Mixed Reaction As Councils Told To Halt Planning Work
Resource Management Act (RMA) Reform Minister Chris Bishop has put a stop to councils working on District and Regional Plans until the new RMA legislation takes effect.
''Rather than let these pricey, pointless planning and policy processes play out, we will be giving councils clarity on where to focus their efforts while they await the new planning system,'' Mr Bishop said at the Local Government NZ conference in Christchurch last week.
The shake-up of the RMA is expected to come into effect in 2027.
The Waimakariri District Council recently completed its District Plan, and barring any Environment Court appeals, it will become operative next month.
But the Hurunui and Kaikōura district councils are just starting out on their District Plan reviews.
Waimakariri Mayor Dan Gordon said he welcomed any initiative which streamlines planning processes and reduces the financial and capacity burdens on councils.
''However, it's essential that these changes still allow for meaningful local decision-making.
''Our recently notified District Plan represents a major investment in the future of our district, built on years of dedicated work and community engagement.
''Growth is important, but it must not come at any cost. We need development that is sustainable, well-planned, and aligned with the aspirations of our residents.''
Mr Gordon said local voices must remain central to local planning.
Hurunui District Council chief executive Hamish Dobbie said his council welcomed the pause, but he would seek some clarity around potential plan changes.
''We have held off doing it (the District Plan review) on the basis this (new legislation) was coming up and we didn't want to waste the effort.''
The Kaikōura District Council has been working through a review of its District Plan, which was adopted in 2008.
Council chief executive Will Doughty said the announcement will stifle the council's attempts to make changes to benefit the community.
''We have just awarded a contract to our consultants to work on the first two or three chapters.
''We always knew reform was under way, but we took an approach to respond to the needs of our community, while being flexible enough to review and respond to any changes.''
Mr Doughty said the council faced criticism that the ''rules are prohibitive'', so it was keen to update the plan.
Mr Bishop said money is wasted on planning review processes, which is required under the existing RMA.
''The Government will suspend councils' mandatory RMA requirements to undertake plan and regional policy statement reviews every ten years, and the requirement to implement national planning standards.''
Mr Bishop said there will be some exemptions, including private plan changes and natural hazards planning.
It means Cargill Station Ltd will be able to proceed with its private plan change to sub-divide sections in the Ocean Ridge development, south of Kaikōura, but the council may not be able to make any changes.
Other council leaders from around the country expressed frustration, following Mr Bishop's address, at not being able to make changes to fix any planning issues, while private developers are still able to submit plan change requests.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Shane Te Pou: Tāmaki Makaurau byelection a chance to test out campaign machine
No electorate belongs to any party and Peeni Henare (who was Tāmaki Makaurau's MP for three terms until he lost to Kemp by 42 votes) has every right to try to win the seat back. And, contrary to some claims that Henare winning would mean fewer Māori in Parliament, if he wins the electorate, Labour will have an empty list seat, with the next in line being the wāhine Māori Georgie Dansey. Labour's Peeni Henare was Tāmaki Makaurau's MP for three terms and is fighting to win the seat back. Photo / Mark Mitchell Having a contested campaign is good for Labour and Te Pāti Māori. It will allow both parties to give their election campaign machines a run and put forward their vision to people who have been hard hit by this Government's poor decisions and negligence. According to the latest census, construction is the biggest employer for Tāmaki Makaurau voters. It's also been a sector that's been hammered by the Government stopping large infrastructure projects mid-stream and cutting off funding for building more state houses. Oriini Kaipara is the Te Pāti Māori candidate for the Tāmaki Makaurau byelection. Photo / Supplied Fifteen thousand construction jobs have been lost in the past two years. Nationwide, the economy has lost 34,000 jobs in the past year and Māori unemployment is over 10%. Rising costs for basics such as food, GP visits, prescriptions, and electricity are hitting whānau who are dealing with job losses, all while being characterised as dole bludgers by a Government that seemingly has no solutions. With 79% of Tāmaki Makaurau voters renting, they're also feeling the pinch of continuing rent rises. The reality is most of our people work, but no matter how hard they work, even holding down two jobs, they just cannot get ahead in life. Many whānau live in overcrowded homes, with the constant spectre of having nowhere to live as the Government has brought back no-cause evictions and cut off access to emergency housing. Anyone who walks the streets of our largest city knows that the number of homeless people in Tāmaki Makaurau is growing, and many of them are Māori. Labour says its focus is on jobs, homes, health and the cost of living. Those are clearly key issues for voters, who are unimpressed by this Government's lack of delivery and their carelessness towards the hurt people are feeling. But voters aren't yet ready to fully embrace Labour – probably because of the lack of a vision and policy to go with those priorities. This byelection is an opportunity for Labour to start putting some meat on those bones and present themselves as an alternative government that people can trust with their vote. For Te Pāti Māori, holding on to Tāmaki Makaurau will be an important goal, to cement their hold on the Māori seats and prove that 2023 wasn't a passing high-tide mark, like 2008 was. It will also be a test of how they handle more mainstream media attention. Next year, National will spend a huge amount of money and energy trying to show that a vote for Labour is a vote for Te Pāti Māori and that they are too extreme to be let near power. It will be up to Te Pāti Māori to prove that fear-mongering wrong. Labour and Te Pāti Māori will need to use this byelection to show they can compete while keeping things civil and positive. Oriini Kaipara and Peeni Henare are excellent candidates, and I'm not making a pick on who will win. I am confident that whoever is elected will be able to represent our people well. I hope that the winner will work tirelessly for more jobs, more houses and better public services. Two years of cuts and negligence have left our people hurting. It's time for some hope.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Heather du Plessis-Allan: We are being irrational about the price of butter
Unless you're into commercial scale baking, butter is not the thing putting the most pressure on household budgets. Try power. This winter power is costing the average household almost a block of butter every day. Or rates. That's costing the average Wellingtonian more than a block of butter every day. Those expenses have no alternatives. You have to pay them. With butter we at least have alternatives. If we don't like the price we can do a swap. I don't want to be Marie Antoinette but at least we have the option to switch to margarine. Not only have we abandoned logic, but also facts. Even the Finance Minister briefly took to complaining that butter is cheaper in Australia than in the very country that produces it. Except that's not true. At the time of writing, if you take Woolworths' salted butter, which is available both sides of the Tasman, adjust for currency and the fact the Australian Government does not charge their equivalent of GST on butter, we actually pay 30c less. Discounting butter domestically is impractical, as it would require subsidies, impacting farmers and shareholders. Actually, the price of butter is a good news story for New Zealand. Because if we're paying our farmers more, the world is paying our farmers more. And they're buying a lot more blocks of butter than we are. So that means they're paying a good chunk towards our tax take, our health, our roads, our schools. It's become slightly fashionable to suggest the solution is to discount butter domestically. That's a nutty idea. A discount is a subsidy. A subsidy has to be paid by someone. Who? Fonterra? The shareholders will probably object to that. Maybe, if this drama runs on long enough and there is enough reputational damage to Fonterra, it might be in the business' interest to cut the price to make the pain stop. That would not be a good day for farmers and shareholders. Miles Hurrell attributes the 46.5% rise in butter prices to global demand and supply issues. Photo / Alyse Wright The Government? Again, bonkers. If New Zealand is too broke to afford the full Dunedin hospital build, we're too broke to help commercial bakers afford their butter. The truth is there is no fix to the price of butter that isn't stupid or temporary. We simply have to pay the price that we pay. And the Finance Minister knows this. She knows this because she is a very clever woman. And because she worked for Fonterra for six years. Finance Minister Nicola Willis has turned butter into the cost-of-living symbol. Photo / Mark Mitchell So, she should never have turned butter into the cost-of-living symbol she has. This really started with her in April when she visited Costco and was taken by the fact it could sell butter for about half the price mainstream supermarkets were selling it for. It became her evidence that supermarkets were ripping us off. But then somehow, Fonterra got dragged into it and one of their regular ministerial briefings became a please-explain. And then the TV news was chasing the CEO Miles Hurrell around the forecourt of Parliament and going live to air while the meeting was under way. And there were expectations. And then nothing happened. And it has become yet another example of the Finance Minister, disappointingly, talking big but doing nothing. Just like with the retail banks. And just like with the supermarkets, so far. Spare a thought for Hurrell. The man is one of the most impressive Kiwi CEOs of his generation but had to spend his week cast as the villain of the butter story. There is no story. It's not even the biggest pressure on our weekly bills.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Minister keeping eye on consent application
Environment Minister Penny Simmonds says she is "keeping a watching brief" as the application for treated wastewater being discharged directly into the Shotover River makes its way to the Environment Court. And Otago Fish & Game Council chief executive Ian Hadland says the council is confident authorities will handle the situation to safeguard the catchment's outstanding values, including water quality, fisheries and amenity values such as swimming. The Queenstown Lakes District Council (QLDC) began using emergency powers to discharge treated wastewater into the river — in order to bypass failing disposal fields at its Shotover Wastewater Treatment Plant — on March 31. Ms Simmonds said she was "aware of concerns" raised about the QLDC decision. "I understand that this is an interim approach while QLDC completes necessary upgrades to its wastewater treatment system," she said. "The need for upgrades to the system was acknowledged by QLDC in its evidence and considered by the panel in its recommendations on Te Pūtahi Ladies Mile Variation." Because the Otago Regional Council granted the QLDC request for its retrospective consent applications for the emergency discharge to be referred directly to the Environment Court she did not have further comment at present. "However, I am keeping a watching brief on the situation." Mr Hadland said the resource consent application was for a "temporary solution" for the Shotover wastewater treatment plant's issues. "We are pleased to see that they are referring it straight to the Environment Court and allowing the public to have a say, because there is high interest in this matter. "We will review the application at that point and consider a submission on behalf of our angling and hunting licence holders." The Kawarau River and its tributaries, which include the Shotover, were protected by a Water Conservation Order put in place in 1997 to safeguard the catchment's outstanding values, including water quality, fisheries and amenity values such as contact recreation, he said. "We remain confident authorities will handle this situation to ensure the provisions of the Water Conservation Order are upheld." Mr Hadland said Otago Fish & Game supported enforcement action taken by the regional council for QLDC consent breaches. "We recognise this is a complex legacy issue and the potential remedies are costly. "We're hoping the QLDC moves quickly on to finding a more permanent solution." Otago Fish & Game was at the forefront of litigation which secured the Water Conservation Order to protect the Kawarau River and its tributaries, he said.— APL
