Buckingham praises GRS government
Published on: Fri, Jun 13, 2025
By: Sherell Jeffrey Text Size: Princess Anne and Hajiji. Kota Kinabalu: The GRS State Government led by Datuk Seri Hajiji Noor, particularly the State Finance Ministry, was praised by Buckingham Palace for the initiative to erect clear signages on both wings of arguably the earliest, modern and among the best medical institutions in Borneo and the nation – Hospital Queen Elizabeth. Accompanying the signages were the erection of a historical gallery detailing highlights of the hospital since its inception in 1957 at a cost of 2.5 million pounds sterling funded by British taxpayers and premiere of a special documentary titled 'The Queen's Hospital in Borneo' for Youtube.
Advertisement Princess Anne, in her capacity as President of The Duke of Edinburgh's Commonwealth Study Conferences, expressed appreciation for the endeavour. 'The hospital has provided essential medical treatment for more than 60 years and also trained countless doctors and medical specialists, ensuring the people of Sabah receive the best medical care the Government can offer,' Princess Anne said in her message, which was read during the ceremony at the premises, Thursday. 'I was pleased to be reminded of my visit to Kota Kinabalu in 1972 with my parents and to hear about the impact of The Queen Elizabeth Hospital on the local people of Sabah,' she said. Princess Anne acknowledged the project's importance, noting that the initiative, led by the Commonwealth Association of Leadership Malaysia (Calm), would ensure that the hospital's name remains a visible landmark and a beacon for health services in Malaysian Borneo. 'The initiative led by Calm, the hospital's administration, the Ministry of Health Malaysia and the project funder, the Sabah Minister of Finance, reminds us of the warm relations that the United Kingdom and Malaysia enjoy as members of the Commonwealth and highlights the importance of collaboration, service and shared heritage,' she said. Daily Express, Sabah's leading newspaper, was a strategic partner. Credit is also due to the Sabah Archive and the Information Department. The hospital that has undergone major upgrades was named after the late British monarch after the colonial administration approached her Majesty's permission in 1956 and it was granted. Two other renowned hospitals named after the Queen are in Hong Kong and Perth, Australia. It started with just 140 beds under a single matron, a single nurse tutor who trained the first batch of 17 nurses, 34 medical assistants and two church Sisters. Today, this has expanded since to 775 beds and the past 70 years has seen the many new types of treatment being possible from its highly trained medical staff. State Finance Minister Datuk Seri Masidi Manjun said he had no hesitation to accord the State Government's backing for the initiative, when approached by CALM. He said he and others only had many nostalgic memories of the hospital. He acknowledged there would always be those who question the retention of colonial-era names, but that it is high time these people realise and accept that history can never be erased. 'Sometimes we are too obsessed with these matters. Instead, we should be asking how we can make this hospital better, not its name. The name reflects history, but what is needed is how you make this hospital's services improve from day to day. We should depart from this mentality of giving so much emphasis on form rather than substance. 'We cannot escape from history that once upon a time we were a British colony,' he said, noting that he was a successful product of the British school system and even oversaw the centenary celebration of colonial rule during Berjaya era in 1981 while serving as Tuaran District Officer. The British presence in North Borneo as it was known then dates back to 1881 with the beginning of Chartered Company rule. 'We have to accept our history as a form of education which makes us more knowledgeable humans,' he said, and thanked CALM, especially its President Yap Li Ling for spearheading the commendable effort. He was also full of praise for the hospital's workforce, describing Malaysian healthcare workers serving in Sabah as the best in the country. 'I am very proud to say as a Sabahan, some of the most dedicated people, the frontliners, are those working in hospitals and forever we are thankful to all those serving in Sabah's hospitals past and present,' he said, acknowledging also their dedication during the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Today we are actually looking back and writing the history of this hospital again, looking at its current state and looking forward with hope for additional facilities and amenities. 'We take a small step to show history, but this small step hopefully will bring goodness and great happiness for us to be proud of in the future,' he said. Masidi acknowledged the hospital's ongoing parking problems, which also affect the Sabah Women and Children's Hospital in Likas. 'This parking problem is an issue and challenge that needs to be addressed quickly,' he said, adding that the matter has been raised repeatedly in State Cabinet meetings. He said Sabah Health Exco Datuk James Ratib would meet with relevant parties in Kuala Lumpur to expedite solutions to this persistent problem. 'I also fully support the suggestions made by State Health Deputy Director (Medicine) Datuk Dr Abd Kahar Abd Asis for one more block at QEH. I will fully support it and will speak to the Prime Minister and Federal Finance Minister to accelerate funding for this new construction and a multi-storey parking facility. Also present were Queen Elizabeth Hospital Director Dr William Gotulis and Sabah Publishing House Deputy General Manager Dexter Yeh, among others. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
06-07-2025
- Daily Express
Costly private or over-burdened govt hosps?
Published on: Sunday, July 06, 2025 Published on: Sun, Jul 06, 2025 By: Lee Ke Yin, Tee Chen Giap Text Size: RECENTLY, Malaysians have been bombarded with headlines about rising medical costs, forcing many to either pay up, or forgo private healthcare, and turn to the 'near-collapsed' public healthcare system. Both are undesirable options. Meanwhile, across the globe, just a few months ago, Luigi Mangione, in a moment of rage and desperation, pulled the trigger on Brian Thompson, the CEO of a major US health insurance company. Advertisement The impact of the gunshots that were fired in New York still continue to ripple throughout the world. To some, it was an act of senseless violence. To others, it was the breaking point for a man who saw himself as a victim of a healthcare system that decides who gets to live and who doesn't. While Malaysia's healthcare system differs significantly from that of the US, we are similarly facing a dire healthcare crisis: Malaysians find themselves trapped between unaffordable private care and an overstretched public system struggling to provide essential services. As our country navigates this two-pronged healthcare crisis, what can be done before it collapses and creates our own Luigi Mangione? Generally, healthcare systems follow either the Bismarck model, developed by Otto von Bismarck, Germany's first chancellor, or the Beveridge model, developed by William Beveridge, a British economist-politician. The Bismarck model was adopted to build healthcare funded by private insurance and employers, as reflected in the US, while the Beveridge model gave birth to the taxpayer-funded National Health Service in the UK, which the Ministry of Health Malaysia (MoH) system is based on. However, as demand for healthcare grew, private hospitals, health insurance schemes and employer-sponsored medical benefits rapidly sprouted in the country. This was how the two-tiered healthcare system started in Malaysia: A taxpayer-funded public healthcare system and a market-driven, predominantly insurance-based private healthcare system. The key difference between the US' and Malaysia's healthcare systems is that while Malaysians can always rely on the 'safety net' of taxpayer-funded public healthcare, Americans do not have this 'privilege'. This prompts a crucial question: Is healthcare a fundamental human right, or is it merely a privilege dictated by power and economic forces? Malaysians know very well that our public healthcare system has long been overstrained. It suffers from overcrowding and extremely long waiting times. In some government hospitals, it is not unknown for patients in emergency departments to experience waiting times of over 24 hours before being admitted. The bed occupancy rate (BOR) in some hospitals has even surpassed 100pc, leading to the use of makeshift beds in corridors. Furthermore, the pressure on doctors and nurses is evident from the newspaper headlines that range from 'Malaysia's medical graduates glut' to 'It's back to a shortage of doctors', the contract doctors' strike (Hartal Doktor Kontrak), and the recent government mandate for longer working hours for government staff nurses. This issue is exacerbated by the low level of public healthcare spending, where the latest regional data in 2021 shows that it amounts to only 4.38pc of Malaysia's gross domestic product — significantly lower than our neighbours (Thailand 5.16pc, the Philippines 5.87pc, Singapore 5.57pc) and well below the spending level seen in developed countries (more than 10pc of GDP). While Malaysians often pride themselves on the 'cost effectiveness' of our healthcare system, it comes at the price of quality healthcare delivery due to a long-standing mismatch between supply and demand. All of this leads to poorer health outcomes for Malaysians, from delays in receiving crucial treatment to constraints in accessing more effective (but costly) treatment options. Till today, discussions among stakeholders have largely focused on public health, and the legal and economic aspects of the healthcare crisis. A crucial, fresh perspective needs to be introduced to the discussion table. As healthcare decisions and policies are enacted that benefit particular stakeholders while depriving others, these should be viewed as active exercises of 'biopower'. The term 'biopower' was popularised by an influential French historian and philosopher, Michel Foucault, in the mid-20th century. It refers to the state and institutions actively regulating lives, health, reproduction and mortality, with the ultimate goal of managing populations. In modern societies, power is no longer limited to traditional sovereign control, as it can manifest in more subtle mechanisms such as policies, health normalisation and surveillance — ultimately deciding who lives and dies within a population. In other words, it has shifted from a 'power to take life [away]' to a 'power over life', or rather, a power to 'help live and let die'. The state actively controls resource allocation and determines the standard of healthcare accessible to the population, shaping health outcomes through policy decisions. It has sadly become 'normal' for Malaysians to suffer complications of diabetes, such as heart disease, cancers, and including amputations, despite these being largely preventable especially when benchmarked against other nations. When diagnosed with diabetes, Malaysians often do not feel an urgency to regain control of their health due to the 'norm' set by current policies, budgets and healthcare standards — a downwards spiralling continuum. The fact that Malaysia is the most obese country in Southeast Asia — due to lifestyle, food and health literacy factors, all of which are influenced by policies through biopower — makes it even less surprising that we have the highest prevalence of diabetes in Asean. This forces us to confront a difficult reality: Who is being left behind or, to use the words of Foucault, 'to let die', in the pursuit of economic efficiency? On the other hand, in private healthcare, healthcare costs are skyrocketing, as seen in University Malaya Medical Centre's medical fees surging by over 200pc, to insurance companies reportedly intending to increase healthcare premiums by up to 70pc this year, until regulators intervened. While the existence of a two-tier system offers more options for Malaysians seeking medical treatment, many such treatments remain out of reach: Only 22pc of Malaysians are insured by personal medical insurance. More worryingly, a stark number of Malaysians are going bankrupt due to healthcare expenditure. Out of 8,321 debt default cases solved by the Credit Counselling and Debt Management Agency (AKPK) in 2015, some 14.3pc was due to high medical costs. The rapid rise in medical inflation will drive more Malaysians away from private healthcare, while further overwhelming the already strained public healthcare. At face value, the decision by faceless bureaucrats to hike medical fees can always be justified through economic reasoning. However, we must critically examine how the decisions of these institutions, even when driven by economic logic, can profoundly shape the lives of Malaysians. The framing of healthcare as a mere commodity — subject to market forces and investor returns — should be challenged, especially when discussions reduce it to a numbers game. Political philosopher Michael J Sandel's words are especially relevant: 'We cannot actually put a monetary value on human life ... to do so is to treat lives as commodities rather than as beings worthy of respect and dignity.' As healthcare costs continue to rise under the guise of economic necessity, we must first recognise this as an expression of biopower, where systemic policies and economic forces end up shaping who gets to live well and who is left behind. Observing the healthcare systems via the lens of biopower offers two major benefits: First, biopower reveals that healthcare is never neutral; it is shaped by policies that can reflect political agenda. Next, acknowledging this fosters crucial discussions surrounding healthcare injustices, and reinforces healthcare as a fundamental human right for all. Recent developments, including stakeholder engagements and public hearings by the Public Accounts Committee, mark a crucial step forward in fostering inclusive polylogue on healthcare costs. These discussions facilitate a comprehensive review of hospital charges and insurance premiums. Bank Negara Malaysia's decision to impose a 10pc cap on insurance premium hikes reflects an institutional willingness to balance economic considerations with public welfare. While efforts are made to evaluate inefficiencies and unjustified pricing distortions, the rakyat must exercise democracy themselves by actively participating in town halls and public hearings. This collective effort helps to hold leaders and policymakers accountable, serving as a counterbalance to the structural power that shapes healthcare outcomes in society. The Malaysian Philosophy Society urges the government to prioritise healthcare budget allocations to bring transformative changes to the public healthcare system. The long-held notion of national pride in a 'low cost and efficient' public healthcare model is no longer sustainable, as the widening cracks in the system make evident. To meet the growing healthcare needs of the population, proactive investments and systemic reforms are imperative. Apart from that, we echo the call for transparent pricing methodologies and ethical costing models used in healthcare to curb the exponential rate of medical inflation due to predatory practices. Ignoring these realities risks abandoning more lives from both fronts of healthcare sectors and recreating our very own Mangione in Malaysia. Lee Ke Yin is a content curator at the Malaysian Philosophy Society and a student at University Malaya. Dr Tee Chen Giap is a medical doctor and co-founder of the Malaysian Philosophy Society. The views expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of the Daily Express. If you have something to share, write to us at: [email protected]
The Star
04-07-2025
- The Star
Cancer patients, be wary of taking those popular obesity drugs
Popular weight-loss drugs like semaglutide can help people lose weight, but cancer patients should check with their doctors before taking them. — dpa Cancer patients must speak to their doctor before taking weight-loss jabs, a British charity has warned, amid a rise in people seeking help over whether they can take them. Macmillan Cancer Support said that while 'quick fixes' may seem appealing, there is currently not enough evidence over how the drugs might affect anti-cancer treatments. It said that more research is needed, but that it was already known the drugs may affect how other medicines are absorbed by the body. This may include some anti-cancer drugs, it said. The organisation's national clinical adviser Dr Owen Carter said: 'Recently, we have seen a noticeable increase in calls to Macmillan's free support line and a flurry of messages on our peer-to-peer online community about weight-loss drugs. 'We know that cancer affects everybody differently and it's understandable that lots of people are interested in new drugs which accelerate weight loss, particularly if they want to manage their weight before or after treatment for cancer. 'While 'quick fixes' may seem attractive, we simply do not know enough about the long-term impact of these weight-loss medications to recommend them if they're not prescribed by a specialist. 'Additionally, certain weight-loss medications carry warnings about a potential link with thyroid cancer. 'However, we know that eating well and staying as active as possible are proven to help people feel better, increase their energy levels and strengthen their immune systems, which can help them to manage their weight and cope better with cancer treatment. 'If you have questions about cancer, including about weight-loss drugs, we urge you to speak to your GP [general practitioner] or call the Macmillan support line [in Britain]. The charity said that it has now published new information on its website about the weight-loss drugs and cancer. – PA Media/dpa
The Sun
01-07-2025
- The Sun
UK arrests three in Lucy Letby hospital probe
LONDON: British police on Tuesday said they had arrested three senior staff at the hospital where nurse Lucy Letby was found to have murdered seven babies, on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter. Police launched a probe at the Countess of Chester Hospital (CoCH) in northwest England in 2023 after Letby was convicted and jailed for life for murders said to have taken place between 2015 and 2016. The probe aimed to find out whether the failure of hospital staff to act in the face of increasing deaths amounted to criminality. Detective Superintendent Paul Hughes said three people 'who were part of the senior leadership team at the CoCH in 2015-2016' were arrested on Monday on suspicion of gross negligence manslaughter. Hughes said the arrests, which were the first under the wider probe, had no impact on Letby's convictions. The three were not named and were released on bail. The Letby case shocked the nation during lengthy trials in 2023 and 2024, after which she was convicted for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven more. Letby, from Hereford, western England, was charged in 2020 following a string of deaths at the hospital's neo-natal unit, but has always maintained her innocence. The prosecution said she attacked her vulnerable prematurely born victims, often during night shifts, by either injecting them with air, overfeeding them with milk or poisoning them with insulin. But a panel of international experts said in February that the evidence used to convict her was wrong, and it was more likely that the babies had died from natural causes or bad medical care. Her defence team has applied to the independent Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) to probe whether there had been a possible miscarriage of justice in her two trials.
