
Global Times: Realizing high-quality development by eliminating 'rat race' competition
It is necessary to deepen market-oriented factor allocation reforms, proactively eliminate local protectionism, market segmentation and 'rat race' competition.
Based on a clear understanding of these cyclical challenges and a deep grasp of market dynamics, China, has prioritized comprehensive measures to address 'rat race' competition. This is a critical step to resolve current economic contradictions, key guarantee for deepening economic system reforms and effective path to promote enterprise innovation, elevate value chains and enhance developmental resilience.
Urgent need
Eliminating 'rat race' competition is a necessity for economic law.
Competition is the cornerstone of a market economy, but it can be either constructive or unfair. 'Rat race' or destructive competition defies economic principles, with clear drawbacks.
First, 'rat race' competition weakens industry competitiveness.
China's new-energy vehicle (NEV) sector has led global production and sales for a decade, contributing significantly to global carbon neutrality. However, concerns loom: In 2024, the NEV industry's profit margin fell to 4.3 percent, with only BYD, Seres, Li Auto and Leapmotor reporting profits, while many other firms had to cut R&D spending.
Excessive focus on price wars may boost short-term sales but squeezes profits, limiting innovation, technical progress and after-sales investment, ultimately undermining the industry's global competitiveness.
Second, 'rat race' competition disrupts industrial ecosystems.
To reduce costs, some firms abuse their market dominance to delay payments or shift burdens. In 2024, China's auto parts industry saw a 0.3 percent drop in profit margins and a 10.6 percent rise in liabilities.
Some firms' behaviors resulted in inferior products to crowd out quality ones, necessitating urgent ecosystem optimization.
Third, 'rat race' competition hinders the domestic economic cycle.
High-quality development requires strong innovation, demand responsiveness, brand influence and product quality. It should yield returns for investors, corporate profits, adequate wages and tax revenue.
'Rat race' competition, however, wastes resources in inefficient competition, stifling innovation, disrupting supply-demand balance, and reducing wages, tax revenues, and investment confidence, impacting the broader economy.
In recent years, China's 'new trio' products, namely NEVs, solar batteries and lithium-ion batteries, have thrived, lowering global green transition costs and diversifying energy supplies. Yet, high-input, low-output 'rat race' competition harms industry health and deviates from the essence of high-quality development.
Ongoing improvement
Eliminating 'rat race' competition is essential for a high-level socialist market economy.
What are the root causes of 'rat race' competition?
Taking the PV sector as an example. Total annual capacity surpasses 1,100 gigawatts, pushing down prices for polysilicon, wafers, cells and modules. On the other hand, some local governments continue to aggressively attract investment, offering land, policies and funds, with investments exceeding 800 billion yuan in 2024, according to incomplete statistics.
The 'rat race' competition stems from several factors, including supply-demand mismatch, imperfect market systems and misaligned local priorities.
The key to ending 'rat race' competition lies in coordinating the relationship between an effective government and a functional market.
The market plays a decisive role in resource allocation and the government better fulfills its role, which is part of the efforts to build a high-standard socialist market economy, read the resolution adopted at the third plenary session of the 20th CPC Central Committee in July 2024.
In early 2025, China unveiled a guideline for building a unified national market, explicitly aiming to curb unfair market competition and improper intervention.
Based on this guidance, provinces such as Guangdong and Zhejiang have accelerated fair competition reforms. These efforts dismantle regional 'small cycles' and market barriers, laying a foundation for unleashing domestic demand and eliminating 'rat race' competition.
On April 20, a set of measures to enhance the implementation of China's fair competition review regulations took effect, requiring that public affairs must conduct fair competition reviews when formulating laws, rules and policies related to business activities.
Ongoing improvements to foundational institutions are slated to foster a fairer and more dynamic market environment.
Reforms are gaining momentum. The more standardized government actions become, the more effective the market's role. To comprehensively address 'rat race' competition, it is essential to create a fairer, more vibrant market environment, achieving optimal resource allocation efficiency and maximum economic benefits.
Fueling economic cycle
Eliminating 'rat race' competition is essential for strengthening domestic economic cycles and building a unified national market.
On June 1, the regulations aimed at ensuring timely payments to small and medium-sized enterprises took effect, with 17 automakers committing to unify supplier payment terms within 60 days. Following the China Automobile Industry Association's initiative, multiple automakers pledged to foster a healthy, orderly industrial ecosystem.
As a result, relevant authorities are intensifying efforts to curb 'rat race' competition and promote high-quality development by expanding demand to grow the market, strengthening legal enforcement, driving upgrades through standards and with collaborative action across sectors.
The 15 percent subsidies for 3C products and 20 percent subsidies for home appliances and home goods have driven trade-in programs, with the Ministry of Commerce reporting 1.1 trillion yuan in sales across five major categories by May 31.
Leveraging the policies that aim to promote the large-scale equipment renewal and trade-in of consumer goods, China is unleashing the potential of its 1.4 billion people market to boost domestic demand.
A market economy thrives on the rule of law. Enhanced product consistency checks, anti-unfair competition enforcement and crackdowns on low-quality products, counterfeiting and intellectual property violations correct market failures. A better business environment and freer flow of resources promote survival of the fittest, helping industries escape the 'rat race' trap.
Strengthened standards help boost upgrades. In May alone, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology proposed four mandatory and seven recommended national standards, alongside 79 industry standards soliciting public opinions, while nine industries issued 421 standards.
Standards guide industries away from price wars toward value-driven competition, achieving both quantitative growth and qualitative improvement.
Industry associations are stepping up. As economic promotion organizations, industry associations serve as key intermediaries connecting the government, market, enterprises and society.
For example, the China Photovoltaic Industry Association promoted voluntary production control agreements, the Chinese Wind Energy Association set standards against predatory pricing, and the China Cement Association explored price coordination mechanisms. These efforts help normalize behaviors and sustain industry health.
Enterprises are also acting responsibly: State-owned enterprises revised bidding rules to prioritize technology and China's top 10 PV glass producers cut output by 30 percent.
With government guidance, industry self-regulations, and corporate accountability, eliminating 'rat race' competition is progressing steadily.
China's economy is like a vast sea, with enterprises as navigators. By fostering fair competition, innovation and a 'quality-over-price' consensus, China's economic ship is steering toward a future of high-quality development.
View original content: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-times-realizing-high-quality-development-by-eliminating-rat-race-competition-302493935.html
SOURCE Global Times
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
7 Kid Items To Stock Up on Before Tariff-Induced Shortages
If you've been following the news in recent months, you've probably heard a lot about higher tariffs being imposed on imported goods — especially those from Mexico, China and Canada. As a parent, you may also be wondering which kids items to stock up on before the stores run out. We're a Family of 5 Living on One Salary: Check Out: While you should only ever buy what you need, some experts believe it might be wise to make some purchases now — just in case those items disappear or skyrocket in price. Many kids toys (approximately 85% of those sold in the U.S., according to the Toy Association) are manufactured in China — one of the countries that'd be hit hardest by rising tariffs. Aaron Razon, personal finance expert at Couponsnake, said toys made in China are most likely to be in short supply due to proposed tariffs. This includes things like action figures, LEGO sets and Barbie dolls. These toys could also become more expensive — if you're even likely to find them on the shelves. Explore More: There could be a scarcity in kids' clothes, too, especially with back-to-school shopping. Razon said that coats, boots and other seasonal accessories could be harder to find. The same could be said for accessories like socks and underwear. But don't stock up out of fear. Only buy the things you already need for your kids. If consumers start to panic buy, retailers could potentially increase their prices accordingly. Some, especially online retailers, might also place limits on how much shoppers can purchase. Along those same lines, consider buying footwear — like athletic shoes or sandals — for your kids. Just don't go overboard with it. 'I think stocking up on these items could backfire on parents if everyone starts buying in bulk in anticipation of a shortage,' said Razon. 'I mean, apart from the fact that this could lead to a surge in demand, and potentially exacerbate the very shortage they are trying to prepare for, there is also the fact that it could lead to wasted resources.' Are you in the market for a new gaming console for your kids? You might only need the one console, but now could be a good time to buy. 'Tariffs affect kids and youth particularly hard since most toys, electronics and clothing are manufactured overseas, including gaming consoles,' said Liam Hunt, Director of Research at That's because many of these items are made in China and Southeast Asia. Gaming consoles aren't the only thing to consider buying. A lot of tech and accessories imported from abroad could become more expensive or see limited stock. Hunt suggested shopping early if you're looking for holiday gifts since prices will likely increase. Supply also tends to drop around these busier times. Tariffs have a trickle-down effect on both prices and availability. Things like bikes, scooters and backyard playground equipment could be in short supply due to tariffs. So, if you're in the market for any of these things, now might be the time to buy. 'It would be wise for parents to stock up on big-ticket items,' said Hunt. 'But avoid hoarding everyday items.' Do you have a little one on the way? Or are you already a proud parent (or grandparent, or aunt or uncle)? If so, you might want to grab essential baby gear like strollers or high chairs now. Razon said the availability of these items could also be impacted by tariffs. More From GOBankingRates These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs This article originally appeared on 7 Kid Items To Stock Up on Before Tariff-Induced Shortages


Forbes
23 minutes ago
- Forbes
Agentic Commerce And Payments, Money And Identity, AIs And APIs
Technicians work on the bionic humanoid robots at a workshop of Ex-Robots factory on June 23, 2025 ... More in Dalian, Liaoning Province of China (Photo by VCG/VCG via Getty Images). At the Merchant Payments Ecosystem conference in Berlin earlier this year, I saw Simon Redfern from the Open Banking Project (the people behind the Berlin APIs for open banking in Europe) give an eye-opening presentation on Disrupting Payments with Autonomous Agents and APIs in which he explored the impact of the shift to agentic commerce on the retail payments sector. In summary: huge. Agentic Commerce Within Reach? Despite the limitations of current AI models, I think that full agentic commerce is not that far away, and to those industry observers who think that consumers might be reluctant to hand over purchasing power to, I would merely point out that swathes of the population already use agents as therapists, as life partners and as investment advisors. It is a very small step for them to use agents to make payments! Given this impending shift, I am very curious about the fintech sector's strategic response, and I found Simon's insights particularly helpful and I have been reflecting on them in the light of recent activity around payments in agentic commerce environments. Announcement's such as Mastercard's Agent Pay initiative, Visa's Intelligent Commerce, Coinbase's x402 approach and Stripe's acquisitions have brought energy and focus to a payments sector that is on the cusp of radical change. (Stripe, in particular, is embracing the scale of change. With the acquisitions of Bridge and Privy, Stripe is not simply chasing the future of payments, it is building it. By bringing to together Bridge's stablecoin payment capabilities and Privy's embedded wallet infrastructure it is developing programmable, borderless finances delivered through APIs.) Anyway, back to Berlin. Simon identified three broad categories of impact that agents will have on retail financial services. I have labelled these management, optimisation and execution, and I found them to be a useful way of organising discussions in a financial services context: Management includes analysing data to provide insight, taking care of bills and subscriptions, looking after financial health issues such as savings plans and so on; Optimisation takes care of finding the best deals, selecting payment methods based on fees & rates, obtaining rewards and scheduling payments; Execution means making bookings, obtaining tickets, subscriptions payments, tracking prices and executing purchases at the best moment, applying promotional codes and loyalty points and so on. Now, it is one thing to draw some clouds on a whiteboard, of course, and quite another to drop down a level to begin to understand how agents will achieve the variety of impacts described above. I wrote recently how the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard that enables developers to connect their data sources and AI-powered tools, will accelerate the evolution of agentic commerce (a-commerce) so I thought it might be of interest to people to show how it is used in practice by returning to Simon's live demo (I know it was live because some of it didn't work and I take my hat off to him, because I would always rather see a live demo than a canned demo) of Opey, their agent for open banking. Open is informed by open banking protocol documentation so it can understand natural language questions and respond with well-structured answers (ie, combinations of API calls that will satisfy the data and service requirements for various use cases) by following a three step process: Parse: Opey ingests Swagger-defined API endpoints, organising them into structured, retrievable documents. Identify: Using vector similarity search, Opey interprets queries and identifies the most relevant API endpoints. Execute: Opey uses tools to call the relevant APIs. Given my obsession with identity, Simon's comments on access control caught my eye. They all look like people to me. Simon made the point that existing open banking access controls operate under broad consents, whereas agentic access controls need more dynamic and granular permissions. Some examples that he gave were 'allow this agent to make travel-related payments but not other purchases' and 'this agent can only approve transactions under €500 unless I manually confirm'. He is correct, and indeed this is where the Visa, Mastercard and Paypal announcements mentioned earlier have all focussed. If you look at Visa's approach, for example, they onboard agents to their Visa Intelligent Commerce platform and then when the agent wants to make a purchase of 'their' consumers, the consumer uses a passkey to give permission and then the agent obtains a payment credential (ie, a network token) to give to the merchant. Importantly, and this is obviously one of the key roles that the networks can provide, the transaction outcome is shared with the platform in order to facilitate dispute resolution. Agentic Commerce Needs Identity The need to identify agents (whether to register them with a network or for a wide variety of other reasons) provides some amazing growth opportunities in the digital identity world and I strongly agree with the noted venture capitalists at Andreessen Horowitz who call for agents to be given a single, portable 'passport'. I might disagree with them about the need for agents to use a single passport (for privacy-related reasons I can see the agents might need multiple, non-correlatable identities) but they are right to say that there is no way to know how to pay the agent, know who the agent is working on behalf of, or trace its reputation. Agents need access to an identity infrastructure the works across all interfaces (eg, email, Slack, inter-agent and whatever). Without this infrastructure, every applications needs to rebuild the plumbing from scratch. How should we build this infrastructure? Well, why reinvent the wheel when we already know that verifiable credentials (VCs) are a viable way forward? This means new businesses springing up and I saw an article saying that one of these businesses will be granting agents access to our VCs to get stuff done on our behalf, but actually I think that's not quite right. We don't want AIs to present our verifiable credentials we want AIs to present their own verifiable credentials that we have consented to authorise. In other words, my bot shouldn't show up at a bank pretending to me: it should show up at a bank as a bot acting on my behalf. Now, this makes digital identity for bots more complicated, but also more flexible. I can safely say that the ABCs of digital identity (that is, know-your-Agent, know-your-Business and know-your-Customer) should be front and centre in the strategies of financial services organisations looking to take advantage of the shift to agentic commerce.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
At China's robot school, machines learn like humans, teacher uses VR headset
A specialized training facility in China has taken on its first cohort of 'robot students'. Located in Hefei—capital of the eastern province of Anhui—this new 'robot school' is being used to teach robots technical skills, such as holding and using tools. The robot students are taught fine motor skills by a human teacher a wearing virtual reality (VR) headset and holding motion-sensing controllers. According to reports, one student robot arm is learning how to pick up a wrench and tighten a screw using this method. The school, technically referred to as an embodied intelligent robot training environment, is essentially a high-tech training ground for robots, situated on a simulated factory floor. "Our aim is to train robots to generalize from one example to others, so that they can perform reliably no matter the setting—and that only comes through real-world exposure," said Ji Chao, founder of a robotics company based in Hefei and a developer involved with the training facility. "The service-based support model allows robot developers to purchase professional services regarding computing power, training scenarios, and data acquisition for algorithm iteration at reasonable costs, thus creating a virtuous circle," observed Sun Dandan, an executive at the robotics division of China's International Advanced Technology Application Promotion Center, which is independently running the program. At present, robots from various Chinese companies are being taught how to function in specific work scenarios. These include, but not limited to, logistics and warehouse handling, picking and sorting parts, home assistance, and providing retail and tour guide customer service. The training curriculum is pretty intense at the school, with human trainers inputting 200 action sequences per day per robot. These actions are collected as real-world physical data (not just code or simulations). Each robot uses this data to train machine learning models, which will eventually enable it to perform the task autonomously. The idea is not just memorizing a motion (e.g., turning a screw) but understanding how to adapt on the fly, such as recognizing different types of screws. Real-world training like this exposes robots to unpredictable scenarios such as uneven surfaces, dropped tools, and unusual objects, which simulations often struggle to replicate well. The training is believed to help enhance the robots' ability to generalize across environments, making them more effective in real-world applications. The school is the first public robot training platform of its kind in China. It offers shared infrastructure like computing power, datasets, and realistic environments, which is rare and expensive for smaller companies to build alone. The initiative also supports various business models, and companies can co-run, operate independently, or purchase training and data services. The program helps bridge the 'gap', or the disparity between simulated training and actual performance in the real world. It also promotes collaboration, standardization, and scalability in China's growing robotics sector. The ultimate goal is to expedite the development of more capable, general-purpose autonomous robots. To sum up, the robot school is something of a real-world machine learning lab for robots which would enable them to work more independently in factories, warehouses, homes, or stores eventually.