logo
Senate Declines to Block Weapons for Israel as Gaza Hunger Worries Grow

Senate Declines to Block Weapons for Israel as Gaza Hunger Worries Grow

Hindustan Times2 days ago
WASHINGTON—Senators rejected an effort to block U.S. arms sales to Israel, sticking with the increasingly isolated government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even as lawmakers of both parties expressed growing concerns about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The votes took on new prominence following an international outcry over images of malnourished babies and children. Global food-insecurity experts have said famine is unfolding in the enclave, where at least 16 children under age 5 have died of hunger-related causes since mid-July, according to a U.N.-backed report.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I., Vt.) led the effort late Wednesday on two resolutions to block the sale of weapons to the Israeli military over its conduct in the war against Hamas. In debate on the Senate floor before the vote, he held up a stack of papers that he said contained the names of children in Gaza who have died during the war and asked to put their names into the congressional record.
'The time is long overdue for Congress to use the leverage we have—tens of billions in arms and military aid—to demand that Israel end these atrocities,' he said.
Sen. Jim Risch (R., Idaho), who leads the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, spoke against the resolutions. 'The solution to all of this isn't to deprive Israel of the weapons it needs. The solution is in the hands of Hamas,' he said.
Sanders's proposals would prohibit the $676 million sale of two types of 1,000-pound bombs and guidance kits that direct them, along with tens of thousands of assault rifles. The resolution to block assault rifles failed with 27 in favor and 70 opposed. The resolution to block bombs failed 24-73. No Republican in the GOP-controlled chamber supported either measure.
Democratic support has grown since April, when Sanders forced similar votes. Notable Democrats who voted to block weapons sales after rejecting earlier measures to do so included Sen. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R., Ga.) this week became the first Republican lawmaker to say that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
President Trump said Tuesday the U.S. would partner with Israel on new food centers in Gaza but stopped short of providing further details or clarifying how any new efforts would differ from existing distribution sites. Earlier this week, Trump also appeared to reject Netanyahu's claim that there was no starvation in Gaza by citing images of children on television who 'look very hungry.'
U.S. allies are stepping up pressure on Israel. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the U.K. would join France in recognizing a Palestinian state, unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' to end the war in Gaza, among other moves. Canada said it intends to recognize a Palestinian state, if conditions including a new election are met.
Only 32% of Americans currently approve of Israel's military action in Gaza, a 10 percentage point drop since September, according to a Gallup poll released Tuesday.
Democrats have long grappled over how to navigate the divide between pro-Israel members and progressives who criticize the country's treatment of Palestinians. But cracks were also showing among Republicans, who have largely stood firmly behind Israel's actions following the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R., Ga.), long a skeptic of aid to Israel, this week became the first Republican lawmaker to say that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza. She also sparred online with one of Israel's top supporters in the House, newcomer Florida Rep. Randy Fine.
In a social-media post earlier this month, Fine said: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away,' casting reports of hunger as Hamas propaganda. Greene shot back in a tweet that questioned how Fine's constituents feel about his 'calls for starving innocent people and children.'
Pro-Palestinian activists said the Senate votes were a litmus test for whether lawmakers are willing to pair sharper rhetoric with meaningful action.
'We are at the tipping point of the famine,' said Beth Miller, the political director of Jewish Voice for Peace Action, the political arm of a group that has been protesting U.S. support for Israel since the beginning of the war. 'Senators who keep voting to send weapons to Israel are acting against the will of the American people,' she said.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.), the highest-ranking Jewish U.S. elected official, condemned 'the devastating levels of hunger, starvation, suffering and death' being documented in Gaza, calling them 'wholly unacceptable.' He has been an outspoken critic of Netanyahu. Still, he voted against the Sanders resolutions on Wednesday.
Schumer signed a letter led by Sen. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.) to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, saying the humanitarian crisis in Gaza is 'unsustainable and worsens by the day.' The letter urged the Trump administration to use diplomatic efforts to end the fighting.
Write to Katy Stech Ferek at katy.stech@wsj.com and Sabrina Siddiqui at sabrina.siddiqui@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Have we become so weak?" Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat on Trump's 25% tariff on India
"Have we become so weak?" Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat on Trump's 25% tariff on India

Time of India

time5 minutes ago

  • Time of India

"Have we become so weak?" Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat on Trump's 25% tariff on India

Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat has criticised PM Modi's silence on the 25% tariff imposed by the US, questioning the government's vulnerability to US interference in strategic matters. Trump's announcement of tariffs and threats of further penalties for importing Russian oil have sparked concern. The government is examining the impact and engaging with stakeholders to safeguard national interests. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his silence on the 25 per cent tariff imposed by US President Donald Trump on questioned whether the BJP government has become so vulnerable that discussions regarding strategic initiatives or oil procurement are subject to interference from US President Trump."Trump has created a state of confusion. Neither the government nor PM Modi made any statement in the House or took responsibility... Have we become so weak that even discussing strategies prompts interference from Trump?... The saddest part is when we discuss the trade balance, especially since we have about 130 billion dollars worth of trade with the US. Our position is strong on this, so there is no reason for America to dominate us... PM Modi should come forward and clarify the entire situation regarding India's decision... We are a sovereign country, but such interference contradicts the dignity of the nation," he on Wednesday made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25 per cent tariffs against India and threatened an additional "penalty" for importing Russian oil."I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care. We have done very little business with India; their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world," Trump later signed a fresh executive order imposing revised tariffs for 70 countries, including imposed on India's neighbouring countries are less than India's 25 per cent, except for Myanmar at 40 per cent. The new tariffs for Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan, and Sri Lanka are 19%, 15%, 20%, 19%, 15%, and 20%, new tariffs, outlined in a sweeping order signed on Friday (IST), will come into effect from 12:01 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on August the government told the Parliament on Thursday that it is examining the impact of the recent events and will take all necessary steps to safeguard the national interest. Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal made a statement in the lower House of Parliament a day after Trump announced the tariff. He later made a similar statement in the Rajya said the Ministry of Commerce and Industry is holding talks with exporters, industries and all stakeholders and gathering information on their assessment of this issue.

Why Smithsonian removed Donald Trump impeachment references from an exhibit
Why Smithsonian removed Donald Trump impeachment references from an exhibit

Hindustan Times

time35 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Why Smithsonian removed Donald Trump impeachment references from an exhibit

The Smithsonian Institution has quietly removed a reference to US President Donald Trump's two impeachment proceedings from a key exhibit at the National Museum of American History. The decision comes as the White House exerts pressure to offer a more positive and selective view of American history. A Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed its removal.(AFP) The label referencing all Presidential impeachment proceedings was added in 2021 to the museum's "American Presidency" exhibit under the section "Limits of Presidential Power." It also addressed Trump's unprecedented dual impeachments. A Smithsonian spokesperson confirmed its removal, which comes as the new Trump administration has called for intensified efforts to reshape how federal cultural institutions portray American history. Why were the impeachment exhibits removed? Smithsonian spokesperson Phillip Zimmerman said Friday that the section, which includes materials on President Bill Clinton's impeachment and the Watergate scandal that led to President Richard Nixon's resignation, needed to be overhauled. He said the decision came after the museum" reviewed our legacy content recently." "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance," Zimmerman said in an email. He said that in September 2021, the museum installed a temporary label on content concerning Trump's impeachment. "It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time," he said. But the label remained in place. "A large permanent gallery like The American Presidency that opened in 2000 requires a significant amount of time and funding to update and renew," he said. "A future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments." Did political pressure play a role? While museum officials framed the decision as part of routine exhibit maintenance, the timing has raised eyebrows. Since his return to the Oval Office, Trump and his allies have called for efforts to eliminate what they describe as divisive or unpatriotic narratives. In March, Trump issued an executive order entitled "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History," in which he alleged that the Smithsonian was beholden to 'a divisive, race-centred ideology.' He has placed Vice President JD Vance in charge of an effort to ensure no funding goes to "exhibits or programmes that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programmes or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy."

Russian Media Says ‘Indian Govt Did Not Ask Refineries To Stop Buying Oil From Moscow'
Russian Media Says ‘Indian Govt Did Not Ask Refineries To Stop Buying Oil From Moscow'

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

Russian Media Says ‘Indian Govt Did Not Ask Refineries To Stop Buying Oil From Moscow'

Last Updated: After Trump claimed India might have stopped buying Russian oil, reports have surfaced, claiming that New Delhi has not issued any such instructions to refineries. Amid Donald Trump's criticism of New Delhi's energy ties with Moscow, the Russian media reported that the Government of India has not issued any instructions to refineries in the country to stop their purchase of oil from Russia or explore other suppliers. 'The government did not ask refineries to stop buying Russian oil," news agency TASS reported, citing a governmental source. 'No instructions were also given regarding oil imports from other sources instead of Russia," the source added. Earlier in the day, news agency ANI reported, citing sources, that the Indian oil refiners continue to source oil from Russian suppliers. 'Their supply decisions are guided by price, grade of crude, inventories, logistics, and other economic factors," sources told ANI. The latest developments come as US President Trump said on Friday (local time) that he had 'heard" India was going to stop buying oil from Russia, describing the reported move as 'a good step". However, he added that he was unaware if it was true. 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard, I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens," Trump told reporters. More to follow… view comments First Published: August 02, 2025, 14:33 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store