Effort blocked to move more Louisiana teenagers from juvenile to adult courts
After outcry from several corners of the legal community, Louisiana lawmakers scuttled a controversial proposal backed by Attorney General Liz Murrill that could have moved thousands of criminal cases involving children and teenagers from juvenile to adult courts every year.
The Louisiana Senate Finance Committee voted 6-5 Monday to reject Senate Bill 74 by Sen. Alan Seabaugh, R-Shreveport. The committee's decision came a few weeks after state voters overwhelmingly rejected a similar constitutional amendment.
The legislation would have mostly affected Orleans, Jefferson, East Baton Rouge and Caddo parishes, where juvenile courts operate separately from district courts.
Larry Frieman, chief deputy attorney general, told senators the bill was crafted specifically to address New Orleans juvenile court judges who are too lenient on the teens and children who come before them. 'They are one of the ones that have created this problem that we are trying to fix,' Frieman said.
Pushback for the bill came from a wide swath of people involved in the criminal justice system who often aren't aligned with each other. District attorneys, public defenders, judges and anti-incarceration groups all spoke out against the proposal.
'The logistics of it are not as simple as everyone seems to think,' said Kyla Romanach, chief public defender for East Baton Rouge Parish, who opposed the legislation.
Had it been approved, the bill would have allowed district attorneys and the attorney general to transfer 15- and 16-year-olds accused of felony crimes from juvenile courts to state district courts that mostly handle adult cases.
District attorneys and the attorney general also would have gained the ability to move cases involving children under 15 accused of any crime, misdemeanor or felony, from juvenile courts to city and parish courts that focus on adult cases.
District attorneys can already move 14-, 15-, and 16-year-olds into the adult criminal justice system, but only when they are accused of the most serious crimes such as murder, manslaughter and rape.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
The Louisiana Legislature also passed a statute last year that reclassifies all 17-year-olds as adults in the eyes of the criminal justice system. They are automatically tried in adult court and face adult prison sentences.
The attorney general's failed legislation would have further blurred the lines between punishments for adults and minors in Louisiana, though the additional children and teenagers transferred from juvenile to adult courts under the bill would have been subjected to juvenile law standards, Frieman said. Judges, prosecutors and public defenders from the four parishes with juvenile courts indicated the attorney general's proposal would cost their courthouses and offices hundreds of thousands of dollars each. District attorneys and public defenders from East Baton Rouge, Jefferson and Caddo all said they would have to hire more staff to track cases in juvenile and district court if the legislation had been approved.
Federal and state law also require minors to be separated from adult detainees. District courthouses in the four affected parishes don't have the appropriate accommodations for minors and would have had to retrofit their buildings. East Baton Rouge judges said the changes they would have to undertake at their courthouse would have cost between $3 million and $10 million, according to a legislative financial analysis.
Legislators initially delayed a vote on the bill last week over questions about the accuracy of the fiscal review attached to it. An earlier version didn't have as many of the potential costs included, in part, because State Public Defender Rémy Starns told the legislative staff to disregard information provided by his office.
Daniel Druilhet, a member of the Legislative Fiscal Office staff, said Starns asked him to ignore any costs public defenders had initially said would be associated with the bill when drafting the fiscal review.
'[W]hile I did receive an initial response from the Office of the State Public Defender, including information from those four jurisdictions related to potential costs, I was contacted by Mr. Starns on May 2, 2025, instructing me not to include that cost in the fiscal note,' Druilhet told senators at a public hearing last week.
In response to Druilhet's comments, the senators put off a vote on the matter for a week so a new financial write-up could be put together. Sen. Katrina Jackson-Andrews, D-Monroe, chastised Starns for intervening in the legislative process. 'I want our state employees to understand there's not a time when they can tell our fiscal office not to consider costs that have been submitted,' she said after Druilhet's testimony.
Starns told Jackson he had decided, after an amendment was added to the legislation, that the expenses his office had turned over to the fiscal office were no longer relevant.
Starns has been working closely with the attorney general on other criminal justice bills filed this session that would give Starns more authority over local public defender office budgets and personnel.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Live updates: Trump scrambling to announce trade deals ahead of self-imposed deadline
President Donald Trump is scrambling to announce trade deals before broad new tariffs on imports kick in on dozens of countries Friday, a self-imposed deadline that Trump says he is standing by. Results so far have been mixed. Trump announced the framework for a deal with South Korea on Wednesday but cast doubt early Thursday on reaching an accord with Canada after the country said it planned to recognize a Palestinian state — an unrelated move Trump opposes. Trump has only one public event scheduled Thursday: signing more executive orders. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt is scheduled to hold a briefing. The Republican-controlled Senate voted along sharply partisan lines Wednesday to confirm Joseph Kent as head of the National Counterterrorism Center, approving his nomination over objections from Democrats who cited his embrace of conspiracy theories and attempts to alter intelligence reports as disqualifying. Twelve House Democrats on Wednesday filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over what they say are illegal actions to limit in-person congressional oversight visits to federal immigration detention facilities. President Donald Trump said Wednesday he had reached a trade deal with South Korea ahead of a self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline before broad new taxes on imports kick in, though he also cast doubt on striking a deal with India, another of the United States' largest trading partners. Brown University reached an agreement with the Trump administration to restore federal research funding, the school's president and the White House announced Wednesday. Brown will not pay any money to the federal government as a result of the deal. The school does commit $50 million over the next decade to workforce development organizations in Rhode Island — a promise the university's president said aligns with the school's mission of service and community engagement.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Cooper's North Carolina Senate bid will put Medicaid front and center
Democrats are hoping health care will be a winning issue across the 2026 midterm elections and see North Carolina as the top potential pickup opportunity in their long-shot play to regain control of the Senate. They think Cooper's record as governor — working with and pressuring the GOP-dominated Legislature across two terms until he could expand Medicaid — makes him the perfect messenger. In his campaign launch video, Cooper previewed what will likely be a common line of attack. He accused Republicans of 'ripping away our health care' and threatening Medicare and Social Security 'just to give tax breaks to billionaires.' In his first television interview after announcing his candidacy, Cooper made it clear he wants to focus on Medicaid and affordability. 'We expanded health care to more than 670,000 North Carolinians. We were able to put a plan in place that helps address the high cost of living for North Carolinians by eliminating $4 billion in medical debt for 2 million North Carolinians,' Cooper told Rachel Maddow. 'We knew we had accomplished something, getting health insurance to people who had never had it before. Now, Washington Republicans are going to strip it away. I think that is such a contrast in this race,' he added. Health care looms over the race — likely between Cooper and Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley, who has President Trump's endorsement — in part because incumbent Sen. Thom Tillis (R) is not running. Tillis said he would retire rather than vote for Trump's massive tax cut and spending legislation. He called the legislation 'devastating' and was one of only three Republicans to vote against the bill after saying it would 'betray the very promise' Trump made about not touching Medicaid. The legislation is projected to push about 10 million low-income people off their health insurance over the next decade. Health policy research group KFF estimates 520,000 North Carolinians will lose their health insurance because of proposed changes to Medicaid and ObamaCare exchange health plans, and if enhanced subsidies expire at the end of 2025. Brad Woodhouse, a longtime Democratic strategist and president of the advocacy group Protect Our Care, said Cooper is going to spend the next year linking Whatley to the GOP Medicaid cuts. 'I don't know what positions Michael Whatley is going to take. He's a blank slate … but what he is tied to, it's Trump. And these cuts are Trump's, this health care disaster is Trump's. Michael Whatley can't separate himself from Trump,' Woodhouse said. When he first ran for governor in 2016, Cooper said he wanted expand Medicaid and help low-income residents afford health care. But he faced strong opposition from the GOP-controlled Legislature. Legislation finally passed in March 2023, spurred by a growing chorus of Republican support and the promise of more than $1.5 billion in additional federal money for the state. Health care resonates with voters across the political spectrum, and Cooper is likely to tout his ability to work across the aisle, which experts said is something that helped him consistently win in North Carolina even when Trump was on the ticket. 'Cooper is going to focus on where he knows best, and he's got the track record of six statewide elections under his belt to know how to best frame and message a campaign to North Carolinians,' said Michael Bitzer, a professor of politics and history at Catawba College. 'I think the argument that he will make is, 'We worked together across political aisles to get Medicaid expanded, and now Washington Republicans are cutting just about the same number as we expanded,'' Bitzer said. Yet in trying to tie Whatley to the 'big, beautiful' law, Cooper is going to face the same issue as Democrats nationwide: Most of the cuts in the law are back-loaded and won't take effect until well after the midterm elections. 'Clearly, he's going to bring up [Medicaid]. The problem is people aren't going to feel this until after the election takes place. So the trick for Cooper is going to be to remind people of how beneficial Medicaid expansion has been and get them to believe him about how bad it's going to be,' said Chris Cooper, a Western Carolina University politics professor. It's not clear Republicans will want to engage the former governor on Medicaid directly, and Bitzer said they have their own list of attacks. Federal campaigns often center on much more partisan issues than statewide elections, and Republicans have already started attacking Cooper as a radical liberal.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Redistricting war underscores growing power of state legislatures
The brewing war over redistricting is underscoring the increasing importance of state legislatures heading into the midterms. Texas Republicans unveiled a new set of proposed House lines on Wednesday, creating five more Republican-friendly districts ahead of 2026. Legislators in states like New York and Maryland are similarly beginning to take measures into their own hands amid the redistricting tit-for-tat. The broader turmoil over changing congressional lines is putting a fresh spotlight on state legislatures' ability to shape federal politics, though some experts say national donors still need to pay more attention to local races. 'So local races and state House races, state Senate races have always mattered,' said Republican strategist Jimmy Keady, who's worked on state legislative races. 'They're just becoming more important in the long run, because now they're directly influencing representation that is happening in the federal space. And I think the smart candidates are talking about that,' he added. Texas Republicans finally issued their proposal for a new House map, which will have major implications for lawmakers representing areas near Dallas-Fort Worth, Austin, Houston and the southern border. The Texas GOP currently holds 25 seats while Democrats hold 12. One other seat, represented by the late Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-Texas), awaits a replacement in a special election this November. The new map would add five House seats that would have gone for President Trump by double digits, increasing the possibility Republicans increase their majority in the congressional delegation to 30 House members. While the map is not set in stone, the larger redistricting process playing out in the Lone Star State has prompted other states — both red and blue — to consider doing mid-decade redistricting in response. More importantly, the broader battle over redrawing House maps is underscoring that state legislative elections can impact issues of national importance, including federal races. Mandara Meyers, executive director of The States Project, noted how Democrats narrowly lost key state House races in their bid to flip nine seats to gain a Democratic majority in the lower chamber in 2020. 'So little attention is paid to these state legislative races, and so few votes can make a difference, not just in winning or losing a single election, but in control of an entire legislative chamber,' she said. To be sure, state legislatures have been receiving growing attention for some time as they've become the epicenter over battles on issues like election certification, school choice and abortion access. While Republicans have been focused on state legislative races — particularly during the 2010 cycle with their REDMAP program, which saw key GOP gains down ballot in state houses — Democrats have struggled to match their Republican counterparts in terms of attention and fundraising to these critical races. Even though Democrats have started to outperform in special elections, including in states like Alabama and Iowa, several Democratic-aligned groups focused on state legislative elections said they've heard little interest from donors about the races, even amid the redistricting battle. 'A little bit,' Forward Majority CEO Leslie Martes told The Hill when asked if she had been hearing more from donors who were more interested in contributing given the redistricting news. 'One of our problems is that state legislative resources are further down the list for donors, that they want to fund federal work first,' she said, noting that 'the lack of dedicated funders for this work' is a problem. Mandara Meyers, executive director of The States Project, suggested a similar dynamic was playing out with her group. 'When we look at the issues that impact people's daily lives, we believe state legislators are the most important policymakers in the country, and yet again, much of the focus from donors, from the media, tends to be at the national level,' she said. 'So we are not seeing the kind of shift that we would like to see towards the importance of states.' In a memo released earlier this month by Heather Williams, the president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC), she pointed out that there would be consequences for the party if Democrats continued to prioritize federal races at the expense of down-ballot ones. She specifically pointed to redistricting as one reason why members of the party needed to start paying attention to state legislative races, noting 'Democrats are still digging themselves out of the hole we found ourselves in after the GOP executed their $30 million REDMAP strategy that gained them 20 legislative chamber majorities and the ability to unilaterally draw over 340 congressional districts.' 'To have a shot at winning and maintaining a Democratic majority in the House of Representatives moving forward, Democrats must reassess our failed federal-first strategy and get serious about winning state legislatures ahead of redistricting — not just in the final months of 2030,' she said, 'but starting now.' Some Republican groups are similarly invoking redistricting as reason for their party to continue paying attention to the key down ballot elections. 'The only way to halt the Democrats' relentless efforts to manipulate district lines is to win state legislative races cycle after cycle,' said Mason Di Palma, spokesman for the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC), in a statement, knocking Democrats for both advocating for redistricting commissions while also pushing for new map lines mid-decade in response to Texas. Despite the attention redistricting has received nationally, that issue isn't necessarily playing out in all states. Redistricting is particularly tricky for more evenly divided legislatures like Minnesota and Pennsylvania. A Minnesota Senate Republican spokesperson told The Hill in an email that they couldn't 'comment on any campaign activity, including donor conversations' but noted of the state's maps that they 'have not been contested or discussed as needing change.' 2024 Election Coverage The Minnesota House has a 67-66 edge, with Democrats looking to fill a vacancy after the assassination of former House DFL Leader Melissa Hortman. The state House has a power-sharing agreement between the two parties but a Republican speaker. The state Senate has two vacancies right now but has a slight 33-32 Democratic edge. Pennsylvania Senate Democratic Leader Jay Costa (D) similarly told The Hill that 'it's not being discussed as much' on the legislative side. The state Senate has a 27-23 GOP edge while Democrats hold a narrow 102-101 majority in the state House. 'The bigger issue is holding onto the majority,' he said, referring to the state Supreme Court majority and its retention races this year, 'and making sure Gov. Shapiro gets reelected, which I think he's the ultimate backstop in that regard on redistricting.'
