
MarketAxess Announces Trading Volume Statistics for June and Second Quarter 2025
Select Second Quarter Trading Records
Total trading average daily volume ('ADV') of $49.0 billion
Total credit ADV of $16.8 billion
U.S. high-grade ADV of $7.8 billion
Emerging markets ADV of $4.0 billion
Eurobonds ADV of $2.7 billion
Municipal bonds ADV of $643 million
Total portfolio trading ADV of $1.5 billion
Total Open Trading ADV of $5.0 billion
Total rates ADV of $32.2 billion
Expand
Select Second Quarter 2025 Highlights* (See tables 1-1C and table 2)
The MarketAxess platform's strong year-over-year volume growth continued in June as volatility moderated through the quarter.
We delivered strong progress with our new initiatives across the client-initiated, portfolio trading and dealer-initiated channels that contributed to the record level of trading volumes across most products in the second quarter of 2025.
Client-Initiated Channel
Strong growth in block trading ADV with record ADV across U.S. credit block trading increasing 37%, emerging markets increasing 27%, and eurobonds increasing 100%.
Block trading in emerging markets and eurobonds both benefitted from the launch of our targeted block solution in late 2024, which has generated cumulative trading volume of approximately $2.0 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively, since launch.
Clients continued to leverage our algos in U.S. government bond trading, helping to drive a 57% increase in ADV to $30.8 billion with estimated market share of 2.6%.
Portfolio Trading Channel
Estimated market share of U.S. credit portfolio trading was 17.5%, compared to 15.1% in the prior year. 2
Dealer-Initiated Channel
Dealer-initiated ADV increased 40% to $1.8 billion, including record levels of eurobonds activity.
Second Quarter 2025 Variable Transaction Fees Per Million 1 (See table 1D)
The decline in total credit FPM compared to the prior year was driven principally by protocol mix. The slight decline compared to 1Q25 was driven principally by protocol mix.
The decline in total rates FPM both quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year was driven by the impact of product mix.
*All comparisons versus second quarter 2024 unless noted.
Table 1: MarketAxess ADV 3
Table 1A: Market ADV
Table 1B: Estimated Market Share 5
Month % Change Quarter Bps Change
Jun-25 May-25 Jun-24 MoM YoY
2Q25
1Q25
2Q24
QoQ YoY
MKTX ESTIMATED MARKET SHARE (%)
U.S. High-Grade
% of U.S. High-Grade TRACE (incl. SD PT) 5
20.2
%
19.9
%
20.2
%
+30 bps
–
bps
19.8
%
18.6
%
19.2
%
+120 bps +60 bps
% of U.S. High-Grade TRACE (excl. SD PT) 5
19.7
%
19.3
%
19.9
%
+40 bps
(20
)
bps
19.4
%
18.0
%
18.7
%
+140 bps +70 bps
U.S. High-Yield
% of U.S. High-Yield TRACE (incl. SD PT) 5
13.0
%
12.4
%
14.1
%
+60 bps
(110
)
bps
13.2
%
12.4
%
13.8
%
+80 bps
(60
)
bps
% of U.S. High-Yield TRACE (excl. SD PT) 5
12.4
%
12.2
%
13.9
%
+20 bps
(150
)
bps
12.7
%
11.9
%
13.5
%
+80 bps
(80
)
bps
Other Credit Products
% of Municipal Bonds MSRB
5.7
%
5.9
%
7.8
%
(20
)
bps
(210
)
bps
5.4
%
6.4
%
7.4
%
(100
)
bps
(200
)
bps
Rates
% of U.S. Government Bonds TRACE
2.5
%
2.6
%
2.4
%
(10
)
bps +10 bps
2.6
%
2.6
%
2.3
%
–
bps +30 bps
Expand
Table 1C: Strategic Priorities ADV 2
Month % Change Quarter % Change
Jun-25 May-25 Jun-24 MoM YoY
2Q25
1Q25
2Q24
QoQ YoY
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES ADV ($ millions)
Client-Initiated Channel
U.S. Credit Block Trading
$
2,672
$
3,070
$
2,292
(13
)
%
17
%
$
3,172
$
2,942
$
2,322
8
%
37
%
Emerging Markets Block Trading
1,860
1,451
1,469
28
27
1,626
1,562
1,283
4
27
Eurobonds Block Trading
462
637
235
(27
)
97
529
407
265
30
100
Portfolio Trading Channel
Total MKTX Portfolio Trading 2
$
1,193
$
1,455
$
868
(18
)
%
37
%
$
1,481
$
1,284
$
875
15
%
69
%
Total MKTX U.S. Credit Portfolio Trading 2
874
1,013
685
(14
)
28
1,112
1,070
724
4
54
Dealer-Initiated Channel
Total Dealer Initiated (DRFQ & Mid-X)
$
1,683
$
1,781
$
1,365
(6
)
%
23
%
$
1,795
$
1,856
$
1,283
(3
)
%
40
%
Other
Open Trading
$
4,553
$
4,777
$
3,960
(5
)
%
15
%
$
5,030
$
4,769
$
3,951
5
%
27
%
AxessIQ
158
189
140
(16
)
13
176
159
134
11
31
U.S. Trading Days 4
20
21
19
62
61
63
U.K. Trading Days 4
21
19
20
60
63
61
Expand
Table 1D: Variable Transaction Fees Per Million (FPM) 1
1
The FPM for total credit and total rates for June 2025 and second quarter 2025 are preliminary and may be revised in subsequent updates and public filings. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any fee information in future press releases.
2
Due to variances in how portfolio trading market participants utilized the portfolio trading TRACE 'flag,' the Company previously used its own internal methodology for calculating portfolio trading as an estimated percentage of TRACE volume and the Company's estimated market share. Starting in June 2024, the Company utilized the portfolio trading TRACE flag in its reported portfolio trading TRACE volume and the Company's portfolio trading estimated market share.
3
'Other Credit Products' includes municipal bonds, leveraged loans, convertible bonds and structured products.
4
The number of U.S. trading days is based on the SIFMA holiday recommendation calendar and the number of U.K. trading days is based primarily on the U.K. Bank holiday schedule.
5
'SD PT' is defined as single-dealer portfolio trades. The Company is currently highlighting the impact of single-dealer portfolio trading volume on U.S. high-grade and U.S. high-yield trading volume and estimated market share, but will continue to exclude single-dealer portfolio trading activity from each product's aggregated trading volume and estimated market share and the total credit FPM calculation.
Expand
General Notes Regarding the Data Presented
Reported MarketAxess volume in all product categories includes only fully electronic trading volume. MarketAxess trading volumes and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ('FINRA') Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine ('TRACE') reported volumes are available on the Company's website at investor.marketaxess.com/volume.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may contain forward-looking statements, including statements about the outlook and prospects for the Company, market conditions and industry growth, as well as statements about the Company's future financial and operating performance. These and other statements that relate to future results and events are based on MarketAxess' current expectations. The Company's actual results in future periods may differ materially from those currently expected or desired because of a number of risks and uncertainties, including: global economic, political and market factors; the level of trading volume transacted on the MarketAxess platform; the rapidly evolving nature of the electronic financial services industry; the level and intensity of competition in the fixed-income electronic trading industry and the pricing pressures that may result; the variability of our growth rate; our ability to introduce new fee plans and our clients' response; our ability to attract clients or adapt our technology and marketing strategy to new markets; risks related to our growing international operations; our dependence on our broker-dealer clients; the loss of any of our significant institutional investor clients; our exposure to risks resulting from non-performance by counterparties to transactions executed between our clients in which we act as an intermediary in matched principal trades; risks related to self-clearing; risks related to sanctions levied against states or individuals that could expose us to operational or regulatory risks; the effect of rapid market or technological changes on us and the users of our technology; issues related to the development and use of artificial intelligence; our dependence on third-party suppliers for key products and services; our ability to successfully maintain the integrity of our trading platform and our response to system failures, capacity constraints and business interruptions; the occurrence of design defects, errors, failures or delays with our platforms, products or services; our vulnerability to malicious cyber-attacks and attempted cybersecurity breaches; our actual or perceived failure to comply with privacy and data protection laws; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights or technology and defend against intellectual property infringement or other claims; our use of open-source software; our ability to enter into strategic alliances and to acquire other businesses and successfully integrate them with our business; our dependence on our management team and our ability to attract and retain talent; limitations on our flexibility because we operate in a highly regulated industry; the increasing government regulation of us and our clients; risks related to the divergence of U.K. and European Union legal and regulatory requirements following the U.K.'s exit from the European Union; our exposure to costs and penalties related to our extensive regulation; our risks of litigation and securities laws liability; our tax filing positions; the effects of climate change or other sustainability risks that could affect our operations or reputation; our future capital needs and our ability to obtain capital when needed; limitations on our operating flexibility contained in our credit agreement; our exposure to financial institutions by holding cash in excess of federally insured limits; and other factors. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. More information about these and other factors affecting MarketAxess' business and prospects is contained in MarketAxess' periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and can be accessed at www.marketaxess.com.
About MarketAxess
MarketAxess (Nasdaq: MKTX) operates a leading electronic trading platform that delivers greater trading efficiency, a diversified pool of liquidity and significant cost savings to institutional investors and broker-dealers across the global fixed-income markets. Approximately 2,100 firms leverage MarketAxess' patented technology to efficiently trade fixed-income securities. Our automated and algorithmic trading solutions, combined with our integrated and actionable data offerings, help our clients make faster, better-informed decisions on when and how to trade on our platform. MarketAxess' award-winning Open Trading® marketplace is widely regarded as the preferred all-to-all trading solution in the global credit markets. Founded in 2000, MarketAxess connects a robust network of market participants through an advanced full trading lifecycle solution that includes automated trading solutions, intelligent data and index products and a range of post-trade services. Learn more at www.marketaxess.com and on X @MarketAxess.
Table 2: Trading Volume Detail (continued)
Year-to-Date Ended June 30,
In millions (unaudited)
2025
2024
% Change
Volume
ADV
Volume
ADV
Volume
ADV
Credit
High-grade
$
942,398
$
7,662
$
861,438
$
6,947
9
%
10
%
High-yield
194,894
1,585
169,627
1,368
15
16
Emerging markets
489,376
3,979
431,632
3,481
13
14
Eurobonds
308,790
2,510
257,115
2,074
20
21
Other credit
76,447
621
59,705
481
28
29
Total credit trading 1
2,011,905
16,357
1,779,517
14,351
13
14
Rates
U.S. government bonds 2
3,488,973
28,366
2,282,713
18,409
53
54
Agency and other government bonds 1
153,450
1,248
80,132
646
91
93
Total rates trading
3,642,423
29,614
2,362,845
19,055
54
55
Total trading
$
5,654,328
$
45,971
$
4,142,362
$
33,406
37
38
Number of U.S. Trading Days 3
123
124
Number of U.K. Trading Days 4
123
124
1 Consistent with FINRA TRACE reporting standards, both sides of trades are included in the Company's reported volumes when the Company executes trades on a matched principal basis between two counterparties.
2 Consistent with industry standards, U.S. government bond trades are single-counted.
3 The number of U.S. trading days is based on the SIFMA holiday recommendation calendar.
4 The number of U.K. trading days is based primarily on the U.K. Bank holiday schedule.
Expand

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
29 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
TOP RANKED ROSEN LAW FIRM Encourages Vera Bradley, Inc. Investors to Inquire About Securities Class Action Investigation
NEW YORK, July 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, continues to investigate potential securities claims on behalf of shareholders of Vera Bradley, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRA) resulting from allegations that Vera Bradley may have issued materially misleading business information to the investing public. SO WHAT: If you purchased Vera Bradley securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. The Rosen Law Firm is preparing a class action seeking recovery of investor losses. WHAT TO DO NEXT: To join the prospective class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email [email protected] for information on the class action. WHAT IS THIS ABOUT: On June 11, 2025, Vera Bradley announced its financial results for the first quarter of the 2026 fiscal year. Commenting on the results, Vera Bradley's CEO stated that '[o]ur first quarter results were disappointing as top line and profitability trends from the previous several quarters continued.' On this news, Vera Bradley's stock fell 19% on June 11, 2025. WHY ROSEN LAW: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources, or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. At the time Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. ——————————- Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 [email protected]
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Dogs of the Dow: Why Amgen's (AMGN) Dividend Power Makes it a Standout Pick
Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) is included among the 11 Dogs of the Dow Dividend Stocks to Buy Now. A pharmacist filling a prescription for a complex drug developed by the company. Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) is on the hunt for its next breakthrough drug— a common pursuit among pharmaceutical companies looking to stay ahead of rivals, especially as biosimilar competition grows. The company boasts a robust pipeline, with dozens of ongoing programs that could result in future drug approvals and expanded uses for existing treatments. Thanks to its strong track record of innovation, Amgen has performed well for years, and that momentum is expected to continue. Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) also reported strong earnings in the first quarter of 2025. The company posted revenue of $8.15 billion, marking a 9.4% increase year-over-year. It benefited from strong global demand for its products. Management voiced optimism about its long-term growth prospects, supported by the success of recent product launches and encouraging Phase 3 trial outcomes for multiple treatments. Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN)'s cash flow makes it one of the most reliable dividend stocks. The company generated $1.0 billion in free cash flow during the quarter, doubling the figure from the same period a year earlier. Operating cash flow rose to $1.4 billion from $0.7 billion in the prior year. The company also returned $1.3 billion to shareholders in the form of dividends. Amgen Inc. (NASDAQ:AMGN) offers a quarterly dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.11%, as of July 26. The company has raised its dividends every year since 2011, which places it among the best dogs of the Dow. While we acknowledge the potential of AMGN as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key)
Key Points The future of the auto industry lies in electric vehicles and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles. After many years in service, Waymo still can't point to a timeline of profitability. Tesla also faces challenges with its robotaxi offering, but it's well positioned, provided it can demonstrate safety and efficacy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) isn't, strictly speaking, an electric vehicle (EV) company. However, its autonomous driving technology company, Waymo, is committed to only using EVs in its fleet. Funnily enough, it could be argued that Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) isn't really a pure EV company either. After all, most of its sky–high valuation is attributable to the potential of its robotaxis. However, the comparison of these two as EV companies is valid because the future of the auto industry is EVs, and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles will be a larger part of the industry in the future. But which company is better placed, and which is the better stock? Alphabet vs. Tesla It's entirely possible that Alphabet could decide to spin off Waymo, not least because it reportedly could be valued at more than $45 billion. Meanwhile, one of Tesla's biggest supporters, Cathie Wood's Ark Invest, ascribes 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) to robotaxis in its investment case for the stock, producing an expected value of $2,600 for the stock in 2029. As I have previously discussed, the Ark targets should be taken with a pinch of salt, as its track record on Tesla hasn't been good. However, Ark's core argument is sound and points to Tesla being potentially a far more valuable stock than Waymo ever will be. Pathways to profitability The core argument is that Tesla's business model is scalable to profitability while Waymo's is far less so. The issue of Waymo's profitability arose in a recent CNBC interview with Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, where she was asked whether Waymo is profitable. She replied, "We're proving out that it can be a profitable business." When asked when Waymo would be profitable, she replied, "not clear." It's also not clear if Alphabet/Waymo doesn't have an internal forecast for when it will hit profitability, or if Mawakana preferred not to divulge what the company considers an uncertain forecast. However, it's inconceivable that Alphabet is not internally crunching the numbers on this, and if it does decide to spin off Waymo, it's a question that needs to be answered. The point here is that a business that can't be profitable isn't worth anything, let alone $45 billion, so at some point, its management is going to have to set some timelines. Tesla and timelines Whereas investors need to hear more about timelines from Waymo, whose public self-driving ride-hailing service was launched in 2018, there's probably a need for fewer declared timelines from Tesla, or, rather, a need for more accurate ones. For example, in 2019, CEO Elon Musk famously told investors to expect a million self-driving vehicles on the road by mid-2020. In April 2022, he also stated that Tesla aspired to reach volume production of a dedicated robotaxi (Cybercab) in 2024 -- a timeline that has now been pushed back to 2026. These timeline estimates matter because plugging overly optimistic assumptions from them into valuation models can produce dramatically erroneous conclusions. Why Tesla is better positioned With all that said, Tesla has clear advantages over Waymo, provided it can demonstrate safety and reliability and achieve regulatory approvals. Its advantages include: Lower vehicle costs, with Musk aiming for a $30,000 price tag for a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts estimate Waymo's current vehicles cost more than $120,000. In addition, Tesla manufactures its own cars (Waymo does not), and existing Teslas can be converted into robotaxis using Tesla's as-yet-unreleased-to-the-public unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software, giving Tesla a significant advantage in scaling the robotaxi business. Tesla's use of camera-centric technology is inherently less expensive than Waymo's combination of cameras, light detection and ranging (Lidar) lasers, and high-definition maps. Every Tesla car (robotaxi or not) on the road is effectively a data gatherer, with the data used to improve the AI that powers its AI models. As such, even though Waymo was first, Tesla has significantly more data than Waymo. Which is the better EV stock? Waymo may become profitable in the future, particularly if Lidar costs continue to drop. However, it's challenging to think that it will be a strong competitor to Tesla, provided Musk's company can master safe, unsupervised FSD using a camera-centric approach. That's a big "if" at this stage, but it becomes a smaller "if" as time goes by and Tesla expands its nascent robotaxi offering across new geographies. Tesla's next robotaxi launch is expected to be in Phoenix, as it plans to continue slowly building its robotaxi business. I think Tesla is the better EV stock when comparing Tesla and Alphabet. Should you buy stock in Tesla right now? The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key) was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio