
Is this Britain's SMUGGEST high street? Locals in market town boast everyone 'wishes' they had shops like theirs and claim it is 'creative capital of England'
But this is Totnes, self-declared 'creative capital' of England, scourge of the chain store and home of what one independent retailer describes as a 'Goldilocks high street'.
Which is partly why by 11am the historic South Devon town is already thronging with shoppers - locals and visitors alike - and the coffee shops are buzzing.
At least, most are. The one representative of a major national café brand, Caffe Nero's Coffee#1, has only a couple of occupied tables in its comparatively spacious premises.
In fairness this may be because it stands at the top of the steepish high street, furthest from the main car parks.
Yet there can be no doubt that national chains, particularly coffee chains, are about as welcome in Totnes as a cold cappuccino.
Costa got the message 12 years when its attempt to launch in the medieval market town resulted in a residents' 6,000-name protest petition, 300 objections to planners and a natty campaign website, 'notocosta.co.uk'.
The company could have gone ahead but pulled out after then managing director Chris Rogers acknowledged that it was 'a town with a long and proud history of independent retailers'.
Since the successful revolt, locals in the region have managed to keep most big brands from encroaching on their cherished town centre, with some business owners claiming others 'wish' for a high street like theirs.
At Brioche café, front-of-house manager Gavin Brown, remembers Totnes's outrage well.
'The locals got so riled about that,' he said. 'There were fears that every national chain would start eyeing us up.
'People here have a strong sense that this town is the creative capital of England.
'There are lots of artistic retailers, lots of quirky shops. It was felt franchises would diminish the character of the place.
'Independence isn't the only reason Totnes has bucked the trend of run-down town centres.
'We have the coast, the moors, beautiful countryside and amazing history on our doorstep. It all helps attract visitors. But it also helps to look and be different.'
At the nearby Green Café, Yorkshireman John Pollard, agrees. He says Totnes is collectively 'a little curiosity shop' and it's a misconception that chains are cheaper.
'Our coffee is cheaper than Costa and our pasties cheaper than our nearest chain rival,' he said.
'Yes, Totnes is successful. I shudder to think what it's like for shops in similar small towns in the north of England.
'But we're also under pressure. Our business energy contract has been crippling. Taxes we pay to local and national government have hit five per cent of turnover. There's no support for family enterprises.'
John, 56, launched the business with his wife Sylvia Kerkar after returning from India three years ago. They try to employ young people and encourage entrepreneurship.
'Some are thinking about it,' he added. 'If they've learned one thing it is that you have to work hard and be resourceful.'
Across the road at Totnes Wine and Fine Foods owner Simon Moorman, a former investment manager, echoes his words.
'Relatively speaking, we're thriving,' he told Mail Online. 'Visitors all tell me the same thing: 'We wish our high street was like yours'.
Pictured: Coffee#1, a subsidiary of Cafe Nero, and the only coffee chain in Totnes centre. The area has a history of fighting against the establishment of chain brands, including campaigning against the opening of a Costa in 2012
'But almost every Totnes trader I know is cutting back on hours or the number of people they employ.
'The notion that this government supports growth is absolute crap. Business rates have doubled, the minimum wage and national insurance contributions have increased and local parking charges have rocketed.
'Why is anyone surprised that high streets are in trouble.'
His words ring true but every trader we spoke to agreed that Totnes would be in a whole lot more trouble if its independent stores had to compete with an influx of major chains.
At the Fayre Trade Fairy, a mother-and-daughter run fashion store which supports suppliers across the world, 24-year-old Rosie Sage says the town's strong sense of community keeps her in business.
'If H&M moved next door to us we'd be finished,' she said.
'I used to live on a shopping street in Exeter next to the city centre. Premises would change hands every year because no independent trader could compete with the big brands up the road.
'That doesn't happen in Totnes because we have a really strong community willing to fight to protect what it has.'
Some of the protection is in-built, as Nigel Jones of the family-run East Gate Bookshop points out.
'Having a medieval high street means that most shop premises are comparatively small – 2,000 sq ft or less,' he said.
'This doesn't work for most major chains who typically want at least 5,000 sqft to fit their business models.
'It helps protect the rest of us. Although we have a few chains such as WHSmith, Mountain Warehouse, Fatface and the like, they have already snapped up the larger premises. There are few opportunities for other big brands to move in.
'It's also important to point out the obvious - we have a beautiful and unique town which is a draw in itself for visitors.
'We're a Goldilocks high street. Not too big, not too small and always tempting.
'But we're not a mini theme park. Locals have butchers, greengrocers and all the other shops they need to stay functional.
'It's old fashioned but it's not Ye Olde Totnes.'
Up the road, Conker Shoes proprieter Simon Gwilt is proudly maintaining a trade that has been part of Totnes for hundreds of years. A shoemaker himself, he employs two others full-time using skills that have changed little.
'Too many high streets look exactly the same, wherever you are in the country,' he said.
'Our shops all look very different. That's what adds to Totnes's character.
'We have locals and visitors as regular customers. They like the idea of hand-made shoes which are properly sustainable. We design them so they can eventually be re-soled.'
Shoppers we spoke to were universally enthusiastic about a shopping trip to Totnes.
While the town's population is a modest 8,800, it is a retail magnet for residents from surrounding villages.
The mayor says the fact there are 300 listed buildings, of which some 280 are on the high street, means that it is an automatic deterrent for chains as it comes with extra costs
Pictured: An independent store called Revival. The market town sits within the South Devon Area of Outstanding Beauty and so attracts many visitors to the area
Sue Keeler makes a regular 30-mile round trip from Kingsbridge, in the South Hams, precisely because she enjoys the day out.
'I love the place,' she said. 'It's great shopping here, a relaxing experience – you can wander round a beautiful town packed with shops you won't find anywhere else.
'I feel for people who are denied that because their town centre shops are run-down or boarded up.'
At Zappa's 'plant-based' café, assistant Kerry Hope says the importance of surrounding villages is key to the local economy.
'We serve regular groups who are on a coffee-shop crawl – like a pub crawl but cheaper, she said.
'Local people do not like the big chains. That applies as much to the natives as those who have come down from London to live here.
'There's no doubt though that visitors sustain our businesses. Some shops would never get through the winter without the summer trade.'
Before we leave we call in on Town Mayor Tim Bennett, who proudly dons red robes, white gloves, and a gold chain before advising that he's the 592nd Mayor of Totnes.
'There was a time when you could only be Mayor if you bought another gold link for the chain,' he said.
'My predecessors clearly thought this a good way of keeping out the hoy-palloy.
'What's the secret of our success? There's no single thing. A lot is built up about residents keeping out big chains such as Costa but in truth we aren't really what most chains are looking for.
'There are 300 listed buildings in Totnes and some 280 are on the High Street. So moving in to any of those premises is going to come with costs.
'We have a decent retail mix now. The chains don't dominate and our independent shops have a fair chance to succeed.'
Under the town's famous clock tower Tim is spotted by visitors who question whether he is Mayor or Town Crier. Either way, they want a selfie. He's happy to oblige.
'The Town Council knows the importance of holidaymakers,' he said. 'But we can't rely only on our summer trade.
'Street markets are vital. I know of shops which take more money during our three Christmas markets then they do for the whole of the rest of the year. Without that income they would go to the wall.
'We are under no illusion. Totnes lives and dies by its High Street.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The landlord tax trap stopping home owners renting out their spare rooms
Homeowners looking to earn some extra cash from renting out a room to a lodger are being snared by a tax trap. Households can let out a furnished room and earn up to £7,500 a year tax-free without notifying the tax office. But the allowance hasn't risen in nine years, despite rental prices shooting up in that time as the cost of living has risen. Housing expert Matt Hutchinson, director of house share site SpareRoom, says the freeze on the Rent a Room Scheme's tax-free threshold is putting off would-be landlords. He says that if just one in 20 of Britain's spare rooms were rented out to lodgers, it would add the equivalent of a city the size of Birmingham to the nation's housing stock. Mr Hutchinson says that if the threshold had risen in line with RPI inflation – which includes costs associated with home ownership – it would now be £11,500 and cover 94 per cent of UK postcode areas. He also thinks a higher threshold would mean more rooms coming on to the market. Among those worst affected by the freeze are homeowners for whom lodgers are a useful source of extra income, as the cost of living and mortgage rate rises have added substantially to bills. Alex Hobbs, 29, a manager in the construction industry, took in a lodger when he was looking for a way to help cover his mortgage on a two-bedroom flat in London after the pandemic lockdown. But the tax threshold – and the cost of getting an accountant to check he was correctly declaring his income – has now put him off. He says: 'The cost of living had hit all my different household bills. Interest rates had gone up on residential mortgages, so I was giving myself that security and peace of mind that I wouldn't be stretched too thin. 'So I decided it would be sensible to rent out a spare room. He [the lodger] was quite sociable, so we became friendly, and it was quite nice because it gave me a bit of company sometimes.' Mr Hobbs says that renting out a room covered half his mortgage payments, and the tax-free allowance, which works out at £625 per month, was a major benefit. 'I was charging £750 a month and then he paid separately for a share of the bills. Then I realised you had to pay tax on rent over £625 a month. 'I thought the allowance was quite low. I had to get an accountant and pay their fees, and it was a lot of work. I know that other tax allowances have been frozen too, but the personal income tax allowance has at least changed in the last ten years, and the lodger allowance hasn't.' Mr Hobbs has now moved further out of London and into a one-bedroom home, so he no longer has a spare room to rent. However, he says he would have considered buying a bigger property and relying on one or two lodgers if it hadn't meant completing a tax return each year. The Rent a Room scheme is open to households who let a furnished room in their main home to a lodger. Even tenants can make use of it, although many leases can forbid sub-letting and require special permission from the landlord. Mr Hutchinson campaigned for the threshold to be lifted from £4,250, or £354 a month, to the higher rate in 2016. At this point £7,500 covered average room rents everywhere except London. But data from SpareRoom shows average room rents have increased by 21 per cent across the UK, and by 34 per cent in London over the past nine years. Mr Hutchinson says: 'It's not just the money – people can be really scared about tax and adding complexity to their finances. 'If you look at Office for National Statistics data and the number of houses in England and Wales with one or two spare rooms, there's about 26 million. So even renting out 5 per cent of those rooms would create a city the size of Birmingham but spread out across the country.' Frozen income tax thresholds mean the bill for breaching the allowance can be larger if someone has been dragged into a higher tax bracket by the extra income. Laura Suter, director of personal finance at the investment platform AJ Bell, says: 'It means that, for some, once this tax and other costs of renting a room are taken into account, there isn't sufficient incentive for them to do it.' The question of hiking the tax-free allowance has been raised in Parliament, most recently in February when Baroness Watkins of Tavistock asked if the Government had considered raising it. Replying on behalf of the Treasury, Labour peer Lord Livermore agreed the scheme 'reduces and simplifies the tax and administration burden for those affected and has taken some taxpayers out of self-assessment entirely'. However, he added a rise was not on the cards, saying: 'At present, the Government believes that the Rent a Room Scheme threshold is set at an appropriate level.'


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JEFF PRESTRIDGE: Why is it so difficult to get our pensions in one place?
Nothing is straightforward when it comes to pensions. Complexity rules. It's one of the reasons more than 40 per cent of working age people are not saving enough for retirement. Many just don't understand the myriad rules governing pension contributions, permitted tax breaks and how funds at retirement can be turned into hard cash. As a result, they desist from long-term saving when they should be embracing it. This complexity extends to when people attempt to put their pension affairs in good order. Long gone are the days when people retired after working all their life for one employer. Now, unlike our parents who had one works pension to see them through retirement, we have a mishmash of pensions – some good, others not fit for purpose. Some we may have forgotten about or struggle to track down. Research by financial services company Hargreaves Lansdown shows more than one in five people have lost track of pensions accumulated over a lifetime of work. To address this, consumer groups have repeatedly called for the setting up of an online dashboard, allowing people to see in one place key details on all of the pension plans they have accumulated over their working life. Such a dashboard would be a game-changer, allowing people to piece together their pension jigsaw – and enable them to make better choices when saving and at the point of retirement. Yet despite promises by previous governments to get it off the ground, it has yet to see the light of day. Although a quango called the Pensions Dashboards Programme has been tasked with delivering the scheme, the project trundles on at a snail's pace. Pensions minister Emma Reynolds says the Government is committed to getting a dashboard over the line. But I doubt it will be fully operational before the next General Election in 2029. In light of such slow progress, Labour should listen to those calling for new rules governing pension switches. Pension switching and consolidation of plans makes great sense for many savers, giving them greater control over their long-term finances and the opportunity to benefit from lower fund fees. It's not for everyone. Some older pensions can include valuable benefits that would be lost if transferred to another provider. Yet overall, it is good for consumers and should be hiccup-free. Sadly, it isn't. Many providers make life difficult for want-away customers by dragging out transfers over many weeks and sometimes months. Scandalous. PensionBee, a relatively new pension kid on the block, wants the Government to introduce a ten-day pension switching guarantee, backed by law. It would be similar to the seven-day current account switching service (CASS) launched 12 years ago to stop banks dilly-dallying on account transfer requests. CASS's data indicates that of the 11.9 million current account switches completed since 2013, 99.6 per cent have been within the required seven working days. PensionBee's Lisa Picardo says pension switching delays 'have real opportunity costs – hampering engagement, costing people real money, limiting their choices and undermining trust in the whole pensions system'. To prompt change, PensionBee has set up a petition calling for 'faster, electronic pension transfers'. Bafflingly, there's no specific mention of the ten-day switching guarantee, nor the compensation savers should (must) get if the guarantee is breached. And the petition's title – 'legislate to mandate offer of electronic pension transfers and higher standards' – reads like it has been dreamt up by an actuary who has spent too much time immersed in the complexities of pensions. I can only assume there is method in the madness. As I said at the start, nothing is straightforward when it comes to pensions. Find the petition at Cashless tills have invaded our shops Paying for goods with cash at a supermarket should be a given. But many stores are rapidly turning invasive self-checkout services into near cashless zones. Think 1963 horror film The Day Of The Triffids, about an invasion of carnivorous plants. For example, at Marks & Spencer's store at London Paddington (the railway station I commute into and from five days a week), there are only a handful among the phalanx of self-checkout terminals that now accept cash. Debra Morrison, chief executive of charity CLASP, based in my home town of Wokingham in Berkshire, is a passionate advocate for cash. CLASP provides invaluable support to people with learning difficulties, encouraging them to express themselves, participate in a wide range of events, and live more independently. Its work is enlightening. Debra says cash is vital for most CLASP members who need to budget carefully and don't use credit and debit cards. It is also key for the elderly and others who eschew other payment methods. Debra is backing an petition – find it online at – calling for an end to the discrimination of cash users at self-service checkouts. Financial inclusion is an imperative. I urge you to sign the petition. Shame on Barclays for axeing ANOTHER service I hadn't heard of Barclays' 'sterling home service' until a neighbour of my partner mentioned it a few days ago. The service, introduced during the 2020 lockdown, enables people to order cash and have it delivered to their home rather than trundle off in search of a cash machine or a Barclays branch still open (good luck there). It has been a godsend for Edna who was 90 a couple of weeks ago and is not as mobile as she once was. It has enabled her to pay cash for at-home care, food deliveries and other needs besides. Sadly for Edna and other elderly people, Barclays is withdrawing the service on October 9. It says it was only meant to be temporary – and given it is now only used by a 'very small number of customers' (its words, not mine), it must be given the chop. The bank says the Ednas of this world can still get cash in other ways: via an ATM, getting cashback at a retailer or by asking for an 'authorised user' to be added to their account who can get cash out for them. Interestingly, it didn't mention the other option: withdrawing cash over the counter at a local Barclays branch. I draw two conclusions from this. Either Barclays feels it has shut so many branches (1,236 since 2015) that such an option is not worth mentioning. In Edna's case, the local Barclays in Wokingham, Berkshire, shut two years ago – and is now an ugly, empty shell. Or, that the days of permitted big cash withdrawals over the counter at Barclays' branches are drawing to an end. PS: There is worrying evidence that banks and retailers are turning their backs on cheques. If you have had difficulties banking a cheque or making a payment by cheque, email me at


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
73 Holyrood fat cats paid over £100,000 as satisfaction with public services falls
The number of Scots civil servants earning more than £100,000 a year has soared under the SNP, the Scottish Mail on Sunday can reveal. Taxpayers are footing the bill for a growing army of civil servants - many of whom are predominanty allowed to work from home - as satisfaction with public services plummets. Overall, the Scottish Government now employs an unprecedented 73 mandarins who are officially ranked as Senior Civil Service (SCS) - mostly heads of various departments and directorates. In total, this upper tier of civil servants now costs the public purse an astonishing £8.6m a year in wages, with the vast majority earning in excess of £110,000 - three times the Scottish average annual salary. Earlier this year the SNP administration's finance secretary Shona Robison slashed millions from the budgets for the NHS, mental health and transport, claiming Scotland was facing 'enormous and growing' financial pressure. Despite this, the number of senior civil servants employed to run the country has grown sharply - as has the cost. At the same time, the civil service has come under fire for its refusal to abandon 'working from home' and for a 'sick-note' culture in which government staff take far more days off than workers in the private sector. Critics have attacked the 'out of control' cost to taxpayers and accused the SNP Government of getting its priorities all wrong. Scottish Conservative spokesman for finance and local government Craig Hoy said: 'The civil service, and the cost of it, have ballooned out of control under the SNP's watch, and by far the biggest expansion has been in those on the highest salaries. 'When Scots are paying the UK's highest taxes, but seeing worsening services, there 's no excuse for fat-cat pay packages of this sort.' Callum McGoldrick, researcher at the TaxPayers' Alliance said: 'At a time when public services are clearly under pressure, it's hard to justify the steady growth in high-paid civil servants at the top of the Scottish government. 'With budgets being squeezed across the board, Scottish taxpayers will be asking whether ministers have got their priorities right. 'The focus should be on improving services for the public, not inflating the salaries bill in Holyrood.' The Scottish Government recently published its annual list of Senior Civil Service staff, reflecting the situation at the end of March. Overall there are now 73 SCS on a wage bill of totalling £8.6m. The number is higher than the 66 staff on six-figure sums last year, which had added up to a total wage bill of £7.5m. In comparison, there were 52 SCS on £100,000 in 2023, 38 in 2021 and just 14 as recently as 2018. The current list includes director generals of government departments - plus heads of directorates including Cladding Remediation, Covid Inquiry Response, Organisational Continuity and Heat In Buildings. The highest paid is Caroline Lamb, director general of the health department and head of the Scottish NHS, whose salary is listed between £205,000 and £209,000 a year. Four other staff are listed as earning over £150,000, including former Permanent Secretary JP Marks who took home £190,000 as the country's most senior civil servant before leaving in April to take up a new job as chief executive of tax agency HMRC. He was replaced by Joe Griffin, who in his former role as the Scottish Government's director general of strategy & external affairs earned £140,000 a year. The official responsible for the country's finances is director general of the Scottish Exchequer Alyson Stafford who takes home £160,000. The list shows a further nine civil servants earning between £120,000 and £150,000 a year. Most are director generals of departments including Communities, Corporate, Economy, Education & Justice, and Net Zero. Overall 45 officials earn between £110,000 and £120,000 a year - including the government's directors of Corporate Transformation, Digital, and Propriety & Ethics. Meanwhile the public are increasingly unhappy with the public services the government provides. A survey published earlier this year by research firm Ipsos shows almost three in four Scots (74 per cent) think public services in their local area have got worse in the last five years. Of those, 62 per cent believe the Scottish Government is mainly responsible for the deterioration. Half of Scots (51 per cent) say they are dissatisfied with the quality of health services, while 28 per cent are dissatisfied with the quality of primary and secondary education, and half (51 per cent) are dissatisfied with the quality of policing. The civil service has also been criticised for clinging to the working from home policies initially imposed in the wake of Covid. Since the pandemic in 2020, working from home or hybrid working has been the default option for many staff. New rules introduced to try and boost productivity mean that, from October, staff will have to turn up at the office at least two days a week. The figure is lower than the equivalent policy for civil servants working for the UK government in Whitehall, which states that civil servants must spend at least 60 per cent of their time working in the office. However the edict has sparked complaints from some Scottish civil servants about the cost of having commute more regularly to government offices in Edinburgh and Glasgow. Some have raised concerns about the environmental impact of driving themselves to work - while others have warned the order to return to the office is 'an attack on their human rights'. Separately it emerged in June that Scotland's civil servants last year took an average of 8.7 days off sick - the worst recorded rate of absence in the government's history, and more than double the rate across the private sector. Although levels of pay for SCS staff are reserved to Westminster, the size and hierarchy of the civil service in Scotland is a matter for the Scottish Government. Responding to the criticism levelled at it, the government argued that its senior civil servants brought valuable expertise - while also vowing to deliver 'optimum value' for taxpayers. A spokesperson said: 'Senior civil servants manage performance and delivery, and ensure the Scottish Government achieves its goals. They bring significant expertise and progress the government's plans for delivering on its Programme for Government. ' It also said its public service reform strategy will 'ensure every pound spent delivers optimum value' and will 'reduce the annual combined corporate costs of the government and Scotland's public bodies by £1 billion over five years'.