemitism, like all other forms of racism, is not supported by most Australians. We are at heart the proud outcome of our indigenous and ethnic diversity. Australia is also a democracy. Criticism of the Israeli state or Zionism is neither antisemitic nor racist. Robbing us of our right to criticise the egregious actions of nation states is tantamount to destroying our own democracy. Do that at your own peril. Brian Barrett, Padstow
In Australia 2025, Jewish students are harassed on campus, and Jewish artists and academics – even ones with a history of speaking up for Palestinians – are excommunicated for disagreeing with the modern progressive dogma that Israel is evil. Jewish-owned businesses are vandalised and synagogues are burnt. But we are told by Richard Flanagan that 'leading Jewish figures' such as Louise Adler (who in reality represent a fringe minority of Australian Jews) are calling reports of antisemitism exaggerated. We are told that the IHRA definition of antisemitism says that criticism of Israel is antisemitic, when it explicitly says this is not the case. Gaslighting at its finest. Tim Peach, South Perth (WA)
As a child of Holocaust survivors, I believe it is essential that the Executive Council of Australian Jewry condemn the war of annihilation waged by Israel's Netanyahu government against the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank. It also behoves Jillian Segal, Australia's special envoy to combat antisemitism, to unequivocally condemn the inhumanity of Netanyahu in his ruthless and indiscriminate killing of Palestinian women, children and men according to the false doctrine of 'collective punishment', which is regarded as a war crime by the United Nations and other bodies such as the International Criminal Court, the International Court of Justice and Amnesty International, among others. John-Janusz Ebel, Caulfield North (Vic)
Plastic not fantastic
Like most Australian consumers, I want to do the right thing when it comes to recycling plastics. So I was horrified, but not altogether surprised, to read Hannah Kennedy's feature (' The plastic that contaminates our recycling stream', July 19). It seems that despite the efforts of people such as me, companies, watchdogs and governments are all dragging the chain when it comes to plastic recycling standards and product symbols. Silly me. Turns out the whole area is a minefield – businesses labelling their products recyclable when they are not, different local councils with different rules, different rules applying to local and overseas markets, products without symbols indicating they can be recycled when they cannot be – and so on. A dog's breakfast, indeed. It's time to fix this problem. Consumers must lobby their elected representatives and boycott companies that make misleading and sometimes dishonest claims about their products. Jane Mundy, Balgowlah
According to Hannah Kennedy's article, many of the product symbols commonly used are misleading and incomprehensible. What about simply having 'Recyclable in Australia' shown on all relevant containers and packaging? It would be simple and effective and make it easy for all to do the right thing. Wendy Crew, Lane Cove North
Latham can't be avoided
Unless a government has an absolute majority, it will need to work with independents and minor party members to get legislation passed, regardless of political persuasion, moral compass or alleged sins of said parliamentarians. Why, then, do we demonise the NSW government for working with Mark Latham on matters of policy and law (' NSW Labor vowed not to work with Latham. The reality is complicated ', July 19)? He is a member of Parliament and as such, his vote counts. The government is not supporting Latham; it is asking him to support them on political matters. I don't see a problem. Gerianne Rudd, Toowong (Qld)
We read that Liberal Upper House leader Damien Tudehope worked with Mark Latham to oppose Labor's controversial cuts to the workers' compensation scheme, which seems to have angered Premier Chris Minns. Yet the premier had no qualms about collaborating with the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party to try to push through these same cuts. The premier has opened the door to a plan by Shooters to establish a new 'hunting authority'. Apparently, Latham's alleged personal foibles count for more than the risk of allowing shooters to intrude onto public land and blast away at supposedly 'game and feral animals'. The approval of night shooting and guns with silencers is a chilling prospect. It would not only be a tragedy for wildlife but for unwary members of the public. Shooters will even be paid a bounty for the kill. We presume that won't be paid on people who cop a bullet. Jan O'Leary, Springwood
Correspondent Jack Robertson decries the 'wowserish curtain-twitching and public hysteria about private and consensual sexual behaviours' concerning Mark Latham (Letters, July 19). Meanwhile, Latham was found to have defamed lower house MP Alex Greenwich to the tune of $140,000 in damages in a tweet targeting Greenwich over his sexuality. Can your correspondent please clarify the difference between his pearl-clutching concern about Latham's 'private and consensual sexual behaviours' and the aforementioned Mr Greenwich's 'private and consensual sexual behaviours'? Nick Andrews, Bellevue Hill
Trump's Achilles
Be very careful, Mr Trump ('Trump taunts Murdoch as he files $15b lawsuit over Epstein story', July 19). You may have been able to dismiss some of your loyal followers over the Epstein saga, and even rid yourself of your biggest donor, Elon Musk. However, Rupert Murdoch is another matter altogether. If you alienate Murdoch, keep in mind his empire has been, and will be, there for a lot longer than four years. Perhaps Murdoch's critics might forgive him for everything if he rids the world of this serial pest. Mary Lawson, Marrickville
I read that Trump is suing Murdoch for $15 billion for defamation. His lawyers claim a newspaper article 'malign[s] President Trump's character and integrity'. Question: how can a convicted criminal have character and/or integrity worth $15 billion? Peter Duffy, Burra
Has Trump finally done something useful in suing Murdoch? Or has Murdoch actually given us some truth in his rags, calling out a convicted criminal? Paul Fergus, Croydon
Wow, I almost find myself in the very strange position of wishing Murdoch well. Judy Hungerford, Kew (Vic)
Houses of God
I think correspondent Jacqui Keats is being rather uncharitable on the subject of churches building high-rise unit blocks (Letters, July 19). Now more than ever, churches need income, especially to house and sustain their ministers and priests, and all the help and succour they give to society besides providing spiritual support to the community. Churches are also suffering the high cost of living and if it means building high-rise apartments, then so be it. Lynne Zahra, Epping
Correspondent Tony Doyle wrote that high-rise apartments built by churches were closer to heaven, but with all those extra cars, they will also need deeper basements. It gets satanically hotter parking down there. Yours warmly. Russ Couch, Woonona
Respect the planet
Millie Muroi has written an important article about the need for 'clear goals' concerning environmental management (' Like ChatGPT, we need clear goals and rules. Otherwise, we could make bad decisions ', July19). After all, if we don't know where we want to go, it doesn't matter which bus we get on. Unfortunately, the goals we espouse involve growth, especially in terms of the economy and population size, both of which being achieved at the expense of the environment. Since this environment provides our life-support system, it is increasingly imperative to address these damaging growth factors and find sustainable, ethical alternatives. Alan Jones, Narraweena
At US behest
Does anyone believe that the delivery of the 49 Abrams tanks promised to Ukraine was delayed because of 'logistics challenges' (' Australian tanks arrive in Ukraine after nine-month wait ', July19)? I believe it's more likely the nine-month wait was caused by the need to gain Washington's approval. Australia is at the mercy of United States decision makers – or maker. We have out-of-service, US-made Abrams and don't need them. Ukraine does. Australian pledged to help Ukraine, and in October 2024 we said we would send them 49 tanks immediately. The ABC and others report that the United States refused to give us permission to send the tanks to Ukraine. How could Australia have gotten in this deplorable position? Why would our sovereign country need any other country's permission? This raises the question of what else we need permission from the United States for. Carol Dance, Wollstonecraft
Ages of consent
While many politicians favour lowering the voting age in Australia and elsewhere, there doesn't seem to be a similar enthusiasm for lowering the age at which young people should be treated as adults in court (' Could Australia follow UK's 'shock' move to lower voting age to 16? ' July 19). If 16-year-olds are mature enough to have an equal voice in selecting the government, surely they are mature enough to accept the consequences of their illegal actions as an adult. Or is this lowering of the voting age just pandering for votes rather than a well-reasoned view of maturity? Remember, once the voting age is lowered, there will be no going back. Steen Petersen, Nanaimo (Canada)
Not appy, Jen
Thank you, Jenna Guillaume (' The app-ocalypse: Please, I beg, don't make me download one more app ', July 19). I find the world of apps exhausting. Like Jenna, I try to avoid them by using my trusty computer, yet somehow I end up with that dreaded word 'app'. Am I sounding like a grumpy old woman? Perhaps I could find an app to help me. Philippa Reiss, Port Macquarie
Harmony to discord
Best meme from that kiss-cam moment (' CEO of $1.5b tech firm appears caught out on Coldplay 'kiss cam'? July 19)? 'Coldplay haven't released any singles for ages – but they created two last night.' George Zivkovic, Northmead
Bastardly act
Richard Glover's article about Australian English, including our multiple meanings of the word 'bastards' – from insult to compliment to collective noun – jogged my memory about a story from the 'bodyline' Ashes series in the 1930s (' Do Australians have the best possible version of English? ' July 19). After a particularly acrimonious session, English captain Douglas Jardine stormed into the Australian dressing room to demand an apology after he had been sworn at by an Australian player. Vic Richardson, the Australian captain, called the team together and asked 'which one of you bastards called this bastard a bastard?' Ian Morris, Strathfield
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
9 minutes ago
- ABC News
Dutch defence chief warns Australia to increase military capability
The Netherlands' chief of defence has warned Australian leaders the country needs to counter China's military rise by increasing its own defence capability. General Onno Eichelsheim, visiting Australia for the Talisman Sabre defence exercises, warned the threat posed by China to the Indo-Pacific is not unlike that Russia poses to Europe. And he says "naivety" should not allow Australia and other countries to avoid preparing for the risk of conflict in future. "You should look at the facts that are around you … if Russia tells us that they want to have more, more influence, than take that seriously," he said. "And if you see in this case in this region, China building up, take it seriously and get ready for something that you hope will never happen. "If you prepare for war, you can avoid war. And that's how we look at it." The Netherlands recently agreed to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP, alongside most other NATO countries. The decision came in part due to pressure from the United States for NATO countries to provide more for their own security. Australia has faced its own pressure from the United States to lift defence spending to the same level. General Eichelsheim said 3.5 per cent of GDP would provide the Netherlands with the capability the country needs, given the security situation in Europe. He said while the focus on GDP percentages was not important, there was no doubt Australia would need to do more. "It's not about the percentage, it's about the capabilities," he said. "But inevitably, I think Australia has to increase its capabilities as well, if you look at the region, and the build-up in this case of China. "Also, if they need to help out Europe, which [Australia is] actually already doing — if you look at the war in Ukraine, and supporting us there." In April General Eichelsheim issued an order to the country's 76,000 defence personnel, both uniformed and civilian. The top-ranking Dutch military official warned they needed to increase their readiness and be ready for rapid deployment. He said the message was sent for two reasons: that a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine might need to be protected, and that it might lead Russia to shift its attention elsewhere. "We know that [Russia has] the ability, if there is a ceasefire, they can move within one or two years to other locations where they can threaten, for instance, the Baltic States," he said. "So we need to be ready to defend that line as well. And that is not that much time, to be honest." The Netherlands is one of 19 countries taking part in the Talisman Sabre defence exercises, which are jointly organised by Australia and the United States. The Dutch defence personnel taking part are also joined by other European militaries like France, Germany and Norway. Asked why the Netherlands is taking an interest in the region, and how he views the security situation in the Indo-Pacific, General Eichelsheim said he has real concerns. "We worry about the amount of capabilities that China is building up," he said. "Those are not capabilities that you only use for protecting yourself. There are also quite a lot of offensive capabilities in it. "Leaving it only to the US versus China is also not a good idea — so we've increased our partnerships a lot with Japan, the Republic of Korea, Australia, New Zealand and also the Philippines." The Albanese government has pushed back on the United States' calls for significant increases in defence spending, arguing spending is already rising quickly. The prime minister has argued Australia will set its own defence policy, and made the case that specific capabilities should be funded, rather than funding targets set and pursued. Asked about whether pressure might come from other allies rapidly increasing defence spending as a share of GDP, Defence Minister Richard Marles said those countries can see what Australia is doing. "We understand there is a process of international benchmarking, but ultimately every country, when it goes through its own processes about what kind of defence force it needs to build, does so based on assessing its own strategic need," he said. "And that's exactly what we're doing and I think countries can see that we are engaging in that process, it's an ongoing process and a process which up until this point has yielded the biggest peacetime increase in Australia's defence spending."
ABC News
9 minutes ago
- ABC News
Lowy Institute South-East Asia aid map reveals retreat of US and Europe from Australia's region
China is expected to fill a gap in aid funding to South-East Asia as the Trump administration dismantles United States development programs worldwide. The Lowy Institute's latest South-East Asia aid map warns some of the region's poorest countries, including Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, and Timor-Leste, will suffer due to $US60 billion ($92 billion) worth of aid cuts from the US. China would "continue to play a really big role as the region's infrastructure provider," said Grace Stanhope, a research associate with the Lowy Institute's Indo-Pacific Development Centre, who co-authored the report. "Infrastructure is certainly a soft power tool that China has used not only throughout South-East Asia, but in the Pacific, South Asia, all over the world," she said. Lowy's report cited China's construction of high-speed rail between the Indonesian cities of Jakarta and Bandung, as well as funding for Malaysia's East Coast Rail Link. Due to a delay in the public release of data, Lowy's report focused on the situation in 2023, since when major geopolitical shifts have occurred, not least due to the return of US President Donald Trump to the White House. After returning to office in early 2025, Mr Trump moved to abolish the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which had previously provided over 40 per cent of humanitarian funding worldwide. Major European development providers such as Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Sweden — as well as the European Union — have also withdrawn some $US25 billion ($38 billion) from their aid budgets. Despite enduring poverty and reliance on external aid for its economic survival, Cambodia saw Sweden end its bilateral aid program in 2024. Lowy's analysis found that while spending for humanitarian aid responses to natural disasters in South-East Asia had increased, support for longer-term climate adaptation in the region remained inadequate. Yet, she said Western nations had not made good on financial pledges for middle and low-income countries to aid their transition to clean energy. "If that support is not being delivered, we're at political risk of being perceived as not following through on our promises," she said. The world's entire aid and development system had been "rewritten and rebuilt" over the past six months, Ms Stanhope said. The Australian Council for International Development's head of policy and advocacy, Jessica Mackenzie, recently told the ABC's Pacific Beat that the US was previously the top contributor to the World Bank and Asian Development Bank, which would also have major flow-on effects. "A lot of projects are still coming down the line that are going to be cancelled from those [institutions]," she said. "The US was working on a lot of projects with DFAT [Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade] … as soon as that US funding is stripped, the whole project stops. The ABC revealed last week that the US had returned $1.5 million to DFAT, which Australia had provided to USAID to deliver a clean water project in Indonesia. Still, the Lowy analysis noted that South Korea and Japan remained major aid donors to South-East Asia. Ms Stanhope said the East Asian democracies had larger development programs than Australia and were able to use public finance to lend to South-East Asian countries to develop sectors such as energy, transport, and communications. "Australia can stick to doing our more traditional, very human-based development, and we can trust that for the infrastructure and the bigger-spending, more visible [projects] … Japan and Korea are very trusted partners," she said. Australia's expenditure on overseas development assistance is among the lowest of comparable rich countries, providing 19 cents for every $100 of national income in 2024, according to Oxfam Australia. "Outside of the OECD, Australia trails behind countries like Malta and Croatia, who give more as a proportion of their economies," Oxfam Australia's acting head Chrisanta Muli said earlier this year. But Ms Stanhope said Australia continued to play an important regional role, for example by being the largest development provider to Timor-Leste and running specialist programs focused on gender, climate, and disability.
West Australian
39 minutes ago
- West Australian
Trump says he will help Afghans stuck in the UAE
US President Donald Trump says he will help Afghans detained in the United Arab Emirates for years after fleeing their country when the United States pulled out and the Taliban took power. Trump, a Republican who promised a far-reaching immigration crackdown, suspended refugee resettlement after he took office in January. In April, Trump's administration terminated temporary deportation protections for thousands of Afghans in the US. "I will try to save them, starting right now," Trump said in a post on Truth Social that linked to an article on the Afghans held in limbo there. Trump cited news website Just the News as saying that UAE officials were preparing to hand over some Afghan refugees to the Taliban. Reuters has not confirmed the report. The UAE, a close security partner of the United States, agreed in 2021 to temporarily house several thousand Afghans relocated from Kabul as the Taliban ousted the US-backed government during the final stages of the US-led withdrawal. Nearly 200,000 Afghans were brought to the US by former president Joe Biden's administration since the chaotic US troop withdrawal from Kabul. Canada agreed in 2022 to resettle about 1000 of the Afghans still held in the UAE after a US request. It is unclear how many remain in the Gulf country. Some countries have forced Afghan refugees to return to Afghanistan. Nearly two million Afghans were returned from Iran and Pakistan in the past seven months, the United Nations said last week. Germany on Friday deported 81 Afghan men to Afghanistan amid a tightening of refugee admissions. Some other European Union countries are pushing to tighten asylum rules in the bloc. In the United States, Democrats have urged Trump to restore temporary protected status for Afghans, saying women and children could face particular harm under the Taliban-led government in place since 2021. Refugees include children cleared to reunite with their parents, relatives of Afghans already admitted and tens of thousands of Afghans who worked for the US government during the 20-year war. Shawn VanDiver, president of the #AfghanEvac advocacy group, urged Trump to follow up on his post with action. "President Trump has the authority to do the right thing. He should instruct DHS (Department of Homeland Security) and the Department of State to expedite processing, push for third-country partnerships, and ensure that we never again leave our wartime allies behind," he said in a statement.
