logo
Exercise item sold at Costco recalled after more than 100 injuries reported

Exercise item sold at Costco recalled after more than 100 injuries reported

New York Post09-06-2025
A set of dumbbells once sold at Costco is now under recall.
Johnson Health Tech Trading and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued the voluntary recall of the BowFlex 552 adjustable dumbbells on Thursday 'due to reports that the weight plates can dislodge from the handle during use, posing an impact hazard.'
Along with the dumbbells – which were sold at Costco, Best Buy, Dick's Sporting Goods, and online through Amazon and BowFlex's website – the CPSC says BowFlex 1090 adjustable dumbbells are also impacted.
Nearly 4 million units are involved in the recall, according to the CPSC.
'BowFlex Inc. filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2024,' a CPSC statement said. 'Johnson Health Tech Trading has agreed to provide a remedy for the 552 and 1090 adjustable dumbbells sold by BowFlex Inc., (formerly Nautilus Inc.), prior to May 2024 as a part of this recall.'
To date, Johnson Health Tech Trading and Nautilus have received more than nearly 350 reports of plates dislodging, resulting in at least 111 reported injuries 'such as concussions, abrasions, broken toes or contusions,' CPSC said.
Costco issued a recall for millions of BowFlex adjustable dumbbells.
Refrina – stock.adobe.com
Over 100 customers said they were injured after the item's plates reportedly dislodged.
BowFlex
Those who purchased BowFlex 552 from Costco should stop using them immediately before returning them to a store for a full refund.
Consumers who purchase recalled dumbbells from other retailers should contact the Johnson Health Tech Trading Customer Support Team at 800-209-3539 from 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. CT Monday through Friday or email recall@bowflex.com.
'For units sold by BowFlex Inc. (formerly Nautilus Inc.), consumers can request a refund in the form of a prorated voucher and a one-year JRNY digital fitness membership,' a CPSC statement said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Coles and Costco price comparison 'shocks' Aussie mum: 'Significant amount'
Coles and Costco price comparison 'shocks' Aussie mum: 'Significant amount'

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Coles and Costco price comparison 'shocks' Aussie mum: 'Significant amount'

An Adelaide woman has shared her surprise after comparing the price of grocery items at Costco and Coles to see which one was cheaper based on unit prices. American bulk-goods chain Costco has been growing in popularity in Australia, with 15 stores now dotted around the country. Ri Springbett has been a Costco member for the last five years, paying $65 a year to shop there. The 37-year-old told Yahoo Finance she was curious to see if her membership was still worth it for her smaller family and decided to do a price comparison against Coles, where she does her weekly grocery shop. 'Costco is known for its bulk-buy and bulk discounts, but as a family of three, I thought, is this really beneficial for me to actually be a member to be shopping here?' she said. RELATED Aldi delivery warning as supermarket takes on Coles, Woolworths with online move Aussie tradie loses $110,000 house deposit due to small detail Aussies issued July 14 ATO tax return warning: 'Really messy' Springbett said she was 'shocked' by the difference and found some items were 40 to 50 per cent cheaper at Costco. However, she noted that Costco-branded products dominated its offering, so she had to compare similar products offered by Coles instead of like-for-like. Australian mince meat, for example, worked out to be $10.99 a kilogram at Costco, compared to $20 per kilogram at Coles. However, this was based on buying 3.920kg of mince at Costco, with the comparable Coles item available in a 500g pack. Free range eggs were $0.67 per 100 grams at Costco based on a 30 pack, compared to $0.94 per 100 grams at Coles based on its 12 pack. TipTop bread was $3.69 a loaf at Costco, compared to $4.50 a loaf at Coles. A whole roast chicken was $7.99 at Costco, compared to $12.50 at Coles. Springbett only compared a relatively small range of products, but she said she "cannot believe" what she discovered, and it was enough for her to change her mind about the value of her membership. 'From those few things, I'm actually saving a significant amount by purchasing the items that we're already using at home or items like coffee, cheese and mince,' she said. A CHOICE comparison conducted in June last year found that of the 23 bulk items it spotchecked against similar items at Coles and Woolworths, Costco had the cheapest unit price 19 times. Aussies urged to compare prices as grocery spending hits record high Grocery spending reached a record high in June this year, according to Finder, with the average household spending $233 per week. That was up 27 per cent per week from June, 2024. Like Springbett, millions of people are looking for ways to save on their groceries, with around a third now shopping at multiple stores to find the best deal. Finder money expert Rebecca Pike told Yahoo Finance Costco's primary appeal was offering lower unit prices on items sold in larger quantities. 'Costco's bulk-buying model can offer significant value on certain items, particularly for larger households or those willing to stock up on non-perishables,' she said. However, she said it was still worth doing your own research. 'It's also important to remember that not every item will be the cheapest, so you should really be clear on how much the unit price is at your local supermarket so you can compare,' she said. Bulk buying also won't be practical or possible for every household, including smaller households, those with limited storage space and those who don't have the upfront cash to bulk buy. 'It's essential for consumers to be savvy. You should be really certain that you can recoup the membership fee through savings from your bulk buying, and that includes having the means and the space to do so,' Pike said. 'If you don't shop there regularly, or don't buy enough to offset the fee, it might not be worthwhile.' Costco membership worth it for Aussie mum Springbett said the grocery savings, along with the savings she gets from her and her husband filling up their cars at the Costco fuel station, made a membership worth it for her. 'It has definitely changed my perception a little bit on Costco. I can see that value more clearly now, but also I will be inclined to purchase more things in bulk,' she told Yahoo Finance. Costco allows members to bring up to two guests and Springbett said she often takes friends and family members to help add more value. Springbett usually shops at Coles weekly and spends between $100 and $120 for her family of three. She then shops at Costco every few months and spends about $200 each trip. She said the biggest items she likes to buy at Costco are school snacks for her son, fruit and vegetables, which can be frozen, and loaves of bread that can be frozen. Springbett said she was very 'strategic' with her Costco shop and made sure she wrote out a list and stuck to it. 'You can get distracted. You can go in and everything looks shiny and exciting … You can end up walking out spending $500 easily,' she said. 'The excitement of Costco is quite appealing, but that doesn't benefit you in any way if you're spending double the amount you intended to."

Spokane Valley voters to decide if additional law enforcement is worth paying more in sales tax
Spokane Valley voters to decide if additional law enforcement is worth paying more in sales tax

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Spokane Valley voters to decide if additional law enforcement is worth paying more in sales tax

Jul. 15—Primary ballots were dropped in the mail in Spokane County on Wednesday, which means the Spokane Valley City Council's yearslong effort to strengthen public safety will soon be in the hands of the city's residents. Spokane Valley voters will decide in the Aug. 5 election if they're willing to pay more in sales tax in exchange for more deputies, law enforcement equipment and public safety costs. If approved, Spokane Valley Proposition 1 would enact a 0.1% sales tax on purchases throughout the city, bringing the total sales tax to 9%. While revenue from the tax would fluctuate annually depending on the economic climate, city estimates expect at least $2.6 million to be generated in 2026. The ballot measure dedicates the funding to public safety expenses, which includes the court system, detention services and law enforcement provided by Spokane County. Proceeds from the tax could be used to hire more police officers or for other public safety needs. Those in favor of the measure argue it's a fair trade-off that will result in a higher quality of life in Spokane Valley while ensuring the onus of paying for public safety does not fall solely on the city's residents since many Valley businesses, like Costco, are frequented by people who live outside the Valley. The measure's detractors, meanwhile, argue that the city council should find a way to fund additional officers without asking for a tax increase, with some arguing against the need for more law enforcement personnel. The council has said the first priority with the funding would be to add another 10 deputies to the Spokane Valley Police Department. It's part of the ongoing effort to improve staffing levels and police services, which are provided via contract with the Spokane County Sheriff's Office. In 2023, the city hired Matrix Consulting Group for $84,900 to review the efficacy of the city's police work. In its eventual report, the consultant group found police services have not kept pace with the city's growth, and recommended adding 25 deputies to the Valley's dedicated force, three deputies that would split time with the county and at least two civilian positions to handle administrative work. The council approved and funded the addition of 10 deputies and a civilian to the department last year by pulling funding from street maintenance and parks projects and cutting some city positions. In advancing the sales tax measure, the council said an additional revenue source would be needed to fund the remaining recommended deputies. Like many local governments, the city is dealing with a succession of tight budgeting years as sales and property tax proceeds have stagnated, state and federal programs are being reeled back and expenses are on the rise. City Manager John Hohman said internal forecasts project a budget deficit of $1.4 million by the end of the year, which follows 5% cuts across all departments last year enacted to balance the 2025 budget. "Now we're at a point where when you look at, 'How do we provide a balanced budget for 2026?' " Hohman said. "It really comes down to either needing to increase some type of revenue into the city, or we're going to be forced to cut additional items, and now we're going to get into potential service cuts to whatever program that council wants to tackle." Police services are the city's greatest recurring cost, totaling over $41 million, more than half of the city's 2025 general fund budget. That percentage climbs to nearly two-thirds of the city's general fund budget when factoring in other related public safety costs like public defenders, prosecutors and judicial and detention services. Adding to the fray is the sharp rise of those public safety costs, Hohman said, which have grown by around 5% annually since 2021. An increase of $4.7 million is forecast over the next three years, due in part to a recent collective bargaining agreement between the county and sheriff's office deputies. Valley resident Rod Tadlock, who wrote the election guide "against" statement opposing the measure, disagrees that an additional tax is needed to contend with some of the city's financial struggles. He believes the council should redirect existing funding streams toward public safety, but not necessarily to hiring more police officers. He'd prefer the city look at automating policing by investing in cameras, speed readers and more. "There's a lot of things that we have laws on the books for that could be done easily with automation and technology," Tadlock said. "A lot of those things could be monitored and taken care of without having a police officer roaming around." Tadlock had support from Spokane Valley City Council candidate Mike Kelly in preparing the against statement, and at least one sitting council member stands in opposition to the measure alongside him. Councilman Al Merkel decried putting the question to the voters as it worked its way through the council earlier this year, stating he believes the city should fund public safety and the additional deputy positions in full and then make cuts elsewhere in the budget. "The way the city spends money sometimes can be done a lot smarter," Tadlock added. Hohman said there simply aren't any additional cuts to be made without cutting services for residents and laying off city staff members — which is smaller than like-sized municipalities due to Spokane Valley's tendency to contract for work instead of standing up city departments. City leadership have said for decades that contracting keeps the city nimble, the budget from ballooning and services consistent. Hohman added that the city recently tasked the consulting and accounting firm FCS Groups to analyze the city's contract with the county. He's hopeful some cost saving measures will be identified, and said it shows the city's commitment to making the most of taxpayer dollars. Spokane Valley resident and former longtime city attorney Cary Driskell, who wrote the statement in favor of the measure for the election guide, said the city prides itself on being fiscally responsible. He would know, he said, as someone who helped lead the city's incorporation effort two decades ago and then began working for the city within a month of its formation. He left around the start of 2023, after 20 years at City Hall. "I know from personal experience the real, strong fiscal responsibility approach they take to budgeting and oversight of the tax funds," Driskell said. "It is the highest importance for that organization, and you can only scrub for extra funding so many times when it's not there." Driskell said his experience with the city gave him an intimate understanding of how public safety needs have changed over the years, pointing to the 2023 report findings that while the population has grown by 31% and the nature and frequency of service calls grew, staffing has not matched pace. Public safety and by extension a healthy police department are non-negotiables if the city wants to remain an attractive place to live, visit and do business as it continues to grow, Driskell said. "To me, that was the bottom line," Driskell said. "If we want to have the policing levels at a point where the community feels is appropriate, then we're gonna have to come up with a little bit more funding." Tadlock countered that the tax would be an additional burden on families that are contending with tax increases at the state level, as well as broader financial struggles. If the city needs additional funding, he recommended turning to state and federal assistance, not the local taxpayer. "There's so many things that the government gets your money for already," Tadlock said. Driskell said he dislikes additional taxes as much as the next guy, but still believes the 0.1% increase would be more than a fair trade for a stronger Spokane Valley Police Department. A city analysis found nearly 50% of it would be paid by nonresidents, which he said makes it a much more attractive option than a property or utility tax that would fall entirely on Valley residents. "The basic question is, do you want increased public safety?" Driskell said. "If so, at this point in time, after they've already scrubbed their budget, are you willing to pay this additional property tax, understanding that 48% of it will be paid by nonresidents? That's the equation, in my mind." Nick Gibson can be reached at (509) 459-5039 or by email at nickg@

4 ​Popular Kirkland Items Discontinued at Costco — How To Replace Them for Cheap
4 ​Popular Kirkland Items Discontinued at Costco — How To Replace Them for Cheap

Yahoo

time21 hours ago

  • Yahoo

4 ​Popular Kirkland Items Discontinued at Costco — How To Replace Them for Cheap

You probably already know that fans of Costco love the company's super affordable products, including its own food products. Some may even have been elevated to almost a cult-like status, with members tracking its availability. Be Aware: Read Next: Sadly, there have been several Kirkland Signature products that have been discontinued. If you're sad about their disappearance, so are many others. The promising news is that there may be some decent cheap replacements to try. Here are the four items being discontinued and what to purchase in their stead. You may have seen a few Reddit threads with users lamenting that their favorite soy milk has disappeared. Some have emailed Costco to ask for updates. According to one Reddit thread, a user got a reply stating Costco has experienced slow sales and decided to discontinue the product. Apparently, Costco will roll out an unsweetened soy beverage with the Your Good Foods brand in the spring of 2026. In the meantime, you can try Kirkland Signature's oat beverage, with some other Redditors saying Trader Joe's soy milk is the far superior choice. Trending Now: This item found on many social media posts was discontinued because of a manufacturer issue back in 2020. There have been other brands like Mrs. Renfro's peach salsa, but some say that it costs more. Costco did eventually bring back another brand called La Mexicana Organic Mango Salsa and La Juan's Salsa Co's Pineapple Mango Salsa, but the latter had a recent recall notice. Warehouse members and even publications like Chowhound are still lamenting the loss of this brand of four cheese ravioli. What many loved was that it was easy to cook, and packed full of flavor. Considering it had Asiago, Grana Pandano, Parmesean and Romano cheese, it's hard not to get a ton of flavor from that combination. You can still find Kirkland Signature fresh ravioli, like their spinach and cheese flavor. Costo also sells other brands like Fazio's and Rana. For those looking for a more similar replacement (or who hate the taste of spinach), Amazon, Walmart's Great Value and Target's Good & Gather brands have their own version. As for how good these alternatives fare, you'll have to do a taste test and find out. According to Reader's Digest, Costco started phasing out its own brand of chocolate chips back in August 2024. So, if you wanted to buy them for your next baking adventure, you're sadly out of luck. One Redditor found out Costco discontinued it probably due to rising cocoa prices. For now, Costco is only selling Nestle's chocolate chips, which could cost more. If you want to buy in bulk, Costco's offering may still be cheaper. You could also try Walmart's Great Value brand. You can buy a six pack of their 12 oz bags online, and can come in much cheaper than other major chain grocery stores. Disclaimer: Prices and availability of products accurate as of July 16, 2025 and subject to change. More From GOBankingRates 8 Dollar Tree Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Summer 2025 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 The New Retirement Problem Boomers Are Facing This article originally appeared on 4 ​Popular Kirkland Items Discontinued at Costco — How To Replace Them for Cheap

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store