logo
Four years after the heat dome, does BC need an extreme heat czar?

Four years after the heat dome, does BC need an extreme heat czar?

National Observer19 hours ago
At least 619 people died in the heat dome that broiled British Columbia four years ago. Most were seniors, and most died alone in their homes. Paramedics were pushed to the brink — there weren't enough ambulances to save those in need — as the most deadly environmental disaster in Canadian history unfolded.
Four years later, there is widespread recognition from municipalities, the provincial and federal governments that protecting people from extreme heat is crucial as climate change makes heat waves more common and severe. But while steps have been taken, plenty of work remains, and some experts say it's time to recognize the right to cool.
'We are in a much better place than we were at this time in 2021,' said Sarah Henderson, scientific director of environmental health services with the BC Centre of Disease Control and professor at UBC's School of Population and Public Health. 'That doesn't mean that we're as far as we need to go.'
Henderson said the province has taken coordinated and effective planning decisions around extreme heat, including identifying conditions under which to issue heat alerts or declaring extreme heat emergencies, and has put 'a real emphasis on the risks around indoor temperatures.'
The next major extreme heat planning step, she said, is coordinating across sectors like agriculture, transportation, utilities and, of course, health.
Dying from a brutal, oppressive heat is a terrifying death. When temperatures become dangerously high, blood vessels dilate to redirect blood flow from the body's core to the periphery to cool. But this can lead to not enough blood flowing to vital organs, which then begin to fail. Extreme, prolonged heat can also cause cell death, causing damage to vital organs like the heart, increasing the risk of cardiac arrest.
One medical study found 27 different ways extreme heat can lead to death, offering 'a worrisome glimpse into what a warming planet may have in store for us.'
'These aren't random misfortunes, they are evidence of what scientists have been talking about for decades. The climate is changing,' said Sarah Henderson, scientific director of environmental health services with the BC Centre of Disease Control.
Katia Tynan, manager of resilience and disaster risk reduction with the city of Vancouver, told Canada's National Observer the city is proactively responding to extreme heat. Since the heat dome, the city has rolled out grants to 14 separate organizations, including the Vancouver Aboriginal Friendship Centre Society, community centres and neighbourhood houses, to respond to extreme heat.
'During crises like extreme heat, people go to the places and people they know and trust to meet their needs,' Tynan said. 'So, these organizations work very hard behind the scenes to create these heat plans.' Those organizations also conduct wellness checks on seniors, provide cooling equipment and set up informal cooling spaces in their own facilities.
Tynan said the city has opened more cooling centres (40 are open today, compared to 30 in 2021), more misting stations, more water fountains, and has set up a program that has so far delivered 6,000 cooling kits to people (essentially a box holding a thermometer, spray bottle, cooling towel, gel freezer packs and information about extreme heat.)
Air conditioning should be a 'standard expectation'
These are policy responses to a memo to the mayor and council from the Vancouver City Planning Commission sent immediately following the heat dome, in July 2021, urging the city to 'save lives by addressing the municipal policy gaps between acknowledging the reality of the climate emergency and the policies necessary for people to survive it.'
That memo said without improving the city's response to extreme heat and poor air quality, it is more likely people will die. Policy decisions that disproportionately impact disabled, racialized and poor people have meant those with the least ability to stay safe from climate change are bearing the brunt of it, it adds.
City planning staff said responses would have to be tailored to the specific needs of different populations. Unhoused people need access to cooling stations. At the same time, cooling stations are not a viable solution for disabled or elderly people living at home because they should not be told to leave home to seek relief from the heat while heat alerts are warning them to stay inside, staff said.
One of the most challenging areas of improvement is air conditioning. Nationally, about 61 per cent of people have air conditioning. In British Columbia, once famous for its mild weather, that rate drops to 32 per cent.
'Please remember, at one time central heating and indoor plumbing were considered luxuries only available to the wealthiest,' the Vancouver city planning memo reads. 'It is time we make maintaining high indoor air quality and energy-efficient air conditioning part of our standard expectations of housing, just as we do toilets, bathtubs and heat.'
Provincial utility BC Hydro was offering free air conditioning units to lower-income people, and delivered 27,000 units in the past three years, but has exhausted its funding, the Vancouver Sun reported last month.
Henderson said air conditioning could be an important part of a suite of policy options, but other steps can be taken to cool buildings. Shaded windows, installed awnings, and even painting roofs white can all help nudge temperatures down.
Building codes and retrofits
In an interview with Canada's National Observer, Kelly Greene, BC's minister for emergency preparedness and climate readiness, pointed to updates to building standards for new homes requiring 'at least one living space within every unit to not go over certain temperature thresholds,' she said, as well as changes to residential tenancy regulations to allow renters to install AC units. But there are limits.
'Sometimes, there are genuine issues about electrical load that can't be overcome in an older building, but barring that … you are allowed to put in a free-standing air conditioning unit,' she said.
Tynan agreed access to cool, clean air in homes is important, and said Vancouver now requires new buildings to have cooling and air filtration. The city is also funding two retrofit projects: one aimed at rental buildings, the other for non-profit housing.
'The goal of these is to fully or partially electrify — so adding heat pumps and mechanical cooling electrical systems to 20 buildings in each of these pilots over the next couple of years,' she said. 'So, we are trying to address this gap around existing facilities as well, recognizing that people do need to have cooling in their homes to protect them from extreme heat.'
Kendra Jewell, the University of British Columbia's Centre for Climate Justice housing research project manager, was a renter in Vancouver during the heat dome, and said while there are many short-term and targeted solutions worth pursuing, it's time to take a more systemic approach and recognize that people have a 'right to cool.'
The right to cool, Jewell said, is a proposal outlined in a report published last week for policy-makers that recognizes cooling as a fundamental right rather than a privilege.
'You can't think about it as a series of isolated one-time policy fixes; it has to be a sustained political and social commitment that considers many different types of vulnerability,' Jewell said. 'One of the key findings of our research is that heat risk is systemic and intersectional.'
Jewell pointed to the finding that two-thirds of the heat dome deaths were seniors, saying it's a case study on how to think about vulnerability to extreme heat. A lot of the strategies to deal with extreme heat looked at why seniors were disproportionately at risk, and would point to underlying chronic health conditions as the answer. (The BC Coroner's report of the heat dome found heat deaths were higher among people with chronic diseases and more than 60 per cent of the deaths involved individuals who had seen medical professionals within the prior month).
To Jewell, that's a great evidence-based start, but it doesn't go far enough in understanding people's vulnerability. They said research indicates that looking at both physiological and social conditions is actually the most predictive of heat related risk.
'In the context of seniors, you can think about how things, like living on a fixed income or living alone, compounded that bio-medical risk,' they said. 'We can't think about age, poverty, social isolation or any other risk factor alone.
'We have to think about heat risk as systemic and intersectional, and we need our responses to be similarly multi-faceted so that they can reflect that.'
Extreme heat czar
Beyond the 619 people killed, the heat dome also eviscerated marine life, with an estimated billion marine animals killed along the Pacific coast. And the heat wave ushered the BC town of Lytton to its fiery end. After record-melting temperatures (49.6C) were recorded in the town, a wildfire soon swept in, reducing it to smouldering ashes.
None of this would have happened if not for fossil fuel-driven climate change, found a 2022 study published in Nature Climate Change from Columbia Climate School at Columbia University. Climate scientists are clear that until global greenhouse gas emissions stabilize, extreme weather like heat waves, droughts, floods and wildfires will continue to be more common and more severe.
The frequency of this extreme heat won't be evenly felt across Canada. By 2050, Ontario and Manitoba will have 1.5 times the number of days of extreme heat, while Yukon will be experiencing six times more extreme temperatures. By 2080, the average number of days above safe temperature thresholds in Canada will range from 75 to 100 days if emissions continue to climb — representing a lethal summer season. Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba and the Atlantic provinces are expected to have the most 'potentially deadly hot days annually,' reports the Canadian Climate Institute.
For Henderson, that's the key lesson from the heat dome. Extreme heat will happen again. It's just a matter of time.
'These aren't random misfortunes, they are evidence of what scientists have been talking about for decades. The climate is changing,' she said. 'So everything we can do to raise the bar on preparedness for next year and 10 years from now and 30 years from now, is going to pay dividends into the future.'
'One of the key things we don't have in the province right now, which we're seeing in other places, is for lack of a better word, an 'extreme heat czar,'' she said. 'We have lots of people who view this as part of their broader work, but nobody with dedicated responsibility to extreme heat.'
The benefit, Henderson says, is that priorities frequently shift based on the priorities of the day. If an individual were empowered to keep extreme heat as their focus, even when other disasters, like flooding or a pandemic, occur, further change to protect lives could be driven.
LNG ships
Greene said because BC's government recognizes more climate change-driven extreme heat and other disasters will continue to be more common, the province is taking steps.
She described an extreme heat emergency alert sent out to people through their phones, radios and televisions with information about how to stay safe; financial support to help communities open cooling centres, updating building codes for new buildings to require temperatures to not exceed certain thresholds; and providing funding for communities to plan for extreme heat through temperature mapping.
But she also acknowledged that rising global emissions will mean worsening climate disasters, including droughts, floods, wildfires and landslides.
'So it is important to continue to decarbonize our economy,' she said.
As the anniversary of the heat dome passes, British Columbia is witnessing another milestone: the first LNG ships to export natural gas to global markets — setting off the carbon bomb that is the Montney Play — had sailed.
'I know there is more work to do, and it's something that has to happen in tandem with protecting communities, protecting people from the effects of climate change,' Greene said. 'Realistically in the world, we're not going to be turning off fossil fuels tomorrow, there's no switch to turn off, and so this work continues to be important both in growing our clean economy and protecting communities.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mom who suffered stroke after giving birth emerges from 18-day coma
Mom who suffered stroke after giving birth emerges from 18-day coma

Calgary Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Mom who suffered stroke after giving birth emerges from 18-day coma

A Calgary mother of three who suffered a severe stroke after giving birth has come out of a coma, her husband said Thursday. Article content Iffat Shakti, 28, suffered a hemorrhagic stroke June 12, a week after the birth of daughter Julia Ameera, then experienced a second stroke and remained in a coma for the rest of the month. Article content Article content But three days ago, the woman opened her eyes, though remains unresponsive, said husband Marco Martel. Article content Article content Article content That condition is a sign of brain damage from the two strokes, said Martel, who's been at his wife's side at the Foothills Medical Centre daily. Article content 'That's what worries me the most – when the brain swelling goes down we'll know the extent of the damage to her brain,' he said. Article content Physicians, he said, have told him his wife still might not survive her ordeal and to 'prepare for the worst.' Article content But the man said he's placed his faith in a higher power, who's seems to want his wife to survive her ordeal, which was brought on by her high blood pressure. Article content But he's also been relying on the generosity of family, friends and strangers who have so far pledged about $19,500 in donations at a GoFundMe page set up to cover the family's expenses. Article content Article content 'When she comes out of the hospital, we know she'll have special needs like a bed and wheelchair,' said Martel. Article content His family will also need support as he's been unable to tend to their property rental business while he takes care of their new daughter, two young boys and spends time at the hospital, he said. Article content The auto body detailer says he's paying loans on three rental properties, and his absence makes it difficult to find renters to pay for them. Article content Shakti, he said, handled the financial end of the business, adding he's slowly learning that task. Article content 'I've got a lot on my plate,' he said. Article content 'I just want to bring her home but the best care she'll get is in the hospital.' Article content Shakti, who came to Canada from her native Bangladesh in 2018, was set to take her Canadian citizenship exam last month when she suffered her strokes. Article content

Canada's LNG Touted-And Doubted-as 'Transition' Fuel as Doctors Sound the Alarm
Canada's LNG Touted-And Doubted-as 'Transition' Fuel as Doctors Sound the Alarm

Canada Standard

time12 hours ago

  • Canada Standard

Canada's LNG Touted-And Doubted-as 'Transition' Fuel as Doctors Sound the Alarm

Doctors and health professionals are flagging significant health risks in British Columbia and around the world as Canada's first liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes make their way toward Asian shores. Some analysts, meanwhile, are touting the industry milestone-and more credible voices are doubting it-as a boon for global efforts to curb the greenhouse gas emissions driving the climate emergency. LNG Canada said Monday that the vessel GasLog Glasgow has departed the northern port of Kitimat, British Columbia, full of ultra-chilled natural gas, The Canadian Press reports. LNG Canada hasn't confirmed the overall price tag for the project. But the federal government has billed it as the biggest private sector investment in Canadian history-$40 billion between the Kitimat operation, the northeast B.C. gas fields supplying it, and the pipeline in between. Shell and four Asian companies are partners in LNG Canada, the first facility to export Canadian gas across the Pacific in the ultra-chilled state using specialized tankers. A handful of other projects are either under construction or in development on the B.C. coast. "Cleaner energy around the world is what I think about when I think about LNG," Shell Canada country chair Stastia West said in an onstage interview at the Global Energy Show in Calgary in June. But "clean" was not quite the adjective the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment attached to LNG in an early July release. "The departure of this first LNG tanker marks a troubling new chapter in British Columbia's health story," family physician and CAPE President Dr. Melissa Lem said in a release. "While industry celebrates, health care professionals are bracing for the consequences of expanded fracking operations. Fracking and LNG production accelerate climate change and release harmful pollutants-including benzene, toluene, formaldehyde, and particulate matter linked with asthma, heart disease, birth defects, and childhood leukemia." Lem said northeastern B.C. communities adjacent to fracking operations "are already experiencing these impacts, with higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes and respiratory diseases. Indigenous communities are disproportionately affected, with studies showing elevated levels of fracking-related chemicals in household air, water, and the bodies of pregnant women compared to unexposed populations. Health care professionals are moving away from these communities with their families because of their lived experience with the local health impacts of fracking, exacerbating issues with access to care. This represents a serious environmental justice issue that demands immediate attention." "We're already seeing the health consequences of climate change in B.C. through more frequent and intense wildfires, heat domes, and flooding," added family doctor Dr. Bethany Ricker, a Nanaimo-based representative of CAPE-BC. "By expanding LNG production, we're locking in decades of these climate-related health emergencies." Alberta Premier Danielle Smith told the fossil energy show that Canadian oil and gas exports can be an "antidote" to the current geopolitical chaos, CP writes, while claiming outsized benefits from LNG as a climate solutions. View our latest digests "By moving more natural gas, we can also help countries transition away from higher emitting fuels, such as coal." Smith cited a recent study by the fossil industry-funded Fraser Institute that claimed if Canada were to double its gas production, export the additional supply to Asia, and displace coal there, it would lead to an annual emissions cut of up to 630 million tonnes annually. "That's almost 90% of Canada's total greenhouse gas emissions each year," Smith said. The primary component of natural gas, fracked or otherwise, is methane, a climate super-pollutant about 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide over the 20-year span when humanity will be scrambling to get climate change under control. And actual scientists doing real research say methane releases from fracking operations, controlled or not, can make the climate impact of gas as bad as or worse than coal. But CP says the authors of the Fraser Institute study, released in May, still maintained that LNG's claims to reduce emissions elsewhere should be factored into Canadian climate policy. "It is important to recognize that GHG emissions are global and are not confined by borders," wrote Elmira Aliakbari and Julio Mejia. "Instead of focusing on reducing domestic GHG emissions in Canada by implementing various policies that hinder economic growth, governments must shift their focus toward global GHG reductions and help the country cut emissions worldwide by expanding its LNG exports." Many experts see a murkier picture. Most credible estimates suggest that if LNG were to indeed displace coal abroad, there would be some emissions reductions, said Kent Fellows, assistant professor of economics with the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy. But the magnitude is debatable. "Will all of our natural gas exports be displacing coal? Absolutely not. Will a portion of them be displacing coal? Probably, and it's really hard to know exactly what that number is," he said. Fellows said there's a good chance Canadian supplies would supplant other sources of gas from Russia, Eurasia, and the Middle East, perhaps making it a wash emissions-wise. He said the Canadian gas could actually be worse from an emissions standpoint, depending on how the competing supply moves. LNG is more energy intensive than pipeline shipment because the gas needs to be liquefied and moved on a ship. In China, every type of energy is in demand. So instead of displacing coal, LNG would likely just be added to the mix, Fellows added. "Anyone who's thinking about this as one or the other is thinking about it wrong," Fellows said. A senior analyst with Investors for Paris Compliance, which aims to hold Canadian publicly-traded companies to their net-zero promises, said he doubts a country like India would see the economic case for replacing domestically produced coal with imported Canadian gas. "Even at the lowest price of gas, it's still multiple times the price," said Michael Sambasivam. "You'd need some massive system to provide subsidies to developing countries to be replacing their coal with a fuel that isn't even really proven to be much greener." And even in that case, "it's not as if they can just flip a switch and take it in," he added. "There's a lot of infrastructure that needs to be built to take in LNG as well as to use it. You have to build import terminals. You have to refit your power terminals." Moreover, the world is not many months away from a global glut of LNG that will further erode demand for Canadian gas. "As pointed out by the IEA [last month], we are at the cusp of 'the largest capacity wave in any comparable period in the history of LNG markets,'" wrote Alexandra Scott, senior climate diplomacy expert with Italy's ECCO climate think tank, and Luca Bergamaschi, the organization's co-founding executive director. "This would have profound impact on global gas markets at a time when major gas consumers, namely Europe and China, show trends of much lower demand than expected, as both blocs electrify their economy and increase efficiency." What LNG would be competing head-to-head with, Sambasivam told CP, is renewable energy. And if there were any emissions reductions abroad as a result of the coal-to-gas switch, Sambasivam said he doesn't see why a Canadian company should get the credit. "Both parties are going to want to claim the emissions savings and you can't claim those double savings," he said. There's also a "jarring" double-standard at play, he said, as industry players have long railed against environmental reviews that factor in emissions from the production and combustion of the oil and gas a pipeline carries, saying only the negligible emissions from running the infrastructure itself should be considered. Devyani Singh, an investigative researcher at who ran for the Greens in last year's B.C. election, said arguments that LNG is a green fuel are undermined by the climate impacts of producing, liquefying, and shipping it. Methane that leaks from tanks, pipelines, and wells has been a major issue that industry, government, and environmental groups have been working to tackle. "Have we actually accounted for all the leakage along the whole pipeline? Have we accounted for the actual under-reporting of methane emissions happening in B.C. and Canada?" asked Singh. Even if LNG does have an edge over coal, thinking about it as a "transition" or "bridge" fuel at this juncture is a problem, she said. "The time for transition fuels is over," she said. "Let's just be honest-we are in a climate crisis where the time for transition fuels was over a decade ago." The main body of this report was first published by The Canadian Press on June 29, 2025. Source: The Energy Mix

Canada's LNG Touted-And Doubted-as 'Transition' Fuel as Doctors Sound the Alarm
Canada's LNG Touted-And Doubted-as 'Transition' Fuel as Doctors Sound the Alarm

Canada News.Net

time13 hours ago

  • Canada News.Net

Canada's LNG Touted-And Doubted-as 'Transition' Fuel as Doctors Sound the Alarm

Doctors and health professionals are flagging significant health risks in British Columbia and around the world as Canada's first liquefied natural gas (LNG) cargoes make their way toward Asian shores. Some analysts, meanwhile, are touting the industry milestone-and more credible voices are doubting it-as a boon for global efforts to curb the greenhouse gas emissions driving the climate emergency. LNG Canada said Monday that the vessel GasLog Glasgow has departed the northern port of Kitimat, British Columbia, full of ultra-chilled natural gas, The Canadian Press reports. LNG Canada hasn't confirmed the overall price tag for the project. But the federal government has billed it as the biggest private sector investment in Canadian history-$40 billion between the Kitimat operation, the northeast B.C. gas fields supplying it, and the pipeline in between. Shell and four Asian companies are partners in LNG Canada, the first facility to export Canadian gas across the Pacific in the ultra-chilled state using specialized tankers. A handful of other projects are either under construction or in development on the B.C. coast. "Cleaner energy around the world is what I think about when I think about LNG," Shell Canada country chair Stastia West said in an onstage interview at the Global Energy Show in Calgary in June. But "clean" was not quite the adjective the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment attached to LNG in an early July release. "The departure of this first LNG tanker marks a troubling new chapter in British Columbia's health story," family physician and CAPE President Dr. Melissa Lem said in a release. "While industry celebrates, health care professionals are bracing for the consequences of expanded fracking operations. Fracking and LNG production accelerate climate change and release harmful pollutants-including benzene, toluene, formaldehyde, and particulate matter linked with asthma, heart disease, birth defects, and childhood leukemia." Lem said northeastern B.C. communities adjacent to fracking operations "are already experiencing these impacts, with higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes and respiratory diseases. Indigenous communities are disproportionately affected, with studies showing elevated levels of fracking-related chemicals in household air, water, and the bodies of pregnant women compared to unexposed populations. Health care professionals are moving away from these communities with their families because of their lived experience with the local health impacts of fracking, exacerbating issues with access to care. This represents a serious environmental justice issue that demands immediate attention." "We're already seeing the health consequences of climate change in B.C. through more frequent and intense wildfires, heat domes, and flooding," added family doctor Dr. Bethany Ricker, a Nanaimo-based representative of CAPE-BC. "By expanding LNG production, we're locking in decades of these climate-related health emergencies." Alberta Premier Danielle Smith told the fossil energy show that Canadian oil and gas exports can be an "antidote" to the current geopolitical chaos, CP writes, while claiming outsized benefits from LNG as a climate solutions. View our latest digests "By moving more natural gas, we can also help countries transition away from higher emitting fuels, such as coal." Smith cited a recent study by the fossil industry-funded Fraser Institute that claimed if Canada were to double its gas production, export the additional supply to Asia, and displace coal there, it would lead to an annual emissions cut of up to 630 million tonnes annually. "That's almost 90% of Canada's total greenhouse gas emissions each year," Smith said. The primary component of natural gas, fracked or otherwise, is methane, a climate super-pollutant about 84 times more potent than carbon dioxide over the 20-year span when humanity will be scrambling to get climate change under control. And actual scientists doing real research say methane releases from fracking operations, controlled or not, can make the climate impact of gas as bad as or worse than coal. But CP says the authors of the Fraser Institute study, released in May, still maintained that LNG's claims to reduce emissions elsewhere should be factored into Canadian climate policy. "It is important to recognize that GHG emissions are global and are not confined by borders," wrote Elmira Aliakbari and Julio Mejia. "Instead of focusing on reducing domestic GHG emissions in Canada by implementing various policies that hinder economic growth, governments must shift their focus toward global GHG reductions and help the country cut emissions worldwide by expanding its LNG exports." Many experts see a murkier picture. Most credible estimates suggest that if LNG were to indeed displace coal abroad, there would be some emissions reductions, said Kent Fellows, assistant professor of economics with the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy. But the magnitude is debatable. "Will all of our natural gas exports be displacing coal? Absolutely not. Will a portion of them be displacing coal? Probably, and it's really hard to know exactly what that number is," he said. Fellows said there's a good chance Canadian supplies would supplant other sources of gas from Russia, Eurasia, and the Middle East, perhaps making it a wash emissions-wise. He said the Canadian gas could actually be worse from an emissions standpoint, depending on how the competing supply moves. LNG is more energy intensive than pipeline shipment because the gas needs to be liquefied and moved on a ship. In China, every type of energy is in demand. So instead of displacing coal, LNG would likely just be added to the mix, Fellows added. "Anyone who's thinking about this as one or the other is thinking about it wrong," Fellows said. A senior analyst with Investors for Paris Compliance, which aims to hold Canadian publicly-traded companies to their net-zero promises, said he doubts a country like India would see the economic case for replacing domestically produced coal with imported Canadian gas. "Even at the lowest price of gas, it's still multiple times the price," said Michael Sambasivam. "You'd need some massive system to provide subsidies to developing countries to be replacing their coal with a fuel that isn't even really proven to be much greener." And even in that case, "it's not as if they can just flip a switch and take it in," he added. "There's a lot of infrastructure that needs to be built to take in LNG as well as to use it. You have to build import terminals. You have to refit your power terminals." Moreover, the world is not many months away from a global glut of LNG that will further erode demand for Canadian gas. "As pointed out by the IEA [last month], we are at the cusp of 'the largest capacity wave in any comparable period in the history of LNG markets,'" wrote Alexandra Scott, senior climate diplomacy expert with Italy's ECCO climate think tank, and Luca Bergamaschi, the organization's co-founding executive director. "This would have profound impact on global gas markets at a time when major gas consumers, namely Europe and China, show trends of much lower demand than expected, as both blocs electrify their economy and increase efficiency." What LNG would be competing head-to-head with, Sambasivam told CP, is renewable energy. And if there were any emissions reductions abroad as a result of the coal-to-gas switch, Sambasivam said he doesn't see why a Canadian company should get the credit. "Both parties are going to want to claim the emissions savings and you can't claim those double savings," he said. There's also a "jarring" double-standard at play, he said, as industry players have long railed against environmental reviews that factor in emissions from the production and combustion of the oil and gas a pipeline carries, saying only the negligible emissions from running the infrastructure itself should be considered. Devyani Singh, an investigative researcher at who ran for the Greens in last year's B.C. election, said arguments that LNG is a green fuel are undermined by the climate impacts of producing, liquefying, and shipping it. Methane that leaks from tanks, pipelines, and wells has been a major issue that industry, government, and environmental groups have been working to tackle. "Have we actually accounted for all the leakage along the whole pipeline? Have we accounted for the actual under-reporting of methane emissions happening in B.C. and Canada?" asked Singh. Even if LNG does have an edge over coal, thinking about it as a "transition" or "bridge" fuel at this juncture is a problem, she said. "The time for transition fuels is over," she said. "Let's just be honest-we are in a climate crisis where the time for transition fuels was over a decade ago." The main body of this report was first published by The Canadian Press on June 29, 2025.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store