logo
NATO aims to flatter, but Trump remains unpredictable

NATO aims to flatter, but Trump remains unpredictable

Donald Trump was in a bad mood when he left the White House Rose Garden for the NATO summit in The Netherlands.
The leader of the free world spoke of Israel and Iran like they were two underperforming contactors on one of his New York construction sites.
Perhaps his mood improved on Air Force One as it raced across the Atlantic — but the NATO summit in the Hague wouldn't be at the top of the president's list of things to cheer him up.
He's openly criticised NATO for several years — once describing it as obsolete.
Former officials within his administration have spoken of Mr Trump's episodic displays of contempt for the alliance, with some reports claiming he's threatened to withdraw the US from the organisation.
NATO's secretary-general Mark Rutte seems acutely aware that the other 31 NATO nations are concerned about Mr Trump's unpredictability and the fact he could remove the US's membership at any moment.
Many analysts believe this year's summit and Mr Rutte's recent comments are a deliberate attempt to flatter the president.
Mr Rutte is using the conference as a vehicle to urge member nations to up defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 and so far, aside from one hold out, it looks like he'll be successful.
Europe's defence spending has been a bug bear of Mr Trump who sees a modest investment in military operations as a way to shift the responsibility onto the US.
The White House will likely see Mr Rutte's constant lobbying and the fact he's discussed defence spending in almost every public engagement at the NATO event so far, as a big win.
He's also been fawning over Mr Trump in recent days — in a private message which the president later posted on social media, Mr Rutte showered the leader with gushing praise.
"Mr President, dear Donald, Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do. It makes us all safer."
Mr Rutte reportedly wrote in the message: "You are flying into another big success in The Hague this evening. It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5 per cent!"
The event also only requires leaders to be in town for about 12 hours rather than the standard two days.
As evidenced at the recent G7 event in Canada where Mr Trump dramatically left the event early to deal with what he said was "big stuff", the commander in chief likes these events to run short.
It's these attempts at flattery that may have led Mr Rutte to remark at the summit's opening forum on Tuesday that NATO members shouldn't worry about the US' commitment to the alliance.
"So my message to my European colleagues is: stop worrying so much. Start to make sure that you get investment plans done, that you get [the] industrial base up and running," he said.
"This is what you should work on and stop running around being worried about the US. They are there, they are with us.
"There is total commitment by the US president and the US senior leadership to NATO," he said, adding that its backing of the organisation came with an expectation that European countries and Canada would continue to increase their defence budgets.
But despite NATO rolling out the red carpet for the Americans, Mr Trump is refusing to temper his running commentary on the alliance.
While on Air Force One, Mr Trump raised doubts over his commitment to one of organisations cornerstone agreements — Article 5 — which states that an attack on one NATO nation is an attack on the alliance itself.
When asked whether he was committed to it, he responded: "Depends on your definition. There are numerous definitions of Article 5. You know that, right? But I'm committed to being their friends.
"I'm committed to saving lives. I'm committed to life and safety. And I'm going to give you an exact definition when I get there. I just don't want to do it on the back of an airplane."
The presence of Mr Trump has shifted the focus away from the purpose of the summit, which was to agree on a spending plan and discuss a way to restrict Russia's war effort.
The shortened summit means there will be no meeting of NATO's Ukraine council.
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who is an invited guest at the summit, told Sky News UK on the morning of the conference's first day that the war in the Middle East was diverting attention away from his country.
"It is a big problem, the political focus is changing, and that is understandable … and this may mean that aid from partners, above all the United States, may be reduced," he said.
Mr Zelenskyy was given centre stage at the first major event of the summit, where he addressed a defence industry forum and spoke of the enormous challenge his military were facing.
"We all understand that the source of this war and the long-term threat to the European way of life is Russia. But in reality, we are not just facing Russia alone," he said.
"We are facing a network of state and non-state actors that are serving the cause of aggression. This network includes Russia, North Korea, the current regime in Iran and Chinese companies."
Mr Zelenskyy has been critical of NATO's increased defence spending timeline saying it's too long and has warned that Russia may attack a NATO member in the next five years.
The Ukranian leader will meet with Mr Trump on the second day of the summit, in what is expected to be another eventful bilateral between the pair.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MSNBC host has meltdown over Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling
MSNBC host has meltdown over Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling

Sky News AU

time27 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

MSNBC host has meltdown over Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling

MSNBC host Symone Sanders Townsend has had a meltdown following the Supreme Court's ruling on birthright citizenship. During a panel discussion on Friday, Townsend called SCOTUS's ruling 'insane' as they voted in favour of US President Donald Trump's executive order. 'I just don't, I can't believe that we are asking the question, 'Is the 14th Amendment to the Constitution constitutional?' That is what, it is crazy. And I am sorry, but people need to call, 'This is crazy,'' she said. 'They are asking us… They're asking us not to believe our own eyes and our own ears. They're asking us to go against everything that we know to be true. This is insane.' The Supreme Court recently handed the Trump administration a major victory in its efforts to block lower courts from upending its executive orders. The justices ruled 6-3 in favour of the Trump administration; the ruling will allow lower courts to issue injunctions but only in limited situations.

Head of nuclear agency concedes he ‘doesn't know' whether Iran's nuclear material remains intact
Head of nuclear agency concedes he ‘doesn't know' whether Iran's nuclear material remains intact

News.com.au

time36 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Head of nuclear agency concedes he ‘doesn't know' whether Iran's nuclear material remains intact

The head of the international agency responsible for monitoring Iran's nuclear development has made a troubling admission, conceding he 'doesn't know' whether the country managed to move its stockpile of enriched uranium to safety before the American strikes. Rafael Grossi is Director-General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Today he spoke to Face the Nation, a current affairs program on CBS News in the United States. 'People here are looking for clarity, and there's confusion,' host Margaret Brennan said. 'The Defence Intelligence Agency assesses that Iran's program was set back by a few months, but once they dig out they could resume in a number of months. 'The CIA and the Director of National Intelligence (Trump appointee Tusli Gabbard) say the facilities were destroyed and it would take years to rebuild. 'Israel says the military program is set back by many years. 'What's the truth here? What do you make of these assessments?' Ms Brennan could have also cited President Donald Trump himself, who claimed in the immediate aftermath of the strikes that Iran's nuclear sites had been 'obliterated'. Or Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who said 'Iran's nuclear ambitions have been obliterated'. Or White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who said the strikes 'took away Iran's ability to create a nuclear bomb'. 'You know what? This hourglass approach, with weapons of mass destruction, is not a good idea,' Mr Grossi said. 'All of that depends on your metrics. If you tell me it will take them two months or three months – for what? 'The capacities they have are there. They can have, in a matter of months I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium. Or less than that. 'But frankly, one cannot say that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there. Because first of all, it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it is not total damage. But Iran has the capacities there, industrial and technological capacities. 'If they wish, they will be able to start doing this again.' He did concede that Iran's 'protective measures' ahead of the American strikes could have included the 'movement of materials', as suggested by a series of satellite images from the days beforehand, which showed trucks leaving the Fordow nuclear facility. 'We don't know. We saw the same images that the whole world has seen,' Mr Grossi said, referring to those satellite images. The fear, here, is that Iran managed to move its stores of highly enriched uranium to safety. Ms Brennan noted that Iran possessed 'just under 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium' before Israel and the United States launched their attacks. 'Do you have any idea where that was moved, and if it was moved before the attack?' Ms Brennan asked. 'We presume, and I think it's logical to presume, that when they announced they were going to be taking protective measures, this could be part of it,' said Mr Grossi. 'But we don't know where this material could be, or whether part of it could have been under attack during those 12 days. 'Some could have been destroyed as part of the attack, but some could have been moved. 'There has to be, at some point, a verification. If we don't get that verification, this will continue to hang over our heads as a problem.' Ms Brennan said she was probing at the 'open question' of whether Iran 'could sprint towards a bomb'. 'If we don't know where the highly enriched uranium is, and cannot account for all the centrifuges, is that still a risk?' she asked. 'We don't want to be alarmist here, and I don't want to be part of a messaging that would be spreading alarm,' said Mr Grossi. 'But we need to be in a position to confirm what is there, and where is it, and what happened. Iran had a very vast, ambitious program. Part of it may still be there. And if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there. The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country, in terms of nuclear technology. 'You can't disinvent this.' He stressed that 'we are not going to solve this in a definitive way militarily'. 'You are going to (have to have) an agreement, and an inspection system,' he said. Mr Grossi's point, repeated throughout the interview, was that Iran likely retains the capacity to develop nuclear weapons, despite the damage caused by America's attack. 'There is an agreement in describing this as a very serious level of damage. It can be described in different ways, but at facilities where Iran used to have capabilities in treatment and enrichment of uranium, (that has) been destroyed to an important degree. Some is still standing,' he said. 'So there is, of course, an important setback in terms of those capabilities. This is clear. Now the important issue is, what are the next steps? 'I think we have a snapshot of a program that has been very seriously damaged, and now what we need to focus on is the next steps.' He said he 'wholeheartedly' supports Trump envoy Steve Witkoff's attempts to reach a negotiated deal with Iran, but 'it's not going to be easy' in the aftermath of the strikes. Ms Brennan pointed out that Iran's parliament just passed a law saying it would not be co-operating with the IAEA, and the country's Foreign Minister had specifically said Mr Grossi would be barred from entering the country. 'This is why it's so important that we sit down around the table,' said Mr Grossi. 'Iran is party to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. That implies that they need to work with the agency. 'So we have been going through this law they approved, and we see that they are talking about co-operation on the basis of the security and the safety of their sites. I think that is not incompatible with the inspection work that needs to take place. 'At the end of the day, this whole thing, will have to have a long-term solution.' Pressed on whether Iran was kicking out IAEA inspectors, Mr Grossi hinted the answer was no, though he did not say as much directly. 'An international treaty takes precedence. You cannot invoke an internal law to not abide with an international law,' he said. 'I think we have to go down into the details, because the work will have to continue. Otherwise nobody will have an idea of what is happening in Iran. Iran will continue with a nuclear program, the contours of which are yet to be seen.'

Barnaby Joyce says ‘bipartisan concern' in US about PM meeting Trump
Barnaby Joyce says ‘bipartisan concern' in US about PM meeting Trump

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Barnaby Joyce says ‘bipartisan concern' in US about PM meeting Trump

A Coalition heavyweight has called on Anthony Albanese to lock in a meeting with Donald Trump after two of the staunchest supporters of the US-Australia alliance urged the Prime Minister to visit Washington. Six months have passed since Mr Trump's inauguration and Mr Albanese is yet to secure an in-person meeting with the US President. Australian producers have been slugged with tariffs on most exports to the US, including duties of up to 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, and doubts loom large about the Trump administration's commitment to AUKUS. The Albanese government has also made Australia an outlier in the West on defence spending, refusing to budge after Washington's request to hike it to 3.5 per cent of GDP amid alarm bells over China's military build-up. Speaking to Australian media, Republican representative Michael McCaul and Democrat colleague Joe Courtney said Mr Albanese would benefit from a one-on-one with Mr Trump. 'For (Albanese) to come to the White House would be a great gesture on the Prime Minister's part, that I think would go over very well,' Mr McCaul told the Australian Financial Review. 'That would be very sound advice for him to do that.' Mr McCaul and Mr Courtney are co-chairs of a congressional working group on AUKUS, which the Trump administration is reviewing. Asked about the comments on Monday, Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek said she was 'sure the Prime Minister's very much looking forward to' meeting Mr Trump. 'We're awaiting confirmation of a suitable time, and I'm sure when that confirmation comes through, the Prime Minister will be very happy to visit Washington,' she told Seven's Sunrise. 'He's had a number of calls with President Trump.' Ms Plibersek noted there had been numerous meetings at the ministerial level, including Foreign Minister Penny Wong's upcoming Quad summit in Washington. She also praised Australia's ambassador, Kevin Rudd. 'Ambassador Rudd … is the Energiser Bunny of diplomacy,' Ms Plibersek said. 'He will be meeting with all of the members of the congress and Senate and people close to Donald Trump. 'There's a lot of communication going on both ways, but it's not the sort of thing where you just pop in with a plate of scones, hoping someone's home.' But appearing opposite the senior minister, Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce took a different view. He said the approach was not good enough. 'Ambassador Rudd might be the Energiser Bunny, but he hasn't energised a meeting between President Trump and the Prime Minister of Australia,' Mr Joyce said. 'We've gotta do that. When two people either side of the political fence in the United States say 'you better get over here' – they've obviously got a genuine bipartisan concern.' He also blasted Mr Albanese for having 'four meetings with the leader of China but no meetings with the President of the United States'. Mr Albanese is finalising details for his state visit to China mid next month. It will be his fourth meeting with Xi Jinping since winning power in 2022. Asked at an early morning press conference if a meeting with Mr Trump was in the works, Mr Albanese replied: 'Yes.' Originally published as 'Genuine bipartisan concern' in US about when PM will meet Donald Trump, Barnaby Joyce says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store